Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin combination regimen as salvage chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma after failure of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy

Treatment Options for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After First-Line Chemotherapy

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a frequently diagnosed tumor and an important cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Until a few years ago, despite the unquestioned role of platinum-based chemotherapy, therapeutic choices beyond the first line were limited and related to unsatisfactory outcomes. Metastatic UC has always been associated with a poor prognosis, with overall survival only slightly above a year. In the recent past, huge progress has been made in our understanding of the molecular and genomic disease characteristics, to enable stratification of patients in terms of prognosis and treatment responses. Unfortunately, we still do not have the perfect combination of clinical biomarkers to tailor the optimal treatment for each patient, despite making several efforts in this direction. The therapeutic arsenal has been augmented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which nowadays represent the backbone of the second-line setting. Equally revolutionary was the FDA's approval of erdafitinib, a potent fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, the use of which is reserved for patients whose tumor harbors specific FGF pathway alterations. Recently, the therapeutic landscape of metastatic UC has been enhanced by the introduction of novel compounds, consisting of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody targeting nectin-4, a cell adhesion molecule highly expressed in UC, conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a microtubule-disrupting agent. Sacituzumab govitecan is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting Trop-2, a transmembrane glycoprotein, conjugated to the active metabolite of irinotecan. These two compounds have received accelerated approval by the FDA in patients pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Several ongoing trials are investigating the role of ICIs combined with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic drugs, or other ICIs, as well as the efficacy of PARP inhibitors and target therapies, hoping to provide information for some important unmet needs. In this review, we aim to evaluate the current potential treatment options after first-line chemotherapy.

Contemporary best practice in the management of urothelial carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for 5% of urothelial carcinomas (UCs), the estimated annual incidence being 1-2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Similarly to bladder UC, divergent differentiations and histologic variants confer an adverse risk factor in comparison with pure UTUC. Molecular and genomic characterization studies on UTUC have shown changes occurring at differing frequencies from bladder cancer, with unique molecular and clinical subtypes, potentially with different responses to treatment. Systemic chemotherapy is the standard approach for patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic UCs. Although initial response rates are high, the median survival with combination chemotherapy is about 15 months. In first-line chemotherapy several cisplatin-based regimens have been proposed. For patients with advanced UC who progress to first-line treatment, the only product licensed in Europe is vinflunine, a third-generation, semisynthetic, vinca alkaloid. Better response rates (15-60%), with higher toxicity rates and no overall survival (OS) benefit, are generally achieved in multidrug combinations, which often include taxanes and gemcitabine. The US FDA has recently approved five agents targeting the programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1 pathway as a second-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy. Potential therapeutic targets are present in 69% of tumours analyzed. Specific molecular alterations include those involved in the RTK/Ras/PI(3)K, cell-cycle regulation and chromatin-remodeling pathways, many of them have either targeted therapies approved or under investigation. Angiogenic agents, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway inhibitors and immunotherapeutic drugs are being successfully investigated.

A prospective study to examine the accuracies and efficacies of prediction systems for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer

The present study established systems to predict the chemo-sensitivity of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin plus cisplatin (M-VAC) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine (CaG) by analyzing microarray data. The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether the clinical response would increase by combining these prediction systems. Treatment of each MIBC case was allocated into M-VAC NAC, CaG NAC, surgery, or radiation therapy groups by their prediction score (PS), which was calculated using the designed chemo-sensitivity prediction system. The therapeutic effect of the present study was compared with the results of historical controls (n=76 patients) whose treatments were not allocated using the chemo-sensitivity prediction system. In addition, the overall survival between the predicted to be responder (positive PS) group and predicted to be non-responder (negative PS) group was investigated in the present study. Of the 33 patients with MIBC, 25 cases were positive PS and 8 were negative PS. Among the 25 positive PS cases, 7 were allocated to receive M-VAC NAC and 18 were allocated to receive CaG NAC according to the results of the prediction systems. Of the 8 negative PS cases, 3 received CaG NAC, 1 received surgery without NAC and 4 received radiation therapy. The total clinical response to NAC was 88.0% (22/25), which was significantly increased compared with the historical controls [56.6% (43/76) P=0.0041]. Overall survival of the positive PS group in the study was significantly increased compared with the negative PS group (P=0.027). In conclusion, the combination of the two prediction systems may increase the treatment efficacy for patients with MIBC by proposing the optimal NAC regimen. In addition, the positive PS group would have a better prognosis compared with the negative PS group. These results suggest that the two prediction systems may lead to the achievement of ‘precision medicine’.

A network meta-analysis of the PD(L)-1 inhibitors in the salvage treatment of urothelial bladder cancer

Aim: To determine which of the approved immune checkpoint inhibitors is the optimal treatment in metastatic urothelial bladder cancer. Methods & materials: Only the pivotal Phase III trials of second-line metastatic urothelial bladder cancer were included in this network meta-analysis. Results: This NMA included three pooled trials (NCT00315237, NCT02256436 and NCT02302807) of 1125 participants. Pembrolizumab was the only treatment with positive effect on overall survival compared with the best supportive care. The treatment discontinuation rates due to adverse events of the pembrolizumab and atezolizumab did not differ from that of the best supportive care. C onclusion: Our results confirmed the superiority of pembrolizumab in the management of metastatic urothelial bladder cancer.

Therapeutic strategies for organ-confined and non-organ-confined bladder cancer after radical cystectomy

INTRODUCTION

In patients with muscle invasive or Bacillus Calmette-Guérin refractory urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) radical cystectomy represents the standard of care. However, a proportion of patients experience disease progression, local recurrence and/or metastatic disease. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of available therapeutic strategies after radical cystectomy and examines ongoing clinical trials including cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Expert commentary: Cytotoxic chemotherapy offers limited benefit in UCUB patients. However, the recent introduction of immunotherapy provides new hope for durable responses or possibly complete cures.

The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy can be a preferred regimen for patients with urothelial carcinoma after the failure of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy

There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy after the failure of the first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. With regards to second-line chemotherapy, methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC) was used from July 2009 onwards, and paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) was introduced in April 2014 at the National Kyushu Cancer Center. The present study aimed to assess the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in second-line treatment that included best supportive care (BSC), and the tolerability and efficacy of TC chemotherapy. In total, 52 patients who were confirmed to have disease progression with first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) between June 2009 and November 2016 were enrolled in the current study. In addition, 28 patients selected BSC as second-line treatment, while 24 patients received second-line chemotherapy (MVAC, n=8; TC, n=16). The median OS for BSC, MVAC and TC was 2.8, 5.4, and 12.7 months, respectively. The difference between BSC and MVAC was not statistically significant (P=0.596). However, the difference between BSC and TC was statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (P=0.002). Multivariate analyses revealed that anemia [hazard ratio (HR), 7.047; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.553-35.636; P=0.011], the presence of visceral metastasis (HR, 4.174; 95% CI, 1.506-13.429; P=0.005) and second-line treatment (TC HR, 0.296; 95% CI, 0.124-0.636; P=0.003) were independent prognostic factors. TC achieved an 18.7% overall response rate and a 56.2% disease control rate. Myelosuppression was the most common grade ≥3 toxicity, but no treatment-associated mortalities occurred during the study period. TC was associated with favorable benefits and safety, and may be considered a preferred regimen after the failure of GC.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of atezolizumab for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is difficult to manage for patients who progress during or after initial chemotherapy regimens. Current regimens offer low response rates with high toxicities. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors may represent a new opportunity for effective management of these patients. Areas covered: Atezolizumab is an engineered humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody that binds selectively to PD-L1 and prevents its interaction with PD-1 and B7-1. It is administered intravenously and is given every 3 weeks as long as there is no evidence of tumor progression. Phase I trials confirmed antitumor activity of atezolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Phase II trials showed an improved response rate and a longer durable response than current conventional therapy. Phase III trials are currently underway with an estimated accrual end date of 2017. Expert opinion: MIBC is a high-risk disease, and after progression on current chemotherapy regimens, second-line treatments leave much to be desired. Emerging evidence of efficacy and safety and a recent accelerated approval by the FDA presents atezolizumab as a promising treatment option. Current clinical challenges include the details of disease progression and determining where immune checkpoint inhibition will reside in the treatment algorithm.

Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (UC) and is generally used in the first-line setting. However, the optimal salvage treatment for previously treated UC patients is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of published clinical trials of single agent versus combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment in previously treated UC patients.

Methods

Trials published between 1994 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). All relevant studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS), and grade 3/4 toxicities were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (Version 2.0).

Results

Fifty cohorts with 1,685 patients were included for analysis: 814 patients were treated with single agent chemotherapy and 871 with combined chemotherapy. Pooled OS was significantly higher at 1 year for combined chemotherapy than for single agent (relative risk [RR] 1.52; 95% CI: 1.01–2.37; P=0.03) but not for 2-year OS (RR 1.31; 95% CI: 0.92–1.85; P=0.064). Additionally, combined chemotherapy significantly improved ORR (RR 2.25; 95% CI: 1.60–3.18; P<0.001) and DCR (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01–1.25, P=0.033) compared to single agent for advanced UC patients. As for grade 3 and 4 toxicities, more frequencies of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in the combined chemotherapy than in single agent group, while equivalent frequencies of anemia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were found between the two groups.

Conclusion

In comparison with single agent alone, combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment for advanced UC patients significantly improved ORR, DCR, and 1-year OS, but not 2-year OS. Our findings support the need to compare combined chemotherapy with single agent alone in the salvage setting in large prospective trials due to its potential survival benefit in advanced UC patients.

Androgen-glucocorticoid interactions in the era of novel prostate cancer therapy

Great strides have been made in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with the development of new antiandrogens (enzalutamide) and more potent androgen synthesis inhibitors (abiraterone) that have both improved patient outcomes. These new drugs have also helped unravel the complex biology of androgen-androgen receptor driven prostate cancer and brought into prominence various mechanisms triggering the development of drug resistance and tumour cell survival despite use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The complex role of glucocorticoids in the treatment, management and progression of patients with CRPC is integral to these advances. Historically, glucocorticoid treatment has resulted in both subjective and objective responses in patients with advanced-stage prostate cancer. With the use of these new therapeutic agents, however, unexpected glucocorticoid-related mechanisms that can cause iatrogenic stimulation of prostate cancer growth have emerged, which might contribute to drug resistance and disease progression despite optimal ADT. For example, the upregulation of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) during enzalutamide therapy results in glucocorticoid-GR-mediated regulation of androgen target genes, leading to escape from enzalutamide blockade. Thus, understanding the biological role of glucocorticoids in patients with prostate cancer is of major importance in the era of new and evolving antiandrogen therapies.

Predicting the response of patients with advanced urothelial cancer to methotrexate, vinblastine, Adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC) after the failure of gemcitabine and platinum (GP)

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based systemic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Although no chemotherapeutic regimen is established as a second-line therapy, recent studies reported that methotrexate, vinblastine, Adriamycin and cisplatin (MVAC) elicited a significant response in patients who failed gemcitabine and platinum (GP) chemotherapy. We investigated the clinical factors useful for predicting a favourable response to MVAC in UC patients who failed GP.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with advanced UC who received second-line MVAC chemotherapy after failure with first-line GP chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses based on Cox's regression were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) after second-line MVAC chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period after the first MVAC administration was 10.0 months. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1-7.9) and 14.5 months (95% CI, 7.4-21.4), respectively. The overall response rate was 57.8%. The response to first-line GP chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.500; p = 0.012) and patient age (HR, 1.047; p = 0.033) were predictors of PFS after MVAC chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The response to first-line GP chemotherapy and age were independent predictors of PFS in patients who received second-line MVAC chemotherapy. This report is the first to describe independent predictors of PFS after MVAC chemotherapy.

Second Line Chemotherapy for Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Vinflunine and Beyond-A Comprehensive Review of the Current Literature

PURPOSE

We comprehensively reviewed current efforts and advances in the field of chemotherapeutic and biologically targeted treatment options after the failure of cisplatin based, first line regimens for urothelial carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE®, Central®, and meeting abstracts of ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) and ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) to identify original articles, reviews and retrospective analyses on second line treatment of urothelial carcinoma. Articles were included in analysis if they described prospective phase II/III studies or larger high quality retrospective studies of second line treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

RESULTS

Although considered a chemosensitive disease, most patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma relapse after cisplatin based first line treatment. Today none of the commonly used drugs, ie paclitaxel, carboplatin and/or gemcitabine, are approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for second line systemic treatment. In Europe vinflunine plus best supportive care is the only option approved by the EMA (European Medicines Agency) with moderate clinical efficacy. Responses to combined chemotherapy approaches are often better but associated with remarkable toxicity. In patients who respond well to first line treatment and, thus, are considered cisplatin sensitive readministration of a platinum based combination regimen may be an option. To date targeted therapies do not have a role in second line treatment of urothelial cancer. Immunotherapeutic strategies to target the PD-1/PD-L1 axis are emerging. In a recent phase I trial evaluating the PD-L1 targeted monoclonal antibody MPDL3280A a promising 43% response rate with good tolerability was achieved, which led to an immediate breakthrough therapy designation by the FDA. Combining chemotherapy with targeted agents, eg weekly paclitaxel and pazopanib, also shows promising activity in this prognostically poor treatment situation.

CONCLUSIONS

Response rates and survival are poor after second line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. To improve outcomes of salvage treatment novel biologically targeted drugs as monotherapy or as part of a combination with conventional cytostatics are urgently needed.

A Phase II Study of Weekly Docetaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

The present multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Weekly docetaxel was well tolerated but demonstrated modest activity, with a response rate of 6%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 1.4 months, and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.3 months. The dichotomy between PFS and OS was likely associated with subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy received by 58% of the patients.

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is commonly used for second-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, myelosuppression is a substantial concern when the traditional 3-week docetaxel cycle is used. The present multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic UC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with progression after previous platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease were treated with docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the response rate.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 31 patients. Their median age was 64 years (range, 40-79 years). An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1, liver metastasis, and a hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL were observed in 100%, 32%, and 23% of patients, respectively. Previous platinum-based chemotherapy had been administered for metastatic disease in 29 patients (94%). Although fatigue (13%) and anorexia (6%) were the most frequently observed grade 3 to 4 toxicities, the safety profiles were generally mild and manageable. Two patients (6%) achieved an objective response, which was maintained for 3.0 to 7.8 months. Eight patients experienced disease stabilization (disease control rate, 32%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.6) and 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.9-10.6), respectively. A relatively long OS was associated with further salvage platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 18, 58%) showing an encouraging activity (response rate, 44%; median PFS, 4.0 months).

CONCLUSION

Second-line chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel was well tolerated but demonstrated modest activity in patients with metastatic UC. A platinum-based combination as second-line treatment might be considered for selected patients.

Second-line therapies in metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Patients with relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC) face a poor prognosis and a dearth of available treatment options that improve their survival. End-organ function and performance status play a vital role in the choice of second-line therapies. Evidence supporting the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy, as single agents or in combination, arises from small phase 2 studies with modest responses. With the evolution of genomic testing in UC, several pathways amenable to available targeted therapies have emerged. Encouraging patient participation in clinical trials is critical to improve patient outcomes and to advance the current modest treatment armamentarium.

Second-line systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

While platinum-based combination chemotherapy leads to high response rates in patients with advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder, most patients will ultimately progress and optimal treatment in the second-line setting still needs to be determined. Advanced age, poor performance status, comorbidities and rapidly progressive disease have rendered accrual into trials difficult. Vinflunine is the only cytotoxic agent to demonstrate survival benefit in a randomized Phase III setting, but its response rate is disappointing and it has not been compared with other currently used agents such as taxanes. Recent years have seen a better definition of prognostic and predictive factors in patients with relapsed urothelial cancer. In addition, several trials have investigated novel biological agents to target chemoresistant disease. This review provides an update on the current systemic management of advanced urothelial cancer on progression following first-line chemotherapy, and discusses emerging data from recent Phase II/III trials.

Modified MVAC as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma after Failure of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment

Purpose

There is no established standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) who failed gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study was conducted in order to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of modified methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) in patients with metastatic UC previously treated with GC.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who received modified MVAC between November 2004 and November 2012. All patients failed prior, first-line GC chemotherapy.

Results

The median age of patients was 64.0 years (range, 33.0 to 77.0 years), and 23 (82.1%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 36.0% and 64.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 38 weeks (range, 5 to 182 weeks), median progression free survival was 21.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3 to 35.7 weeks) and median overall survival was 49.0 weeks (95% CI, 18.8 to 79.3 weeks). Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (n=21, 75.0%) and anemia (n=9, 32.1%). Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities did not occur and there was no treatment-related death.

Conclusion

Modified MVAC appears to be a safe and active chemotherapy regimen in patients with stable physical status and adequate renal function after GC treatment.

[Systemic therapy of metastatic bladder cancer.]

This review focuses on current options in the medical therapy of metastasized urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Standard treatments as well as new, recently published therapeutic approaches are evaluated and discussed.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as third-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of urothelial tract: results of a phase II study

Until the recent approval of vinflunine, no standard second-line chemotherapy existed for advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Few data exist about third-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Although administered in up-front regimens, anthracyclines were never evaluated beyond second-line treatment. This study assessed the activity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with advanced TCC previously treated with two chemotherapy regimens. From May 2005 to June 2009, 23 patients with metastatic TCC were recruited: median age was 62 years (49-76 years) with a median ECOG PS of 1. Patients received PLD 35 mg/m(2) every 21 days. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. No patient showed complete response. Three patients (13 %) had partial response; seven patients (30 %) showed stable disease for a disease control rate of 43 %. The median time to progression (TTP) was 4.1 months with a median survival time (MST) of 6.3 months. Treatment was well tolerated: no patient developed grade 4 toxicities. This is the first study which evaluated the role of anthracyclines as third-line chemotherapy in metastatic TCC. Despite its manageable profile of toxicity, PLD showed modest activity. Beyond second-line chemotherapy, supportive care still represents the best therapeutic option for patients with metastatic TCC.

Current treatment of metastatic bladder cancer and future directions

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma portends a very poor long-term prognosis, with 5-year survival at approximately 5%. The overall survival of metastatic bladder cancer has not improved over the last 20 years. The first-line therapy is cisplatin-based chemotherapy with the response rate approximately 50%. Approximately 30-50% of the patients are unsuitable for cisplatin, and there is no standard of care for this patient population. There is no standard second-line treatment. Several signaling pathways are activated in bladder urothelial carcinoma, but no targeted therapy, either alone or in combination with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, has been shown to significantly improve the treatment outcomes. The future of metastatic urothelial carcinoma treatment lies in the ability to deliver personalized therapy. This area remains an active research field today.

First- and second-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Urothelial cancer of the bladder is the 4th most common malignancy in American men and the 9th most common in women. Although it is a chemosensitive disease, advanced bladder cancer seems to have reached a plateau with regard to median survival of patients. Standard first-line therapy remains gemcitabine plus cisplatin (gc) or methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (mvac). In patients deemed unfit to receive cisplatin, gemcitabine plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus paclitaxel can be considered. To date, no standard therapy has been established for patients who recur or are refractory to first-line therapy. Second-line vinflunine, by way of superiority over best supportive care, has shown promise in a phase iii trial. Cisplatin-based therapy (mvac or gc) can also be offered to patients previously treated with cisplatin, especially if they responded previously and are considered platinum-sensitive. Novel targeted therapies are sorely needed to further improve the delivery and efficacy of chemotherapy.

Vinflunine in the treatment of advanced bladder cancer

Accounting for 14,000 deaths in the USA last year, research informs us that advanced bladder cancer is a lethal disease with a median survival that has remained a little over 1 year for the past two decades. For the majority of patients with metastatic disease, chemotherapy with cisplatin-based combinations is the standard first-line treatment. Although initial response rates are high, disease progression is common, creating a growing number of patients in need of effective second-line chemotherapy. For this population, no standard of care currently exists. Salvage chemotherapy is associated with low response rates and studies exploring potential clinical benefit over supportive care alone are limited to nonrandomized Phase II trials. Vinflunine, a novel anti-mitotic drug from the Vinca alkaloid class, is the first and only agent that has been compared with supportive care in the second-line setting. In Europe, vinflunine is approved as a treatment option for patients with advanced urothelial cancer who have failed a prior platinum-containing regimen. To date, in the USA, there is no FDA-approved second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic bladder cancer and treatment continues to emphasize patient enrollment into a clinical trial.

A phase I study of personalized peptide vaccination for advanced urothelial carcinoma patients who failed treatment with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin

OBJECTIVE

• To investigate the safety and immune responses of 12 consecutive weeks of once-weekly personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) administration in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) for whom therapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (MVAC) has failed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• A phase I trial was designed. Ten patients with MVAC-refractory advanced or metastatic UC were treated with weekly personalized peptide vaccine 12 times using positive peptides chosen from 14 and 16 peptides in patients with human leucocyte antigens A24 and A2, respectively. • Peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor analysis by interferon-γ production and peptide-reactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was monitored during the treatment.

RESULTS

• The peptide vaccination was safe and well tolerated with no major adverse effects. Increased cytotoxic T lymphocyte response and the anti-peptide IgG titre were revealed by the post-vaccination sera in eight patients. • Clinical responses were as follows: one complete response, one partial response, two stable disease and six progressive disease. • Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.0 and 8.9 months, respectively. In the four responders, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 21 and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

• This phase I study showed the safety of and boosted immune responses in response to PPV for advanced UC. • The potential efficacy of 12 consecutive weekly vaccinations with PPV in patients with advanced UC merits further investigation based on these findings.

Efficacy of methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin cisplatin combination in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced urothelial cancer: a retrospective analysis

Objective

Second-line treatment options in advanced urothelial cancer are limited. We investigated the efficacy of a methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) combination after failure of gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

Twenty-five patients with advanced urothelial cancer, who received second-line MVAC after first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin (n = 9) or gemcitabine/carboplatin (n = 16), were included in this retrospective analysis.

Results

Twenty-two patients (88%) relapsed within 6 months after first-line treatment. Following MVAC, there were 5 (20%) objective responses. Median follow-up was 20.2 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.3–5.2), and median overall survival (OS) was 9 months (95% CI: 6.6–11.4). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0.1 versus 2 was associated with longer PFS (5 months versus 3.3 months, P = 0.049). Response or stabilization of disease during second-line chemotherapy predicted for a significantly longer PFS and OS (7.4 versus 3.5, P = 0.005; 15.5 versus 7, P = 0.046).

Conclusions

Second-line MVAC chemotherapy may result in prolonged survival in some patients with refractory disease. Further research in this field is necessary.

Critical evaluation of vinflunine in the treatment of refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) accounts for 5% to 10% of malignancies in men in Europe and the United States. For locally advanced or metastatic disease, there are two standard firstline chemotherapy regimens: MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin) and gemcitabine/cisplatin. For refractory disease, there is currently no standard treatment. Vinflunine, a second-generation Vinca alkaloid, is the first chemotherapeutic agent to be evaluated in a large UC second-line population. This review discusses the pre-clinical and clinical data published, and compares vinflunine to alternative single agents and combination regimens tested in this setting. Based on the results of the phase II and III clinical trials, there appears to be sufficient evidence to support the use of vinflunine in the second-line setting.

Renal safety and efficacy of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with a solitary kidney after nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract

PURPOSE

Little information is available about changes in renal function after cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CBCT) in patients with a solitary kidney. The authors evaluated the renal safety and efficacy of CBCT after nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract-urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC).

METHODS

The data of patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for UUT-UC and received CBCT for adjuvant and/or palliative treatment were reviewed. Renal function changes and renal function-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, and objective tumor responses were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled, and a median of 6 cycles (1-22) of CBCT were administered. After the 3rd cycle of CBCT, serum creatinine levels were significantly higher than at baseline, whereas mean creatinine clearances and estimated glomerular filtration rates were significantly lower. These renal function indicators also tended to be lower than baseline after the 6th-21st cycles, but these decreases were not significant. Significant AEs (≥grade 2) occurred in 10 patients (16.7%), and serious AEs (≥grade 3) developed in two that required temporary hemodialysis. Univariate analysis revealed that a low estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline was related to the occurrence of a significant renal AE with borderline significance (Hazard ratio = 3.284, P = 0.100). The overall tumor response rate was 30.2%, and tumor response rates of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd line therapies were 36.4, 25.0, and 12.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy can be administered in the majority of patients with UUT-UC with a solitary kidney after nephroureterectomy without inducing a serious AE, and provides acceptable efficacy.