Differential effects of ketoconazole on exposure to temsirolimus following intravenous infusion of temsirolimus

An Investigation in the Comparability of the Exposure and Recommended Dose of Selected Pfizer Drugs in East Asian Countries: Is Mutual Usage of Clinical Data Among East Asian Countries Feasible?

The current regulatory path for new drug registration in East Asian countries has led to significant delay of the new medicines in these countries. A unified regulatory path and allowance of mutual usage of clinical data in East Asian countries would lead to cost saving in drug development and expedite the new drug registration in these countries. The objectives of the present analysis are to compare the approval dates of a selection of products developed by Pfizer in the United States and East Asian countries (China, Japan, Korea) and compare the pharmacokinetics and recommended doses of these products in East Asian countries. Eighteen products (20 drugs, 2 products with 2 combination drugs) with exposure data available in at least 2 of the 3 East Asian countries across different therapeutic areas were included in the analyses. The results showed that most products had delayed approval in East Asian countries (up to 8 years) after US or EU approval. No distinct differences were observed in the drug exposure and recommended doses for the selected products in East Asian countries. These results together with literature data of genetic similarity of the East Asian populations support the mutual usage of the clinical data in the East Asian countries for expedited regulatory submission and approval.

A Fluidic Isolation-Assisted Homogeneous-Flow-Pressure Chip-Solid Phase Extraction-Mass Spectrometry System for Online Dynamic Monitoring of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Biotransformation in Cells

It is well known that cell can response to various chemical and mechanical stimuli. Therefore, flow pressure variation induced by sample loading and elution should be small enough to ignore the physical impact on cells when we use a Chip-SPE-MS system for cells. However, most existent Chip-SPE-MS systems ignored the pressure alternation because it is extremely difficult to develop a homogeneous-flow-pressure hyphenated module. Herein, we developed an interesting fluidic isolation-assisted homogeneous-flow-pressure Chip-SPE-MS system and demonstrated that it is adequate for online high-throughput determination and quantification of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ (25(OH)D₃) biotransformation in different cells. Briefly, the homogeneous ambient flow pressure is achieved by fluidic isolation between the cell culture channel and the SPE column, and an automatic sampling probe could accomplish the sample loading and dispensing to fulfill online pretreatment of the sample. Through this new system, the expression levels of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (24,25(OH)₂D₃) can be determined in real time with a detection limit of 2.54 nM. In addition, the results revealed that 25(OH)D₃ metabolic activity differed significantly between normal L-02 cells and cancerous HepG2 cells. Treatment of L-02 cells with a high dose of 25(OH)D₃ was found to increase significant formation of 24,25(OH)₂D₃, but this change was not apparent in HepG2 cells. The presented system promises to be a versatile tool for online accurate molecule biotransformation investigation and drug screening processes.

Pivotal Considerations for Optimal Deployment of Healthy Volunteers in Oncology Drug Development

Oncology drug development is among the most challenging of any therapeutic area, with first-in-human trials expected to deliver information on both safety and activity. Until recently, therapeutic approaches in oncology focused on cytotoxic chemotherapy agents, ruling out even the possibility of enrolling normal healthy volunteers (NHVs) in clinical trials due to safety considerations. The emergence of noncytotoxic modalities, including molecularly targeted agents with more favorable safety profiles, however, has led to increasing numbers of clinical pharmacology studies of these agents being conducted in NHVs. Beyond rapid enrollment and cost savings, there are other advantages of conducting specific types of studies in NHVs with the goal of more appropriate dosing decisions in certain subsets of the intended patient populations, allowing for enrollment of such patients in therapeutic trials from which they might otherwise have been excluded. Nevertheless, the decision must be carefully weighed against potential disadvantages, and although the considerations surrounding conduct of clinical trials using NHVs are generally well-defined in most other therapeutic areas, they are less well-defined in oncology.

A phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and temsirolimus in patients with refractory solid malignancies

This study aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in combination with temsirolimus (T) in patients with refractory solid tumors. Using a standard “3+3” dose escalation design, 23 patients were enrolled in three dosing cohorts in this phase I study. The starting dose level was PLD at 30 mg/m² every 4 weeks and T at 20 mg weekly. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of doxorubicin were evaluated for patients in the expansion cohort. The most common treatment-related adverse events of all grades were mucositis/stomatitis (69.6 %), anorexia (52.2 %), thrombocytopenia (52.2 %), and fatigue (47.8 %). The recommended doses of this combination for phase II studies are 25 mg/m² PLD and 25 mg T. PK analyses suggested increased exposure of doxorubicin in this combination regimen compared to doxorubicin administered as a single agent, possibly due to PK drug interactions. Out of 18 patients evaluable for a treatment response, two had partial responses (PR) (breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma) and six had stable disease (SD). Two patients remained on treatment for more than 1 year. The combination of PLD and T is tolerable, and the treatment resulted in clinical benefit. The combination regimen should be further explored in appropriate tumor types.

Temsirolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) represent one of the ten leading cancer entities with an increasing incidence especially in the western world. Unfortunately, about 25% of the patients develop metastatic RCC (mRCC) associated with a most unfavorable prognosis. In the recent years, various new agents targeting VEGF or VEGF receptor (VEGFR) or the mTOR pathway have been approved for the treatment of mRCC with significant prolongation of progression-free survival and, in part, of overall survival (OS). Targeting the mTOR kinase is an interesting option for mRCC. Temsirolimus, one of the available mTOR inhibitors, has been approved as a single agent in poor-risk mRCC patients based on the pivotal Phase III trial showing a significant superiority in OS versus IFN-α or temsirolimus + IFN-α, which has been verified by a pivotal Phase III trial. The benefit has been shown for clear cell carcinoma and papillary RCC as well. For poor prognosis patients, temsirolimus improves median survival by 3.6 months. In second-line treatment compared with sorafenib following first-line treatment with sunitinib temsirolimus showed a relative progression-free survival benefit for patients with nonclear cell RCC with temsirolimus. The median OS for the temsirolimus group was 12.27 and 16.64 months for the sorafenib group. In 2007, the US FDA granted approval for temsirolimus for the treatment of advanced RCC.

Clinical efficacy and management of temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) relapse within a few years of treatment. Conventional agents provide little benefit, thus identification of new therapies is critical to improve patient outcomes. Temsirolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, is an effective, well-tolerated option authorized in Europe for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Intravenous temsirolimus has been extensively studied in MCL and has consistently demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity. In the pivotal phase III trial, treatment with temsirolimus 175 mg weekly for 3 weeks followed by 75 mg weekly (175/75 mg) resulted in significant improvements in progression-free survival (P = .0009) and objective response rate (P = .002) vs. investigator's choice of therapy. Hematologic toxicities (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia) were the principal grade 3/4 adverse events associated with temsirolimus 175/75 mg. Other toxicities included increases in serum cholesterol and triglycerides, hyperglycemia, fatigue, and dyspnea. Overall, the safety profile of temsirolimus is acceptable in this setting, and most toxicities are manageable with dose modification or medical intervention. Clinical studies of temsirolimus in relapsed or refractory MCL patients aim to clarify the optimal treatment schedule and to assess rational combinations with other therapeutic agents, such as rituximab or chemotherapy. Practical considerations are discussed for the clinical use of temsirolimus in patients with MCL.

mTOR inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinomas: from biology to clinical practice

To date, oral everolimus is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, whose disease has progressed on or after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy, and intravenous temsirolimus for the first-line treatment of patients with poor prognosis metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, some factors could guide the treatment choice aiming to individualize a treatment plan. Besides the crucial issue of treatment efficacy, other factors are to be considered such as disease status, histological subtype, extent of the disease, patient-specific factors, and agent-specific factors. All of these considerations have to stay in the frame of guideline recommendations which represent evidence-based medicine. The purpose of this article is to summarize the main pharmacological and pharmacokinetic characteristics of mTOR inhibitors, and to define targeted populations according to prognostic indexes.

Temsirolimus: a safety and efficacy review

INTRODUCTION

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway and the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) represent the most frequently exploited targets in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Temsirolimus is an inhibitor of mTOR, and is a unique ester derivative of sirolimus, a macrocyclic lactone, with improved pharmaceutical properties, including stability and solubility. Temsirolimus binds to the cytoplasmic protein FKBP-12, and the complex binds and inhibits mTOR.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the clinical findings and safety of temsirolimus in RCC patients.

EXPERT OPINION

A Phase III clinical trial has demonstrated that temsirolimus has statistically significant advantages over treatment with IFN-α in RCC patients with poor prognosis, in terms of OS (overall survival), PFS (progression-free survival), and tumor response. Median OS was improved 49% compared to IFN-α, and median PFS was approximately doubled. It is now considered the standard for RCC patients with poor prognostic features. The possibility that this agent is useful in metastatic non-clear cell carcinoma patients has also been suggested by a subset analysis of the pivotal Phase III trial. Studies in untreated favorable and intermediate risk clear cell and refractory mRCC patients are required.

A quantitative framework and strategies for management and evaluation of metabolic drug-drug interactions in oncology drug development: new molecular entities as object drugs

This article outlines general strategies for the management and evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) resulting from perturbation of clearance of investigational anticancer drug candidates by concomitantly administered agents in a drug development setting, with a focus on drug candidates that cannot be evaluated in first-in-human studies in healthy subjects. A risk level classification is proposed, based on quantitative integration of knowledge derived from preclinical drug-metabolism studies evaluating the projected percentage contribution [f(i)(%)] of individual molecular determinants (e.g. cytochrome P450 isoenzymes) to the overall human clearance of the investigational agent. The following classification is proposed with respect to susceptibility to DDIs with metabolic inhibitors: a projected maximum DDI expected to result in a ≤1.33-fold increase in exposure, representing a low level of risk; a projected maximum DDI expected to result in a >1.33-fold but <2-fold increase in exposure, representing a moderate level of risk; and a projected maximum DDI expected to result in a ≥2-fold increase in exposure, representing a potentially high level of risk. For DDIs with metabolic inducers, the following operational classification is proposed, based on the sum of the percentage contributions of enzymes that are inducible via a common mechanism to the overall clearance of the investigational drug: <<25%, representing a low level of risk; <50%, representing a moderate level of risk; and ≥50%, representing a potentially high level of risk. To ensure patient safety and to minimize bias in determination of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), it is recommended that strong and moderate inhibitors and inducers of the major contributing enzyme are excluded in phase I dose-escalation studies of high-risk compounds, whereas exclusion of strong inhibitors and inducers of the contributing enzyme(s) is recommended as being sufficient for moderate-risk compounds. For drugs that will be investigated in diseases such as glioblastoma, where there may be relatively frequent use of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic agents (EIAEDs), a separate dose-escalation study in this subpopulation is recommended to define the RP2D. For compounds in the high-risk category, if genetic deficiencies in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzyme are known, it is recommended that poor metabolizers be studied separately to define the RP2D for this subpopulation. Whereas concomitant medication exclusion criteria that are utilized in the phase I dose-escalation studies will probably also need to be maintained for high-risk compounds in phase II studies unless the results of a clinical DDI study indicate the absence of a clinically relevant interaction, these exclusion criteria can potentially be relaxed beyond phase I for moderate-risk compounds, if supported by the nature of clinical toxicities and the understanding of the therapeutic index in phase I. Adequately designed clinical DDI studies will not only inform potential relaxation of concomitant medication exclusion criteria in later-phase studies but, importantly, will also inform the development of pharmacokinetically derived dose-modification guidelines for use in clinical practice when coupled with adequate safety monitoring, as illustrated in the prescribing guidance for many recently approved oncology therapeutics.

Temsirolimus for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma

Although recent progress has been made in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) the majority of patients experience relapse and ultimately die of their disease. The translocation t(11;14) is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MCL and results in overexpression of cyclin D1. Its protein translation is controlled by mTOR, a key element of the PI3K/Akt pathway, and mTOR constitutes an attractive therapeutic target. Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of mTOR, has been evaluated in two Phase II trials in patients with relapsed MCL, and promising response rates up to 40% were found. Subsequently, a randomized Phase III trial was initiated, in which superiority in remission induction and progression-free survival could be demonstrated for a regimen of temsirolimus 175 mg for 3 weeks, followed by a 75-mg weekly application in comparison with established agents. This adds temsirolimus to the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of MCL. Further developments target combination therapy in MCL and other lymphoid neoplasms.

Dosing modifications of targeted cancer therapies in patients with special needs: evidence and controversies

Targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment of malignancies over the past decade. These agents are generally regarded to posses fewer systemic side effects than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies. However, patients manifesting organ dysfunction or drug interactions with concurrent medications may require dosing modifications of their targeted therapies in order to reduce the risk of systemic toxicities or reduction of drug efficacies. Studies have shown that wide variations and controversies exist with regard to dosing modifications of drugs, due to the lack of well conducted studies and consensus. Hence, this review was conducted to review the literature on the dosing modification strategies, for 30 commercially available targeted cancer drugs, and to evaluate the current mainstay recommendations and controversies.

Renal cell carcinoma: focus on safety and efficacy of temsirolimus

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma has harboured a poor prognosis for decades with immunotherapy being the only available therapy with high toxicity and modest effect. Dependance of renal cell carcinoma oncogenesis on the mTOR pathway has led to clinical development of temsirolimus in this setting. This sirolimus derivative has shown clinical efficacy in monotherapy for poor-risk renal cell carcinoma leading to an overall survival of 10.8 months in the pivotal phase III trial of this agent. Its specific adverse events consist of metabolic dysregulation (hyperlipemia, hyperglycemia), mucositis, rash and pneumonitis which can be severe and need careful monitoring and management. In this review, we will discuss of the clinical development of this molecule, its efficacy, its safety profile and future perspectives.

Inhibitors of mTOR

Inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have been approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and appear to have a role in the treatment of other malignancies. The primary objective of this drug review is to provide pharmacokinetic and dynamic properties of the commonly used drugs everolimus and temsirolimus. Additionally, information on clinical use, mechanism of action, bioanalysis, drug-drug interactions, alterations with disease or age, pharmacogenetics, and drug resistance is given. This overview should assist the treating medical oncologist in adjusting treatment with mTOR inhibitors to individual patient circumstances.

Temsirolimus in the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare and aggressive subtype of lymphoma associated with a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of frontline treatment for patients with this disease. Despite high response rates to combination chemotherapy regimens, the majority of patients relapse within a few years of treatment. Therefore, finding efficacious treatments for relapsed or refractory disease has become a growing area of clinical research. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is responsible for integrating cell signals from growth factors, hormones, and nutrients and communicating energy status. Scientific research on aberrant molecular pathways in cancer has revealed that several proteins along the mTOR pathway may be upregulated in this and other types of lymphoma. Temsirolimus is the first mTOR inhibitor that has shown clinical efficacy in treating MCL that has relapsed after frontline treatments.

Emergent toxicities associated with the use of mTOR inhibitors in patients with advanced renal carcinoma

The inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) improve outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. These agents are associated with unusual class-adverse events that represent a challenge to the clinician, making it critical to recognize and treat them appropriately. This study aims to highlight the clinical management of these toxicities by presenting evidence from the literature and suggesting treatment recommendations. A critical review of the literature is performed and a summary of the most relevant emergent toxicities and their management is presented. Treatment recommendations of metabolic disturbances induced by mTOR inhibitors, such as hypophosphatemia, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia along with the management of drug-induced pneumonitis and possible pharmacological interactions are presented. Most of these toxicities, if recognized and treated accordingly, should resolve with minimal impact on patients' quality of life and in the efficacy of this anticancer therapy. Oncologists should be familiar with the recognition and appropriate medical management of these clinical scenarios.

Targeted therapies to treat non-AIDS-defining cancers in patients with HIV on HAART therapy: treatment considerations and research outlook

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Highly active antiretroviral therapy has led to a dramatic improvement in the prognosis of patients diagnosed with HIV and AIDS. This includes a significant decline in the rates of AIDS-related cancers, including Kaposi's sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Unfortunately, rates of non-AIDS-defining cancers are on the rise, and now exceed the rates of AIDS-related cancers in patients with HIV. Treating non-AIDS-defining cancers in patients who are on highly active antiretroviral therapy is an open and complicated clinical question.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer targeted therapies are now available to treat cancers which were historically refractory to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Highly active antiretroviral therapy agents are notorious for causing drug-drug interactions. The co-administration of targeted chemotherapies with highly active antiretroviral therapy could well impede the efficacy or increase the toxicity of these targeted therapies. Unfortunately little is known about possible drug-drug interactions because HIV patients are typically excluded from clinical trials.

SUMMARY

We highlight what is known about how and why highly active antiretroviral therapy agents can affect drug metabolism. We then present the clinical and pharmacological data for nine recently approved targeted therapies - imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, erlotinib, sunitinib, lapatinib, bortezomib, sorafenib, and temsirolimus. We conclude with considerations on how to use these new agents to treat non-AIDS-defining cancers, and discuss a future research agenda to better understand and predict potential highly active antiretroviral therapy-targeted therapy interactions.

Examination of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein-mediated drug-drug interactions using animal models

With the advent of polytherapy for cancer treatment it has become prudent to minimize, as much as possible, the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDI). Toward this end, the metabolic and transporter pathways involved in the disposition of a drug candidate (phenotyping) and potential for inhibition and induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters are evaluated in vitro. Such in vitro human data can be made available prior to human dosing and enable in vitro to in vivo-based predictions of clinical outcomes. Despite some success, however, in vitro systems are not dynamic and sometimes fail to predict drug-drug interactions for a variety of reasons. In comparison, relatively less effort has been made to evaluate predictions based on data derived from in vivo animal models. This chapter will attempt to summarize different examples from the literature where animal models have been used to predict cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A)- and P-glycoprotein-based DDI. When employing data from animal models one needs to be aware of species differences in enzyme- and transporter-activity leading to differences in pharmacokinetics, clearance pathways as well as species differences in selectivity and affinity of probe substrates and inhibitors. Because of these differences, in vivo animal studies alone, cannot be predictive of human DDI. Despite these caveats, the information obtained from validated in vivo animal models may prove useful when used in conjunction with in vitro-in vivo extrapolation methods. Such an integrated data set can be used to select drug candidates with a reduced DDI potential.