Idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease is associated with a poorer prognosis from subsequent malignancy

Survival patterns among venous thromboembolism patients with hematologic malignancies in Alberta, Canada from 2003 to 2015

BACKGROUND

Hematologic malignancies are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify the prevalence of hematologic malignancy in VTE patients and compare the survival with or without VTE.

METHODS

Using linked administrative data and a validated algorithm we identified VTE cases in Alberta, Canada from 2003 to 2015. Subjects having International Classification of Diseases code for hematologic malignancies, solid tumors and both cancers within 1 year before and after the VTE index event were defined as cancer associated VTE cases. We also identified patients with no VTE. Cox proportional hazards model was applied to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of death. Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to compare survival rate between different groups.

RESULTS

We identified 5157 cancer associated VTE patients and 24,932 cancer patients with no VTE. Among the cancer associated VTE patients 697 (13.5%), 4376 (84.9%) and 84 (1.6%) had hematologic malignancies, solid tumors and both cancers, respectively. The median survival (in months) was significantly shorter in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and plasma cell dyscrasia patients with VTE than those without (16.6 vs 27.1, p = 0.004; 70.6 vs 99.2, p = 0.023 and 32.9 vs 55.5, p = 0.007 respectively). Occurrence of pulmonary embolism in MDS and MPN patients and deep vein thrombosis in plasma cell dyscrasia patients were significantly associated with increased risk of death (adjusted HR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1. 46-6.16; adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI:1.01-2.51 and adjusted HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.03-1.89 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

VTE adversely affects the survival among patients with hematologic malignancies.

Rivaroxaban compared to no treatment in ER-negative stage I-III early breast cancer patients (the TIP Trial): study protocol for a phase II preoperative window-of-opportunity study design randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer patients are at a four-fold increased risk of developing a venous thromboembolism (VTE), a major cause of death in this group. Conversely, coagulation factors promote tumour growth and metastasis. This has been evidenced in preclinical models, with an inhibitory effect of anticoagulants on cancer growth through proliferative, angiogenic, apoptotic, cancer stem cell and metastatic processes. The extrinsic clotting pathway is also more upregulated in patients in the relatively poorer prognosis oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer subgroup, with increased tumour stromal expression of the coagulation factors Tissue Factor and thrombin. Rivaroxaban (Xarelto®, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). It is a Factor Xa inhibitor that is routinely prescribed for the prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for both VTE prophylaxis and treatment. This trial will assess the anti-proliferative and other anti-cancer progression mechanisms of Rivaroxaban in ER-negative early breast cancer patients.

METHODS

This UK-based preoperative window-of-opportunity phase II randomised control trial will randomise 88 treatment-naïve early breast cancer patients to receive 20 mg OD Rivaroxaban treatment for 11 to 17 days or no treatment. Treatment will be stopped 24 h (range 18-36 h) prior to surgery or repeat core biopsy. All patients will be followed up for 2 weeks following surgery or repeat core biopsy. The primary endpoint is change in tumour Ki67. Secondary outcome measures include tumour markers of apoptosis and angiogenesis, extrinsic clotting pathway activation and systemic markers of metastasis, tumour load and coagulation.

DISCUSSION

Laboratory evidence supports an anti-cancer role for anticoagulants; however, this has failed to translate into survival benefit when trialled in patients with metastatic disease or poor prognosis cancers, such as lung cancer. Subgroup analysis supported a potential survival benefit in better prognosis advanced disease patients. This is the first study to investigate the anti-cancer effects of anticoagulants in early breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UK National Research Ethics Service (NRES) approval 15/NW/0406, MHRA Clinical Trials Authorisation 48380/0003/001-0001. The sponsor is Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, and the trial is co-ordinated by Cancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit (LCTU). EudraCT 2014-004909-33 , registered 27 July 2015. ISRCTN14785273 .

Venous thromboembolism and mortality in breast cancer: cohort study with systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer patients are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, current evidence as to whether VTE increases the risk of mortality in breast cancer patients is conflicting. We present data from a large cohort of patients from the UK and pool these with previous data from a systematic review.

METHODS

Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) dataset, we identified a cohort of 13,202 breast cancer patients, of whom 611 were diagnosed with VTE between 1997 and 2006 and 12,591 did not develop VTE. Hazard ratios (HR) were used to compare mortality between the two groups. These were then pooled with existing data on this topic identified via a search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (until January 2015) using a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Within the CPRD, VTE was associated with increased mortality when treated as a time-varying covariate (HR = 2.42; 95% CI, 2.13-2.75), however, when patients were permanently classed as having VTE based on presence of a VTE event within 6 months of cancer diagnosis, no increased risk was observed (HR = 1.22; 0.93-1.60). The pooled HR from seven studies using the second approach was 1.69 (1.12-2.55), with no effect seen when restricted to studies which adjusted for key covariates.

CONCLUSION

A large HR for VTE in the time-varying covariate analysis reflects the known short-term mortality following a VTE. When breast cancer patients are fortunate to survive the initial VTE, the influence on longer-term mortality is less certain.

Excess long-term mortality in outpatient deep venous thrombosis patients managed in an ambulatory care setting

BACKGROUND

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is increasingly being managed in the outpatient setting, particularly patients deemed low-risk at presentation. The long-term outcomes of these patients remain unclear.

AIM

To determine the long-term outcomes of patients with DVT and those with raised D-dimer without DVT managed exclusively by an ambulatory care pathway.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

828 consecutive patients assessed at the Ambulatory Care Clinic of a tertiary care university hospital between 1 January and 31 December 2008 for potential lower limb DVT were analysed. Primary and secondary outcome was all-cause mortality and new diagnosis of cancer, respectively. Median follow-up was 6.4 years.

RESULTS

The final cohort comprised 131 patients with DVT, 396 with raised D-dimer without DVT and 165 with normal D-dimer without DVT. Long-term survival was 72.5% for DVT, 75.3% for elevated D-dimer without thrombosis and 93.3% for those with normal D-dimer ( P < 0.0001). The risk of death with DVT remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, previous cancer, recent surgery and previous thromboembolism (HR 2.17, 95% CI [1.07, 4.38]). Cancer accounted for 44.4 and 37.8% of deaths within the first and second groups, respectively. 50% of cancers in the former group were diagnosed during follow-up vs. 95.1% in the latter.

CONCLUSION

The 5-year survival of patients with DVT managed via ambulatory care was worse than expected. An algorithm is urgently needed to identify predictors of adverse outcomes for both these patients as well as those with raised D-dimer without thrombosis.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalised cancer patients in England-a cohort study

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognised and life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. However, the precise risk of VTE in hospitalised cancer patients in England has not been previously reported.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study using linked Hospital Episodes Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality data. We determined the risk of VTE separately for 24 cancer sites following first hospitalisation for cancer (index date) and how this varied by age, proximity from hospital admission, administration of chemotherapy and calendar time.

Results

Between 1998 and 2012, 3,558,660 patients were hospitalised for cancer. The cancer sites with the highest risk of VTE during initial hospitalisation for cancer were pancreatic (4.9 %), ovarian (4 %) and liver (3.8 %). The three cancer sites with the highest risk of first VTE event within 6 months from discharge were pancreatic (3.7 %), oesophagus (3 %) and stomach (2.8 %). For most cancers, the risk of VTE within 6 months from discharge was higher amongst patients who underwent chemotherapy compared to those who did not. The impact of age on risk of VTE varied considerably between cancer sites.

Conclusions

The risk of VTE amongst patients hospitalised for cancer varies greatly by cancer site, age, proximity from hospital admission, and chemotherapy administration.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0291-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Unprovoked venous thromboembolism and subsequent cancer risk: a population-based cohort study

ESSENTIALS: A relationship between unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer risk was investigated. We collected 27,751 VTE patients and compared them with 110,409 frequency-matched people without VTE. This cohort study showed significantly higher risks of overall and site-specific cancers in the VTE group. There is an increased risk in the first 6 months after VTE, and VTE can be an indicator of occult cancer.

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND

We investigated the relationship between unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) and subsequent cancer risk in Taiwan, focusing on both short-term and long-term cancer development.

METHODS

For the case group, we obtained data on 27,751 patients diagnosed with unprovoked VTE between 1 January 1998, and 31 December 2008. For the comparison group, four people without unprovoked VTE were frequency-matched with each unprovoked VTE patient according to age, sex, and index year. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to determine the effects of unprovoked VTE on cancer risk.

RESULTS

Overall cancer risk was significantly higher in the unprovoked VTE group than in the comparison group (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.26, 95% confidence interval = 2.16-2.37). The increased risk was observed in both men and women in various age groups. The patients in the unprovoked VTE group showed a significantly increased risk of cancer at all site-specific cancer sites. Analyses stratified according to follow-up duration revealed that significant differences were more evident between the two groups over a follow-up duration of < 0.5 years than over a follow-up duration of ≥ 3 years. Furthermore, the 1-year mortality risk of cancer patients with unprovoked VTE was significantly higher than that for cancer patients in the non-VTE group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that unprovoked VTE is associated with a consistently high risk of subsequent cancer diagnosis. This is particularly true in the first 6 months after VTE. It suggests that unprovoked VTE can be an indicator of occult malignancy.

When are breast cancer patients at highest risk of venous thromboembolism? A cohort study using English health care data

Patients with breast cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly in the peridiagnosis period. However, no previous epidemiologic studies have investigated the relative impact of breast cancer treatments in a time-dependent manner. We aimed to determine the impact of breast cancer stage, biology, and treatment on the absolute and relative risks of VTE by using several recently linked data sources from England. Our cohort comprised 13,202 patients with breast cancer from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Cancer Registry data) diagnosed between 1997 and 2006 with follow-up continuing to the end of 2010. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine which demographic, treatment-related, and biological factors independently affected VTE risk. Women had an annual VTE incidence of 6% while receiving chemotherapy which was 10.8-fold higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-14.4; absolute rate [AR], 59.6 per 1000 person-years) than that in women who did not receive chemotherapy. After surgery, the risk was significantly increased in the first month (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.4; AR, 23.5; reference group, no surgery), but the risk was not increased after the first month. Risk of VTE was noticeably higher in the 3 months after initiation of tamoxifen compared with the risk before therapy (HR, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.3-12.7; AR, 24.1); however, initiating therapy with aromatase inhibitors was not associated with VTE (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.4; AR, 28.3). In conclusion, women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer have a clinically important risk of VTE, whereas an increased risk of VTE immediately after endocrine therapy is restricted to tamoxifen.

Improving clinician performance of inpatient venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis

Clinicians are aware of the importance of thromboprophylaxis, and that the application of measures to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence in hospitalized patients must be improved. To enhance clinician execution of appropriate steps to reduce the risk of inpatient VTE, a performance improvement (PI) continuing medical education (CME) initiative consisting of 3 independent tracks for hospitalized patients-patients who are medically ill, patients receiving oncology treatment, and patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery-was designed and implemented. After a baseline chart review of select evidenced-based performance measures for VTE risk stratification and prevention, participants identified ≥ 1 area of personal improvement. Participants then engaged in a period of self-improvement and reassessed their performance with a second chart review. After participating in the PI CME activity, clinician participants in the medically ill track increased their documentation of VTE risk assessments upon patient admission from baseline (56% vs 93%, n = 250; P < 0.001) and their prescription of low-molecular-weight heparin, low-dose unfractionated heparin, or fondaparinux (72% vs 88%, n = 250; P < 0.001). Orthopedic-track participants were significantly more likely to prescribe 15 to 35 days of VTE prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty or hip fracture surgery upon patient discharge compared with baseline (51%, n = 123 vs 61%, n = 107; P < 0.001). Oncology-track participants demonstrated a nonsignificant trend for assessing and documenting bleeding risk after participation in the PI CME activity (56% vs 68%, n = 80; P = 0.143). Improvements in evidence-based strategies to reduce the risk of inpatient VTE were associated with PI CME participation. Although areas for improvement remain, increased participant identification and use of prophylactic measures can reduce the risk of VTE in hospitalized patients.