Suzuki Y, Saitoh M, Suzumori K, Kajikuri J, Itoh T. Characterization of changes in mechanical responses to histamine in omental resistance arteries in pre-eclampsia.
Br J Pharmacol 2000;
131:37-42. [PMID:
10960066 PMCID:
PMC1572289 DOI:
10.1038/sj.bjp.0703529]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Changes in the effect of histamine on the smooth muscle of resistance arteries in pre-eclampsia were investigated by measuring isometric contractions in endothelium-denuded strips of omental resistance arteries from pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnant women (pregnancy-term matched). Histamine (0.03 -1 microM) caused concentration-dependent relaxation of the contraction induced by 9, 11-epithio-11,12-methano-thromboxane A(2) (STA(2)) in strips from both groups. Sensitivity (for pre-eclampsia: pD(2)=6.66+/-0.04, n=5 and for normotensive pregnant women: pD(2)=7.07+/-0.03, n=10, P<0.001) was lower and the maximum response (90.6+/-0.6% vs 95.5+/-1.1%, P<0.05) was smaller in strips from pre-eclamptic women. Although 8-bromoadenosine-3', 5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate (Sp-isomer: Sp-8-Br-cAMPS, 0.1 - 0.3 mM), a phosphodiesterase (PDE)-resistant activator of adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP)-dependent protein kinase, concentration-dependently attenuated the contraction induced by STA(2) in strips from both groups, the sensitivity (for pre-eclampsia: pD(2)=3.68+/-0.04, n=5 and for normotensive pregnant women: 3.94+/-0.09, n=7, P:=0.02) was lower and the maximum response (64.2+/-2.4% vs 74.9+/-4.4%, P:<0.05) was smaller in pre-eclampsia. In beta-escin-skinned strips, the pD(2) value for the contraction-inducing effect of Ca(2+) did not differ significantly between the two groups (for pre-eclampsia, n=6; for normotensive pregnant women, n=6). Thus, omental resistance arteries from human subjects with pre-eclampsia showed (i) a weaker H(2)-receptor-mediated relaxation to histamine and (ii) a weaker cyclic AMP-analogue-induced relaxation, suggesting that the reduced action of histamine may be partly due to a decreased effect of cyclic AMP.
Collapse