1
|
Sena DM, Cong X, Giorgetti A. Ligand based conformational space studies of the μ-opioid receptor. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2020; 1865:129838. [PMID: 33373630 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise a family of membrane proteins that can be activated by a variety of external factors. The μ-opioid receptor (MOR), a class A GPCR, is the main target of morphine. Recently, enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations of a constitutively active mutant of MOR in its apo form allowed us to capture the novel intermediate states of activation, as well as the active state. This prompted us to apply the same techniques to wild type MOR in complex with ligands, in order to explore their contributions to the receptor conformational changes in the activation process. METHODS MOR was modeled in complex with agonists (morphine, BU72), a partial agonist (naloxone benzoylhydrazone) and an antagonist (naloxone). Replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2) molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for all systems. Trajectory frames were clustered, and the activation state of each cluster was assessed by two different methods. RESULTS Cluster sizes and activation indices show that while agonists stabilized structures in a higher activation state, the antagonist behaved oppositely. Morphine tends to drive the receptor towards increasing R165-T279 distances, while naloxone tends to increase the NPxxYA motif conformational change. CONCLUSIONS Despite not observing a full transition between inactive and active states, an important conformational change of transmembrane helix 5 was observed and associated with a ligand-driven step of the process. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE The activation process of GPCRs is widely studied but still not fully understood. Here we carried out a step forward in the direction of gaining more details of this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diniz M Sena
- Universidade Regional do Cariri - URCA, Biological Chemistry Dept., Crato, CE 63105-000, Brazil.
| | - Xiaojing Cong
- Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institut de Chimie de Nice UMR7272, Nice 06108, France
| | - Alejandro Giorgetti
- Computational Biomedicine, Institute for Advanced Simulation IAS-5 and Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-9, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burns JA, Kroll DS, Feldman DE, Kure Liu C, Manza P, Wiers CE, Volkow ND, Wang GJ. Molecular Imaging of Opioid and Dopamine Systems: Insights Into the Pharmacogenetics of Opioid Use Disorders. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:626. [PMID: 31620026 PMCID: PMC6759955 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Opioid use in the United States has steadily risen since the 1990s, along with staggering increases in addiction and overdose fatalities. With this surge in prescription and illicit opioid abuse, it is paramount to understand the genetic risk factors and neuropsychological effects of opioid use disorder (OUD). Polymorphisms disrupting the opioid and dopamine systems have been associated with increased risk for developing substance use disorders. Molecular imaging studies have revealed how these polymorphisms impact the brain and contribute to cognitive and behavioral differences across individuals. Here, we review the current molecular imaging literature to assess how genetic variations in the opioid and dopamine systems affect function in the brain's reward, cognition, and stress pathways, potentially resulting in vulnerabilities to OUD. Continued research of the functional consequences of genetic variants and corresponding alterations in neural mechanisms will inform prevention and treatment of OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie A Burns
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Danielle S Kroll
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Dana E Feldman
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | | | - Peter Manza
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Corinde E Wiers
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Nora D Volkow
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, United States.,National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Gene-Jack Wang
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gendron L, Cahill CM, von Zastrow M, Schiller PW, Pineyro G. Molecular Pharmacology of δ-Opioid Receptors. Pharmacol Rev 2017; 68:631-700. [PMID: 27343248 DOI: 10.1124/pr.114.008979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Opioids are among the most effective analgesics available and are the first choice in the treatment of acute severe pain. However, partial efficacy, a tendency to produce tolerance, and a host of ill-tolerated side effects make clinically available opioids less effective in the management of chronic pain syndromes. Given that most therapeutic opioids produce their actions via µ-opioid receptors (MOPrs), other targets are constantly being explored, among which δ-opioid receptors (DOPrs) are being increasingly considered as promising alternatives. This review addresses DOPrs from the perspective of cellular and molecular determinants of their pharmacological diversity. Thus, DOPr ligands are examined in terms of structural and functional variety, DOPrs' capacity to engage a multiplicity of canonical and noncanonical G protein-dependent responses is surveyed, and evidence supporting ligand-specific signaling and regulation is analyzed. Pharmacological DOPr subtypes are examined in light of the ability of DOPr to organize into multimeric arrays and to adopt multiple active conformations as well as differences in ligand kinetics. Current knowledge on DOPr targeting to the membrane is examined as a means of understanding how these receptors are especially active in chronic pain management. Insight into cellular and molecular mechanisms of pharmacological diversity should guide the rational design of more effective, longer-lasting, and better-tolerated opioid analgesics for chronic pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Gendron
- Département de Pharmacologie-Physiologie, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Centre d'excellence en neurosciences de l'Univeristé de Sherbrooke, and Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Québec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care and Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, California (C.M.C.); Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (C.M.C.); Departments of Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California (M.v.Z.); Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Peptide Research, Clinical Research Institute of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (P.W.S.); and Departments of Psychiatry, Pharmacology, and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal and Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (G.P.)
| | - Catherine M Cahill
- Département de Pharmacologie-Physiologie, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Centre d'excellence en neurosciences de l'Univeristé de Sherbrooke, and Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Québec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care and Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, California (C.M.C.); Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (C.M.C.); Departments of Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California (M.v.Z.); Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Peptide Research, Clinical Research Institute of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (P.W.S.); and Departments of Psychiatry, Pharmacology, and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal and Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (G.P.)
| | - Mark von Zastrow
- Département de Pharmacologie-Physiologie, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Centre d'excellence en neurosciences de l'Univeristé de Sherbrooke, and Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Québec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care and Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, California (C.M.C.); Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (C.M.C.); Departments of Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California (M.v.Z.); Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Peptide Research, Clinical Research Institute of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (P.W.S.); and Departments of Psychiatry, Pharmacology, and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal and Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (G.P.)
| | - Peter W Schiller
- Département de Pharmacologie-Physiologie, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Centre d'excellence en neurosciences de l'Univeristé de Sherbrooke, and Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Québec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care and Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, California (C.M.C.); Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (C.M.C.); Departments of Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California (M.v.Z.); Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Peptide Research, Clinical Research Institute of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (P.W.S.); and Departments of Psychiatry, Pharmacology, and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal and Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (G.P.)
| | - Graciela Pineyro
- Département de Pharmacologie-Physiologie, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Centre d'excellence en neurosciences de l'Univeristé de Sherbrooke, and Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Québec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (L.G.); Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care and Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, California (C.M.C.); Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (C.M.C.); Departments of Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California (M.v.Z.); Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Peptide Research, Clinical Research Institute of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (P.W.S.); and Departments of Psychiatry, Pharmacology, and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal and Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (G.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Onali P, Olianas MC. N-Desmethylclozapine, a major clozapine metabolite, acts as a selective and efficacious delta-opioid agonist at recombinant and native receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007; 32:773-85. [PMID: 16841075 DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The present study examined the effects of N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC), a biologically active metabolite of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, at cloned human opioid receptors stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and at native opioid receptors present in NG108-15 cells and rat brain. In CHO cells expressing the delta-opioid receptor (CHO/DOR), NDMC behaved as a full agonist both in stimulating [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding (pEC(50)=7.24) and in inhibiting cyclic AMP formation (pEC(50)=6.40). NDMC inhibited [(3)H]naltrindole binding to CHO/DOR membranes with competition curves that were modulated by guanine nucleotides in an agonist-like manner. Determination of intrinsic efficacies by taking into consideration both the maximal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding stimulation and the extent of receptor occupancy at which half-maximal effect occurred indicated that NDMC had an efficacy value equal to 82% of that of the full delta-opioid receptor agonist DPDPE, whereas clozapine and the other clozapine metabolite clozapine N-oxide displayed much lower levels of agonist efficacy. NDMC exhibited poor agonist activity and lower affinity at the kappa-opioid receptor and was inactive at mu-opioid and NOP receptors. In NG108-15 cells, NDMC inhibited cyclic AMP formation and stimulated the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 by activating the endogenously expressed delta-opioid receptor. Moreover, in membranes of different brain regions, NDMC stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and regulated adenylyl cyclase activity and the effects were potently antagonized by naltrindole. These data demonstrate for the first time that NDMC acts as a selective and efficacious delta-opioid receptor agonist and suggest that this unique property may contribute, at least in part, to the clinical actions of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierluigi Onali
- Department of Neurosciences, Section of Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Olianas MC, Concas D, Onali P. Agonist activity of naloxone benzoylhydrazone at recombinant and native opioid receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2006; 147:360-70. [PMID: 16402046 PMCID: PMC1616995 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
1. In the present study, we examined the pharmacological activity of the putative kappa3-opioid receptor agonist naloxone benzoylhydrazone (NalBzoH) at recombinant human opioid receptors individually expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and native opioid receptors present in rat striatum. 2. At the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), NalBzoH stimulated guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding (pEC50=8.59) and inhibited cyclic AMP accumulation (pEC50=8.74) with maximal effects (Emax) corresponding to 55 and 65% of those obtained with the MOR agonist DAMGO, respectively. The MOR antagonist CTAP blocked the stimulatory effects of NalBzoH and DAMGO with similar potencies. 3. At the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR), NalBzoH stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding (pEC50=9.70) and inhibited cyclic AMP formation (pEC50=9.45) as effectively as the selective KOR agonist (-)-U-50,488. The NalBzoH effect was blocked by the KOR antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) (pKi=10.30). 4. In CHO cells expressing the delta-opioid receptor (DOR), NalBzoH increased [35S]GTPgammaS binding (pEC50=8.49) and inhibited cyclic AMP formation (pEC50=8.61) almost as effectively as the DOR agonist DPDPE. Naltrindole (NTI), a selective DOR antagonist, completely blocked the response to NalBzoH (pKi of 10.40). 5. In CHO cells expressing the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) receptor (NOP), NalBzoH failed to exert agonist effects and antagonized the agonist-induced receptor activation. 6. When compared to other opioid receptor ligands, NalBzoH showed an efficacy that was lower than that of morphine at MOR, but higher at KOR and DOR. 7. In rat striatum, NalBzoH enhanced [35S]GTPgammaS binding and inhibited adenylyl cyclase activity. These effects were antagonized by either CTAP, nor-BNI or NTI, each antagonist blocking a fraction of the NalBzoH response. 8. These data demonstrate that NalBzoH displays agonist activity at MOR, DOR and KOR expressed either in a heterologous cell system or in a native environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Olianas
- Section of Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Danilo Concas
- Section of Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Onali
- Section of Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
- Author for correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Mu-opioid receptor agonists are a mainstay of clinical analgesia, despite the significant unwanted effects and dependence liability associated with drugs like morphine. The quest for opioids that produce analgesia with fewer undesirable effects has lead to the putative identification of multiple opioid receptor subtypes, despite the identification of only four opioid-related receptor genes. One such putative receptor subtype is the kappa3 receptor, activation of which supposedly produces analgesia in animals. In the present issue of this Journal, Olianas and co-workers have demonstrated that the prototypic kappa3 agonist naloxone benzoylhydrazone is actually a partial agonist at the cloned mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors and an antagonist at opioid-like NOP receptors. Together with a recent study that showed that high-affinity naloxone benzoylhydrazone binding is abolished in triple mu/delta/kappa receptor knockout mice, the present study provides strong evidence that in vivo effects attributed to kappa3 receptor activation probably just reflect the combined actions of a particularly nonselective opioid drug. Indeed, molecular identification of any of the proposed subtypes of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors has proven elusive, suggesting that it is perhaps time to retire the notion of opioid receptor subtypes until definitive evidence for their existence is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Connor
- Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, E25, University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, 2065 NSW, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|