Hepatitis B virus infection in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Immune responses to hepatitis B vaccination after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric and young adult patients

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients require hepatitis B (HBV) revaccination. Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) seroconversion rates after revaccination range from 64% to 79% in these patients. The seroconversion rate and factors associated with non-seroconversion have not been clearly elucidated in pediatric and young adult recipients after HSCT.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate anti-HBs seroconversion rates in pediatric and young adult patients revaccinated after HSCT, and to identify factors associated with non-seroconversion.

METHOD

The current study was prospective and cross-sectional. Post-HSCT recipients aged ≤25 years who had completed a course of three HBV revaccinations were recruited, and their anti-HBs titers were assessed. Non-seroconverted patients were administered a fourth vaccination. Those who subsequently remained seronegative were administered two additional vaccinations. Those who remained seronegative after all six vaccinations were defined as non-responders.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were enrolled. The HBV-containing vaccines used included DTaP-IPV-HBV-Hib, DTwP-HBV-Hib, and monovalent vaccines. The anti-HBs seroconversion rate after three revaccinations was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.7-89.2). One patient (0.8%) was classified as non-responder. Factors associated with non-seroconversion after three revaccinations included cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (odds ratio [OR] 10.63, 95% CI 1.16-97.00), anti-HBs seronegativity before HSCT (OR 7.01, 95% CI 1.55-31.78) and three DTwP-HBV-Hib revaccinations (OR 11.71, 95% CI 1.43-96.26).

CONCLUSION

In the current study the anti-HBs seroconversion rate after three HBV revaccinations was excellent. CMV reactivation, anti-HBs seronegativity before HSCT, and three DTwP-HBV-Hib revaccinations were associated with non-seroconversion, but the non-responder rate was low.

Screening and Prophylaxis to Prevent Hepatitis B Reactivation: Transplant Recipients

Organ transplantation is a lifesaving procedure for many patients. To prevent rejection or graft-versus-host disease, recipients require long-term immunosuppression. In patients who have ever been exposed to hepatitis B, it is possible for reactivation to occur; this includes patients who are anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive only or both anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive and hepatitis B surface antibody-positive. The susceptibility to this varies with the nature of the transplant. Hepatitis B can be transmitted from donor to recipient. It is important to assess the hepatitis B status and formulate a strategy to prevent transmission and prevent reactivation.

Management of viral hepatitis in patients with haematological malignancy and in patients undergoing haemopoietic stem cell transplantation: recommendations of the 5th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-5)

Viral hepatitis affects millions of people worldwide, and host immunity is the key determinant of patient outcome. Viral hepatitis can be life threatening in patients with haematological malignancy, including haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, because of the virus itself, or through a need to decrease the dose of chemotherapy. A past or currently infected haemopoietic stem cell donor could also transmit viral hepatitis. The burden of viral hepatitis in patients with haematological malignancies and the weak evidence on which previous guidelines are based has prompted the European Conference on Infection in Leukaemia (ECIL-5) to convene a group of experts in the fields of viral hepatitis and of haematological malignancy to specifically address previously unconsidered issues and grade the available quality of evidence according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America grading system. The group recommends that all patients should be screened for hepatotropic viruses before haematological treatment and that patients or haemopoietic stem cell donors with markers of past or current viral hepatitis should be assessed by an expert. Screening, vaccination, and treatment rules are reported in this Review.

Occult HBV infection in the oncohematological setting

INTRODUCTION

Occult hepatitis B infection (OBI), a virological condition characterized by a low release of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) from liver cells and low HBV-DNA levels in serum and/or liver tissue of HBsAg-negative subjects, may reactivate in oncohematological patients undergoing immunosuppression by aggressive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The entity of OBI reactivation varies from an increase in HBV replication without liver damage to an active HBV replication followed by liver cell necrosis, frequently severe and in some cases life threatening. Because of a possible severe outcome associated with OBI reactivation (hepatic failure or death due to the discontinuation of chemotherapy), prophylaxis with anti-HBV nucleot(s)ide analogues is recommended in relation to the foreseeable degree of immunosuppression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review article focuses on the clinical impact of OBI in the oncohematological setting and is addressed to all health care workers having in care oncohematological patients or involved in the treatment of HBV infection and OBI prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

International guidelines have indicated lamivudine prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and when high-dose corticosteroids or anti-CD20 or anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies are used. Entecavir or tenofovir should replace lamivudine for patients with advanced liver diseases for whom reactivation of OBI may be life threatening. When anti-CD20 or anti-CD52 sparing schedules or other non-aggressive chemotherapies are used, monitoring may be indicated, but very early treatment with highly effective antiviral drugs (entecavir or tenofovir) should be administered once a reactivation of OBI has occurred.

Immunological analysis of a patient with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after bone marrow transplantation

Patients with resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection undergoing chemo- or immunosuppressive therapy are at potential risk for HBV reactivation. To determine whether the host immune response contributes to liver injury, we performed an immunological analysis of a patient with HBV reactivation. Consistent with the detection of HBV DNA in the sera, the number of polyclonal HBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) gradually increased; however, the number of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) decreased. The interaction between HBV-specific CTLs and CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg is an important determinant of liver injury during HBV reactivation. Therefore, monitoring the number of these cells might be a useful modality for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis resulting from HBV reactivation.

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in Japan: efficacy of nucleos(t)ide analogues for prevention and treatment

We retrospectively reviewed 413 recipients with hematologic malignancies who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between June 1986 and March 2013. Recipients with antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and/or to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) were regarded as experiencing previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Clinical data of these recipients were reviewed from medical records. We defined ≥1 log IU/mL increase in serum HBV DNA from nadir as HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive recipients, and also defined ≥1 log IU/mL increase or re-appearance of HBV DNA and/or HBsAg as HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative recipients. In 5 HBsAg-positive recipients, 2 recipients initially not administered with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) experienced HBV reactivation, but finally all 5 were successfully controlled with NUCs. HBV reactivation was observed in 11 (2.7%) of 408 HBsAg-negative recipients; 8 of these were treated with NUCs, and fortunately none developed acute liver failure. In 5 (6.0%) of 83 anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs-positive recipients, HBV reactivation occurred. None of 157 (0%) recipients without HBsAg, anti-HBs or anti-HBc experienced HBV reactivation. In HSCT recipients, HBV reactivation is a common event in HBsAg-positive recipients, or in HBsAg-negative recipients with anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs. Further attention should be paid to HSCT recipients with previous exposure to HBV.

Clinical impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection in immunosuppressed patients

Occult hepatitis B infection (OBI), is characterized by low level hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in circulating blood and/or liver tissue. In clinical practice the presence of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-/anti-HBs-negative subjects is considered indicative of OBI. OBI is mostly observed in the window period of acute HBV infection in blood donors and in recipients of blood and blood products, in hepatitis C virus chronic carriers, in patients under pharmacological immunosuppression, and in those with immunodepression due to HIV infection or cancer. Reactivation of OBI mostly occurs in anti-HIV-positive subjects, in patients treated with immunosuppressive therapy in onco-hematological settings, in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in those treated with anti-CD20 or anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, or anti-tumor necrosis factors antibody for rheumatological diseases, or chemotherapy for solid tumors. Under these conditions the mortality rate for hepatic failure or progression of the underlying disease due to discontinuation of specific treatment can reach 20%. For patients with OBI, prophylaxis with nucleot(s)ide analogues should be based on the HBV serological markers, the underlying diseases and the type of immunosuppressive treatment. Lamivudine prophylaxis is indicated in hemopoietic stem cell transplantation and in onco-hematological diseases when high dose corticosteroids and rituximab are used; monitoring may be indicated when rituximab-sparing schedules are used, but early treatment should be applied as soon as HBsAg becomes detectable. This review article presents an up-to-date evaluation of the current knowledge on OBI.

Clinical impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection in immunosuppressed patients

Occult hepatitis B infection (OBI), is characterized by low level hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in circulating blood and/or liver tissue. In clinical practice the presence of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-/anti-HBs-negative subjects is considered indicative of OBI. OBI is mostly observed in the window period of acute HBV infection in blood donors and in recipients of blood and blood products, in hepatitis C virus chronic carriers, in patients under pharmacological immunosuppression, and in those with immunodepression due to HIV infection or cancer. Reactivation of OBI mostly occurs in anti-HIV-positive subjects, in patients treated with immunosuppressive therapy in onco-hematological settings, in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in those treated with anti-CD20 or anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, or anti-tumor necrosis factors antibody for rheumatological diseases, or chemotherapy for solid tumors. Under these conditions the mortality rate for hepatic failure or progression of the underlying disease due to discontinuation of specific treatment can reach 20%. For patients with OBI, prophylaxis with nucleot(s)ide analogues should be based on the HBV serological markers, the underlying diseases and the type of immunosuppressive treatment. Lamivudine prophylaxis is indicated in hemopoietic stem cell transplantation and in onco-hematological diseases when high dose corticosteroids and rituximab are used; monitoring may be indicated when rituximab-sparing schedules are used, but early treatment should be applied as soon as HBsAg becomes detectable. This review article presents an up-to-date evaluation of the current knowledge on OBI.

Evaluation and management of hepatitis B virus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: before and after transplantation

HBV infection remains a major global health problem and continues to be a common cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality in both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed individuals. Reactivation of HBV is a serious complication of chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy in patients with HBV infection. In this article, we aim to describe the diagnosis, prevention and management of HBV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant candidates, from the pre- to post-transplant period. The data currently available suggest that all individuals with hemato-/onco-logical malignancies who undergo chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy should be screened for hepatotropic viruses such as HBV and HCV. HBV surface antigen-positive individuals who receive chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy are at considerable risk of HBV reactivation. Antiviral prophylaxis prevents HBV reactivation, decreases reactivation-related morbidity and mortality, and prevents interruptions in chemotherapy/immunosuppressive therapy in such individuals. The optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis remains to be elucidated. The vaccination of HBV-naive recipients and their donors against HBV infection prior to transplantation plays an important role in preventing acquired HBV infection. The presence of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity is not an absolute contraindication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Changes of hepatitis B virus serologic status after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and impact of donor immunity on hepatitis B virus

Reverse seroconversion (RS) of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been reported after allogeneic transplantation with an incidence of 14% to 86%. However, most prior studies on HBV RS were performed in HBV nonendemic areas. In this study, the frequency of HBV RS at a single center in Korea, endemic for HBV, was evaluated. Also, the influence of the donor's immunity for HBV on posttransplantation HBV serologic changes in recipients was also investigated. A total of 288 patients underwent allogeneic transplantation between February 1996 and June 2008. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 288 patients and their paired donors. Among the 268 HBsAg(-) patients, 205 were assessed for posttransplantation HBsAg, and 114 (55.6%) of 205 had HBcAb before transplantation. With a median follow-up of 77.9 months, 3 of 114 patients experienced HBV RS (2.6%). With regard to donor immunity, significantly more patients with anti-HBs(-) donors experienced anti-HBs loss (P = .006), and the donor anti-HBs showed significant protective effects against the anti-HBs loss with an HR of 0.4. HBV RS after allogeneic transplantation may not be as common in HBV endemic areas. Also, donor anti-HBs showed a significant favorable effect on maintaining HBV immunity in recipients.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Reactivation of resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been reported in allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, but its epidemiology is not well characterized. We performed a retrospective assessment of the timing and risk factors of HBV reactivation among patients with resolved HBV infection undergoing allogeneic HSCT between January 2000 and March 2008. HBV reactivation was defined as development of positive hepatitis B surface antigen after transplant. Among the 61 patients with resolved HBV infection before transplant (hepatitis B core antibody-positive, hepatitis B surface antigen-negative), 12 (19.7%) developed HBV reactivation. The cumulative probability of HBV reactivation 1, 2, and 4 years after transplant was 9.0%, 21.7%, and 42.9%, respectively. In a time-dependent Cox model, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of HBV reactivation for patients with pretransplant hepatitis B surface antibody levels <10 milli-international units per milliliter (mIU/mL) was 4.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-16.9) compared to those with levels > or =10 mIU/mL; the adjusted HR among patients who developed extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was 7.21 (95% CI 1.25-41.5) compared to those who did not. HBV reactivation is a common late complication among allogeneic HSCT recipients with pretransplant resolved infection. Screening for HBV reactivation should be considered for at-risk HSCT recipients. In this cohort, HBV reactivation often developed in patients with cGVHD. Liver biopsy was useful in those patients with both to delineate the contribution of each to liver dysfunction.

Lamivudine for the prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis-B surface antigen (HBSAG) seropositive cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the major causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Cancer patients who are chronic carriers of HBV have a higher hepatic complication rate while receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) and this has mainly been attributed to HBV reactivation. In this study, cancer patients who have solid and hematological malignancies with chronic HBV infection received the antiviral agent lamivudine prior and during CT compared with historical control group who did not receive lamivudine. The objectives were to assess the efficacy of lamivudine in reducing the incidence of HBV reactivation, and diminishing morbidity and mortality during CT. Two groups were compared in this study. The prophylactic lamivudin group consisted of 37 patients who received prophylactic lamivudine treatment. The historical controls consisted of 50 consecutive patients who underwent CT without prophylactic lamivudine. They were followed up during and for 8 weeks after CT. The outcomes were compared for both groups. Of our control group (n= 50), 21 patients (42%) were established hepatitis. Twelve (24%) of them were evaluated as severe hepatitis. In the prophylactic lamivudine group severe hepatitis were observed only in 1 patient (2.7%) of 37 patients (p < 0.006). Comparison of the mean ALT values revealed significantly higher mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values in the control group than the prophylactic lamivudine group; 154:64 (p < 0.32). Our study suggests that prophylactic lamivudine significantly decreases the incidence of HBV reactivation and overall morbidity in cancer patients during and after immunosuppressive therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the most appropriate nucleoside or nucleotide analogue for antiviral prophylaxis during CT and the optimal duration of administration after completion of CT.

[Management of hepatitis B virus reactivation during chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy]

Reactivation of viral hepatitis B is a well-known complication in patients receiving chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy; its incidence reaches 50%. This reactivation is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic treatment of viral reactivation with lamivudine resulted in lowering the incidence of this risk and improving prognosis in recent studies. Patients with hematological malignancies and other cancers require a precise assessment of their hepatitis B status and adequate management. There is not yet a consensus about the appropriateness of prophylactic treatment of occult hepatitis B infection or of pretreatment virologic assessment, especially measurement of viral DNA.

Hepatitis B reactivation after chemotherapy: two decades of clinical research

Hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus reactivation after cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy is a serious cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. With the characterization of the underlying pathogenesis, much progress in the management of this important clinical problem has been made in the past 2 decades. By year 2008, it is mandatory to screen for hepatitis B surface antigen status before initiating intensive chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. All those who are hepatitis B surface antigen positive should be started on preemptive nucleos(t)ide analogues. However, there remains important issues, such as the type and duration of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, which need to be understood. As not all hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients will suffer from HBV reactivation, it is therefore useful to identify risk factors related to HBV reactivation so that patients will not be treated unnecessarily with nucleos(t)ide analogues. To date, a high baseline level of viral replication, as reflected by high serum HBV DNA level, positive serum hepatitis B e antigen, and a high intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA level, is the most important predictor for HBV reactivation. Recently, there has been an increased awareness of reactivation of occult hepatitis B virus, especially in hepatitis B virus endemic area, such as the Asia-Pacific region. Careful epidemiological study will be needed to clarify the impact of occult hepatitis B infection in patients treated with cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy.

Management of viral hepatitis in hematologic malignancies

Viral hepatitis is the third major cause of liver dysfunction in allogeneic transplant recipients and has become a significant concern in patients with hematological malignancies receiving chemotherapy. Thus, identification of patients at risk for viral hepatitis is very important when evaluating and treating hematological malignancies. Serologic screening for all patients should include anti-HCV, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) testing. Current therapies for hepatitis B (HBV) virus infection are aimed at viral suppression, while treatment for hepatitis C (HCV) virus can eradicate infection in many treated patients. To prevent HBV viral reactivation, prophylaxis with nucleoside analogues should be initiated for all HBsAg-positive patients. HCV infection appears to have little impact on short-term survival after bone marrow transplantation (BMT), but eventually can impact long-term survival due to progression of liver disease. In this review we will highlight the mechanisms of virus reactivation, clinical manifestations, and management strategies to minimize acute and chronic morbidity in this population.

Antiviral prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers are at considerable risk of reactivation of HBV infection when undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Complications of HBV reactivation, including asymptomatic elevation of HBV DNA levels, acute hepatitis, acute liver failure, and delays or dose reductions in chemotherapy, are avoidable with appropriate prophylactic oral antiviral therapy. This article reviews evidence for and presents a grade A recommendation supporting primary prophylaxis among HBV carriers with lamivudine. The dose and duration of prophylaxis, risk of lamivudine resistance, and future directions of prophylactic therapy for HBV reactivation during chemotherapy are discussed. Recommendations are suggested based on expert opinion for prophylaxis with the combination of lamivudine plus adefovir or with entecavir as alternative antiviral strategies that substantially reduce or avoid the risk of HBV antiviral drug resistance.

Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: The liver as a risk factor

Patients with liver dysfunction have an increased risk of developing early and late complications after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). That's why it is mandatory to evaluate liver status before transplantation in all cases. This evaluation should allow us to decide whether HSCT can be performed or whether we should adopt measures focused on preventing these complications. The evaluation of the liver in an HSCT candidate requires the collection of information by history-taking, physical examination, liver-function tests and, occasionally, imaging tests and liver biopsy. Additionally, as infection by hepatitis B or C viruses represents the most relevant cause of hepatic dysfunction after HSCT, the serological status of the patient should be carefully evaluated. This chapter tries to analyse and systematise the most important aspects in the patient's evaluation. Finally, as some liver dysfunctions in the stem-cell donor can have a negative impact for the donor during the harvest and/or for the recipient during HSCT, the methodology to evaluate the donors will also be analysed.

Systematic review: lamivudine prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection in asymptomatic hepatitis B surface antigen carriers undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy is a well-documented and potentially fatal complication. Data supporting the use of lamivudine for primary prophylaxis have emerged, but its use remains controversial and is not standardized.

AIM

To review current randomized-controlled trials, randomized trials and prospective case series to provide a clinically applicable, evidence-based recommendation.

METHODS

The published literature was identified using a MEDLINE/PubMed search with secondary review of cited publications, and inclusion of all prospective studies.

RESULTS

In nine prospective trials and one randomized-controlled trial, the rate of hepatitis among subjects receiving lamivudine prophylaxis ranged from 0% to 20% (16 of 173, 9.2%), compared with 33-67% among controls. Of patients receiving prophylaxis, 0-24% (15 of 173, 8.7%) developed hepatitis B virus reactivation, compared with 29-56% of controls. Three reactivation-related mortalities were reported (one receiving prophylaxis, two controls). No patients withdrew secondary to toxicity or development of lamivudine-resistant mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The available data show a four- to sevenfold decrease in the rate of hepatitis and hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients who receive lamivudine prophylaxis. It is thus recommended that all hepatitis B surface antigen carriers receive lamivudine, or a comparable anti-viral agent, as prophylaxis from the initiation of chemotherapy until at least 1 year following its completion.

Lamivudine prophylaxis in HBV carriers with haemato-oncological malignancies who receive chemotherapy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a well-recognized complication of chemo/immunosuppressive therapy in individuals who are HBV surface antigen-positive inactive carriers and in individuals with chronic HBV infection. Although it is well established that chemo/immunosuppressive therapy enhances HBV replication with a resultant increase in the viral load and disease activation, the role of prophylactic lamivudine therapy to prevent chemo/immunosuppressive therapy-induced HBV activation in HBV-positive individuals who are to receive chemo/immunosuppressive therapy remains controversial. The aims of the present article are: (i) to determine the effect of lamivudine prophylaxis in HBV carriers with haemato-oncological malignancies who require chemotherapy; (ii) to define the duration and safety of lamivudine in such individuals; and (iii) to identify the effect of lamivudine prophylaxis on the outcome of chemotherapy administered for the primary disease. The data currently available suggest that lamivudine prophylaxis prevents chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation in HBV carriers with haemato-oncological malignancies who receive chemotherapy. Lamivudine is safe and tolerable in such individuals. The duration of lamivudine prophylaxis is not yet known; however, it would appear prudent to begin lamivudine at the time of the initiation of the chemotherapy and to continue it throughout the period of chemotherapy administration and for at least 1 and possibly 2 years following the discontinuation of the chemotherapy. Finally, the prophylactic use of lamivudine in inactive HBV carriers with haemato-oncological malignancy prevents interruptions in their treatment for primary disease as a result of HBV reactivation.

Infections among allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients in India

SUMMARY

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing high-dose therapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) despite prophylaxis, use of growth factors and newer antimicrobial drugs. We report the clinical profile of infections among 297 patients who underwent 304 allogeneic transplants between 1986 and December 2001. All patients developed febrile neutropenia. There were 415 documented infections among 304 transplants. This included bacterial (34.9%), viral (42.9%), fungal (15.9%) and other infections (6.3%) including tuberculosis. Bacterial pathogens were mainly Gram-negative bacteria (80%) as compared to Gram-positive (20%) bacteria. The common Gram-negative bacteria were nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) (24.9%), Pseudomonas (17.9%), Escherichia coli (17.9%) and Klebsiella (9.7%). The major source of positive cultures was blood (53.7%) followed by urine (25.5%) and sputum (8.9%). In all, 133/304 (43.7%) transplants had 178 documented viral infections. The common viral infections were due to cytomegalovirus, herpes group of viruses and transfusion-related hepatitis; and 60/304 (19.7%) transplants had 66 documented fungal infections. Common fungi included Aspergillus species (69.7%), Candida (22.2%) and Zygomycetes (8.1%). Tuberculosis was documented in 2.3% of the transplants. Catheter infections were suspected or documented in 7.8% of the transplants (24/304). The incidence of infections in this series from developing countries is not significantly different from reports from the West. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2004) 33, 311-315. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1704347 Published online 1 December 2003

HEPATITIC GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE AFTER HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION: CLINICOPATHOLOGIC FEATURES AND PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATION

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the liver after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation classically presents with increased bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. A hepatitic variant was recently recognized, with more than a 10-fold increase in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. This study defines the clinicopathologic features and prognostic implications of hepatitic GVHD compared with classic liver GVHD.

METHOD

A total of 38 cases of hepatitic GVHD, 68 cases of classic liver GVHD, and 13 cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were analyzed.

RESULTS

Hepatitic GVHD cases showed significantly higher ALT, AST, and ALP levels compared with classic liver GVHD cases (at onset, mean ALT: 154 vs. 58 U/L, P <0.001; AST: 167 vs. 77 U/L, P <0.001; at peak, ALT: 435 vs. 112 U/L, P <0.001; AST: 587 vs. 150 U/L, P <0.001; ALP: 416 vs. 238 U/L, P =0.001), persisted longer (74 vs. 32 days, P =0.006), and showed more lobular pathologic changes in biopsy (lobular changes: 16/26 vs. 4/19, P =0.007; hepatocyte necrosis: 16/26 vs. 6/19, P =0.008; acidophil bodies: 15/26 vs. 4/19, P =0.014) but less cholestasis (4/26 vs. 8/19, P =0.045). However, cumulative doses of immunosuppressants prescribed, response, and outcome were similar. Compared with hepatitic GVHD, HBV-related hepatitis occurred later (95 vs. 184 days, P =0.049), but clinical and biochemical profiles were similar, requiring liver biopsies for their distinction.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitic and classic liver GVHD differed biochemically and pathologically, but these differences showed no obvious impact on outcome. The distinction of hepatitic GVHD from other hepatitis is mandatory.

Lamivudine prophylaxis for prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B virus carriers with malignancies

Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV carriers undergoing immunosuppressive therapy is clearly documented, the role of antiviral prophylaxis in such individuals is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of lamivudine prophylaxis in HBV carriers with haemato/oncological malignancies, who receive chemotherapy. Eighteen HBV carriers with malignancy, who were candidates for chemotherapy, were enrolled. Eight subjects (three with leukaemia, four with lymphoma and one with multiple myeloma) were enrolled for prophylactic lamivudine therapy. The remaining 10 patients (six with leukaemia, three with lymphoma and one with breast cancer) were not treated with lamivudine and were used as a control. Lamivudine was administered beginning on the same day as the chemotherapy and was maintained for a year after chemotherapy was discontinued. No HBV-related mortality was observed in either group. In the lamivudine-treated group, none of the subjects had clinical, biochemical or serological evidence of HBV reactivation during the time they were receiving chemotherapy and after their chemotherapy was discontinued. In contrast, five of the 10 HBV carriers not receiving lamivudine therapy experienced a reactivation of HBV infection. This reactivation of HBV was observed during the chemotherapy in four with one individual experiencing a HBV activation 12 months after chemotherapy was discontinued. No lamivudine-related major adverse effects were observed. Hence prophylactic lamivudine treatment in HBV carriers with haemato/oncological malignancy receiving chemotherapy prevents chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation.

Hepatitis B virus vaccination of recipients and donors of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination as defined by the seroconversion to hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) positivity in peripheral blood stem cell transplants.

METHODS

A total of 65 recipients and their donors were enrolled in this study. Recipients were divided into four distinct groups. Group 1 consisted of individuals who were vaccinated, group 2 consisted of individuals who were naturally immunized, group 3 consisted of individuals who were HBs-Ag positive, and group 4 consisted of individuals who were HBV naïve and not vaccinated.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight percent of the HBV-vaccinated recipients (14 of 16), who had vaccinated-donors, seroconverted to anti-HBs positivity. Eighty-three percent of HBV-naïve recipients (five of six), who received stem cells from HBV-immune donors, seroconverted to anti-HBs positivity. Two of the four HBs-Ag positive recipients with HBV-immune donors seroconverted to anti-HBs positivity after transplantation. Fifty-seven percent of previously vaccinated-recipients (eight of 14) lost detectable anti-HBs antibody following transplantation. Finally, 31% of HBV-naïve recipients with HBV-naïve donors acquired a de novo HBV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

(i) Hepatitis B virus immunization of recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation results in an effective antibody response. (ii) The HBV-immune status of the donor plays an important role in post-transplantation HBs-Ab on seroconversion. (iii) Systematic re-immunization of recipients will be necessary to maintain HBV immunity in long-term serving recipients.

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

Hepatitis due to reactivation of hepatitis B virus is an important cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients undergoing autologous hematopoeitic cell transplantation. With the recent introduction of sensitive serum HBV DNA quantitation assay, the diagnosis of hepatitis B reactivation can now be made more reliably. As these hepatitis are driven by the host immune response to a surge of hepatitis B viral load, the availability of effective nucleoside analogues which can inhibit hepatitis B viral replication has opened up new approaches to this previously untreatable condition. Up till now, two such nucleoside analogues, lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. However, further studies are needed to determine which nucleoside analogues should be chosen in this transplant setting. Due to the high dose chemotherapy generally needed in autologous hematopoeitic cell transplantation, there is a high risk of post-transplant hepatitis B reactivation. Hence, all HBsAg positive patients undergoing autologous hematopoeitic cell transplantation should preferably be treated pre-emptively with nucleoside analogous. An alternative approach is to defer treatment with nucleoside analogous until there is evidence of hepatitis B virological reactivation. However, the latter approach would need the patient's hepatitis B viral load be monitored at a very close interval and might not be cost-effective.

Role of liver biopsy in the management of liver dysfunction after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in a hepatitis B virus-prevalent patient population

BACKGROUND

Derangement of liver function tests (LFT) is common after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). The role of liver biopsy in such cases has not been defined in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-prevalent patients. The impact of liver biopsy in the management of LFT derangement after HSCT in an HBV-prevalent population was examined.

METHODS

Seventy-five liver biopsies, performed for 323 patients with LFT derangement post-HSCT (263 allogeneic, 60 autologous), were analyzed. The HBV carrier rate was 13.6%.

RESULTS

Significantly more LFT derangements and therefore liver biopsies occurred in allogeneic versus autologous HSCT. Before biopsy, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and HBV reactivation were clinically diagnosed in 70.6% and 25.3% of cases, respectively. A definite histopathologic diagnosis was obtained after biopsy in 53 cases, with GVHD, HBV hepatitis, and concomitant GVHD-HBV hepatitis found in 33%, 21%, and 8% of cases, respectively. The clinical and histopathologic diagnoses were concordant in 43 cases and discordant in 9 cases. Clinical management was altered in six of nine discordant cases, five of which were caused by HBV or hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation. Twenty-two biopsy specimens showed nondiagnostic histopathologic features. Twenty of these cases were successfully managed on the basis of clinical diagnoses. The clinical-biochemical features of patients clinically diagnosed to have GVHD did not differ significantly whether or not they were HBV-HCV carriers. However, liver biopsies in HBV-HCV carriers resulted in significantly more treatment alterations as compared with noncarriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical diagnoses of LFT derangements post-HSCT might be adequate for initiation of treatment, but liver biopsies in HBV-HCV carriers were needed, as this might impact on management.

Prophylaxis with lamivudine of hepatitis B virus reactivation in chronic HbsAg carriers with hemato-oncological neoplasias treated with chemotherapy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is well documented complication of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy in asymptomatic HBV carriers. Its clinical manifestation include fulminant hepatitis which may result in fatal liver failure. With the more widespread use of chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the problem of delivering potentially harmful treatment to HBV carriers is becoming increasingly frequent. Until recently the management of HBV reactivation has been mainly supportive. With the introduction of lamivudine, a highly effective nucleoside analogue against HBV with an excellent toxicity profile has become available. However, in light of the possibility that its prolonged use may foster the emergence of mutant lamivudine-resistant HBV strain, caution is required before recommending its widespread use. The present review briefly addresses the epidemiological, pathogenetic and clinical aspects of HBV reactivation as well the predisposing factors to its development. The results obtained with lamivudine both as treatment and as prophylaxis of hepatic flares are analysed in detail in order to provide a rational basis for clinical decisions before treating HBV carriers with chemotherapy.

Transfer of humoral and cellular hepatitis B immunity by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Previous data indicate that a transfer of specific humoral and cellular immunity by way of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) should, in principle, be possible.

METHODS

In the HCT setting with a follow-up of up to 55 months, we studied the transfer of hepatitis B virus (HBV) specific immunity from electively immunized donors into HLA compatible recipients suffering from chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). After excluding preexisting HBV specific immunity in donor-recipient pairs, 27 prospective donors were vaccinated against HBV. In addition, on an average of 22 months postHCT, 8 of the 19 recipients were immunized once for HBV.

RESULTS

Donor vaccination resulted in detectable hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibodies in 85% of donors and specific cellular in vitro responses in 77%. Two weeks postHCT, 86 and 67% of the recipients displayed positive humoral and cellular HBV reactions, respectively, which then decreased. Afterwards, HBV immunity reappeared in 83% of the recipients without revaccination. Following a single vaccination in recipients, seven of eight displayed a typical memory response. An HBV specific response was already detectable 1 week after vaccination, approximately 1,300-fold (humoral) and 60-fold (cellular) higher than observed in the corresponding donors after a single immunization.

CONCLUSIONS

The "spontaneous" recurrence of HBV immunity and the memory response in recipients give evidence for an elective immune transfer (e.g., for viral antigens) by way of allogeneic HCT.

Hepatitis B and C infection in children undergoing chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation

Despite preventive measures, patients who have cancer or who undergo bone marrow transplantation remain at higher risk of viral infection since they often receive multiple blood products. This category of patients also includes subjects from countries that are highly endemic for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection and who travel to developed countries for specialized treatment. This review discusses the current opinions concerning the diagnostic, clinical, and therapeutic aspects of hepatitis B and C virus infection in different groups of patients: children with chronic infection before chemotherapy, children infected during chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation, and patients with chronic infection after the end of treatment.

Changes in hepatitis B virus serology in bone marrow transplanted children

Suppression of the immune system and reconstitution of the donor's immune system may affect the course of a chronic viral infection in the recipients. The aim of this study is to evaluate changes in hepatitis B virus (HBV) serology after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). HBV serology and hepatic function tests were examined in 45 children before and after BMT. Before BMT, 40 patients were HBsAg negative and 5 positive. There were no HBsAg positive donors. HBsAg disappeared in two patients and anti-HBs became positive in one. Donors of these patients were anti-HBs positive. In a third patient, acute HBV infection developed and lasted without complication. This patient also seroconverted to anti-HBs. Anti-HBs disappeared in 7 of 21 anti-HBs positive patients. Among 18 patients who were HBsAg and anti-HBs negative, 11 seroconverted to anti-HBs positivity. Our findings support the notion that having an anti-HBs positive donor is important for adoptive immunity transfer and for preventing HBV replication.

Preemptive use of lamivudine reduces hepatitis B exacerbation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Exacerbation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients undergoing transplantation. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of lamivudine to prevent hepatitis due to exacerbation of HBV in HBsAg-positive patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. We studied 20 consecutive HBsAg-positive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation who received lamivudine 100 mg daily starting one week before transplantation until week 52 after transplantation (group 1). Serial serum alanine aminotransferase and HBV DNA levels were measured before and after transplantation at 4- to 8-week intervals for the first year and then 4- to 12-week intervals. Their virologic and clinical outcomes were compared with 20 case-matched recipients who did not receive any antiviral therapy to HBV (anti-HBV) before and after hematopoietic cell transplantation (group 2). After transplantation, 9 patients (45%) in group 2 and one patient (5%) in group 1 had hepatitis due to exacerbation of HBV (P <.008), with 3 hepatic failures in group 2 and none in group 1. The one-year actuarial probability of survival without hepatitis due to exacerbation of HBV was higher in group 1 than group 2 (94.1% vs. 54.3%, P =.002). By multivariate Cox analysis, preemptive use of lamivudine effectively reduced hepatitis due to exacerbation of HBV (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.09; P =.021). In conclusion, preemptive lamivudine reduced HBV exacerbation. The use of lamivudine with other immunosuppressive regimens to prevent exacerbation of HBV should be further explored.

Detection of reactivation and genetic mutations of the hepatitis B virus in patients with chronic hepatitis B infections receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study elucidates the profiles for hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and genetic mutation of the core promoter and precore regions for HBV-carriers receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Sera from 20 HSCT patients diagnosed with hematological diseases, 13 donors and 36 healthy HBV-carriers, were collected regularly for analysis. The hepatic biochemistry profiles, serological HBV markers, and HBV-DNA titers were checked regularly, and primer-amplification of the HBV core promoter or precore region and sequencing were performed once the mutations were identified.

RESULTS

Deteriorated liver function was demonstrated for 13 of 20 post-HSCT patients, compared with none of the 36 controls (P<0.01). The HBV-DNA was detected more frequently for post-HSCT subjects than for controls (P=0.001). Incidence of the HBV precore nucleotide 1896 G-to-A mutation was significantly higher for HSCT patients (P=0.004), and a significant association was demonstrated for carriage of core promoter or precore mutations and the development of hepatitis (P=0.015). Different HBV genotypes were revealed in post-HSCT patients and the respective donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive chemotherapy and immunosuppression may cause HBV reactivation in HBV carriers receiving HSCT, and more frequent core promoter or precore mutations could be detected in HBV carriers receiving HSCT than healthy HBV carriers, with the chemotherapy/immunosuppression-induced immunocompromise possibly contributing to this effect. Donor HBV genotype did not interfere with that of the recipient after HSCT. Core promoter or precore region mutations were associated with a higher incidence of liver dysfunction than wild-type HBV carriers in the HSCT patients.

Retrospective study on the impact of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infection on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan

We performed a retrospective survey in 62 hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) centers in Japan in which all HCTs performed between 1986 and 1998 were reviewed, and those involving hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donors were identified. One hundred and thirty-five patients who underwent allogeneic HCT (alloHCT) were studied for complications related to hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). The median follow-up period was 24 months. Positivity for HBsAg was observed in 32 patients (24%) throughout the study. Twenty-six of the 32 patients were HBsAg carriers before alloHCT, whereas the remaining 6 became HBsAg(+) after alloHCT. Forty-two recipients were anti-HBs antibody (HBsAb)-positive, and 58 recipients (43%) were HCV Ab(+). Eleven of 26 (42%) HBsAg(+) recipients survived between >4 and >119 months. Six of 26 cases received transplants from HBsAg(+) donors, and, although they had not developed acute graft-versus-host disease, 4 of 6 died of hepatic and renal failure within 10 months after HCT. After transplantation, 5 patients showed serologic evidence of HBV reactivation, whereas 4 patients showed evidence of an immune response to HBV. Viral reactivation occurred during the tapering of the immunosuppressive agent. However, 3 of 5 were alive at the time of this report, suggesting that reactivation is not directly correlated with severe liver dysfunction. Seventeen patients (13%) of 135 recipients developed hepatic failure. Eight (47%) of 17 were diagnosed with fulminant hepatitis and 5 (29%) with veno-occlusive disease (VOD). VOD was observed in 12% of both HBsAg(+) and HCVAb(+) patients. In this study, the relatively high incidence of HBV events occurred after alloHCT, and, therefore, we should consider a protocol for active immunization of donors and recipients against HBV. Moreover, although the presence of HBV or HCV is not a contraindication for alloHCT, we recommend a careful follow-up of recipients after transplantation, especially during immunosuppression tapering.

High hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA viral load as the most important risk factor for HBV reactivation in patients positive for HBV surface antigen undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

The risk factors for hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) treated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are unknown. We evaluated 137 consecutive patients (23 positive for HBsAg, 37 positive for hepatitis B surface antibody, and 77 negative for HBV) who underwent HCT. Serial serum ALT were measured before transplant and after transplant at 1 to 4 weekly intervals for the first year and then at 2 to 12 weekly intervals thereafter. Before HCT, basic core promoter (T(1762)/A(1764)) and precore (A(1896)) HBV variants were determined in HBsAg-positive and HBV DNA-positive (by polymerase chain reaction assay) patients by direct sequencing and serum HBV DNA quantitation using the Digene Hybrid Capture II assay. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the association between pretransplantation HBV virologic and host factors and occurrence of hepatitis due to HBV reactivation. After HCT, hepatitis due to HBV reactivation was more common in HBsAg-positive patients than in HBsAg-negative patients (hazard ratio, 33.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.35-142.86; P <.0001). HBsAg-positive patients with detectable serum HBV DNA before HCT (on Digene assay) had a significantly higher risk of hepatitis due to HBV reactivation than HBsAg-positive patients with no detectable serum HBV DNA (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.35; 95% CI, 1.65-52.6; P =.012). Thus, we found that hepatitis due to HBV reactivation is common in HBsAg-positive patients undergoing autologous HCT. A high HBV DNA level (>10(5) copies/mL) was the most important risk factor for HBV reactivation, and its lowering by administration of nucleoside analogues before transplantation should be considered.

Successful allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HBV-positive donor into an HBV-positive recipient using lamivudine

A 21-year-old woman with severe aplastic anemia underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor. The patient also had chronic hepatitis B and the donor was an HBV carrier. To decrease HBV and improve hepatic dysfunction before BMT, the patient had received lamivudine for 6 months. After marrow transfusion, administration of lamivudine was continued to inhibit replication of donor-derived HBV. The patient showed hematological engraftment on day 13 without any serious liver dysfunction. Eight months after BMT, she is now alive and well without chronic liver GVHD or reactivation of hepatitis B. HBV-DNA was not detected in the patient's serum. Administration of lamivudine to a BMT recipient with chronic hepatitis B may be a safe and promising way to prevent fatal liver dysfunction in the setting of allogeneic BMT, even in the event of BMT from an HBV-positive donor.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy--pathogenesis and management

In an endemic area for chronic hepatitis B infection, reactivation of this virus is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy. Careful prospective serological testing has shown that hepatitis B virus reactivation is a two-staged process. The initial stage occurs during intense cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy and is characterised by enhanced viral replication, as reflected by increases in the serum levels of hepatitis B virus DNA, hepatitis B e antigen, hepatitis B virus DNA polymerase and infection of naïve hepatocytes with hepatitis B virus. The second stage is related to restoration of immune function following withdrawal of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy, which causes rapid immune-mediated destruction of infected hepatocytes. Clinically, this can lead to hepatitis, hepatic failure and even death. The occurrence and severity of hepatitis B virus reactivation after various cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy is unpredictable and treatment has been disappointing, largely due to the late administration of therapy. Recently, pre-emptive treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients undergoing cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy, with potent nucleoside analogues has shown some promising results. Further controlled studies are needed to define the incidence and risk factors of hepatitis B reactivation so that pre-emptive treatment with nucleoside analogues could be administered to those patients at high risk of disease.

Use of immunomodulatory therapy (other than interferon) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major health threat in Asia. In order to design a better therapeutic regimen, the underlying mechanism of HBV viral persistence must be understood. Immunological studies have found that impaired HBV virus-specific T cell reactivity is the major cause of chronic infection, whereas strong and multispecific T cell responses to HBV are associated with long-term control, but not elimination of the virus. Furthermore, in the serological clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation, HBsAg seroconversion is associated with activation of the donor's hepatitis B core antigen-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes. This suggests that the donor's hepatitis B core antigen-specific CD4+ T cells provide 'intermolecular T cell help' for the HBsAg seroconversion. These findings are relevant to the future development of therapeutic vaccines or DNA vaccine as immunotherapy for chronic hepatitis B. Apart from interferon-alpha, thymosin alpha1 (Talpha1) has been investigated for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled studies investigating the safety and efficacy of Talpha1 monotherapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B showed that 6 months treatment with Talpha1 (1.6 mg twice weekly) almost doubles the sustained response rate (36%) compared with controls (19%; P=0.04). However, more specific immunological approaches are being developed; notably, hepatitis B core antigen-based therapeutic vaccine was found to induce T cell proliferative responses in chronically infected hepatitis B patients to the T helper epitope included in the construct. However, the cytokine profile observed suggested the induction of a T helper 0/T helper 2 CD4+ T cell response rather than T helper 1 response. Thus, its combination with interferon-gamma or interleukin-12, which might reverse the CD4+T cell response, should be considered. In the future, it is likely that different types of combination therapy may have to be tailor-made for chronic HBV infection with different virological and immunological profiles and different degrees of liver damage.

Differences in liver pathology and clinical outcome between two patients with hepatitis B virus and graft versus host disease

Our two patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (AlloBMT) had both Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In the first patient, liver enzymes elevated three months after AlloBMT, and GVHD was diagnosed. Two weeks after the diagnosis of GVHD, HBsAg appeared in his serum. At that time, liver biopsy was not able to discriminate two disorders, but his sequential liver biopsies disclosed GVHD. Despite the patient was treated with cyclosporin A (CsA), he died for chronic GVHD. In contrast to the first patient, the second patient had HBsAg prior to GVHD. His liver enzymes deterioration was detected in the first month after AlloBMT, and reached the highest level in the third month while withdrawing CsA. In the fifth month he developed scleradermatous skin changes, and skin biopsy revealed chronic GVHD, whereas concurrent liver biopsy revealed chronic active hepatitis. This observation showed that immunosuppressive conditions such as GVHD or its prophylaxis may affect the appearance of liver pathology caused by HBV, which depends on the time of GVHD development, and the duration and depth of GVHD prophylaxis.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from non-replicative hepatitis B virus carriers is safe

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis B virus can cause serious problems in individuals undergoing organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hepatic events among HBs-Ag positive recipients and HBs-Ag negative recipients who received products from hepatitis B virus carriers.

METHODS

A total of 151 patients received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the Department of Hematology-Oncology, University of Ankara, between June 1989 and June 1998. Among these, eight HBs-Ag positive and four HBs-Ag negative recipients received a product from a hepatitis B virus positive donor. The median follow-up period for these 12 patients was 13.2 months.

RESULTS

Three of the eight HBs-Ag positive recipients died (one from hepatic failure); of the remainder, two are HBs-Ag negative, two HBs-Ag positive with normal liver injury tests and one HBs-Ag positive with elevated ALT levels. Of the four HBs-Ag negative recipients who received stem cells from a hepatitis B positive donor, two died; none of the patients in this group became HBs-Ag positive after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis B virus infection is a common problem in patients being considered for allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation, especially in areas where hepatitis B virus infection is endemic. We believe that the presence of HBs-Ag positivity is not an absolute contraindication for allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation unless the hepatitis B virus is in a replication phase.