A comparative study of sequential priming and mobilisation of progenitor cells with rhG-CSF alone and high-dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF

Neutropenic fever during peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization is associated with decreased CD34+ cell collection and increased apheresis collection days

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization with chemotherapy in addition to Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) improves cell collection compared to G-CSF alone; however, it is associated with increased risk of neutropenic fever (NF).

METHODS

We analyzed risk factors for post-priming NF and NF association with autologous stem cell transplant outcomes. Between 1998 and 2008, 593 adult patients with lymphoma underwent PBPC mobilization with etoposide and G-CSF.

RESULTS

Median age was 51 years (range 18-77) and 372 (63%) were male. Diagnoses were 457 (77%) non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 136 (23%) Hodgkin lymphoma. Of 554 (93%) transplanted patients, majority were in complete or partial remission at time of transplant (88%). Overall, 141 (24%) patients were hospitalized for NF. Nine patients (6%) had bacteremia, 4 (3%) had pneumonia, 2 (<1%) had herpes simplex viral infections, and the remaining 126 (90%) had no identified infection source. NF patients had lower likelihood of proceeding to transplant (86% vs. 96%, P < .001), lower CD34+ cell dose collection (median 7.23 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg vs. 8.98 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, P = .002), and were more likely to require > 4 days of apheresis (48% vs. 37%, P < .001). NF was associated with a higher 30-day readmission rate following transplant hospitalization (17% vs. 9%, P = .012).

CONCLUSION

NF during etoposide priming is associated with lower likelihood of proceeding to transplant, lower CD34+ cell dose collection, more apheresis days required for collection and a higher 30-day readmission rate following transplant discharge.

Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study

Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (C+G-CSF) is one of the most widely used stem cell (SC) mobilization regimens for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Plerixafor plus G-CSF (P+G-CSF) has demonstrated superior SC mobilization efficacy when compared with G-CSF alone and has been shown to rescue patients who fail mobilization with G-CSF or C+G-CSF. Despite the proven efficacy of P+G-CSF in upfront SC mobilization, its use has been limited, mostly due to concerns of high price of the drug. However, a comprehensive comparison of the efficacy and cost effectiveness of SC mobilization using C+G-CSF versus P+G-CSF is not available. In this study, we compared 111 patients receiving C+G-CSF to 112 patients receiving P+G-CSF. The use of P+G-CSF was associated with a higher success rate of SC collection defined as ⩾5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (94 versus 83%, P=0.013) and less toxicities. Thirteen patients in the C+G-CSF arm were hospitalized owing to complications while none in the P+G-CSF group. C+G-CSF was associated with higher financial burden as assessed using institutional-specific costs and charges (P<0.001) as well as using Medicare reimbursement rates (P=0.27). Higher rate of hospitalization, increased need for salvage mobilization, and increased G-CSF use account for these differences.

Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in PBSC mobilization for autologous hematopoietic SCT: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Trial outcomes comparing cytokine agents for PBSC mobilization in autologous hematopoietic transplant patients have been controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence available on pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in chemo-cytokine mobilization. Electronic literature searches of PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL identified nine articles eligible for qualitative analysis with one randomized controlled trial. Eight articles involving 719 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results showed similar CD34+ cell collection yields for pegfilgrastim and filgrastim (SDM -0.08, 95% CI: -0.388 to 0.228). On comparison with filgrastim, pegfilgrastim showed a significantly earlier apheresis onset time (SDM: -0.512, 95% CI: -0.973 to -0.050) and reduction in required apheresis procedures (SDM -0.260, 95% CI: -0.466 to -0.054). Times to leukocyte (⩾1.0 × 10(9)/L) and platelet (⩾20 × 10(9)/L) recovery were similar between groups (SDM: 0.015, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.44 and SDM: 0.309, 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.72, respectively). Both agents were well tolerated and mild bone pain was the most frequently reported adverse event. Pegfilgrastim may be a convenient alternative to filgrastim in PBSC mobilization for multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients, but further studies are required to clarify effects of cytokine dosage and previous cytotoxic exposure in specific subpopulations.

Pharmacoeconomic impact of up-front use of plerixafor for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND AIMS

Stem cell collection can be a major component of overall cost of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Plerixafor is an effective agent for mobilization; however, it is often reserved for salvage therapy because of its high cost. We present data on the pharmacoeconomic impact of the use of plerixafor as an up-front mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

Patients with MM who underwent ASCT between January 2008 and April 2011 at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were reviewed retrospectively. In April 2010, practice changes were instituted for patients with MM to delay initiation of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support from day 0 to day +5 and to add plerixafor to G-CSF as an up-front autologous mobilization. Targets of collection were 5-10 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg.

RESULTS

Of 50 adults with MM who underwent ASCT, 25 received plerixafor/filgrastim and 25 received G-CSF alone as an up-front mobilization. Compared with the control, plerixafor mobilization yielded higher CD34(+) cell content (16.1 versus 8.4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg; P = 0.0007) and required fewer sessions of apheresis (1.9 versus 3.1; P = 0.0001). In the plerixafor group, the mean number of plerixafor doses required per patient was 1.8. Although the overall cost of medications was higher in the plerixafor group, the cost for blood products and overall cost of hospitalization were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Up-front use of plerixafor is an effective mobilization strategy in patients with MM and does not have a substantial pharmacoeconomic impact in overall cost of hospitalization combined with the apheresis procedure.

Stem cell mobilization in HIV seropositive patients with lymphoma

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue has been reported as feasible and effective in HIV-associated lymphoma. Although a sufficient number of stem cells seems achievable in most patients, there are cases of stem cell harvest failure. The aim of this study was to describe the mobilization policies used in HIV-associated lymphoma, evaluate the failure rate and identify factors influencing mobilization results. We analyzed 155 patients who underwent attempted stem cell mobilization at 10 European centers from 2000-2012. One hundred and twenty patients had non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 35 Hodgkin lymphoma; 31% had complete remission, 57% chemosensitive disease, 10% refractory disease, 2% untested relapse. Patients were mobilized with chemotherapy + G-CSF (86%) or G-CSF alone (14%); 73% of patients collected >2 and 48% >5 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Low CD4+ count and refractory disease were associated with mobilization failure. Low CD4(+) count, low platelet count and mobilization with G-CSF correlated with lower probability to achieve >5 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, whereas cyclophosphamide ≥ 3 g/m(2) + G-CSF predicted higher collections. Circulating CD34(+) cells and CD34/WBC ratio were strongly associated with collection result. HIV infection alone should not preclude an attempt to obtain stem cells in candidates for autologous transplant as the results are comparable to the HIV-negative population.

Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone

Chemotherapy plus G-CSF (C+G) and G-CSF alone are two of the most common methods used to mobilize CD34(+) cells for autologous hematopoietic SCT (AHSCT). In order to compare and determine the real-world outcomes and costs of these strategies, we performed a retrospective study of 226 consecutive patients at 11 medical centers (64 lymphoma, 162 multiple myeloma), of whom 55% of lymphoma patients and 66% of myeloma patients received C+G. Patients with C+G yielded more CD34(+) cells/day than those with G-CSF alone (lymphoma: average 5.51 × 10(6) cells/kg on day 1 vs 2.92 × 10(6) cells/kg, P=0.0231; myeloma: 4.16 × 10(6) vs 3.69 × 10(6) cells/kg, P<0.00001) and required fewer days of apheresis (lymphoma: average 2.11 vs 2.96 days, P=0.012; myeloma: 2.02 vs 2.83 days, P=0.0015), although nearly all patients ultimately reached the goal of 2 × 10(6) cells/kg. With the exception of higher rates of febrile neutropenia in myeloma patients with C+G (17% vs 2%, P<0.05), toxicities and other outcomes were similar. Mobilization with C+G cost significantly more (lymphoma: median $10,300 vs $7300, P<0.0001; myeloma: $8800 vs $5600, P<0.0001), although re-mobilization adds $6700 for drugs alone. Our results suggest that although both C+G and G-CSF alone are effective mobilization strategies, C+G may be more cost-effective for patients at high risk of insufficient mobilization.

Pharmacoeconomics of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: an overview of current evidence and gaps in the literature

Adequate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization and collection is required prior to proceeding with high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Cytokines such as G-CSF, GM-CSF, and peg-filgrastim, alone or in combination with plerixafor, and after chemotherapy have been used to mobilize HSCs. Studies have shown that the efficiency of HSC mobilization and collection may vary when different methods of mobilization are used. No studies have shown that survival is significantly affected by the method of mobilization, but some studies have suggested that cost and resource utilization may be different between different mobilization techniques. After the FDA approval of plerixafor with G-CSF to mobilize HSCs many transplant centers became concerned about the cost of HSC mobilization. A panel of experts was convened ant this paper reviews the current literature on the pharmacoeconomics of HSC mobilization.

Mobilisation strategies for normal and malignant cells

This review evaluates the latest information on the mobilisation of haemopoietic stem cells for transplantation, with the focus on what is the current best practice and how new understanding of the bone marrow stem cell niche provides new insights into optimising mobilisation regimens. The review then looks at the mobilisation of mesenchymal stromal cells, immune cells as well as malignant cells and what clinical implications there are.

Current status of stem cell mobilization

New advances in effective mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells have permitted a greater proportion of patients to benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation. In this review, the relative merits of peripheral blood and mobilized bone marrow are discussed. All available agents are reviewed. A critical assessment of the appropriate dosing and frequency of available growth factors is undertaken, and the most commonly used chemotherapy plus growth factor combinations are covered. Specific recommendations for patients who are poor mobilizers are dealt with including the role of plerixafor.

Priming with r-metHuSCF and filgrastim or chemotherapy and filgrastim in patients with malignant lymphomas: a randomized phase II pilot study of mobilization and engraftment

SCF has been shown to synergize with G-CSF to mobilize CD34(+) PBPCs. In this study we report results from this combination after a phase II trial of 32 patients with malignant lymphoma randomized to receive recombinant methionyl human SCF (ancestim, r-metHuSCF) in combination with recombinant methionyl human G-CSF (filgrastim, r-metHuG-CSF) (experimental arm A) or routine chemotherapy plus filgrastim (conventional arm B). The primary objective was to evaluate the side effects and toxicity during priming and mobilization. The secondary objectives were efficacy by the level of blood-circulating PBPCs, the number of harvest days and the time to three-lineage engraftment after autografting. First, during priming 5 patients had 8 serious events, 4 in each arm. A summary of all adverse events revealed 30 (94%) patients suffering from 132 events of all grading. Second, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was documented in arm B. Third, 9/14 (64%) patients in arm A reached the target of 5 million CD34(+) cells/kg body weight (bw) compared with 13/15 (87%) in arm B. The results represent the first randomized trial of growth factor plus chemotherapy priming and indicate that a formal phase III trial very unlikely may challenge chemotherapy plus r-metHuG-CSF priming in candidates for high-dose therapy.

Phase III prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (AMD3100), a CXCR4 antagonist, in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem-cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a phase III, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma requiring an autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in first or second complete or partial remission were eligible. Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 10 microg/kg) subcutaneously daily for up to 8 days. Beginning on evening of day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 microg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until > or = 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who collected > or = 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in 4 or fewer apheresis days.

RESULTS

This report presents all data for all patients (n = 298) through 12 months follow-up. Eighty-nine (59%) of 150 patients in the plerixafor group and 29 (20%) of 148 patients in the placebo group met the primary end point (P < .001). One hundred thirty-five patients (90%) in plerixafor group and 82 patients (55%) in placebo group underwent transplantation after initial mobilization. Median time to engraftment was similar in both groups. The most common plerixafor-associated adverse events were GI disorders and injection site reactions.

CONCLUSION

Plerixafor and G-CSF were well tolerated and resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma achieving the optimal CD34+ cell target for transplantation in fewer apheresis days, compared with G-CSF alone.

Prediction of target CD34 positive cells following leukopheresis in children with neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may improve long-term survival in children with disseminated neuroblastoma. In children it is important to be able to ascertain when to start the leukopheresis in order to keep the number of procedures to a minimum.

PROCEDURE

Twenty-three children with high-risk neuroblastoma with a median weight of 13 kg (range 8-16 kg). Stem cell collection was planned to start at day 14 after the start of the preceding induction standard chemotherapy and after 4 days of G-CSF treatment at 10 microg/kg body weight once daily subcutaneously. Normal volume leukopheresis (median 2.2 times the blood volume of the child) was carried out using a CS-3000 Plus Blood Cell Separator. A pre-collection peripheral blood CD34+ count of >20/microl was a prerequisite for initiating the stem cell collection.

RESULTS

Timely leukopheresis was carried out in 19/23 patients. In 17 (74%) of the patients the target number of CD34+ cells/kg body weight was obtained in one procedure; in the remaining the target number of stem cells was obtained after leukopheresis on the following day. A highly significant correlation was found between the pre-harvest CD34+ count from the peripheral blood and the total number of collected CD34+ cells/kg (r = 0.79, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

When the pre-harvest CD34+ count was >40/microl, a sufficient number of CD34+ stem cells was collected in a single procedure in 15 out of 16 cases.

Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell yield from standard chemotherapy used in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies and high-dose cyclophosphamide: a retrospective review of 141 patients

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are often collected after mobilization with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC) combined with growth factors. HDC may not be needed for PBPC mobilization, and patients with lymphoid malignancies can be harvested with treatment regimens of chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 141 patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma whose PBPCs were harvested after chemotherapy. The PBPC yield and time to mobilization was compared between patients who received HDC (n = 51) and other chemotherapy regimens (n = 90) including high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide (HDC plus VP-16; n = 41), CHOP, ESHAP, ABVD, VAD, and others (n = 49). A multiple linear regression model and proportional hazards model determined factors influencing yield and time to mobilization, respectively.

RESULTS

The difference in mean yield between HDC and all non-HDC regimens was significant, with HDC plus VP-16 resulting in the highest yields. The proportion of patients achieving a CD34 count in excess of 5 x 10(6) per kg did not differ significantly between the regimens. In a multiple linear regression model, HDC plus VP-16 resulted in a higher PBPC yield than HDC but all other regimens did not. In addition, patients exposed to more than one prior chemotherapy regimen had lower yield regardless of the mobilization regimen. The mean number of days to mobilization with HDC was 10.2 days, 17.1 days for HDC plus VP-16, and 14.2 days for all other regimens. The timing of mobilization was influenced by the chemotherapy used and the number of prior regimens in a proportional hazards model.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate a higher mean yield of PBPCs with HDC plus VP-16 but no difference in yield between non-HDC plus VP-16 regimens used for first-line or relapse therapy and HDC, suggesting that HDC may be an unnecessary additional therapy.

Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and engraftment kinetics following autologous transplantation in children and adolescents with solid tumor

In 56 pediatric and adolescent patients (median age 7 years, range 1-21) with various solid tumors, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone, and the yields of PBSC and engraftment kinetics following autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) were evaluated retrospectively. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (10 microg/kg) was injected subcutaneously for mobilization when patients showed no influence of previous chemotherapy, and administration was continued for 5 days. The peaks of CD34+ cells and colony-forming units-granulocyte/macrophage in the blood were observed on days 4 through 6 of G-CSF administration in all patients. Peripheral blood stem cell harvest was commenced on day 5 of G-CSF treatment. Compared to the results in patients mobilized by chemotherapy plus G-CSF (N=18), the progenitor cell yields were lower in patients mobilized with G-CSF alone. However, there were no significant differences in WBC and ANC engraftment compared to the chemotherapy plus G-CSF mobilization group. Platelet recovery following autologous PBSCT was delayed in patients mobilized with G-CSF alone. The median time taken for ANC and platelet counts to reach 0.5 x 10(9) and 20 x 10(9)/l was 12 days (range: 9-28) and 15 days (8-55), respectively, in all patients who received PBSC mobilized by G-CSF alone. In summary, mobilization with G-CSF alone can mobilize sufficient CD34+ cells for successful autografting and sustained hematological reconstitution in pediatric and adolescent patients with solid tumors, and even in heavily pre-treated patients.

Impact of different strategies of second-line stem cell harvest on the outcome of autologous transplantation in poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilizers

The optimal approach to obtain an adequate graft for transplantation in patients with poor peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization remains unclear. We retrospectively assessed the impact of different strategies of second-line stem cell harvest on the transplantation outcome of patients who failed PBSC mobilization in our institution. Such patients were distributed into three groups: those who proceeded to steady-state bone marrow (BM) collection (group A, n = 34); those who underwent second PBSC mobilization (group B, n = 41); those in whom no further harvesting was carried out (group C, n = 30). PBSC harvest yielded significantly more CD34+ cells than BM collection. Autologous transplantation was performed in 30, 23 and 11 patients from groups A, B and C, respectively. Engraftment data and transplantation outcome did not differ significantly between groups A and C. By contrast, group B patients had a faster neutrophil recovery, required less platelet transfusions and experienced less transplant-related morbidity, as reflected by lower antibiotics needs and shorter hospital stays. In conclusion, remobilization of PBSC constitutes an effective approach to ensure a rapid hematopoietic engraftment and a safe transplantation procedure for poor mobilizers, whereas unprimed BM harvest does not provide any clinical benefit in this setting.

G-CSF alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment

We performed a randomized study to compare 'G-CSF alone' (administered at dose of 10 mcg/kg/day) and 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF' (cyclophosphamide at dose of 4 g/m(2) and G-CSF at dose of 10 microg/kg/day), as PBPC mobilization schedules in 52 patients with NHL or HD. Randomization was stratified according to the amount of previous chemotherapy (< or =2 and >2 lines of previous chemotherapy). Mean CD34+ cell peak in P.B., mean 'Total CD34+ cells' harvested and percentage of patients successfully mobilized, in the group mobilized with 'G-CSF alone' vs the group mobilized with 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF', were: 35.3 x 10(6) vs 45.8 x 10(6)/l (P=0.3), 5.4 x 10(6) vs 6.8 x 10(6)/kg (P>0.9) and 50 vs 61% (P=0.4). No differences were observed in the stratum of less pretreated patients. However, in the stratum of patients who had previously received more than two lines of chemotherapy, CD34+cell peak (P=0.05) and percentage of successful mobilization (P=0.01) were higher when 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF' was used. Using logistic regression, both age and mobilization with 'G-CSF alone' were significantly associated with a low CD34+ cell peak in P.B. However, in the stratum of less pretreated patients, only age was significantly associated with this risk.

Kinetic studies during peripheral blood stem cell collection show CD34+ cell recruitment intra-apheresis

A sufficient number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood stem cell product is important to achieve a rapid and sustained engraftment. The purpose of the present work was to study CD34+ cell kinetics during leukapheresis. Blood samples before and after leukapheresis were analysed for CD34+ cells in 205 procedures. The number of CD34+ cells after plus the number of CD34+ cells harvested was 1.5-fold greater than the number available at the beginning of the procedure, indicating recruitment of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. In a subgroup of 66 procedures, granulocytes and platelets were measured. In contrast to CD34+ cells, these cell fractions were not recruited to the blood stream during leukapheresis. An additional nine patients were studied with serial blood measurements during leukapheresis, showing an initial decline that was followed by an increase in CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. In conclusion, CD34+ cells are recruited to the blood during the leukapheresis procedure in contrast to granulocytes and platelets.

Harvesting of autologous blood stem cells after a mobilising regimen with low-dose cyclophosphamide

Although high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX) is commonly used as a mobilising regimen for autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection, significant morbidity and insufficient harvesting may complicate the procedure. Alternative regimens and lower doses of cyclophosphamide (CTX) have been investigated as possible ways of overcoming these difficulties. Low-dose CTX (1.5 g/m2) was administered to 102 lymphoma patients as an autologous PBSC mobilising regimen. The collection of 6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was chosen as the target of the apheresis sessions, whereas 3 x 10(6)/kg were considered the minimum necessary to perform autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) safely. The apheretic sessions were started a median of eight days after CTX administration; a median of two aphereses was required. More than 6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected from 78 patients, between 3 and 6 x 10(6)/kg from 19, and fewer than 3 x 10(6)/kg from 5, two of whom underwent bone marrow harvesting and one a successful second PBSC harvesting session using the same mobilising regimen. Eighty-two patients underwent autografting, six of whom received a second transplant after relapse (five using autologous PBSCs coming from the first apheretic course). Low-dose CTX proved to be a safe and effective regimen for autologous PBSC mobilization and also compared favourably with alternative regimens in terms of the rate of harvesting insufficiency. This does not imply that low-dose CTX is the best mobilising regimen for all patients, and the identification of prognostic factors predicting mobilising potential may help in choosing the best individualised regimen.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become increasingly popular over the last 15 years as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation. In the early 1990s, PBPCs replaced bone marrow (BM) as the preferred source of autologous stem cells, and recently the same phenomenon is seen in the allogeneic setting. Under steady-state conditions, the concentration of PBPCs (as defined by CFU-GM and/or CD34+ cells) is very low, and techniques were developed to increase markedly this concentration. Such mobilization techniques include daily injections of filgrastim (G-CSF) or a combination of chemotherapy and growth factors. Leukapheresis procedures allow the collection of large numbers of circulating white blood cells (and PBPCs). One or two leukapheresis procedures are often sufficient to obtain the minimum number of CD34+ cells considered necessary for prompt and consistent engraftment (i.e., 2.5-5.0 x 10(6)/kg). As compared to BM, autologous transplants with PBPCs lead to faster hematologic recovery and have few, if any, disadvantages. In the allogeneic arena, PBPCs also result in faster engraftment, but at a somewhat higher cost of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This may be a double-edged sword leading to both increased graft-versus-tumor effects and increased morbidity. The rapid advances in the study of hematopoietic, and even earlier, stem cells will continue to shape the future of PBPC transplantation.

Technique for PBSC harvesting in children of weight under 10 kg

Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvesting in the smallest children (weight <10 kg) using separators is complicated by specific problems. The volume of the separation set exceeds 25% of the total blood volume and the vascular access is generally not sufficient. Therefore, a simple manual technique for PBSC harvesting was developed. Three children (6-9 kg), with newly diagnosed tumours were scheduled to be treated with three to six sequential courses of high-dose chemotherapy, each followed by PBSC support. PBSC harvests were started after mobilization using cyclophosphamide and G-CSF when the peripheral blood CD34+ cell count exceeded 50/microl. About 50 ml of blood was drawn from a venous catheter, injected into a transfer bag containing ACD-A, and centrifuged. The buffy coat obtained was pooled in a collection bag, remaining plasma and erythrocytes were immediately reinfused and a subsequent cycle started. From three to 13 cycles were performed in 1-3 days and 18.0-32.2 x 10(6) CD34+cells/kg were collected. We did not detect any bacterial contamination or any notable complications. Fifteen PBSC reinfusions have been performed to date, each with rapid engraftment taking between 7 and 13 days. Patients are in very good PR (18 months from diagnosis) or in CR (6 and 8 months). We can conclude that this procedure is feasible and safe.

Mobilisation of tumour cells along with CD34+ cells to peripheral blood in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Cells belonging to the malignant clone are found in the peripheral blood in myeloma patients. In order to minimise the content of tumour cells in the stem cell product it is crucial to perform stem cell harvest at a time when tumour cells in the peripheral blood are at a minimum.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the mobilisation kinetics of normal CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells during mobilisation with either G-CSF alone or high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCy) plus G-CSF.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Morning blood samples were drawn each day during mobilisation from start of G-CSF or HDCy and to the end of leukapheresis, and were analysed by flow cytometry for content of CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells (CD38+ + CD45-). Tumour cells were also estimated by a patient-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method based on the 5' nuclease TaqMan technology.

RESULTS

Flow cytometry data from 16 patients showed concomitant mobilisation of CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells. Seven patients were mobilised twice; first with G-CSF alone and then with HDCy plus G-CSF. There was no difference between the two mobilisation regimens regarding tumour cell mobilisation kinetics. Real-time PCR was performed in one patient and confirmed the mobilisation of tumour cells at the time when CD34+ blood cells were at a maximum.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour cells are mobilised to the peripheral blood at the same time as CD34+ cells in multiple myeloma patients after priming with both G-CSF alone and HDCy in combination with G-CSF.