Early allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation after modified conditioning therapy during marrow aplasia: stable remission in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

Remission induction versus immediate allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed or poor responsive acute myeloid leukaemia (ASAP): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Whether high-dose cytarabine-based salvage chemotherapy, administered to induce complete remission in patients with poor responsive or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia scheduled for allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) after intensive conditioning confers a survival advantage, is unclear.

METHODS

To test salvage chemotherapy before allogeneic HSCT, patients aged between 18 and 75 years with non-favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia not in complete remission after first induction or untreated first relapse were randomly assigned 1:1 to remission induction with high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 intravenously, 1 g/m2 intravenously for patients >60 years or with a substantial comorbidity) twice daily on days 1-3 plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 3-5 or immediate allogeneic HSCT for the disease control group. Block randomisation with variable block lengths was used and patients were stratified by age, acute myeloid leukaemia risk, and disease status. The study was open label. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as complete remission on day 56 after allogeneic HSCT, with the aim to show non-inferiority for disease control compared with remission induction with a non-inferiority-margin of 5% and one-sided type 1 error of 2·5%. The primary endpoint was analysed in both the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in the per-protocol population. The trial is completed and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02461537.

FINDINGS

281 patients were enrolled between Sept 17, 2015, and Jan 12, 2022. Of 140 patients randomly assigned to disease control, 135 (96%) proceeded to allogeneic HSCT, 97 (69%) after watchful waiting only. Of 141 patients randomly assigned to remission induction, 134 (95%) received salvage chemotherapy and 128 (91%) patients subsequently proceeded to allogeneic HSCT. In the ITT population, treatment success was observed in 116 (83%) of 140 patients in the disease control group versus 112 (79%) of 141 patients with remission induction (test for non-inferiority, p=0·036). Among per-protocol treated patients, treatment success was observed in 116 (84%) of 138 patients with disease control versus 109 (81%) of 134 patients in the remission induction group (test for non-inferiority, p=0·047). The difference in treatment success between disease control and remission induction was estimated as 3·4% (95% CI -5·8 to 12·6) for the ITT population and 2·7% (-6·3 to 11·8) for the per-protocol population. Fewer patients with disease control compared with remission induction had non-haematological adverse events grade 3 or worse (30 [21%] of 140 patients vs 86 [61%] of 141 patients, χ2 test p<0·0001). Between randomisation and the start of conditioning, with disease control two patients died from progressive acute myeloid leukaemia and zero from treatment-related complications, and with remission induction two patients died from progressive acute myeloid leukaemia and two from treatment-related complications. Between randomisation and allogeneic HSCT, patients with disease control spent a median of 27 days less in hospital than those with remission induction, ie, the median time in hospital was 15 days (range 7-64) versus 42 days (27-121, U test p<0·0001), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Non-inferiority of disease control could not be shown at the 2·5% significance level. The rate of treatment success was also not statistically better for patients with remission induction. Watchful waiting and immediate transplantation could be an alternative for fit patients with poor response or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia who have a stem cell donor available. More randomised controlled intention-to-transplant trials are needed to define the optimal treatment before transplantation for patients with active acute myeloid leukaemia.

FUNDING

DKMS and the Gert and Susanna Mayer Stiftung Foundation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in chemotherapy-induced aplasia in children with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasia

Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure after hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Inability to achieve hematologic complete remission has been a barrier to transplant for patients with refractory disease. We describe six children with refractory myeloid disease undergoing transplant in chemotherapy-induced aplasia, as a strategy to facilitate curative therapy in refractory patients. Clofarabine- or high-dose cytarabine-based chemotherapy regimens were used to achieve marrow aplasia, followed by reduced-intensity conditioning and allogeneic transplant before hematologic recovery. Long-term disease control was achieved in five, with one transplant-related mortality, suggesting the feasibility of this approach.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with intermediate and high-risk AML: results from the randomized Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) AML 2003 trial

The optimal timing of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is controversial. We report on 1179 patients with a median age of 48 years who were randomized upfront. In the control arm, sibling HCT was scheduled in the first complete remission for intermediate-risk or high-risk AML and matched unrelated HCT in complex karyotype AML. In the experimental arm, matched unrelated HCT in first remission was offered also to patients with an FLT3-ITD (FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication) allelic ratio >0.8, poor day +15 marrow blast clearance and adverse karyotypes. Further, allogeneic HCT was recommended in high-risk AML to be performed in aplasia after induction chemotherapy. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, superiority of the experimental transplant strategy could not be shown with respect to overall survival (OS) or event-free survival. As-treated analyses suggest a profound effect of allogeneic HCT on OS (HR 0.73; P=0.002) and event-free survival (HR 0.67; P<0.001). In high-risk patients, OS was significantly improved after allogeneic HCT in aplasia (HR 0.64; P=0.046) and after HCT in remission (HR 0.74; P=0.03). Although superiority of one study arm could not be demonstrated in the ITT analysis, secondary analyses suggest that early allogeneic HCT is a promising strategy for patients with high-risk AML.

The hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index fails to predict outcomes in high-risk AML patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation--investigation of potential limitations of the index

In the context of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), comorbidities are an important risk factor. Use of the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HSCT-CI), which was developed and validated in Seattle, Washington, has been proposed to predict the probability of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) following allo-HSCT. We performed a single-center retrospective study to validate the prognostic impact of HSCT-CI on transplant outcomes in a cohort of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allo-HSCT between January 2000 and December 2008. The median patient age at the time of transplantation was 53 years (range: 11-76 years). The median pretransplantation HSCT-CI score was 4 (range: 0-10). Among 340 patients, OS at 3 years was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17%-41%), 40% (33%-47%), and 44% (41%-47%) in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk HSCT-CI groups (P = .7), respectively. The corresponding NRM at 3 years was 34% (10%-58%), 32% (20%-44%), and 26% (20%-32%; P = .6). In multivariate analysis, we found no predictive value of HSCT-CI for either OS or NRM. The use of HSCT-CI as a decision-making tool for transplantation eligibility should not be considered until its validity has been unequivocally shown in crossvalidation studies.

Acute myeloid leukaemia

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal disorder of haemopoietic progenitor cells and the most common malignant myeloid disorder in adults. The median age at presentation for patients with AML is 70 years. In the past few years, research in molecular biology has been instrumental in deciphering the pathogenesis of the disease. Genetic defects are thought to be the most important factors in determining the response to chemotherapy and outcome. Whereas significant progress has been made in the treatment of younger adults, the prospects for elderly patients have remained dismal, with median survival times of only a few months. This difference is related to comorbidities associated with ageing and to disease biology. Current efforts in clinical research focus on the assessment of targeted therapies. Such new approaches will probably lead to an increase in the cure rate.

Reduced intensity conditioning allows for up-front allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after cytoreductive induction therapy in newly-diagnosed high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

There is substantial need to improve the outcome of patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The clinical trial reported here investigated a new approach of up-front allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), provided a median of 40 days (range 22-74) after diagnosis, in twenty-six consecutive patients with newly-diagnosed high-risk AML characterized by poor-risk cytogenetics (n = 19) or inadequate blast clearance by induction chemotherapy (IC, n = 7). The median age was 49 years (range 17-68). During IC-induced aplasia after the 1st (n = 11) or 2nd (n = 15) cycle, patients received allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from related (n = 11) or unrelated (n = 15) donors following a fludarabine-based reduced-intensity regimen. Seventeen patients were not in remission before HSCT with a median marrow blast count of 34% (range 6-70). All patients achieved rapid engraftment and went into remission with complete myeloid and lymphatic chimerism. Grades II to IV acute GvHD occurred in 14 (56%) and extensive chronic GvHD was documented in 8 (35%) patients. The probability of disease-free survival was 61% with only three patients relapsing 5, 6 and 7 months after transplantation, respectively. Up-front allogeneic HSCT as part of primary induction therapy seems to be an effective strategy in high-risk AML patients and warrants further investigation.

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in patients with refractory acute leukemia: a long-term follow-up

We examined retrospectively 44 patients with refractory acute leukemia (acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/acute lymphoblastic leukemia=25/19) who underwent allogeneic transplantation at our center between 11/1990 and 04/2004. The median leukemic blasts was 25% and age 28 years (range, 3-56). Twenty-one patients had untreated relapse, 13 failed reinduction, eight in partial remission and two aplastic. Conditioning was myeloablative using cyclophosphamide, busulfan, total-body irradiation and etoposide (Bu/Cy/VP, n=22; TBI/Cy/VP, n=17; others, n=5) followed by marrow or peripheral blood transplant (n=23/21) from unrelated or related donors (n=28/16). All patients had graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclosporin and methotrexate. One patient experienced late graft failure. Severe acute-GVHD and chronic-GVHD appeared in eight and 14 patients, respectively. Thirteen patients (30%) remain alive after a median of 25.3 months (range, 2.4-134.1); with 31 deaths, mostly from relapse (n=15) and infections (n=12). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years was 28 and 26%, respectively. OS and PFS were significantly better with blasts < or =20% and time to transplant < or =1 year while transplant-related mortality was less with the use of TBI. We conclude that patients with refractory leukemia can benefit from allogeneic BMT, especially with < or =20% marrow blast.

Five-month marrow aplasia in a child with refractory acute myeloid leukemia: successful management with continuous granulocyte support and reduced-intensity conditioning followed by matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation

A 10-year-old girl diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia FAB M4 failed to achieve remission following several courses of induction chemotherapy. From the first course of chemotherapy the patient had continuous marrow aplasia, managed by a total of 57 granulocyte transfusions. After reinduction and reduced-intensity conditioning including fludarabine, Campath-1H, and melphalan, the patient received unmanipulated marrow from an HLA-matched unrelated donor. Leukocyte and platelet engraftment was observed on day +18 and +50, respectively. Graft-versus-host disease did not occur. The patient is alive and well in complete remission 18 months after transplantation with complete donor chimerism.

Risk-adapted postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the German multicenter AML HD93 treatment trial

The objective of the AML HD93 treatment trial was to evaluate the outcome in young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after postremission therapy was stratified according to cytogenetically defined risk. The rationales for the study design were based (i) on previous favorable results with high-dose cytarabine in AML with t(8;21), inv/t(16q22) and in AML with normal karyotype, and ii) on encouraging results obtained in several phase II trials using autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Between July 1993 and January 1998, 223 eligible patients, 16-60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML other than French-American-British type M3/M3v, were entered into the trial. Risk groups were defined as follows: low risk: t(8;21) or inv/t(16q22); intermediate risk: normal karyotype; high risk: all other chromosomal abnormalities. Following intensive double induction therapy with idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide, all patients in complete remission (CR) received a first consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM). A second consolidation therapy was stratified according to the risk group: low risk: HAM; intermediate risk: related allogeneic SCT or sequential HAM; high risk: related allogeneic or autologous SCT. Double induction therapy resulted in a high CR rate of 74.5%, and 90% of the responding patients were eligible for consolidation therapy. Survival for all 223 trial entrants was 40%, and for the 166 patients who entered CR, disease-free (DFS) and overall survival were 40 and 51% after 5 years, respectively. Within the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, DFS and survival after 5 years were 62.5 and 87, 40 and 49 and 17 and 26% respectively, without advantage for allogeneic transplantation in the intermediate- and high-risk groups. Postremission therapy-related mortality was 0, 7 and 14%, respectively. This study demonstrates the feasibility of cytogenetically defined risk-adapted consolidation therapy. The overall trial results are at least equivalent to those of published trials supporting the risk-adapted treatment strategy.