A phase II trial of docetaxel for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for patients with breast cancer and ovarian cancer

Feasibility and kinetics of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization in response to a single administration of docetaxel chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim in a contemporary cohort of patients with metastatic breast cancer

AIM

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) remains an experimental therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and there is no established protocol for cluster of differentiation 34⁺ (CD34⁺ ) hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) mobilization with historic studies using growth factors with or without chemotherapy. This study describes the feasibility and kinetics of CD34⁺ HPC mobilization following a single administration of docetaxel and the pegylated form of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor analogue filgrastim (pegfilgrastim).

METHODS

The study design was serial measurement of peripheral blood CD34⁺ HPC in patients with MBC following a single administration of intravenous (IV) docetaxel 100 mg/m² on day 1 and subcutaneous (SC) pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2.

RESULTS

Eight patients with MBC were enrolled. The median age was 56 years (range 51-75 years). All patients had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative disease and either hormone refractory or negative disease. Three patients had bone only disease, four had visceral organ disease with or without bone involvement and one had locally unresectable disease only. All patients had prior therapy for early-advanced stage disease and prior therapy for MBC included seven patients receiving at least one line of hormone therapy and three having palliative chemotherapy. Six patients recorded a rise in the CD34⁺ count greater than 20 cells/μL. The median peak level was 40.2 cells/μL (standard deviation = 28.7) occurring on day 9 and with an average duration of 4 days. Overall, treatment was well tolerated with manageable side-effects.

CONCLUSION

The single administration of docetaxel and pegfilgrastim was effective in mobilization of CD34⁺ HPC and peak levels followed a predictable course. This approach needs validation in prospective studies by preparation of auto-HSCT by leukapheresis and quantification of total CD34⁺ HPC yields.

Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Using Regimen Combining Docetaxel with Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor in Breast Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells by combining docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 57 breast cancer patients were treated with docetaxel 120 mg/m(2). When the white blood cell (WBC) count decreased to 1.0×10(9)/L, patients were given G-CSF 5 μg/kg daily by subcutaneous injection until the end of apheresis. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNC) were isolated by Cobe Spectra Apheresis System. The percentage of CD34(+) cell was assayed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

At a median 6 of days (range 3-8) after the administration of docetaxel, the median WBC count decreased to 1.08×10(9)/L (range 0.20-2.31). The median duration of G-CSF mobilization was 3 days (range 2-7). The MNC collection was conducted 8-12 days (median 10 days) after docetaxel treatment. The median MNC was 5.35×10(8)/kg (range 0.59-14.07), the median CD34(+) cell count was 2.43×10(6)/kg (range 0.16-16.69). The CD34(+) cell count was higher than 1.00×10(6)/kg in 47 of 57 cases (82.46%) and higher than 2.00×10(6)/kg in 36 cases (63.16%). The CD34(+) cell count was higher than 2.00×10(6)/kg in 27 collections (23.68%). The MNC count and the CD34(+) cell count were correlated with the bottom of WBC after docetaxel chemotherapy (r=0.364, 0.502, P=0.005, 0.000). The CD34(+) cell count was correlated with the MNC count (r=0.597, P=0.000). The mobilization and apheresis were well tolerated in all patients. Mild perioral numbness and numbness of hand or feet were observed in 3 cases. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell by combining docetaxel with G-CSF was effective and safety in breast cancer patients.

Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Given the potential to limit cost, we conducted a pilot study evaluating delayed, low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) following chemotherapy for the procurement of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for autologous transplantation and reviewed the relevant literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with various malignancies received cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m(2) and paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF 300 microg/d or 480 microg/d starting day +5 until two to four daily large volume leukapheresis yielded > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells. We searched MEDLINE, Pubmed, and EMBASE databases from 1990 to the present to identify papers on PBPC procurement using delayed G-CSF (starting day +4 or later) following chemotherapy.

RESULTS

G-CSF was administered for a median of 9 days at an average cost of 1260 USD per 70-kg patient. Collection was initiated at a median of 12 days after chemotherapy. A median 2.5 (range 2-4) apheresis were performed yielding an average daily CD34+ collection of 6.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.35-56.7). After one apheresis, 82% and 57% of patients collected > or =2.5 x 10(6)/kg and > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. Ultimately, 89% collected > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg. Febrile neutropenia and catheter-related infection developed in five and two patients, respectively. All patients proceeded to transplantation and engrafted successfully with a median of 14.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.05-113) cells infused. Eleven published reports were identified involving 590 patients of whom 498 received G-CSF at a dose range of 250 microg/d to 10 microg/kg/d starting day +4 to 15 for a period of 4 to 9 days for PBPC procurement. Among these reports, 62 to 100% and 33 to 96% of patients collected > or =2 to 2.5 x 10(6) and > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of delayed, low-dose G-CSF plus chemotherapy for stem cell mobilization was feasible and provides further evidence supporting this potentially cost-effective strategy. A review of the literature supports our findings and emphasizes the need for larger studies to address this issue.

A phase II study of escalated-dose docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

Docetaxel is highly active in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. The principal dose-limiting toxicities of the 3-weekly regimen are neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. In a previous phase I dose-escalation study with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support, the recommended dose was determined to be docetaxel 160 mg/m(2) 3-weekly. The objectives of this phase II study were to determine the response rate and toxicity of this dose and schedule, given as first-line in patients with advanced breast cancer. Mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) was also investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible women had metastatic breast cancer and were aged 18-75 years with ECOG performance status < or =2. Strict criteria for liver function were followed, and adjuvant chemotherapy must have been completed at least 6 months previously. Treatment was docetaxel 160 mg/m(2) over 60-90 min every 21 days with G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day until neutrophil recovery, for up to six cycles. A 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis was given. Bloods samples to determine PBSC levels [CD34+, granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells (GM-CFC) and burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E)] were taken on days 6, 8, 9 and 11 following docetaxel.

RESULTS

Twenty-five women with median age 50 years (range 35-66) were included. Seventeen (68%) had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy. In total, 112 cycles were delivered (median four per patient), with dose reductions required in 12.5% of cycles. G-CSF was given for a median of 6 days. The median neutrophil nadir was 0.5 x 10(9)/l and occurred a median 5 days after treatment. The median duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 2 days (range 1-7). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 44% of patients, but there was only one episode of febrile neutropenia. Five patients were taken off study due to toxicities that included oedema, neurosensory toxicity and asthenia. Confirmed partial response was seen in nine patients (37.5%; 95% confidence interval 19% to 59%). CD34+ cells, GM-CFC and BFU-E levels peaked at day 8 following docetaxel administration. The median CD34+ cell peak was 6.5 x 10(4)/ml, with only 20% of patients <2 x 10(4)/ml, a level below which leukapheresis is not usually attempted.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel 160 mg/m(2) was delivered with G-CSF support with a very low rate of febrile neutropenia. Non-haematological toxicity was significant, causing five patients to go off study. Effective mobilisation of PBSCs was seen. The response rate of 37.5% was less than that obtained in first-line studies using standard-dose docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), suggesting that there is no additional benefit in dose escalation of this cytotoxic agent in breast cancer patients using this schedule.

CliniMACS CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, following high-dose therapy (HDT), unmanipulated autologous PBPC are infused. Alternatively, purified CD34+ cells can now be obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the CliniMACS device. Limited data currently exist examining hemopoietic recovery with such cells.

METHODS

Ten patients with advanced breast cancer had PBPC mobilized with docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and G-CSF (10 microg/kg per day), harvested and processed using the CliniMACS CD34-selection device and equally divided into three aliquots for cryopreservation. Unmanipulated 'back-up' cells were also collected on a separate day of the same mobilization, divided into three and cryopreserved. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2). The intent was for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e., 1/3 for each cycle). If, however, hemopoietic recovery was delayed after Cycle 1, 1/3 of the unmanipulated cells were infused following Cycle 2 and the remaining CD34-selected cells (2/3) were used to support Cycle 3.

RESULTS

PBPC from 10 patients underwent CD34-selection with a resulting median purity of 93% (range: 76-98%) and yield of 62% (range: 16-93%). Of the 10 patients, only two were able to be supported with CD34-selected cells for all three cycles of HDT. The remaining eight patients required unmanipulated 'back-up' cells to support Cycle 2. Three patients also required infusion of 'back-up' unmanipulated cells because of persistent neutropenia (n = 1) or thrombocytopenia (n = 2) following cycles initially supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (x 10(6)/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (0.7-2.6) (n = 20) and unselected cells was 1.7 (1.4-2.8) (n = 10). Comparing hemopoietic recovery between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n = 20) and unmanipulated cells (n = 10) there was a significant slowing with the CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 = 13 days versus 10 days, platelets > 20 = 17 days versus 13 days, > 50 = 25 versus 17 days (all P values < 0.001). There was no correlation between the dose of CD34-selected cells infused and neutrophil/platelet recovery.

DISCUSSION

We have demonstrated that, although unmanipulated PBPC achieve rapid hemopoietic recovery (at modest CD34 doses of < or = 2.8 x 10(6)/kg), CliniMACS-selected CD34+ cells (in the doses utilized in this study of < or = 2.6 x 10(6)/kg) result in significantly prolonged recovery.