Stem cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma: should it ever be used outside clinical trials?

Autografting followed by rituximab for chemosensitive mantle cell lymphoma: A pilot study and literature review

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is rarely cured with either conventional-dose chemotherapy or autografting. Recent evidence suggests that anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy (rituximab) in combination with chemotherapy may improve the response rate. We report a pilot study of autografting using busulfan-melphalan conditioning followed by rituximab in 9 patients (median age 52 years) with chemosensitive MCL. Rituximab was given for 4 doses of 375 mg/m(2) between 4 and 10 weeks post-transplant. Three of 5 patients autografted after induction therapy remain alive in clinical and molecular complete remission at 33-50 months post-transplant. Only 1 of 4 patients autografted after relapse remains in complete remission. Two of the 3 patients with persistent marrow molecular positivity post-autograft became negative after rituximab therapy. Molecular negativity was first observed in 2 patients only after rituximab therapy. Overall, 2 patients have relapsed and the remaining 3 died of late-onset respiratory failure, probably reflecting infection and/or aggressive conditioning in an older patient population. These preliminary results, together with a review of the literature, suggest that the combination of autografting and rituximab may lead to durable molecular remissions in patients with chemosensitive MCL. Further studies are required to clarify whether the administration of rituximab: (1) is optimal pre- or post-autograft and (2) impacts on the incidence of infection and idiopathic pneumonitis in this context.

Therapeutic options in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive lymphoma requiring intensive chemotherapy +/- autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) to achieve optimal rates of progression-free survival. Here we review the treatment options for patients with newly-diagnosed or relapsed MCL and discuss recent advances in management, including the role of autologous and allogeneic SCT.

Bortezomib in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents 6% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but is one of the most active fields of clinical investigation. Unfortunately, there is still no standard or curative therapy in MCL. Front-line therapy appears to benefit from intensification either through high-dose therapy with stem cell transplant consolidation or dose-intense chemotherapy with hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin/doxorubicin and dexamethasone/rituximab. Most patients still relapse and a multitude of novel agents are currently being tested in this setting, including proteasome inhibitors with bortezomib (the first of its class and the first US FDA-approved drug for MCL), mTOR inhibitors, Bcl-2 inhibitors, antiangiogenesis agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors among others. An obvious effort is needed to enroll patients on clinical trials, the design of which might benefit from pharmacogenomics and a better understanding of MCL biology and its diversity.

Expanding therapeutic options in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) still carries a poor prognosis. Chemoimmunotherapy (combination with rituximab) is the routine first-line therapy, although data strongly suggest a benefit from intensification through high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation consolidation or dose-intense chemotherapy with HyperCVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone)/rituximab. Unfortunately, most patients still experience relapse, and a multitude of novel agents are currently being tested in this setting, including proteasome inhibitors with bortezomib (the first of its class and first Food and Drug Administration-approved drug in MCL), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, Bcl-2 inhibitors, and antiangiogenesis agents, among others. Because of the relative rarity of the disease-MCL represents 6% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma-an obvious effort is needed to enroll patients on clinical trials. Not surprisingly, as in other non-Hodgkin lymphomas, MCL appears more and more as a heterogeneous disease, which might impact future clinical trial design through pharmacogenomics and hopefully help us develop smaller "molecular" relevant trials.

New Directions in the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma: An Overview

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is one of the most challenging lymphomas to treat. In the first-line setting, high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation or hyperCVAD/rituximab suggest benefit, especially in patients aged < 60 years. Nucleoside analogue-based regimens represent an alternate option in patients ineligible for HDT. Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone has shown activity, and the results were superior with the addition of rituximab. Other cytotoxic agents, such as cladribine, clofarabine, or bendamustin, showed promising activity as well. A variety of new monoclonal antibody (MoAb) agents, such as humanized anti-CD20, alemtuzumab, anti-HLA-DR, anti-CD22 (as an immunotoxin carrier), anti-CD40, as well as MoAb-targeting TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 are being tested. Radioimmunotherapy with Yttrium 90-ibritumomab tiuxetan and Iodine 131 tositumomab have been tested alone or in combination with chemotherapy, including as part of HDT and autologous stem cell transplantation, in which they showed the best results. New vaccine modalities are exploring the use of tumor cell-based vaccines or of agents that block or activate costimulatory pathways/molecules, such as CTLA-4-Ig. Allogenic transplantation represents a potential curative option for MCL, especially nonmyeloablative transplantation, more feasible in that population. A plethora of novel biologic agents have surfaced, such as bortezomib, temsirolimus, thalidomide, lenalidomide, MoAb anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor-Trap, and flavopiridol. Other targets include gene transcription through histone regulation; nuclear factor-ķB pathway; protein kinase C inhibitors; small-molecules targeting apoptosis, such as antisense Bcl-2, pan-Bcl-2 family member inhibitors; MoAb agonists of cell death receptors; caspases regulators (inhibitors of apoptosis proteins, survivin); and MDM2 antagonist regulators of p53. A molecular approach to define biomarkers might help identify subgroups of patients and help develop rational therapies.

Outcomes of autologous and allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma

To evaluate high-dose therapy and autologous or allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) for mantle cell lymphoma, patients receiving BMT for newly diagnosed or relapsed mantle cell lymphoma were identified through the registry at Johns Hopkins. The pathologic diagnostic criteria were reviewed, and details of the presentation, transplant procedure, and survival outcomes were determined. Fifty-eight patients were identified, of whom 64% underwent transplantation in first remission and 12% had primary induction failure. Nineteen patients (one third) received an allograft. Preparative regimens consisted of cyclophosphamide in combination with either busulfan or total body irradiation. On multiple regression analysis, transplantation after 1 or more relapses (hazard ratio, 2.98; P = .02), primary induction failure (hazard ratio, 5.39; P = .002), and allogeneic transplantation (hazard ratio, 3.03; P = .007) were associated with an inferior event-free survival (EFS). However, EFS curves were not statistically different for autologous and allogeneic BMT performed in first remission, with an estimated 3-year EFS approaching or equaling 70%. Primary induction failure and residual bone marrow involvement were the only statistically significant predictors of relapse on multiple regression analysis. At 3 years, the estimated EFS for the entire cohort after BMT was 51%, the probability of relapse was 31%, and the overall survival was 59%. The benefit of autologous or allogeneic BMT for mantle cell lymphoma is thus most apparent when transplantation is performed in first remission. Whether allogeneic BMT ultimately confers an advantage because of a graft-versus-lymphoma effect remains to be determined.

Long-term results of autologous stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin's disease (HD) and low-/intermediate-grade B non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): a report from the Austrian Stem Cell Transplantation Registry (ASCTR)

Between 1990 and 2001, 68 patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease (HD) and 86 patients classified as low-/intermediate-grade B non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were reported to the Austrian Stem Cell Transplantation Registry (ASCTR). Following autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) for HD, overall survival was 56% [95% confidence interval (CI): 40-72%] with a disease-/progression-free survival of 49%, reaching a plateau at 5 years. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis BEAM conditioning (carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan) was predictive for favourable outcome, better disease-/progression-free survival and a significantly lower risk for relapse. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 30%, even for patients in complete remission at time of SCT. The cumulative risk for developing a secondary malignancy increased continuously over time, achieving 20% at 7 years and 46% at 10 years with previous radiotherapy as the only risk factor in the multivariate analysis. Overall survival for NHL patients was 45% (95% CI: 26-64%) with a disease-/progression-free survival of 26% at 7 years. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis stage of disease at time of SCT was the most powerful parameter for overall survival, disease-/progression-free survival and relapse. Mantle cell lymphoma, greater than or equal to three lines of previous therapy, and a conditioning regimen other than BEAM were also predictive for death. The main reason for treatment failure was relapse (cumulative incidence 54-75%). Because of the high risk of relapse/progression in both disease categories and the additional high rate of second malignancies in HD patients, allogeneic stem cells should be considered a valuable alternative for selected patients. The efficacy of allotransplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning should be tested in randomised trials.

Graft-versus-lymphoma effects: clinical review, policy proposals, and immunobiology

The indubitable existence of a graft-versus-lymphoma (GVL) effect is difficult to prove directly. This article reviews the difficulties in interpreting the current literature in this field and, with a number of caveats, argues for the existence of a clinically meaningful GVL effect in follicular, mantle cell, small lymphocytic, and Hodgkin lymphomas. The evidence, however, for a potent GVL effect in diffuse large-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma is not convincing. Policies for allografting in lymphoma are proposed on the basis of this evidence. The immunobiology of GVL effects is discussed--in particular, the expression of HLA class I and II and co-stimulatory molecules on lymphomas that influence the generation of alloreactive T cells--together with future directions in immunotherapy that may help to eradicate chemoresistant disease.

Mantle cell lymphoma: new treatments targeted to the biology

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents a distinct lymphoma subtype. The prognosis of patients with MCL is the poorest among lymphoma patients and the response to conventional treatments is inadequate. New approaches targeted to the biology of MCL and the genetics underlying the disease are being studied. Monoclonal antibodies directed at molecules expressed on MCL cells are already used in the clinical setting. This article reviews the literature on these and other new possible treatment modalities.

Allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This chapter outlines the rationale for allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and pertinent results from published studies. Trials comparing allogeneic with autologous transplantation are discussed, as are disease-specific results for low-grade (including transformed), mantle cell and high-grade (Burkitt's and lymphoblastic) subtypes of the disease. Allogeneic transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the paediatric population, the use of unrelated donors, allografting after failed autologous or allogeneic transplantation, the graft-versus-lymphoma effect, the use of donor leukocyte infusions and non-myeloablative allografts are considered.