Safety of the concomitant use of caspofungin and cyclosporin A in patients with invasive fungal infections

Consensus guidelines for optimising antifungal drug delivery and monitoring to avoid toxicity and improve outcomes in patients with haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2021

Antifungal agents can have complex dosing and the potential for drug interaction, both of which can lead to subtherapeutic antifungal drug concentrations and poorer clinical outcomes for patients with haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Antifungal agents can also be associated with significant toxicities when drug concentrations are too high. Suboptimal dosing can be minimised by clinical assessment, laboratory monitoring, avoidance of interacting drugs, and dose modification. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays an increasingly important role in antifungal therapy, particularly for antifungal agents that have an established exposure-response relationship with either a narrow therapeutic window, large dose-exposure variability, cytochrome P450 gene polymorphism affecting drug metabolism, the presence of antifungal drug interactions or unexpected toxicity, and/or concerns for non-compliance or inadequate absorption of oral antifungals. These guidelines provide recommendations on antifungal drug monitoring and TDM-guided dosing adjustment for selected antifungal agents, and include suggested resources for identifying and analysing antifungal drug interactions. Recommended competencies for optimal interpretation of antifungal TDM and dose recommendations are also provided.

Echinocandin use in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). However, data outlining use of echinocandins in prophylaxis and therapy of LTRs are limited.

METHOD

A single-center retrospective cohort study on all LTRs from January-2010 to December-2016. Participants were screened for antifungal use to assess rate, tolerability, and clinical outcome of echinocandin use in LTRs, during the first 6 weeks of posttransplant.

RESULTS

A total of 777 lung transplants were reviewed in 763 LTRs. Antifungals were administered to 268 (35%) of LTRs. Reasons included preemptive antifungal therapy (55% [149/268]), targeted antifungal prophylaxis (34% [92/268]), and definitive IFI therapy (10% [27/268]). Azoles were first-line agents in 80% (215/268) of LTRs, caspofungin in 11% (30/268), micafungin in 6.7% (18/268), amphotericin B in 1.5% (4/268), and anidulafungin in 0.4% (1/268]). LTRs were started on echinocandins due to abnormal liver enzymes in 91% (46/49). Overall, 23% (50/215) of LTR's were switched off azoles. Of these, 54% (27/50) were switched to echinocandins. Switch from azoles to echinocandin was undertaken due to abnormal liver enzymes in 63% (17/27). No patients receiving first-line echinocandins were switched to other therapies due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that echinocandins are utilized in approximately 18.3% of lung transplant recipients. They are the preferred second-line agents due to a lower adverse-effect profile compared to the azoles.

Drug interactions and safety profiles with concomitant use of caspofungin and calcineurin inhibitors in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation

AIM

Small-scale clinical studies have reported on drug interactions between caspofungin (CPFG) and calcineurin inhibitors in healthy subjects; however, little is known about these interactions in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the drug interactions and safety profiles in allo-HCT recipients treated concomitantly with CPFG and calcineurin inhibitors.

RESULTS

Ninety-one consecutive cases were evaluated. There were no statistically significant differences in the plasma concentration/dose (C/D) ratios of tacrolimus (TAC) in 34 patients before and after co-administration with CPFG (median: 575.6-672.4, P = 0.200). In contrast, the median C/D ratio of cyclosporin A (CsA) in 16 patients was significantly elevated after co-administration with CPFG (median: 62.8-74.9, P = 0.016). There were no serious adverse effects on liver or renal function associated with the therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that CPFG did not affect the pharmacokinetics of TAC and that it could mildly increase CsA blood concentrations in allo-HCT patients.

[Strategies for antifungal treatment failure in intensive care units]

Recent epidemiologic studies reveal both an increasing incidence and an escalation in resistance of invasive fungal infections in intensive care units. Primary therapy fails in 70 % of cases, depending on the underlying pathogens and diseases. The purpose of this review is to raise awareness for the topic of antifungal therapy failure, describe the clinical conditions in which it occurs, and suggest a possible algorithm for handling the situation of suspected primary therapy failure.

Caspofungin: Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and treatment outcomes

Over the past decade, echinocandins have emerged as first-line antifungal agents for many Candida infections. The echinocandins have a unique mechanism of action, inhibiting the synthesis of β-1,3-d-glucan polymers, key components of the cell wall in pathogenic fungi. Caspofungin was the first echinocandin antifungal agent to become licensed for use. The objectives of this review are to summarize the existing published data on caspofungin, under the subject headings of chemistry and mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical studies, safety, drug interactions, dosing, and an overview of the drug's current place in therapy.

Consensus guidelines for optimising antifungal drug delivery and monitoring to avoid toxicity and improve outcomes in patients with haematological malignancy, 2014

Antifungal agents may be associated with significant toxicity or drug interactions leading to sub-therapeutic antifungal drug concentrations and poorer clinical outcomes for patients with haematological malignancy. These risks may be minimised by clinical assessment, laboratory monitoring, avoidance of particular drug combinations and dose modification. Specific measures, such as the optimal timing of oral drug administration in relation to meals, use of pre-hydration and electrolyte supplementation may also be required. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents is warranted, especially where non-compliance, non-linear pharmacokinetics, inadequate absorption, a narrow therapeutic window, suspected drug interaction or unexpected toxicity are encountered. Recommended indications for voriconazole and posaconazole TDM in the clinical management of haematology patients are provided. With emerging knowledge regarding the impact of pharmacogenomics upon metabolism of azole agents (particularly voriconazole), potential applications of pharmacogenomic evaluation to clinical practice are proposed.

Caspofungin: an overview

The echinocandins are a novel class of antifungal agents that have come into use over the past 10 years. The mechanism of action of these lipopeptide agents is via noncompetitive inhibition of the synthesis of 1,3-beta-glucans, which are fungal cell wall constituents. All agents of this class are only available in an intravenous formulation. The first approved agent of this class was caspofungin (Cancidas). Caspofungin is a therapeutic option for patients with candidal esophagitis and deep-seated candidal infections, and is an alternative therapy for Aspergillus infections, especially in the salvage setting. In addition, it is a therapeutic option for the empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia. The usefulness of this agent in treating less common fungal infections has been cited in anecdotal reports. One major limitation of this drug is the lack of an oral formulation. Caspofungin may be considered as a component of combination antifungal regimens. Caspofungin represents a significant advance in the care of patients with serious fungal infections.

Echinocandin antifungals: review and update

The echinocandins are a new and unique class of antifungal agents that act on the fungal cell wall by way of noncompetitive inhibition of the synthesis of 1,3-beta-glucans. All agents of this class are of parenteral formulation, with no oral preparations available. Caspofungin (Cancidas) was the first approved echinocandin, followed recently by micafungin (Mycamine) and anidulafungin (Eraxis). The precise role of the echinocandins in the antifungal armamentarium is still unfolding. Caspofungin is approved for the treatment of candidal esophagitis and candidemia, salvage therapy of Aspergillus infections and for empirical therapy of febrile neutropenia. Micafungin is likewise approved for candidal esophagitis, in addition to antifungal prophylaxis for hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Anidulafungin is also approved for treatment of candidal esophagitis, as well as therapy of candidemia. There has been anecdotal use of these agents to treat less common fungal pathogens, as well as limited use as a component of combination antifungal therapy. The echinocandins are an important addition to the antifungal armamentarium in the treatment of fungal infections in both immunocompromised patients and those with normal immunity.

Antifungal prophylaxis among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: current issues and new agents

Invasive candidiasis and invasive mold infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant population, in particular in recipients of allografts. The introduction of a variety of new antifungal compounds over the past decade has focused attention on prophylactic strategies as a means to decrease the burden of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Until recently, fluconazole has been the standard agent for prophylaxis before and after engraftment. In 2005, the echinocandin micafungin received US FDA approval for prophylaxis against IFIs in stem cell transplant recipients during the neutropenic period prior to engraftment. In patients with substantial risk for invasive mold infection, many centers now use a mold-active antifungal agent (e.g., a triazole such as itraconazole, voriconazole or posaconazole, or an echinocandin) as prophylaxis after engraftment. Several recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of these newer agents in preventing IFIs in these highly immunocompromised patients. This review will discuss current issues in IFI and new agents available for prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Antimicrobial agents, drug adverse reactions and interactions, and cancer

The intent of this chapter is to review the types of adverse drug reactions and interactions associated with antimicrobial agents, specifically in the setting of patients with malignancies. The initial sections will discuss categorizing and describing the mechanisms of adverse reactions and interactions. The later sections include a detailed discussion about adverse reactions and drug interactions associated with commonly used antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal agents in this subpopulation. Where relevant, the clinical use and indication for the drugs will be reviewed. The antibacterial section will specifically address the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and drugs of last resort (newer agents, such as linezolid and daptomycin and novel uses of older previously retired agents, such as polymyxin B). The antifungal section will address the ramification of pharmacokinetic interactions and the need to measure drug levels. The chapter is not meant to be exhaustive and as such will not extensively address all antimicrobials or all interactions for each of these agents.

Caspofungin therapy in immunocompromised children and neonates

The prevalence of invasive fungal infections is increasing and the infections are becoming a major problem in immunocompromised children and neonates. Fortunately, there has been a recent surge in the development of new antifungal agents. Caspofungin, the first licensed echinocandin, is a novel class of antifungal and is approved for use in children 3 months of age or older for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis and as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia. This article reviews the published data on the use of caspofungin in immunocompromised children and neonates with invasive fungal infections.

Comparison of echinocandin antifungals

The incidence of invasive fungal infections, especially those due to Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp., continues to increase. Despite advances in medical practice, the associated mortality from these infections continues to be substantial. The echinocandin antifungals provide clinicians with another treatment option for serious fungal infections. These agents possess a completely novel mechanism of action, are relatively well-tolerated, and have a low potential for serious drug-drug interactions. At the present time, the echinocandins are an option for the treatment of infections due Candida spp (such as esophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis, and candidemia). In addition, caspofungin is a viable option for the treatment of refractory aspergillosis. Although micafungin is not Food and Drug Administration-approved for this indication, recent data suggests that it may also be effective. Finally, caspofungin- or micafungin-containing combination therapy should be a consideration for the treatment of severe infections due to Aspergillus spp. Although the echinocandins share many common properties, data regarding their differences are emerging at a rapid pace. Anidulafungin exhibits a unique pharmacokinetic profile, and limited cases have shown a potential far activity in isolates with increased minimum inhibitory concentrations to caspofungin and micafungin. Caspofungin appears to have a slightly higher incidence of side effects and potential for drug-drug interactions. This, combined with some evidence of decreasing susceptibility among some strains of Candida, may lessen its future utility. However, one must take these findings in the context of substantially more data and use with caspofungin compared with the other agents. Micafungin appears to be very similar to caspofungin, with very few obvious differences between the two agents.

Caspofungin: when and how? The microbiologist's view

The echinocandins are antifungal agents, which act by inhibiting the synthesis of β-(1,3)-D-glucan, an integral component of fungal cell walls. Caspofungin, the first approved echinocandin, demonstrates good in vitro and in vivo activity against a range of Candida species and is an alternative therapy for Aspergillus infections. Caspofungin provides an excellent safety profile and is therefore favoured in patients with moderately severe to severe illness, recent azole exposure and in those who are at high risk of infections due to Candida glabrata or Candida krusei. In vivo/in vitro resistance to caspofungin and breakthrough infections in patients receiving this agent have been reported for Candida and Aspergillus species. The types of pathogens and the frequency causing breakthrough mycoses are not well delineated. Caspofungin resistance resulting in clinical failure has been linked to mutations in the Fksp subunit of glucan synthase complex. European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute need to improve the in vitro susceptibility testing methods to detect fks hot spot mutants. Caspofungin represents a significant advance in the care of patients with serious fungal infections.

Randomized comparison of safety and pharmacokinetics of caspofungin, liposomal amphotericin B, and the combination of both in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients

The combination of liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) and caspofungin (CAS) holds promise to improve the outcome of opportunistic invasive mycoses with poor prognosis. Little is known, however, about the safety and pharmacokinetics of the combination in patients at high risk for these infections. The safety and pharmacokinetics of the combination of LAMB and CAS were investigated in a risk-stratified, randomized, multicenter phase II clinical trial in 55 adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients (aHSCT) with granulocytopenia and refractory fever. The patients received either CAS (50 mg/day; day 1, 70 mg), LAMB (3 mg/kg of body weight/day), or the combination of both (CASLAMB) until defervescence and granulocyte recovery. Safety, development of invasive fungal infections, and survival were assessed through day 14 after the end of therapy. Pharmacokinetic sampling and analysis were performed on days 1 and 4. All three regimens were well tolerated. Premature study drug discontinuations due to grade III/IV adverse events occurred in 1/18, 2/20, and 0/17 patients randomized to CAS, LAMB, and CASLAMB, respectively. Adverse events not leading to study drug discontinuation were frequent but similar across cohorts, except for a higher frequency of hypokalemia with CASLAMB (P < 0.05). Drug exposures were similar for patients receiving combination therapy and those randomized to monotherapy. There was no apparent difference in the occurrence of proven/probable invasive fungal infections and survival through day 14 after the end of therapy. CASLAMB combination therapy in immunocompromised aHSCT patients was as safe as monotherapy with CAS or LAMB and had similar plasma pharmacokinetics, lending support to further investigations of the combination in the management of patients with invasive opportunistic mycoses.

Drug interactions and adverse events associated with antimycotic drugs used for invasive aspergillosis in hematopoietic SCT

The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) and adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with antimycotics in hospitalized patients with hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Of the 120 HSCT recipients evaluated, 36 received antimycotics. A total of 124 ADEs were recorded in 32 of the 36 patients treated, with 54 ADEs being possibly and 9 probably related to antimycotics. Of the treatments with amphotericin B, 93% were associated with one or more possible and 36% with probable ADEs. The corresponding figures for lipid-based amphotericin B were 100% and 7%, for voriconazole 68% and 11% and for caspofungin 70% and 0%. A total of 57 potentially severe DDIs associated with antimycotics were detected in 31 of the 36 patients. Of these, 14 DDIs were a possible cause of an ADE and 5 (4 times a combination of voriconazole with CYA and once a combination of CYA with conventional amphotericin B) were probably related. Although the prevalence of pDDIs and ADEs is high in HSCT patients, ADEs related with a high probability to treatment with antimycotics are rare. Regarding the high prevalence of pDDIs, our findings underscore the importance of close monitoring of laboratory and clinical parameters, as well as dose adjustment for critical drugs, in patients with HSCT.

Drug interactions in transplant patients: what everyone should know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adverse events due to drug-drug interactions remain a challenge in the postsurgical care of transplant recipients. A combination of potent and selective immunosuppressive drugs, which have a narrow therapeutic index, with medications for the treatment of comorbidities such as dyslipidemia, infection, psychiatric conditions, and hypertension, can lead to life-threatening drug-drug interactions.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are a number of important drug-drug interactions which are important for physicians to consider. It is critical to understand the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of drug-drug interactions, their potential impact on patient care, and the management strategies.

SUMMARY

Close therapeutic drug monitoring and evaluation of drug-specific side effects continue to be an important key to minimize adverse events due to drug-drug interactions.

[Tolerance of caspofungin in intensive care unit: a prospective study]

OBJECTIVE

Caspofungin has shown efficacy and very low toxicity in empirical antifungal therapy in refractory invasive Aspergillus infections and invasive candidiasis in neutropenic (or non) patients. To date, there is no data on tolerability of caspofungin in ICU patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate caspofungine tolerability in critical care patients.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Over a 36-month period, 1430 patients were admitted in a general intensive care unit. All patients data were collected in a prospective database. All the clinical or biological side effects reported in the multicentric studies were required. The patients were laminated in two groups, according to the initial hepatic function.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were treated with caspofungin (5.1%) and 58% were immunocompromised. Immunosuppression was due to acute leukemia (30%), solid organ transplant (20%) or other causes of immunosuppression. In this group, SAPS2 was higher (51+/-20 versus 44+/-20; p<0.05) as mortality rate was (60% versus 23%). More than 90% of patients were ventilated and 55% needed extrarenal therapy. Caspofungin treatment was initiated for aspergillosis in 12 patients, candidiasis in 33 patients and others indications. Partial or complete response to treatment was 72%. Median duration of caspofungin administration was 11 days, no liver dysfunction or acute renal failure due to caspofungin was reported whatever initial liver function was.

CONCLUSION

This prospective open study demonstrate the very low toxicity of caspofungin even in critical care patients.

[Anidulafungin: a new therapeutic approach in antifungal therapy. Pharmacology of anidulafungin]

Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin antifungal agent which inhibits beta-1,3-D-glucan synthase and disrupts fungal cell-wall synthesis. It has marked antifungal activity against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., including amphotericin B and triazole resistant strains. Due to the limited oral availability, anidulafungin in clinical use is available for parenteral administration only. Elimination of anidulafungin takes place via slow non-enzymatic degradation to inactive metabolites. Less than 10% and 1% of the initially administered drug is excreted unchanged into feces and urine, respectively. It does not require dosage adjustment in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment established. Anidulafungin is generally well tolerated. Adverse events appear not to be dose or infusion related. The most common treatment related adverse events are phlebitis, headache, nausea, vomiting and pyrexia. The lack of interactions with tacrolimus, cyclosporine and corticosteroids and its limited toxicity profile places anidulafungin as an attractive new option for the treatment of invasive fungal infections especially in transplant patients.

Early clinical experience with anidulafungin at a large tertiary care medical center

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate early clinical experience with anidulafungin.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large, university-affiliated, tertiary care medical center.

PATIENTS

All patients receiving anidulafungin between July 15, 2006, and January 15, 2007.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-five patients received at least one dose of anidulafungin. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in all patients; efficacy outcomes were assessed in 13 patients who had a documented fungal infection and received anidulafungin for a minimum of 5 days. Common conditions at baseline were hepatic dysfunction (25 patients [71%]), severe sepsis (17 patients [49%]), and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (10 patients [29%]). Eight patients (23%) were receiving drugs with the potential to interact with echinocandins other than anidulafungin. Seventeen (49%) of the 35 patients received anidulafungin as empiric antifungal therapy. Anidulafungin was used to treat invasive candidiasis in seven patients (20%) and candidemia in 10 patients (29%); Candida albicans or Candida glabrata was isolated most frequently in these two infections combined (7 isolates each [41%]/17 infections). A favorable efficacy outcome was noted in 10 (77%) of 13 evaluable patients. One patient developed breakthrough Candida parapsilosis fungemia while receiving anidulafungin. Overall, anidulafungin was well tolerated, with only one patient having an infusion- related reaction. Anidulafungin was also well tolerated among patients receiving concomitant metronidazole.

CONCLUSION

Anidulafungin was well tolerated and produced favorable outcomes in the majority of the patients evaluated. The availability of anidulafungin makes it a feasible option for antifungal therapy, particularly in patients who have hepatic dysfunction and in those who are receiving drugs than can interact with other echinocandins.

Minimizing the risk of recurrent or progressive invasive mold infections during stem cell transplantation or further intensive chemotherapy

The risk of recurrence or progression of prior invasive fungal infection, predominantly due to molds, is 11-33% during subsequent stem cell transplantations or myelosuppressive chemotherapy, with a high mortality. Risk factors at the time of transplant include active infection and having received <6 weeks of antifungal therapy, while after transplant prolonged neutropenia and graft-versus-host disease requiring aggressive immunosuppression are important. The use of peripheral blood stem cells has been associated with a lower risk. Minimal data are available regarding the role of preventative strategies such as surgical resection of pulmonary lesions and prophylactic granulocyte transfusions during neutropenia, the optimal duration of antifungal prophylaxis, and the appropriate monitoring strategy. This article critically evaluates these issues and provides recommendations for the secondary prophylaxis of invasive mold infections.

Fungal infections in solid organ transplantation

Renal, liver, heart and lung transplantation are now considered to be the standard therapeutic interventions in patients with end-stage organ failure. Infectious complications following transplantation are relatively common due to the transplant recipients overall immunosuppressed status. The incidence of invasive mycoses following solid organ transplant ranges from 5 to 42% depending on the organ transplanted. These mycoses are associated with high overall mortality rates. Candida and Aspergillus spp. produce most of these infections. This article will review the risk factors, clinical presentation and treatment of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant patients, and evaluate the role of prophylactic therapy in this group of patients.

Invasive fungal infections and antifungal therapies in solid organ transplant recipients

This manuscript will review the risk factors, prevalence, clinical presentation, and management of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Primary literature was obtained via MEDLINE (1966-April 2007) and EMBASE. Abstracts were obtained from scientific meetings or pharmaceutical manufacturers and included in the analysis. All studies and abstracts evaluating IFIs and/or antifungal therapies, with a primary focus on solid organ transplantation, were considered for inclusion. English-language literature was selected for inclusion, but was limited to those consisting of human subjects. Infectious complications following SOT are common. IFIs are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in this patient population. Determining the best course of therapy is difficult due to the limited availability of data in SOT recipients. Well-designed clinical studies are infrequent and much of the available information is often based on case-reports or retrospective analyses. Transplant practitioners must remain aware of their therapeutic options and the advantages and disadvantages associated with the available treatment alternatives.

Drug-drug interactions of antifungal agents and implications for patient care

Drug interactions in the gastrointestinal tract, liver and kidneys result from alterations in pH, ionic complexation, and interference with membrane transport proteins and enzymatic processes involved in intestinal absorption, enteric and hepatic metabolism, renal filtration and excretion. Azole antifungals can be involved in drug interactions at all the sites, by one or more of the above mechanisms. Consequently, azoles interact with a vast array of compounds. Drug-drug interactions associated with amphotericin B formulations are predictable and result from the renal toxicity and electrolyte disturbances associated with these compounds. The echinocandins are unknown cytochrome P450 substrates and to date are relatively devoid of significant drug-drug interactions. This article reviews drug interactions involving antifungal agents that affect other agents and implications for patient care are highlighted.

A retrospective nationwide case study on the use of a new antifungal agent: patients treated with caspofungin during 2001–2004 in Finland

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of caspofungin in patients treated in Finland during the period 2001-2004. The medical records of 78 adult patients treated with caspofungin in five major hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty-nine (76%) patients had proven invasive fungal infection, of whom 22 (28%) had aspergillosis and 37 (47%) had candidiasis. Nineteen (24%) patients were treated empirically; only 13 (17%) patients received caspofungin as primary therapy. A favourable response was achieved in 52 (67%) patients. The response rate was 78% in patients with candidiasis, and 50% in patients with aspergillosis. At the end of the study period, 40 (51%) patients remained alive; of the 38 deaths, nine (24%) were caused by fungal infection. The response rates were lower, although not significantly, for patients with high (>20) vs. low (< or =20) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores (response rate 50% vs. 68%, p 0.48, respectively), and were also lower in patients with long-term (>20 days) vs. shorter duration (< or =20 days) neutropenia (55% vs. 73%, p 0.32, respectively), and in those with an underlying haematological malignancy vs. patients with other diseases (59% vs. 73%, p 0.2, respectively). In five (6%) patients, caspofungin therapy was discontinued prematurely because of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (elevated liver enzyme values in three patients, neuropathic pain in one, and skin rash in one). Serious ADRs occurred in two (3%) patients (severe hepatic insufficiency with consequent death, and eosinophilia with elevated alkaline phosphatase levels), and laboratory abnormalities, mostly mild and reversible, in 24 (31%) patients. In this unselected patient population, caspofungin was safe, well-tolerated, and had an efficacy comparable to that in previous reports from prospective trials.

Efficacy of caspofungin as secondary prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation with prior pulmonary and/or systemic fungal infection

Transplanted patients with a history of invasive fungal infection (IFI) are at high risk of developing relapse and fatal complications. Eighteen patients affected by hematological malignancies and a previous IFI were submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation, using Caspofungin as a secondary prophylaxis. Patients had a probable or proven fungal infection and 16 had a pulmonary localization. No side effects were recorded during treatment with Caspofungin. Compared to pre-transplant evaluation, stability or improvement of the previous IFI was observed in 16 of the 18 patients at day 30, in 13 of the 15 evaluable patients at day 180 and in 11 of the 11 evaluable patients at day 360 post transplant. In particular, all the six patients with a proven fungal infection were alive, with a stable or improved IFI after 1 year from transplant. At a maximum follow-up of 31 months, eight patients died for disease progression or transplant-related complications, but only two had evidence of fungal progression. Secondary prophylaxis with Caspofungin may represent a suitable approach to limit IFI relapse or progression, allowing patients with hematological malignancies to adhere to the planned therapeutic program.

Caspofungin as salvage monotherapy for invasive aspergillosis in patients with haematological malignancies or following allogeneic stem cell transplantation: efficacy and concomitant cyclosporin A

Caspofungin (CAS) has shown efficacy as salvage monotherapy for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in two open label non-comparative trials. The association between hepatotoxicity and concomitant use of CAS and cyclosporin A (CsA) has not been fully elucidated. We report results on CAS efficacy in the first cohort from outside Europe and USA and the interaction between CAS and CsA. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with haematological malignancies or postallogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) who received >/=1 dose of CAS as salvage monotherapy for IA as part of the Australian Special Access Scheme (4/2001-8/2002). Outcomes were assessed at the end of CAS therapy. Favourable response (FR) was defined as >50% clinical and radiological improvement. Risk factors for elevation of liver transaminases (LTs) were examined using multivariate models. 54 patients were included in the analysis with 47 neutropenic at study entry. Proven or probable IA occurred in 11 and refractory IA in 28. An FR occurred in 26 (48.1%) and predictors for a poor response to CAS were allogeneic HSCT, graft vs. host disease and treatment with CAS for <14 days. Concomitant CAS and CsA for >7 days was an independent risk factor for laboratory hepatoxicity. The CAS efficacy results from the Australian cohort confirm those of previous studies. Close monitoring of LTs is necessary on concomitant CAS and CsA but clinically relevant hepatotoxicity is rare.

Antifungal therapy in children with invasive fungal infections: a systematic review

Invasive fungal infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Differences between children and adults are reported, yet few trials of antifungal agents have been performed in pediatric populations. We performed a systematic review of the literature to guide appropriate pediatric treatment recommendations. From available trials that compared antifungal agents in either prolonged febrile neutropenia or invasive candidal or Aspergillus infection, no clear difference in treatment efficacy was demonstrated, although few trials were adequately powered. Differing antifungal pharmacokinetics between children and adults were demonstrated, requiring dose modification. Significant differences in toxicity, particularly nephrotoxicity, were identified between classes of antifungal agents. Therapy needs to be guided by the pathogen or suspected pathogens, the degree of immunosuppression, comorbidities (particularly renal dysfunction), concurrent nephrotoxins, and the expected length of therapy.

The Echinocandins

The changing pattern in fungal infections has driven the need to expand the targets of antifungal activity. The echinocandins are the newest addition to the arsenal against fungal infections. Three echinocandins have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration: caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin. These agents have a broad spectrum of activity and are similar to each other with respect to in vitro activity against Candida sp, with micafungin and anidulafungin having similar minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) that are generally lower than the MIC of capsofungin. The MICs of the echinocandins are highest against Candida parapsilosis; however, whether this will affect clinical outcomes is unknown. Several case reports have identified clinical failure due to elevated MICs with caspofungin or micafungin against Candida albicans, Candida krusei, and C. parapsilosis. Resistance to the echinocandin class was present in some but not all of the isolates. Empiric therapy with one of the echinocandins for candidemia or invasive candidiasis in patients with neutropenia and those without neutropenia appears to be appropriate when one factors in mortality rate, the increasing frequency of non-albicans Candida infections, and the broad spectrum, safety, and fungicidal effect of the echinocandins. After speciation of the organism, continued therapy with an echinocandin can and should be reevaluated. The echinocandins demonstrate similar in vitro and in vivo activity against Aspergillus sp, but only caspofungin is approved for treatment in patients who are intolerant of or refractory to other therapies. Voriconazole and amphotericin B have demonstrated synergy with the echinocandins. The clinical response to combination therapy has been variable; however, the mortality rate appears to be lower with combination therapy than monotherapy. Large controlled trials are needed to determine the role of combination therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Micafungin and anidulafungin generally have a lower frequency of adverse reactions compared with caspofungin. Phlebitis (3.5-25% of patients) and elevated liver enzyme levels (1-15%) occur more often with caspofungin compared with micafungin and anidulafungin (< 8%). Overall, the three echinocandins are relatively safe and effective agents for the treatment of Candida infections.

Efficacy and safety of caspofungin therapy in children with invasive fungal infections

Twenty children with proven (n = 12) or probable (n = 8) invasive fungal infections received caspofungin treatment either as first-line (n = 7) or as salvage (n = 13) therapy and as monotherapy (n = 5) or in combination (n = 15). Eleven had aspergillosis, 7 had candidiasis, and 2 had Rhodotorula infections. Caspofungin was well tolerated. Nine patients experienced 11 drug-related adverse events, none were severe, and none led to drug discontinuation. Caspofungin as a first-line treatment was successful in 5 of the 7 children (these 5 patients survived the infectious episode, with a follow-up of 147 days), and salvage therapy rescued 8 of 13 children, but only 5 of them survived.

Emerging echinocandins for treatment of invasive fungal infections

The echinocandins are a new class of antifungals, developed in response to the need for safe and effective antifungals for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. These agents work by inhibiting 1,3-beta-d-glucan synthase, an enzyme essential for production of cell walls in select fungi. Echinocandins appear to demonstrate favourable activity in vitro against a variety of yeasts (including both Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida) as well as select moulds (including Aspergillus spp.) In general, all echninocandins demonstrate a favourable safety profile and require once-daily parenteral administration. Caspofungin is the first of these agents to be available in the US, and is approved for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients, candidaemia and select forms of invasive candidiasis, and for management of invasive aspergillosis in patients refractory to or intolerant of other therapies. Micafungin was recently approved by the FDA for treatment of oesophageal candidiasis, and for the prophylaxis of fungal infections in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Emerging data indicate micafungin may have an important role in the treatment of invasive forms of candidiasis. Anidulafungin is an echinocandin approved in the US for treatment of candidaemia and oesophageal candidiasis. Aminocandin (HMR-3702, IP-960) is an investigational agent, with published experience limited to in vitro studies and animal models of infection.

Micafungin: a new echinocandin

Micafungin, a potent inhibitor of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase, has become the second available agent in the echinocandins class that is approved for use in clinical practice. This agent shares with caspofungin an identical spectrum of in vitro activity against Candida albicans, non-albicans species of Candida, and Aspergillus species, as well as several but not all pathogenic molds. If anything, its in vitro activity appears to be superior to that of caspofungin, although the clinical relevance of this observation is unclear. The clinical role of micafungin appears to be similar to that of caspofungin, although clinical data are still lacking at this stage, with initial approval only for treatment of esophageal candidiasis and prophylaxis in subjects with neutropenia. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies and reports of adverse effects and safety have reported similar but not identical results to those of other agents in the echinocandin class. Factors such as acquisition costs and the potential for resistance development may be more relevant to its widespread use than in vitro and in vivo data comparisons with caspofungin.

Treatment with caspofungin in immunocompromised paediatric patients: a multicentre survey

OBJECTIVES

Although a paediatric dosage has not been established, caspofungin is occasionally used in paediatric patients. We conducted a multicentre retrospective survey to obtain data on immunocompromised paediatric patients considered to require caspofungin therapy.

METHODS

The survey identified 64 patients (median age: 11.5 years; 25 females, 39 males) with haematological malignancies (48), marrow failure (9), solid tumours (3), haematological disorders (2) and congenital immunodeficiency (2) who received caspofungin for proven (17), probable (14) and possible (17) invasive fungal infections or empirically (16). Caspofungin was administered until intolerance or maximum efficacy at dosages individually determined by the responsible physician for refractory infection (38), intolerance of other agents (10) or as best therapeutic option (16).

RESULTS

The 64 patients received caspofungin for a median of 37 days (range 3-218) as single agent (20) or in combination (44). The median daily maintenance dosage was 1.07 mg/kg (95% CI 1.09-1.35; range 0.40-2.92) or 34.3 mg/m2 (95% CI 32.3-37.3; range 16.3-57.5). In none of the patients was therapy discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). Clinical AEs were mild to moderate and observed in 34 patients (53.1%). While mean glutamate pyruvate transaminase and glutamate oxalate transaminase values were slightly (P < 0.005) higher at the end of treatment (EOT), serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and creatinine values were not different from baseline. Complete responses, partial responses or stabilization were observed in 5/7/3 of 17 patients with proven, in 3/4/3 of 14 patients with probable and in 7/6/1 of 15 evaluable patients with possible invasive infections. Thirteen of 16 patients on empirical therapy completed without breakthrough infection. Overall survival was 75% at the EOT and 70% at 3 months post-EOT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Caspofungin displayed favourable safety and tolerance and may have useful antifungal efficacy in severely immunocompromised paediatric patients.