Update on extracorporeal photochemotherapy for graft-versus-host disease treatment

Extra corporeal photochemotherapy in steroid refractory graft versus host disease: A review of guidelines and recommendations

Regardless of remarkable progresses in prevention and treatment approaches, graft versus host disease (GVHD) remains a major impediment for successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT) and leads to morbidity and mortality in transplanted patients. Corticosteroids are the standard therapy for GVHD; however, a great number of patients will not respond sufficiently and others will be significantly affected by adverse effects of steroids. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP), as one of the numerous second line therapies, through modulation of immune cells may improves GVHD affected organ function in steroid-refractory forms. Considering to widespread utilization of ECP as a therapeutic strategy, we performed review on current literature of ECP, regarding the treatment strategies, monitoring protocols and technical aspects in chronic and acute GVHD.

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation occurring in 6% to 65% of the recipients. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for chronic GvHD are corticosteroids that are frequently combined with other immunosuppressive agents in people with steroid-refractory manifestations. There is no established standard treatment for steroid-refractory chronic GvHD. The therapeutic options for these patients include extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulatory treatment that involves ex vivo collection of mononuclear cells from peripheral blood, exposure to the photoactive agent 8-methoxypsoralen, ultraviolet radiation and re-infusion of the processed cell product. The mechanisms of action of ECP are not completely understood. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ECP for the management of chronic GvHD in children and adolescents after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 9, 2015), MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from their inception to 23 September 2015. We searched the reference lists of potentially relevant studies without any language restriction. We searched eight trial registers and five conference proceedings on 29 September 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ECP with or without alternative treatment versus alternative treatment alone in paediatric patients with chronic GvHD after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed the study selection. We resolved disagreements in the selection of trials by consultation with a third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

No additional studies were identified in this 2015 review update, in total leading to no studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of ECP in the treatment of chronic GvHD in paediatric patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation based on RCTs cannot be evaluated since the original version of this review and the first review update found no RCTs. Current recommendations are based on retrospective or observational studies only. Thus, ideally, ECP should be applied in the context of controlled trials only. However, performing RCTs in this patient population will be challenging due to the limited number of patients, the variable disease presentation and the lack of well-defined response criteria. International collaboration, multicentre trials and appropriate funding for such trials will be needed. If treatment decisions based on clinical data are made in favour of ECP, patients should be carefully monitored for beneficial and harmful effects. In addition, efforts should be made to share this information with other clinicians, for example by setting up registries for paediatric patients that are treated with ECP.

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus standard treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) occurring in 8% to 59% of the recipients. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for aGvHD is corticosteroids. However, there is no established standard treatment for steroid-refractory aGvHD. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a type of immunomodulatory method amongst different therapeutic options that involves ex vivo collection of peripheral mononuclear cells, exposure to the photoactive agent 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet-A radiation, and re-infusion of these treated blood cells to the patient. The mechanisms of action of ECP are not completely understood. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ECP for the management of aGvHD in children and adolescents after HSCT.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 9, 2015), MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from their inception to 23 September 2015. We searched the reference lists of potentially relevant studies without any language restrictions. We searched eight trial registers and four conference proceedings on 29 September 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ECP with or without standard treatment versus standard treatment alone in paediatric patients with aGvHD after HSCT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed the study selection. We resolved disagreement in the selection of trials by consultation with a third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no additional studies in the 2015 review update, in total leading to no studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of ECP in the treatment of aGvHD in paediatric patients after HSCT is unknown and its use should be restricted within the context of RCTs. Such studies should address a comparison of ECP alone or in combination with standard treatment versus standard treatment alone. The 2015 review update brought about no additions to these conclusions.

The effect of extracorporeal photopheresis on T cell response in chronic graft-versus-host disease

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a safe and effective immunoregulatory therapy for steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) but its mechanism of action is poorly understood. In this study, we evaluated the effect of ECP in a sample of cGVHD patients. Our data showed that ECP-treated patients had lower CD4 T and B cells, and substantially higher NK cells than untreated patients. T regulatory (Treg) cells were similar between the two groups of patients. Interestingly, Treg cells were higher in ECP-treated patients and ECP-responders who had no history of aGVHD or sclerosis, than in those who had one of them or both. These findings suggest that at least one of the mechanisms of immunomodulation by ECP targets the Treg cell population and that an increase in Treg cells may be associated with response in patients with cGVHD. Together, the results of ECP are different depending on the patients' clinical condition.

Treatment of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Childhood with Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy/Photopheresis: The Padova Experience

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Systemic steroid treatment represents the first-line therapy for aGVHD and is associated with a response rate of 30% to 60%. Steroid-resistant patients have a poor prognosis with high transplantation-related mortality (TRM). Several second-line therapies have been proposed for the management of unresponsive aGVHD, without proven beneficial effects on patients' outcome or overall long-term survival. For these reasons, extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis (ECP), a cell-based approach to control GVHD that spares generalized immunosuppression, seems to be promising. In this study, we report the outcome of 72 consecutive pediatric patients treated with ECP between 1997 and 2013 for aGVHD. Among them, 21 patients had steroid-resistant aGVHD, 42 had steroid-dependent aGVHD, and 9 did not receive steroid as first-line therapy because of clinical contraindications. A complete response was obtained in 72% of patients, a partial response was observed in 11%, and there was no response in 17% of patients. At day +180, TRM was 4% in the whole cohort; TRM was 3% and 20% among responders and nonresponders to ECP, respectively (P < .0001). The 5-year overall survival was 71%, showing a difference between responders and nonresponders of 78% and 30%, respectively (P = .0004). The 5-year time to progression of primary disease was 81%, without any significant difference between the 2 groups. Moreover, the 5-year progression-free survival of primary disease was 72%, with a significant difference (P = .0007) between responders (79%) and nonresponders (30%) to ECP. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that ECP is highly effective in aGVHD without a negative impact on primary disease.

•

We conducted a retrospective study of 72 consecutive pediatric patients treated with extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis for acute graft-versus-host disease.

•

Twenty-one steroid-refractory, 21 steroid-dependent, and 30 patients with infectious complications were included.

•

The infectious complications group included 9 with no steroids before extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis and 21 with steroids.

•

Outcomes at the end of extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis were complete remission, 72%; transplantation-related mortality day +180, 4%; 5-year overall survival, 71%; time to progression, 81%; and progression-free survival, 72%.

•

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis was highly effective in acute graft-versus-host disease without negative impact on primary disease.

Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Second-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Diseases: Results from a Health Technology Assessment in Italy

OBJECTIVES

To develop a comparative, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact analysis of Therakos online extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) compared with the main alternatives used for the treatment of steroid-refractory/resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) in Italy.

METHODS

The current therapeutic pathway was identified by searching medical databases and from the results of a survey of practice in Italian clinical reference centers. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line alternatives. Budget impact and cost-effectiveness analyses were performed from the Italian National Health Service perspective over a 7-year time horizon through the adaption of a Markov model. The following health states were considered: complete and partial response, stable disease, and progression. A discount rate of 3% was applied to costs and outcomes.

RESULTS

The most common alternatives used in Italy for the management of steroid-refractory/resistant cGvHD were ECP, mycophenolate, pentostatin, and imatinib. The literature review highlighted that complete and partial responses are higher with ECP than with the alternatives while serious adverse events are less common. The economic analysis showed that Therakos online ECP represents the dominating alternative, in that it delivers greater benefit at a lower cost. In fact, according to the alternatives considered, cost saving ranged from €3237.09 to €19,903.51 per patient with 0.04 to 0.21 quality-adjusted life-year gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Therakos online ECP should be considered an effective, safe, and cost-effective alternative in steroid-refractory/resistant cGvHD. There is inequality in access, and a dedicated reimbursement tariff, however, should be introduced to overcome these barriers.

Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis

BACKGROUND

After the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (photochemotherapy) in the treatment of acute and chronic graft versus host disease: immunological mechanisms and the results from clinical studies

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory alternative for treatment of graft versus host disease (GVHD). The blood is then separated into its various components through apheresis; buffy coat cells are thereafter treated with 8-methoxypsoralen before exposure to ultraviolet light and finally reinfused into the patient. There is a general agreement that this treatment has an anti-GVHD effect, but the mechanisms of action behind this effect are only partly understood. However, altered maturation of dendritic cells (DC) and thereby indirect modulation of T-cell reactivity seems to be one important mechanism together with DC-presentation of antigens derived from apoptotic donor T cells and induction of regulatory T cells. The treatment has been best studied in patients with chronic GVHD (both pediatric and adult patients), but most studies are not randomized and it is difficult to know whether the treatment is more effective than the alternatives. The clinical studies of ECP in adults with acute GVHD are few and not randomized; it is not possible to judge whether this treatment should be a preferred second- or third-line treatment. There is no evidence for increased risk of leukemia relapse or suppression of specific graft versus leukemia reactivity by this treatment, so specific antileukemic immunotherapy may still be possible. Thus, even though the treatment seems effective in patients with GVHD, further clinical (especially randomized) as well as biological studies with careful standardization of the treatment are needed before it is possible to conclude how ECP should be used in acute and chronic GVHD.

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation occurring in 6% to 65% of the recipients. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for chronic GvHD are corticosteroids that are frequently combined with other immunosuppressive agents in people with steroid-refractory manifestations. There is no established standard treatment for steroid-refractory chronic GvHD. The therapeutic options in these people include extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulatory treatment that involves ex vivo collection of mononuclear cells from peripheral blood, exposure to the photoactive agent 8-methoxypsoralen, ultraviolet radiation and re-infusion of the processed cell product. The mechanisms of action of ECP are not completely understood.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ECP for the management of chronic GvHD in children and adolescents after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 9, 2012), MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from their inception to 12 September 2012. We searched the reference lists of potentially relevant studies without any language restriction. We searched eight trial registers and five conference proceedings. We also contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ECP with or without alternative treatment versus alternative treatment alone in paediatric patients with chronic GvHD after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed the study selection. We resolved disagreements in the selection of trials by consultation with a third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of ECP in the treatment of chronic GvHD in paediatric patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation based on RCTs can currently not be evaluated since we have found no such studies. Current recommendations are based on retrospective or observational studies only. Thus, ideally, ECP should be applied in the context of controlled trials only. However, performing RCTs in this patient population will be challenging due to the limited number of patients, the variable disease presentation and the lack of well-defined response criteria. International collaboration, multicentre trials and appropriate funding for such trials will be needed. If treatment decisions based on clinical grounds in favour of ECP are made, people should be carefully monitored for beneficial and harmful effects and efforts should be made to share this information with other clinicians, for example by setting up registries for paediatric patients that are treated with ECP.

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus standard treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Acute graft-versus host disease (aGvHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) occurring in 8% to 59% of the recipients. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for aGvHD is corticosteroids. However, there is no established standard treatment for steroid-refractory aGvHD. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a type of immunomodulatory method amongst different therapeutic options that involves ex vivo collection of peripheral mononuclear cells, exposure to the photoactive agent 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet-A radiation, and re-infusion of these treated blood cells to the patient. The mechanisms of action of ECP are not completely understood

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ECP for the management of aGvHD in children and adolescents after HSCT.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 9, 2012), MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from their inception to 12 September 2012. We searched the reference lists of potentially relevant studies without any language restriction. We searched eight trial registers and four conference proceedings. We also contacted an expert in the field to request information on unpublished study that involves ECP in aGvHD after HSCT.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ECP with or without standard treatment versus standard treatment alone in paediatric patients with aGvHD after HSCT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed the study selection. We resolved disagreement in the selection of trials by consultation with a third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of ECP in the treatment of aGvHD in paediatric patients after HSCT is unknown and its use should be restricted within the context of RCTs. Such studies should address a comparison of ECP alone or in combination with standard treatment versus standard treatment alone. 

Extracorporeal photopheresis, a therapeutic option for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and immunological diseases: state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been extensively used for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases for over 20 years and has a consistent and predictable safety profile with long-term use. Documenting the efficacy of ECP as therapeutic treatment has long been a matter of importance for physicians.

AREAS COVERED

The authors reviewed publications in this field with the goal of providing an overview of this therapeutic approach.

EXPERT OPINION

ECP is efficacious in a high percentage of those cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients who have circulating malignant T cells in the context of a still-near-normal immune competence. From the side of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), the use of ECP showed a clinical benefit in patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD (aGVHD) and it is believed that ECP deserves to be evaluated as part of a combination strategy in first-line therapy of aGVHD. In chronic GHVD, the published data show that ECP can be effective in extensive and long-standing disease even when treatment is initiated at an advanced stage after conventional immunosuppressive and corticosteroid therapy has failed. ECP should be considered most beneficial for patients with predominantly mucocutaneous chronic GVHD. The fields of application of the procedure could be vast, and could also include autoimmune and metabolic diseases. The most important methodological issues which affect ECP evaluation is that the large majority of data about ECP result from single-arm observational series and the significant efficacy is mainly based on small and retrospective studies. ECP has never been proved to offer any survival advantage in a context of a randomized trial and the above-mentioned limitation also affects the accuracy of many biological modifications observed during ECP. Starting from these considerations, the need of a prospective randomized study becomes increasingly urgent.

Analysis of clinical outcome and survival in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of steroid-refractory GVHD

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used for treatment of steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with encouraging results. However, only a few pediatric centers have experienced with ECP, mainly by technical difficulties of leukapheresis in children. We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients treated during 5 years with ECP for steroid-refractory acute and chronic GVHD. We performed an "off-line" approach using a continuous flow cell separator (Cobe Spectra) and a Ultraviolet A irradiator (UVAMATIC). Among acute GVHD patients, 11 of 21 obtained a complete remission (CR) and another 8 reached partial remission. In the chronic GVHD group, 3 patients obtained CR and another 2 were in partial remission. Disease-free survival probability was 43±9% in the whole group. The only variable that impacts on disease-free survival on multivariate analysis was achieving CR with ECP. We also found a better CD4/CD8 ratio after ECP. In detail, among CD4 lymphocyte population, an increase in the effector memory and T-regulatory population was found. We may conclude that ECP is a safe and effective steroid-refractory GVHD treatment using the ex-vivo collection method, even in small children. Clinical response favorably impacts on long-term survival and seems to be associated with peripheral blood lymphocyte subset changes generating peripheral tolerance.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence-based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed.

[Rationale for the use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy in children]

The management of immune diseases in children remains challenging, although significant advances have been made. In addition to pharmacological approaches, extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is distinctive in its ability to provide immunomodulation without immune suppression or toxicity. However, in practice, this therapy is not widely used because of logistical issues and the lack of robust clinical pediatric studies. Here, we discuss the potential clinical applications of ECP in children and emphasize the need for a rigorous and specifically pediatric clinical evaluation of ECP.

The use of fluid boluses to safely perform extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in low-weight children: a novel procedure

Apheresis procedures in small children are technically challenging and require special planning with attention to extracorporeal volume. Discontinuous procedures such as extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) require additional consideration. Alternative methods to perform ECP have been utilized in small children that require manipulation of mononuclear cells outside the standard closed-loop system. We present a safe and feasible alternative to the procedure for children who weigh less than 40 Kg, while maintaining a closed loop, sterile system utilizing the UVAR XTS device. A retrospective chart review was performed analyzing the use of fluid boluses (normal saline in those between 20 and 40 Kg, 5% albumin in those under 20 Kg) before ECP. Eleven patients underwent 334 ECP procedures for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (n = 9), and for prevention of graft-versus-host disease (n = 2). Volumes of fluid boluses were calculated based on the expected extracorporeal volume during the first draw cycle. Treatments consisted of at least three draw cycles using the 125 mL bowl. The median weight was 28.5 Kg (range 19 to 39); nine of 11 required red cell transfusions to maintain adequate hematocrit. Complications attributed to ECP included tachycardia, dizziness, nausea, and hypotension; these occurred either in combination or isolation in 31% of the procedures and resolved following additional fluid boluses. Only three (0.8%) required early photoactivation due to these complications. The median time to completion of treatment was 2 h and 58 min (range 1:30 to 5:03). ECP is well tolerated in low-weight pediatric patients if hematocrit and hydration are carefully maintained.

Consensus conference on clinical practice in chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD): first-line and topical treatment of chronic GVHD

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. First-line treatment of cGVHD is based on steroids of 1 mg/kg/day of prednisone. The role of calcineurin inhibitors remains controversial, especially in patients with low risk for mortality (normal platelets counts), whereas patients with low platelets at diagnosis and/or high risk for steroid toxicity may be treated upfront with the combination of prednisone and a calcineurin inhibitor. Additional systemic immunosuppressive agents, like thalidomide, mycophenolic acid, and azathioprine, failed to improve treatment results in the primary treatment of cGVHD and are in part associated with higher morbidity, and in the case of azathioprine, with higher mortality. Despite advances in diagnosis of cGVHD as well as supportive care, half of the patients fail to achieve a long-lasting response to first-line treatment, and infectious morbidity continues to be significant. Therefore, immunomodulatory interventions with low infectious morbidity and mortality such as photopheresis need urgent evaluation in clinical trials. Beside systemic immunosuppression, the use of topical immunosuppressive interventions may improve local response rates and may be used as the only treatment in mild localized organ manifestations of cGVHD.

Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in Chronic GVHD: Second-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Steroid refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. Although first-line treatment of cGVHD is based on controlled trials, second-line treatment is almost solely based on phase II trials or retrospective analyses. The consensus conference on clinical practice in cGVHD held in Regensburg aimed to achieve a consensus on the current evidence of treatment options as well as to provide guidelines for daily clinical practice. Treatment modalities are the use of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors as well as immunomodulating modalities (photopheresis, mTOR-inhibitors, thalidomide, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin A analogs, clofazimine), and cytostatic agents (mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, pentostatin). Recent reports showed some efficacy of rituximab, alemtuzumab, and etanercept in selected patients. Moreover, tyrosine kinase inihibitors such as imatinib came into the field because of their ability to interfere with the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-R) pathway involved in fibrosis. An other treatment option is low-dose thoracoabdominal irradiation. Although different treatment options are available, the "trial-and-error system" remains the only way to identify the drug effective in the individual patient, and valid biomarkers are eagerly needed to identify the likelihood of response to a drug in advance. Moreover, the sparse evidence for most treatment entities indicates the urgent need for systematic evaluation of second-line treatment options in cGVHD.

Photopheresis in pediatric patients with low-body weight using the UVAR XTS system

BACKGROUND

Photopheresis (ECP) with the UVAR XTS system has been limited to patients with a body weight > 40 kg, because extracorporeal blood volumes (ECV) may exceed 15% of the total blood volumes in low-body-weight patients. Because of these instrument characteristics, the use of ECP is limited in pediatric patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 5 patients (age 4 to 15 years) with graft-versus-host disease and with a body weight between 13 and 34 kilograms, photopheresis was performed using the UVAR XTS system. In 3 patients ECP could be performed by balancing the ECV with saline infusions. In 2 patients the system was modified in that the instrument was primed with packed red cells. During the treatment, fluid balance was guaranteed by a reservoir from a transfusion bag connected in parallel.

RESULTS

Together 223 procedures were performed, among them 28 with the modification of the system. The treatments were well tolerated, and no episodes of hypotension were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to run ECP in low-body weight patients with the UVAR XTS system.

Therapy of chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a common complication after hematopoietic-cell transplant and remains the leading cause of late non-relapse mortality. Standard treatment includes a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and corticosteroids. Prolonged steroid use is required, with more than 50% of patients continuing immunosuppression beyond 2 years. There is no standard second-line therapy for cGVHD. Many agents have been reported in small case series, but the studies are heterogeneous in patient selection and response criteria. There is a need for a systematic study of agents for secondary therapy of cGVHD. In addition, both cGVHD and its treatment are associated with severe complications, including life-threatening infections, reduced quality of life, and psychosocial disturbances. A multidisciplinary approach to evaluating and managing patients with cGVHD is preferred, and disciplined, prospective study of new therapies is essential to make further progress in its understanding and treatment.

Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy as a Challenging Treatment for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma, Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease, Organ Rejection and T-Lymphocyte-Mediated Autoimmune Diseases

SUMMARY: 20 years ago, in 1987, Edelson and co-workers published their first report on the effectiveness of a new procedure, called extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP), in patients with advanced stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The positive response (>70% overall) achieved in those patients encouraged several groups to try out this new technology in other T-lymphocyte-mediated autoimmune diseases and a number of dermatological diseases, which sometimes gave conflicting results. In the following years, ECP obtained FDA approval as first line treatment in CTCL. In the 1990s ECP was applied to acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy and proved to be effective in >60% of cases of this larger patient population. Today, although the effectiveness of ECP in GvHD is generally acknowledged, this is mainly based on retrospective or observational studies, as data from large, randomized multicenter trials, has yet to be published. Moreover, ECP's real mechanism of action and optimal treatment schedule are still under investigation. The aim of this review is to summarize knowledge acquired to date about ECP.

Photopheresis in pediatric graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic marrow transplantation: clinical practice guidelines based on field experience and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) gives positive results in the management of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but in children, specific difficulties can outweigh this benefit. These difficulties must be taken into consideration when establishing a standardized reproducible procedure for implementation under a quality management plan.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-seven children underwent ECP for severe acute GVHD (aGVHD) or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) after allogeneic marrow transplantation. Data were collected prospectively, with particular emphasis placed on technical, biologic, immunologic, clinical, and long-term follow-up issues.

RESULTS

The 27 children underwent a total of 750 sessions. Mononuclear cells were collected on a commercially available apheresis system (COBE Spectra, Gambro BCT). Overall survival was 73 percent, and ECP led to significant improvement in 21 of the 27 patients (11 with complete response and 10 with partial response, i.e., >50% of organ involvement). Tolerance was good overall, the main limiting factors being vascular access and the psychological impact of repeated apheresis procedures. Children weighing less than 25 kg were not more susceptible to side effects.

CONCLUSION

A specifically pediatric-dedicated and -experienced team faces only limited difficulties when treating children with GVHD by ECP. Overall, ECP is efficient and well tolerated. Our experience was therefore pooled together with available pediatric data to establish clinical practice guidelines. These guidelines consider ECP as a first-line therapy in Grade IV aGVHD (in association with conventional pharmacologic approaches) and limited cGVHD and as a second-line therapy in steroid-resistant Grades II to III aGVHD and extensive cGVHD.

Technical report: effects of PUVA treatment on the optical properties of blood/tissue storage bags during extracorporeal photochemotherapy

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (photopheresis, ECP) is a novel therapeutic method for patients who do not respond to immunosuppressive medications, and gaining interest in the treatment of Graft-vs-Host Disease. This paper is focused on the optical transmission properties of plastic bags which can be used in an independent (off-line) method of ECP, and reports the results of spectral measurements on various bags of different chemical compositions, with and without PUVA treatment. Regarding their higher and more uniform UVA transmission values, FEP based bags perform superior to the others. Considering its UVB absorption and UVA transmission properties, the EVA bag is a good choice, while Polyimide Kapton-FEP plastic film should not be considered for use in ECP. PUVA treatment of blood bags may affect their optical behaviour, and causes reduction of transmission of the material in UV range of the spectrum.

Extracorporeal photopheresis with permanent subcutaneous right atrial catheters

BACKGROUND

Adequate peripheral venous access is crucial for successful extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP). As this approach is not always feasible in older patients and patients with graft-versus-host disease, central venous catheters play an increasing role in providing long-term vascular access for ECP.However, not all catheters are able to deliver the minimum flow rate of 7 ml/min for ECP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight different permanent subcutaneous right atrial catheters were connected in vitro to the UVAR-XTS photopheresis system and median flow rates were determined. In addition, in vivo flow rates of patients who received ECP, using either peripheral or central venous access, were determined.

RESULTS

Hemodialysis catheters with an internal diameter of 2.0 or 1.5 x 3.5 mm and a length up to 48 cm provided in vitro flow rates of 27-28 ml/min, almost identical to a peripheral access needle. Central venous catheters with a length of over 90 cm reached flow rates below 7 ml/min and are impractical for ECP. The analysis of 308 ECP collection cycles with peripheral vascular access revealed an average flow rate of 31.5 +/- 6.4 ml/min. Only permanent subcutaneous right atrial catheters made for hemodialysis provided similar flow rates (Quinton PermCath Dual Lumen) (33.7 +/- 4.7 ml/min, n = 198).

CONCLUSIONS

Permanent subcutaneous hemodialysis catheters with a length of maximally 48 cm achieve optimal flow rates for ECP. They represent therefore the central venous access of choice in patients with inadequate peripheral vascular access.

Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Trend for a Possible Cell Dose-Related Effect?

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) has been progressively introduced into the treatment of both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) over the last decade. Nevertheless, its mechanisms of action, as well as the optimal treatment schedule, have not yet been defined. We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients with cGvHD unresponsive to conventional treatments who underwent ECP from 1997 until 2005. The impact of various factors (such as treated and infused nucleated cells, time from transplantation and cGvHD onset, and time from cGvHD and ECP treatment) on the probability of no response to ECP was therefore investigated. A positive response to ECP was achieved in 80% of the patients, after a median of 19 ECP treatments (with a range of 8-38). Eighteen out of the 20 patients responsive to the treatment maintained their response for a median of 30 months. We mainly focused on clinical response and yield composition. The analysis on mononuclear cell (MNC) dose suggested that an increase of MNC dose/kg b.w. (body weight) induced a decrease in the odds of treatment failure, and that, if the MNC dose infused was at least 100 x 10(6)/kg b.w. per ECP treatment, a more positive and longer-lasting response was achieved. Moreover, the mean dose of treated and infused monocytes x 10(6)/kg b.w./ECP did not account for a clear dose-related effect. These findings may eventually result in a more patient-tailored approach to ECP. Prospective multicenter trials should be designed to investigate the real impact of MNC dose on ECP responsiveness.

Advances in the understanding of acute graft-versus-host disease

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the definitive immunotherapy for malignancy. However, morbidity and mortality due to graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) remains the major barrier to its advancement. Emerging experimental data highlights the immuno-modulatory roles of diverse cell populations in GVHD, including regulatory T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, NK T cells, gammadelta T cells, and antigen presenting cells (APC). Knowledge of the pathophysiology of GVHD has driven the investigation of new rational strategies to both prevent severe GVHD and treat steroid-refractory GVHD. Novel cytokine inhibitors, immune-suppressant agents known to preserve or even promote regulatory T-cell function and the depletion of specific alloreactive T-cell sub-populations all promise significant advances in the near future. As our knowledge and therapeutic options expand, the ability to limit GVHD whilst preserving anti-microbial and tumour responses becomes a realistic prospect.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—Evidence-based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American society for apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. This elaborate process had been undertaken every 7 years resulting in three prior publications in 1986, 1993, and 2000 of "The ASFA Special Issues." This article is the integral part of the Fourth ASFA Special Issue. The Fourth ASFA Special Issue is significantly modified in comparison to the previous editions. A new concept of a fact sheet has been introduced. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. A detailed description of the fact sheet is provided. The article consists of 53 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA. Categories I, II, and III are defined as previously in the Third Special Issue. However, a few new therapeutic apheresis modalities, not yet approved in the United States or are currently in clinical trials, have been assigned category P (pending) by the ASFA Clinical Categories Subcommittee. The diseases assigned to category IV are discussed in a separate article in this issue.

Care for patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis to treat chronic graft-versus-host disease: review of the evidence

Late immune dysregulation following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is known as chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which is a major cause of mortality and morbidity after HCT, and a rise in its incidence is predicted. Better therapies are being sought to manage chronic GVHD and limit patients' exposure to corticosteroids. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immune-modulating therapy, has shown preliminary safety and efficacy in treating chronic GVHD. However, access to ECP is limited, care is costly, and the optimal frequency, duration, and durability of response are unknown. Although nurses who care for patients with chronic GVHD recognize its adverse impact on patients' quality of life, limited evidence exists about the selection of patients most likely to benefit from ECP therapy and from the supportive care provided to them. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to define the desired outcomes of ECP therapy and to determine the evidence base for nursing management approaches.

Technology insight: ECP for the treatment of GvHD--can we offer selective immune control without generalized immunosuppression?

Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation remains an important curative therapy for many conditions and its use is increasing annually. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is the major cause of mortality and suffering following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Conventional treatments are associated with multiple side effects and are often ineffective. New therapeutic approaches for the control of GvHD are desperately required. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) was developed in the 1970s for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and was approved by the FDA as the first selective immunotherapy for a cancer. ECP has also proved an effective therapy for immune-related conditions, particularly GvHD, even in patients refractory to conventional therapies. The treatment involves the mechanical separation of circulating white cells, which are exposed to psoralen and UVA light and then returned to the patient. ECP is extremely well tolerated with minimal side effects and is not associated with the increased rates of infection or relapse of malignant disease typical of conventional immunosuppressive agents. Thus, ECP appears to offer selective immune modulation without generalized immunosuppression, but its mechanism of action remains poorly understood. This review discusses the development of ECP, its use in the treatment of GvHD, as well as current theories of its mechanism of action.

Extracorporeal photopheresis in children with graft-versus-host disease

Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are major complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Systemic corticosteroid is the first line of therapy but only half of the patients will respond. The management of steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent GVHD is challenging. Intensification of immunosuppression has been the main strategy but the response rate is not satisfactory. Furthermore, the incidence of treatment-related toxicity and opportunistic infection is unacceptably high. Extracorporel photopheresis (ECP) has been used in the management of refractory GVHD. Retrospective analysis of the experience in adult patients showed activity in both acute and chronic GVHD. The procedure was well tolerated with minimal changes in the hematologic and biochemical parameters. However the machine currently approved is designed for patients over 40 kg of body weight. Significant fluid shift and venous access are major concerns when ECP is performed in children. Various modifications of the ECP procedure have been tried to manage patients with low body weight. Experience with ECP in children is limited but preliminary data also showed favorable response in children with resistant GVHD. Further investigations are needed to refine the optimal schedule, duration, and treatment technique for pediatric patients.