Pre-transplant reduction of isohaemagglutinin titres by donor group plasma infusion does not reduce the incidence of pure red cell aplasia in major ABO-mismatched transplants

Pure red cell aplasia among ABO mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a 13-years retrospective study and literature review

Background

Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a possible complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with major ABO incompatibility. Patients experience delayed engraftment of the erythroid series, with prolonged transfusion-dependent anemia and iron overload.

Methods

We performed a revision of the most recent literature about post-HSCT PRCA treatment procedures. Moreover, we conducted a retrospective study, over the last 13-years, which included all consecutive major ABO mismatched HSCT performed in our unit, with the aim to assess PRCA incidence, risk factors, and response to different treatments. Overall, 194 patients received a major ABO mismatched transplant from 2010 to 2022. For each patient, data about demographic and transplant characteristics, engraftment, blood transfusion, and possible treatment received were collected.

Results

The literature review returned 23 eligible papers on PRCA treatment, with high success rate using plasma-exchange (PEX) and immunoadsorption procedures, daratumumab, and eltrombopag. Our study identified a total of 24 cases of PRCA. Among risk factors for PRCA development, we have found older recipient age (p=0.01), high pre-HSCT IgG and IgM IHA titer (p<0.0001), major rather than bidirectional ABO incompatibility (p=0.02), low T CD8 lymphocyte count in the graft (p=0.006), relative donor (p=0.02) and bone marrow as stem cell source (p=0.002). However, multivariate analysis confirmed only pre-HSCT IgG IHA titer as the unique risk factor for PRCA occurrence. The optimal cut-off value of pre-HSCT IgG IHA for PRCA development, resulted to be 1/64, with a 100% sensitivity and 68.8% specificity (p<0.0001). All patients with PRCA had received rhEPO and transfusion support and 20 patients received additional treatments like PEX, rituximab, and more recently daratumumab. Comprehensively, PEX and rituximab obtained a response in half of the cases, at a variable time, while the few cases of patients we treated with daratumumab suggest promising results. The overall response rate in our cohort was 75%, with significantly better survival (94.4% vs. 16.7%) and lower transplant-related mortality (6.3% vs. 80%) for PRCA responders.

Conclusions

Standardized guidelines on when and how to treat PRCA are necessary because the current treatment is controversial among centers.

Pure red cell aplasia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - experimental therapeutic approaches

Not relevant.

Pre-transplant donor-type red cell transfusion is a safe and effective strategy to reduce isohemagglutinin titers and prevent donor marrow infusion reactions in major ABO-mismatched transplants

ABO incompatibility is not a barrier to allogeneic stem cell transplant but may result in acute hemolytic reactions. As stem cell product manipulation is cumbersome, we are reporting the effectiveness and safety of donor-type red cell infusion as a method of reducing acute hemolytic reaction while using marrow as stem cell source. In major ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplants, manipulation of marrow product requires expertise and expensive equipment, which may not be readily available to transplant centers in low- and middle-income regions. The aim behind our study is to report a safe and effective strategy to reduce isohemagglutinin titers and prevent donor marrow infusion reactions in major ABO-mismatched transplants. We retrospectively analyzed 303 consecutive allogeneic bone marrow transplants (BMTs) for beta thalassemia major, between August 2015 and March 2020, with either major (n = 41) or bidirectional (n = 14) mismatches. When isohemagglutinin titers were 1:32 or higher, donor-type packed red blood cell was divided into 4 aliquots, irradiated and administered over 4 days at incremental volumes. Patients were observed for hemolytic reaction, and if no reaction, bone marrow was infused without manipulation. Out of 55 patients, 20 received donor-type blood infusion. Twelve patients showed evidence of mild hemolysis. None developed severe hemolytic or anaphylactic reaction. Titers were rechecked in 14 patients and all had reduction in titers, except for one. Our experience demonstrated that donor-type PRBC infusion is safe and effective in preventing acute hemolysis in major ABO-mismatched stem cell transplants even with bone marrow as graft source.

Treatment for pure red cell aplasia after major ABO-incompatible allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a multicentre study

Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) with major ABO incompatibility is responsible for transfusion dependent anaemia, impaired quality of life and iron overload. We conducted a retrospective study, over a 10-year period, which included all consecutive patients who received a major ABO mismatched aHSCT, to assess the impact of specific treatment on PRCA. We did not observe any PRCA in the 57 aHSCT issued from cord blood. Among the remaining 631 patients, cumulative incidence of PRCA was 10·5% [range 8·2-13.0]. The median duration of resolved PRCA was 171 days [IQR 116; 261]. Pre-transplant high isohaemagglutinins titre was associated with an increased risk of PRCA (P < 10^-4 ). PRCA did not affect overall survival (P = 0·95). Twenty-two patients (33·3%) received at least one specific treatment. The most commonly used treatments were rituximab (17 patients) and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; seven patients). Regarding PRCA resolution, we did not observe a significant difference between treated or untreated subjects (HR = 0·93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·48- 1·80; P = 0·82). Similar results were observed with erythropoietin treatment (22 patients, HR = 0·86 95% CI: [0·47-1·57] P = 0·62). Our data do not support the use of erythropoietin, rituximab or DLI for the treatment of PRCA.

Impact of ABO incompatibility on outcomes after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe aplastic anemia

The impact of ABO incompatibility on transplantation outcomes in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients receiving haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains controversial without published data. A total of 199 SAA patients receiving haploidentical HSCT from ABO-matched (n = 114), minor ABO-incompatible (n = 47), or major ABO-incompatible donors (n = 38) were included in this study. The median time and cumulative incidences of both myeloid and platelet engraftment in the ABO-compatible and ABO-incompatible groups were similar, and pure red cell aplasia was absent. Minor ABO incompatibility increased the rate of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (ABO compatible: 6.14 ± 0.05%, minor incompatible: 19.15 ± 0.34%, and major incompatible: 10.53 ± 0.25%; P = 0.051), but did not influence the rates of grade II-IV aGVHD or chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Minor ABO-incompatibility was identified as an independent risk factor for grade III-IV aGVHD by multivariate analysis (hazard ration (HR) = 4.00 (1.48-10.80), P = 0.006). Chronic GVHD, mortality, and treatment failure were not increased in the minor ABO-incompatible group. For SAA patients receiving haploidentical HSCT, ABO compatible donors are better than ABO minor incompatible donors if several haploidentical donors are available.

Donor-type fresh frozen plasma is effective in preventing hemolytic reaction in major ABO incompatible allogeneic stem cell transplant

BACKGROUND

Hemolysis at the time of graft infusion is one of the immediate complications in major ABO-incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs). We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy of donor-type fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in reducing isohemagglutinin titer and preventing hemolysis, as well as its effect on delayed red cell engraftment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center study on a series of 380 allogeneic HSCT between 2005 and 2015; of which 99 were either major (n = 74) or bidirectional (n = 25) ABO mismatched. Pre-transplant infusion of FFP, post-transplant complications and transfusion requirements were determined by retrospective review of individual medical records. Laboratory results were also reviewed for evidence of hemolysis and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA).

RESULTS

Clinical manifestation of hemolysis attributable to ABO mismatch was present in one recipient of major ABO-incompatible peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) with a titer of 64. Another recipient of major ABO-incompatible PBSC with a titer of 64 showed biochemical evidence of hemolysis. Both patients recovered with supportive treatment. Hemolysis did not occur in any patients with titer of 32 or less at the time of stem cell infusion. We were unable to demonstrate the influence of any variables on the incidence of PRCA.

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrated that donor-type FFP is safe and effective in preventing acute hemolysis in major ABO-mismatched HSCT. We have also established the titer of 64 as the threshold that may cause hemolysis and therefore efforts should be made to reduce titer to below this level.

ABO blood group incompatibility as an adverse risk factor for outcomes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia undergoing HLA-matched peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning

BACKGROUND

ABO incompatibility is not a contraindication to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but it has been associated with additional risks including delayed engraftment, pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), and higher transfusion needs. Data on these events and on patient survival after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT are limited.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 127 consecutive patients, 86 with acute myeloid leukemia and 41 with myelodysplastic syndromes, who underwent HLA-matched peripheral blood RIC allogenic HCT between 2005 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty ABO-compatible, 26 major/bidirectional, and 21 minor-ABO-mismatch HCT were identified. Compared to the ABO-compatible group, major/bidirectional mismatches had increased red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement during the first 100 days (p = 0.009), delayed RBC and PLT engraftment (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.005, respectively), and higher incidence of grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD; p = 0.037). In multivariable analysis, major/bidirectional mismatches had significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) and inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with ABO-compatible patients (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, and p = 0.035, respectively). Minor ABO mismatch had no impact on survival (p = 0.99). Four (15%) of 26 major/bidirectional mismatches developed PRCA. There was a significant association between fludarabine plus busulfan conditioning and PRCA (p = 0.0046).

CONCLUSION

Major/bidirectional ABO mismatch is associated with higher NRM and shortened DFS and OS in the setting of RIC HCT. Increased transfusion need, delayed RBC and platelet engraftment, PRCA, and increased severity of aGVHD are additional complications contributing to the morbidity.

Clinico-serologic co-relation in bi-directional ABO incompatible hemopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The ABO blood group system is of prime significance in red cell transfusion and organ transplantation. However, ABO compatibility is not critical in allogenic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and approximately 40-50% of hemopoietic stem cell transplants are ABO incompatible. This incompatibility may be major, minor or bi-directional. Though there are descriptions of transfusion practice and protocols in ABO incompatible HSCT, there are considerable variations and transfusion support in these patients can be very challenging.

AIMS

The immunohematologic observations in two cases of bi-directional ABO incompatible HSCT have been described, and clinico-serologic correlation has been attempted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In both cases, peripheral blood stem cell harvests were obtained using the Cobe spectra cell separator. Immunohematologic assessments in the donor and recipient were done as a part of pre HSCT evaluation. Both the standard tube technique and column agglutination method (Ortho Biovue Micro Bead System) was used. Antibody screen was done by column agglutination method using three cell panel (Surgiscreen cells). Isoagglutinin titration was done by the master dilution method and standard validated techniques were used.

RESULTS

The pattern of laboratory findings in the two cases was different and so were the clinical outcomes. Although there was early engraftment in the first case, the second case developed pure red cell aplasia and this was well-reflected in the immunohematologic assessments.

CONCLUSION

Immunohematologic assessment correlated well with the clinical picture and could be used to predict clinical outcome and onset of complications in ABO incompatible HSCT.

Analysis of donor and recipient ABO incompatibility and antibody-associated complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be performed across the ABO blood group barrier. The impact of ABO incompatibility on clinical outcome is controversial. A retrospective analysis of 310 patients who underwent HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning between 1998 and 2011 was performed to investigate the frequency and clinical implications of anti-RBC antibodies in passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) after minor ABO mismatch (mm), persistent or recurring recipient type ABO antibodies (PRABO) after major ABO mm HSCT, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Transplantation characteristics and clinical outcome were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis for groups with or without anti-RBC antibodies. ABO blood group incompatibility did not affect clinical outcome despite an increased requirement of blood transfusion. Twelve patients with AIHA, 6 patients with PLS, and 12 patients with PRABO post-HSCT were identified. AIHA did not affect overall survival (OS) or transplant-related mortality (TRM), but patients with AIHA had a lower incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (P = .05). OS in the PLS group was 0% compared with 61% in the whole group receiving minor ABO mm transplants (P < .001). Comparing PRABO patients with those receiving a major ABO mm HSCT, the OS was 17% versus 73% (P = .002) and TRM was 50% versus 21% (P = .03). At our center, PLS after minor ABO mm and PRABO antibodies after major ABO mm HSCT are significant risk factors for decreased OS and TRM. Our results suggest that occurrence of unexpected ABO antibodies after HSCT warrant a wider investigation individual to find the underlying cause.

Incidence and natural history of pure red cell aplasia in major ABO-mismatched haematopoietic cell transplantation

Major ABO mismatching is not considered a contraindication to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Modern reduced-intensity conditioning and reduced-toxicity regimens cause much less myeloablation than conventional myeloablative regimens, such as cyclophosphamide with busulfan or total body irradiation, which may affect the incidence of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). We estimated the incidence and described the natural history of PRCA in patients with major ABO-mismatched donor stem cells. Between 2007 and 2008, 161 (27% of all patients undergoing HSCT) underwent allogeneic HSCT with major ABO-mismatched stem cells and 12 (7·5%) of these patients developed PRCA. Thirty and ninety day T-cell and myeloid cell chimerism and neutrophil and platelet engraftment did not differ between patients who developed PRCA and those who did not. The only risk factor associated with PRCA was the use of a fludarabine/busulfan conditioning regimen. All patients with PRCA needed red cell transfusion for several months after HSCT resulting in significant iron overload. Pure red cell aplasia resolved spontaneously in the majority (seven patients) but only resolved after stopping tacrolimus in three patients. Hence, after major ABO-mismatched HSCT, the incidence of PRCA was 7·5% and it resolved spontaneously or after withdrawal of immunosuppression in the majority of patients.

Outcomes after major or bidirectional ABO-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation after pretransplant isoagglutinin reduction with donor-type secretor plasma with or without plasma exchange

BACKGROUND

Major ABO mismatch in hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) is associated with a range of immunohematologic consequences including progenitor cell infusion (PCI)-related hemolysis, delayed red blood cell engraftment, and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). Although pretransplant (recipient) isoagglutinin reduction may be associated with decreased immunohematologic complications in this setting, there is no consensus with respect to strategies for isoagglutinin reduction.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This observational study assessed the efficacy of a standardized pretransplant isoagglutinin reduction strategy incorporating donor-type secretor plasma infusions with or without plasma exchange to prevent PCI-associated hemolysis and PRCA in major or bidirectional ABO-mismatched peripheral blood HPCT. All major or bidirectional ABO-mismatched HPCTs performed between 1999 and 2010 were identified from an institutional database. Immunohematologic outcomes were determined retrospectively by review of individual medical records.

RESULTS

In total 110 major or bidirectional ABO-mismatched HPCTs had been performed. No patient developed hemolysis after PCI. With respect to PRCA incidence, 16 patients (15%) were excluded due to early mortality and three (3%) due to incomplete data; of the remaining 91 patients, five (5%) developed PRCA. Patients with PRCA had significantly higher pretransplant isoagglutinin titers (p = 0.0001) compared to those who did not develop PRCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a standardized pretransplant isoagglutinin reduction strategy including donor-type secretor plasma infusions is both safe and efficient in preventing PCI-associated hemolysis and is associated with low rates of posttransplant PRCA.

Impact of ABO-incompatible donor on early and late outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

ABO incompatibility is not a barrier to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the impact of an ABO mismatch on the outcome of the HSCT remains controversial. We analyzed whether ABO incompatibility leads to an increased risk of early/late complications, mortality, or increased transfusion requirements. The 147 consecutive allogeneic HSCTs includes 80 ABO-identical and 25 major, 30 minor, and 12 bidirectional ABO-mismatched grafts. The four groups were balanced with respect to disease status at transplantation. Transplantation-related mortality was significantly greater (P < .01) and overall survival significantly shorter (P = 0.2) among HSCT recipients with minor ABO-mismatched grafts. The relapse rate, progression-free survival, and transfusion requirements until discharge were not different between ABO-identical and ABO-mismatched groups. Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA); (P < .0001) and delayed red blood cell (RBC) engraftment (P < .001) were more frequent in HSCT recipients with major mismatched donors. Delayed RBC engraftment was associated with posttransplantation hyperferritininemia and increased mortality risk (P = .05). The greater frequency of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients with minor mismatched transplants, did not show statistical significance. In contrast severe GVHD was significantly more frequent among minor mismatched patients (P = .04). ABO-mismatched HSCT might have an unfavorable impact on transplant outcomes. Selection of ABO-compatible donors when possible, strategies to prevent and treat PRCA, modifications in transfusion practice, and effective iron chelation are among the measures that can improve transplant outcomes.

Prevention of pure red cell aplasia after major or bidirectional ABO blood group incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by pretransplant reduction of host anti-donor isoagglutinins

BACKGROUND

Persistent anti-donor isoagglutinins after major ABO blood group incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may cause delayed red blood cell engraftment and post-transplant pure red cell aplasia.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We investigated the effect of pretransplant anti-donor isoagglutinin reduction by in vivo absorption and/or plasmapheresis on the incidence of pure red cell aplasia and the time to red blood cell engraftment in 153 hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with major ABO incompatibility.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (8%) developed pure red cell aplasia, 3/98 (3%) with, and 9/55 (16%) without prior isoagglutinin reduction (p=0.009). Red blood cell engraftment was faster in patients with isoagglutinin reduction; in addition, peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, acute graft-versus-host disease, and younger age were associated with faster red blood cell engraftment in Cox regression analysis. In patients with pure red cell aplasia the mean red blood cell engraftment occurred after 225 days (p<0.001) and was associated with a simultaneous decrease of anti-donor isoagglutinins. Patients with pure red cell aplasia had higher pretransplant anti-donor isoagglutinin titers (p=0.001) and received more post-transplant red blood cell transfusions (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Following major ABO incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, pure red cell aplasia and delayed red blood cell engraftment depend on the levels of anti-donor isoagglutinins and are efficiently prevented by the pretransplant removal of these isoagglutinins. The benefits of reducing the time of transfusion-dependency and transfusion-associated risks must be carefully balanced against the potential side effects of isoagglutinin reduction.

ABO-histo blood group incompatibility in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation

In contrast to solid organ transplantation (SOT), ABO-histo blood group incompatibility is of minor importance for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients receiving ABO-incompatible HSCT are at an increased risk for immune-mediated hematological complications including immediate and delayed hemolysis, late red blood cell engraftment and pure red cell aplasia, but seem not to have a worse overall survival or increased transplant-related mortality. This review gives an overview of the immunological mechanisms leading to complications associated with ABO-incompatible HSCT and describes approaches to prevent them. The current organ shortage in SOT stimulates the exploration of new strategies to expand the donor pool including ABO-incompatible SOT and xenotransplantation. Here, we discuss the hypothesis that ABO-incompatible transplantation may be viewed as a human in vivo model for the humoral immune mechanisms of antigen-mismatched transplantation. ABO-incompatible HSCT and SOT provide excellent possibilities to analyze graft accommodation and transplantation tolerance. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of graft survival in ABO-incompatible transplantation may facilitate new strategies to overcome the immunological barriers in SOT and xenotransplantation.