Successful autologous peripheral blood stem cell harvest and transplant in a patient with cold agglutinins

Collection and processing of hematopoietic progenitor cell products at risk of presenting with cold agglutination

BACKGROUND AIMS

Cold agglutinins are commonly identified in transfusion laboratories and are defined by their ability to agglutinate erythrocytes at 3-4°C, with most demonstrating a titer >64. Similarly, cryoglobulins can precipitate from plasma when temperatures drop below central body temperature, resulting in erythrocyte agglutination. Thankfully, disease associated from these autoantibodies is rare, but unfortunately, such temperature ranges are routinely encountered outside of the body's circulation, as in an extracorporeal circuit during hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collection or human cell therapy laboratory processing. When agglutination occurs ex vivo, complications with the collection and product may be encountered, resulting in adverse events or product loss. Here, we endeavor to share our experience in preventing and responding to known cases at risk of or spontaneous HPC agglutination in our human cell therapy laboratory.

CASE REPORTS

Four cases of HPC products at risk for, or spontaneously, agglutinating were seen at our institution from 2018 to 2020. Planned modifications occurred, including ambient room temperature increases, tandem draw and return blood warmers, warm product transport and extended post-thaw warming occurred. In addition, unplanned modifications were undertaken, including warm HPC product processing and plasma replacement of the product when spontaneous agglutination of the product was identified. All recipients successfully engrafted after infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

While uncommon, cold agglutination of HPC products can disrupt standard processes of collection and processing. Protocol modifications can circumvent adverse events for the donor and minimize product loss. Such process modifications should be considered in individuals with known risks for agglutination going to HPC donation/collection.

How do I warm HPC(A) products to maximize cell viability in the setting of cold agglutinin disease?

BACKGROUND

High titers of cold agglutinins jeopardize the quality of an apheresis product meant for autologous or allogeneic transplant. Management of transplant patients with cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is often experience-based and under reported, yet decisions must be made quickly to optimize product management and patient outcomes. There remains a lack of data quantifying cell recovery and viability when using various warming methodologies.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To expand the published experimental data on this subject, our human cellular therapy lab compared cellular recoveries and viabilities after manipulation of cryopreserved apheresis products through various warming methodologies: (1) extended warming in a water bath, (2) warming via blood warmer and infusion pump, and (3) warming in a water bath followed by infusion pump as a control to assess potential shear stress effects.

RESULTS

The presented studies demonstrate that all methods of product warming produce the same rates of recovery of total and viable cells across vital cell types prior to patient administration. Statistically, use of an extended water bath protocol provided a marginal benefit in recovery of total nucleated cells, though this effect is diminished when products are held for an extended period to simulate a delay in administration.

DISCUSSION

These results can inform decisions to improve patient care and minimize product manipulation and loss. Centers are encouraged to use this information to guide proactive measures to establish a standard operating procedure to manage CAD cases.

Advances in automated cell washing and concentration

The successful commercialization of cell therapies requires thorough planning and consideration of product quality, cost and scale of the manufacturing process. The implementation of automation can be central to a robust and reproducible manufacturing process at industrialized scales. There have been a number of wash-and-concentrate devices developed for cell manufacturing. These technologies have arisen from transfusion medicine, hematopoietic stem cell and biologics manufacturing where operating mechanisms are distinct from manual centrifugation. This review describes the historical origin and fundamental technologies underlying each currently available wash-and-concentrate device as well as their relative advantages and disadvantages in cell therapy applications. Understanding the specific attributes and limitations of these technologies is essential to optimizing cell therapy manufacturing.

Failure to achieve a threshold dose of CD34+CD110+ progenitor cells in the graft predicts delayed platelet engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation

In this study, we retrospectively analysed the utility of CD110 expression on CD34(+) cells as a predictor of delayed platelet transfusion independence in 39 patients who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Absolute CD34(+) cells and CD34(+) subsets expressing CD110 were enumerated using flow cytometry. Of the 39 patients, 7 required 21 days or more to achieve platelet transfusion independence. Six of the seven patients received a dose of CD34(+)CD110(+) cells below 6.0 x 10(4)/kg while 30 of 32 patients who achieved platelet transfusion independence in <21 days received a dose of CD34(+)CD110(+) cells >6.0 x 10(4)/kg (P<0.001). Patients with delayed platelet engraftment received a median dose of 5.2 x 10(4) CD34(+)CD110(+) cells/kg compared with a median dose of 16.4 x 10(4) cells/kg for those engrafting within 21 days (P=0.003). Further analysis showed that >6.0 x 10(4) CD34(+)CD110(+) cells/kg was highly sensitive (93.8%) and highly specific (85.7%) for achieving platelet transfusion independence within 21 days. Delay in platelet transfusion independence translated into an increased requirement for platelet transfusion (median 6 vs 2 transfusions, P<0.0001). The dose of CD34(+)/CD110(+) cells/kg infused at time of transplantation appears to be an important factor identifying patients at risk of delayed platelet engraftment.