1
|
Garg V, Kodan P, Pushpam D, Bakhshi S, Kumar L, Sharma A, Gupta G, Gupta N. Impact of microbial contamination of haematopoietic stem cells on post-transplant outcomes: A retrospective study from tertiary care centre in India. Transfus Med 2021; 31:377-382. [PMID: 34396610 DOI: 10.1111/tme.12805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) may act as a source of infection for the recipient due to manipulation at multiple levels from collection to infusion. Due to the high risk of contamination cultures are usually taken during multiple steps. The clinical significance of microbial contamination of HSC on the post-transplant course and the role of prophylactic antibiotics is relatively unknown. AIMS AND METHODS The aim of our study is to investigate the incidence of microbial contamination of haematopoietic stem cell and to assess its impact on the post-transplant febrile neutropenia, engraftment kinetics, hospitalisation and day 100 mortality. Details of all patients admitted in the bone marrow transplantation unit of a tertiary care centre in India between January 2014 and December 2018 were collected from case records. RESULTS Of the 1306 stem cell harvests from 503 patients sent for culture, 17 harvests (1.3%) were found to have a culture positive report. Sixteen patients had undergone autologous transplant. Multiple myeloma was most common indication of HSC transplant followed by Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Twelve of 17 HSC cultures were positive at the time of infusion and five were positive at the time of harvest. The five HSC that were culture positive at the time of harvest were culture negative at the time of infusion. Gram-positive organisms were isolated in six cultures and gram-negative in rest. All patients developed febrile neutropenia post-transplantation between day 1 and day 7. The median time of onset of fever was day +5 (1-7), the median duration of fever was 4 days (2-7), the median duration of antibiotic use was 11 days (9-16). Median day for neutrophil engraftment was 11 days (9-16), the median day for platelet engraftment was 14 days (10-25) and median duration of hospitalisation was 15 days (12-78). All patients were alive at day 100 of transplant. CONCLUSION This study shows that there appears to be minimal impact of culture positive HSC on transplant related outcomes in terms of engraftment kinetics, duration of hospitalisation and day 100 mortality. Discarding of contaminated HSC may not be required, though on development of febrile neutropenia appropriate antibiotics should be administered based on sensitivity pattern of HSC culture. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance of such contaminations. Emphasis should be laid on better infection control practices to minimise contamination rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Garg
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | | | - Deepam Pushpam
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Lalit Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Atul Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Microbial contamination risk in hematopoietic stem cell products: retrospective analysis of 1996–2016 data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.2478/ahp-2020-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
AbstractQuality assurance and safety of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with special emphasis on bacterial and fungal contamination is the prerequisite for any transplantation procedure. The aim was to determine the incidence rate of such contamination during processing of transplantation material with regard to HSC source: peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC), bone marrow (BM), or cord blood (CB). Analysis involved autologous and allogenic products dedicated for patients and comprised in all 4135 donations, including 112 BM (2.70%), 3787 PBSC (91.60%), and 236 CB (5.70%) processed in cell bank over the period 1996–2016. Aerobic and anaerobic contamination was determined.Analysis of the 20-year data revealed 42 contaminated products: 25 PBSC (0.66% of tested units) and 17 CB (7.20% of tested units). No microbial contamination of BM products was detected. Overall percentage of contaminated products was 1.01%, mostly with Staphylococcus epidermidis (61.36%). Bacterial contamination rate at cell bank is relatively low and processing in a closed system does not seem as crucial as might be expected. This is particularly true for BM components. Equally important are evaluation of donor’s medical status and condition of the puncture site for collection of source material. Implementation of appropriate sample collection procedures should help minimize the risk of false-positive results due to environmental contamination.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kou Y, Halpenny M, Elmoazzen H, Ramirez-Arcos S. Development of a proof of principle for universal neutralization of antibiotics in cord blood by-products used for sterility testing. Transfusion 2018; 58:1421-1426. [PMID: 29516509 DOI: 10.1111/trf.14567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bacterial contamination of cord blood (CB) represents a safety risk for transplantation patients. CB sterility testing at Canadian Blood Services' Cord Blood Bank is performed using a 1:1 mix of CB-derived plasma and red blood cells (RBCs). Culture bottles of an automated culture system, which lack antimicrobial neutralization properties, are used for bacterial screening of CB. This process is unsuitable for CB-containing antibiotics, potentially resulting in false-negative results. This study was aimed at developing a protocol for antibiotic neutralization in CB used for sterility testing. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Phase 1: four neutralizers-penicillinase, ion exchange resins L and A, lecithin + Tween80, and activated charcoal (AC)-were individually tested to neutralize penicillin or gentamicin in cultures of Staphylococcus epidermidis or Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively, adjusted to 100 colony forming units/mL, in Müller-Hinton broth (MHB). Phase 2: combinations of penicillinase plus resin L or penicillinase plus AC were assayed for the simultaneous neutralization of both antibiotics in MHB. Phase 3: penicillinase plus resin L was used to neutralize both antibiotics in CB sterility testing samples (plasma + RBCs). RESULTS Phase 1: penicillin was neutralized by penicillinase and resin A, while gentamicin was neutralized by resin L and AC. Phase 2: the antibiotics were simultaneously neutralized by the two neutralizer combinations tested. Phase 3: neutralization of both antibiotics in CB was achieved with penicillinase and resin L. CONCLUSION A protocol for antibiotic neutralization in CB sterility testing samples has been successfully developed at Canadian Blood Services' Cord Blood bank. This in-house assay applies to any culture-based CB bacterial screening method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuntong Kou
- Canadian Blood Services Centre for Innovation, Product and Process Development, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Mike Halpenny
- Canadian Blood Services' Cord Blood Bank, Ottawa, Ontario
| | | | - Sandra Ramirez-Arcos
- Canadian Blood Services Centre for Innovation, Product and Process Development, Ottawa, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Golay J, Pedrini O, Capelli C, Gotti E, Borleri G, Magri M, Vailati F, Passera M, Farina C, Rambaldi A, Introna M. Utility of routine evaluation of sterility of cellular therapy products with or without extensive manipulation: Best practices and clinical significance. Cytotherapy 2018; 20:262-270. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
Savage W. Transfusion Reactions to Blood and Cell Therapy Products. Hematology 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-35762-3.00119-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
6
|
Hütter G. The Safety of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. STEM CELLS IN CLINICAL APPLICATIONS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59165-0_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
7
|
Castagnola E, Faraci M. Management of bacteremia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2014; 7:607-21. [DOI: 10.1586/eri.09.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
8
|
Jacobs MR, Good CE, Fox RM, Roman KP, Lazarus HM. Microbial contamination of hematopoietic progenitor and other regenerative cells used in transplantation and regenerative medicine. Transfusion 2013; 53:2690-6. [PMID: 23461309 DOI: 10.1111/trf.12150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2012] [Revised: 12/27/2012] [Accepted: 01/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial contamination of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) and other regenerative cells used in transplantation and regenerative medicine can occur during collection and after in vitro manipulation, including purging, cryopreservation, thawing, and infusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Microbiologic culture findings on consecutive HPCs and other cell preparations at a single institution derived from peripheral blood, marrow, cord blood, and mesenchymal stromal cells during all phases of manipulation were retrospectively examined from 2005 through 2011. Results were classified as confirmed positive, false positive, and indeterminate. RESULTS During the 6-year surveillance period, 365 patients underwent 912 procedures involving HPC or other cell-based transfusion. True positive microbial contamination was found in five of 663 (0.8%) peripheral blood and two of 34 (5.9%) marrow preparations (p = 0.04), while no contamination was found in 118 preparations from other sources. True-positive microbial contaminants included coagulase-negative staphylococci in autologous HPC products derived from peripheral blood from two patients with asymptomatic central venous catheter infections at time of apheresis and Propionibacterium acnes in one apheresis and two marrow products. Organism loads were low in all cases (≤500 colony-forming units/mL), and no adverse sequelae occurred in four patients that received contaminated products. CONCLUSION The incidence of microbial contamination of progenitor cell products in our institution over a 6-year period was low (0.8% overall), with contaminants originating from infected central venous catheters or from skin flora. All contaminants were bacterial species of low virulence, present in low titers and, if transfused, did not result in adverse reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Jacobs
- Departments of Pathology and Medicine and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu C, Weber C, Sempek DS, Grossman BJ, Burnham CAD. Sterility testing of apheresis hematopoietic progenitor cell products using an automated blood culture system. Transfusion 2013; 53:2659-66. [DOI: 10.1111/trf.12115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2012] [Revised: 11/21/2012] [Accepted: 12/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Liu
- Department of Pathology & Immunology; Washington University; St Louis Missouri
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital; St Louis Missouri
| | - Carol Weber
- Department of Pathology & Immunology; Washington University; St Louis Missouri
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital; St Louis Missouri
| | - Diane S. Sempek
- Department of Pathology & Immunology; Washington University; St Louis Missouri
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital; St Louis Missouri
| | - Brenda J. Grossman
- Department of Pathology & Immunology; Washington University; St Louis Missouri
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital; St Louis Missouri
| | - Carey-Ann D. Burnham
- Department of Pathology & Immunology; Washington University; St Louis Missouri
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital; St Louis Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Microbial contamination of autologous peripheral blood stem cell products: incidence, clinical outcome, quality control and management strategies. Pathology 2011; 43:340-5. [DOI: 10.1097/pat.0b013e32834642ec] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Marr KA. Infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Infect Dis (Lond) 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-04579-7.00074-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
12
|
Vaughan W, Seshadri T, Bridges M, Keating A. The principles and overview of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cancer Treat Res 2009; 144:23-45. [PMID: 19779877 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-78580-6_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William Vaughan
- University of Alabama Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reich-Slotky R, Wu F, Della-Latta P, Savage DG, Schwartz J. Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to identify the source of bacterial contamination of peripheral blood progenitor cell products. Transfusion 2008; 48:2409-13. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01851.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
14
|
Vanneaux V, Foïs E, Robin M, Rea D, de Latour RP, Biscay N, Chantre E, Robert I, Wargnier A, Traineau R, Benbunan M, Marolleau JP, Socié G, Larghero J. Microbial contamination of BM products before and after processing: a report of incidence and immediate adverse events in 257 grafts. Cytotherapy 2007; 9:508-13. [PMID: 17786612 DOI: 10.1080/14653240701420427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence and potential clinical consequences of bacterial contamination of autologous and allogeneic BM products remains open to question. We report our experience of bacterial contamination of BM grafts and adverse events that occurred after transplantation. METHODS From January 2003 to February 2006, 257 BM harvests were processed and infused at our institution. Analysis of microbial contamination incidence before and after processing, sensitivity spectra of isolated bacteria and adverse events after graft infusion were analyzed. RESULTS Nineteen of 257 BM (7.4%) were contaminated. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n=9) and Propionibacterium acnes (n=6) were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. Two of nine coagulase-negative staphylococci were found to be resistant to erythromycin and two of six P. acnes to fosfomycin and gentamycin. The frequency and severity of immediate adverse events reported in patients receiving a contaminated graft were similar to those observed in patients receiving a non-contaminated product. No major adverse sequelae occurred after infusion of contaminated grafts. Finally, none of the patients transplanted with a contaminated graft developed bacteriemia that could have been related to the isolated microorganism. DISCUSSION Microbial contamination of BM progenitor cell grafts does not induce severe clinical complications or infectious diseases after infusion. The vast majority of isolated pathogens were skin contaminants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Vanneaux
- Unité de Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Forte L, Gardiner N, O'Connell B, McCann SR. How much GMP do we need to infuse contaminated HPC and DLI products? Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40:389-90. [PMID: 17572717 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
16
|
Padley DJ, Dietz AB, Gastineau DA. Sterility testing of hematopoietic progenitor cell products: a single-institution series of culture-positive rates and successful infusion of culture-positive products. Transfusion 2007; 47:636-43. [PMID: 17381622 DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01165.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Administration of culture-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) causing adverse events has been a hypothesized yet largely unmeasured risk of the clinical practice of HPC transplantation. To enhance patient safety, the FDA has issued regulations prohibiting the use of culture-positive HPCs. Numerous studies have reported the infusion of culture-positive HPCs; however, the low frequency of adverse events prevents accurate determination of this risk. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Product culture results and clinical outcomes from January 1998 through March 2006 representing 7233 HPC collections for 2118 transplants at a single institution were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 119 units of HPCs (1.6%) intended for 95 patients were culture-positive. Of the 69 patients transplanted with culture-positive HPCs, 5 received products with cultures pending, and 64 received products with the positive culture results known. One of 69 patients had a new positive blood culture 5 days after infusion with the same species as the product. There was not a clinically relevant difference in the rate of infusion-related symptoms reported for patients who received culture-positive products compared to all infusions. The survival of patients who received culture-positive products (n = 69) was not different from all HPC recipients (n = 2046; p = 0.419). CONCLUSION No infusion-related risks of culture-positive HPCs to patient safety were identified. Our data suggest that the decision to use culture-positive HPCs must be made in the context of the global risks associated with transplants such as remobilization, replacement product availability, and the nature of the organism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas J Padley
- Transfusion Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Microbial pathogens of hematopoietic stem cells – screening and testing for infectious diseases. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007. [DOI: 10.1097/mrm.0b013e3282cdf04a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|