Ritonavir 100 mg does not cause QTc prolongation in healthy subjects: a possible role as CYP3A inhibitor in thorough QTc studies

Electrophysiological Profile of Different Antiviral Therapies in a Rabbit Whole-Heart Model

Antiviral therapies for treatment of COVID-19 may be associated with significant proarrhythmic potential. In the present study, the potential cardiotoxic side effects of these therapies were evaluated using a Langendorff model of the isolated rabbit heart. 51 hearts of female rabbits were retrogradely perfused, employing a Langendorff-setup. Eight catheters were placed endo- and epicardially to perform an electrophysiology study, thus obtaining cycle length-dependent action potential duration at 90% of repolarization (APD90), QT intervals and dispersion of repolarization. After generating baseline data, the hearts were assigned to four groups: In group 1 (HXC), hearts were treated with 1 µM hydroxychloroquine. Thereafter, 3 µM hydroxychloroquine were infused additionally. Group 2 (HXC + AZI) was perfused with 3 µM hydroxychloroquine followed by 150 µM azithromycin. In group 3 (LOP) the hearts were perfused with 3 µM lopinavir followed by 5 µM and 10 µM lopinavir. Group 4 (REM) was perfused with 1 µM remdesivir followed by 5 µM and 10 µM remdesivir. Hydroxychloroquine- and azithromycin-based therapies have a significant proarrhythmic potential mediated by action potential prolongation and an increase in dispersion. Lopinavir and remdesivir showed overall significantly less pronounced changes in electrophysiology. In accordance with the reported bradycardic events under remdesivir, it significantly reduced the rate of the ventricular escape rhythm.

A thorough QTc study to evaluate the effects of oral rilzabrutinib administered alone and with ritonavir in healthy subjects

This study aimed to define the clinically relevant supratherapeutic dose of rilzabrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, and evaluate potential effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic exposures on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. This was a two‐part phase I study (anzctr.org.au ACTRN12618001036202). Part A was a randomized, open‐label, three‐period, single‐dose crossover study (n = 12) with rilzabrutinib 100 mg ± ritonavir 100 mg or rilzabrutinib 1200 mg. Part B was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, four‐way, single‐dose crossover study (n = 39) with matched placebo, rilzabrutinib 400 mg ± ritonavir 100 mg, or moxifloxacin (positive control). Primary objectives: part A – pharmacokinetics (PK) of rilzabrutinib ± ritonavir, safety, and optimal dose for Part B; Part B – effect of rilzabrutinib therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentration on electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. ECGs and PK samples were serially recorded before and post‐dose. In part A, rilzabrutinib 100 mg + ritonavir led to 17‐fold area under the concentration–time curve (AUC_0–∞) and 7‐fold maximum plasma concentration (C_max) increases over rilzabrutinib alone. Rilzabrutinib 1200 mg was discontinued due to mild‐to‐moderate gastrointestinal intolerance. In Part B, rilzabrutinib 400 mg + ritonavir increased rilzabrutinib mean AUC_0–∞ from 454 to 3800 ng h/mL and C_max from 144 to 712 ng/mL. The concentration–QTc relationship was slightly negative, shallow (−0.01 ms/ng/mL [90% CI −0.016 to −0.001]), and an effect >10 ms on QTcF could be excluded within the observed range of plasma concentrations, up to 2500 ng/mL. Safety was similar to other studies of rilzabrutinib. In conclusion, rilzabrutinib, even at supratherapeutic doses, had no clinically relevant effects on ECG parameters, including the QTc interval.

Current evidence for the risk of PR prolongation, QRS widening, QT prolongation, from lopinavir, ritonavir, atazanavir, and saquinavir: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lopinavir, ritonavir, atazanavir, and saquinavir had been reportedly used or suggested for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment. They may cause electrocardiography changes. We aim to evaluate risk of PR prolongation, QRS widening, and QT prolongation from lopinavir, ritonavir, atazanavir, and saquinavir.

METHODS

In accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, our search was conducted in PubMed Central, PubMed, EBSCOhost, and ProQuest from inception to June 25, 2020. Titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and Downs and Black criteria was used to evaluate quality of studies.

RESULTS

We retrieved 9 articles. Most randomized controlled trials have low risk of biases while all quasi-experimental studies have a positive rating. Four studies reporting PR prolongation however only 2 studies with PR interval >200 ms. One of which, reported its association after treatment with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir treatment while another, during treatment with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir. No study reported QRS widening >120 ms with treatment. Four studies reporting QT prolongation, with only one study reaching QT interval >450 ms after ritonavir-boosted saquinavir treatment on healthy patients. There is only one study on COVID-19 patients reporting QT prolongation in 1 out of 95 patients after ritonavir-boosted lopinavir treatment.

CONCLUSION

Limited evidence suggests that lopinavir, ritonavir, atazanavir, and saquinavir could cause PR prolongation, QRS widening, and QT prolongation. Further trials with closer monitoring and assessment of electrocardiography are needed to ascertain usage safety of antivirals in COVID-19 era.

Mechanisms of Arrhythmia and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With HIV Infection

Long-term survival of HIV-infected patients has significantly improved with the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART). As a consequence, cardiovascular diseases are now emerging as an important clinical problem in this population. Sudden cardiac death is the third leading cause of mortality in HIV patients. Twenty percent of patients with HIV who died of sudden cardiac death had previous cardiac arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and other unspecified rhythm disorders. This review presents a summary of HIV-related arrhythmias, associated risk factors specific to the HIV population, and underlying mechanisms. Compared with the general population, patients with HIV have several cardiac conditions and electrophysiological abnormalities. As a result, they have an increased risk of developing severe arrhythmias, that can lead to sudden cardiac death. Possible explanations may be related to non-ART polypharmacy, electrolyte imbalances, and use of substances observed in HIV-infected patients; many of these conditions are associated with alterations in cardiac electrical activity, increasing the risk of arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. However, clinical and experimental evidence has also revealed that cardiac arrhythmias occur in HIV-infected patients, even in the absence of drugs. This indicates that HIV itself can change the electrophysiological properties of the heart profoundly and cause cardiac arrhythmias and related sudden cardiac death. The current knowledge of the underlying mechanisms, as well as the emerging role of inflammation in these arrhythmias, are discussed here.

Thorough QT (TQT) studies: concordance with torsadogenesis and an evolving cardiac safety testing paradigm

Since 2005, when the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guideline was adopted, no drug has been withdrawn because of QTc prolongation or torsade de pointes arrhythmia. There are, however, costs associated with this success. In addition to the time and money invested, thorough QT (TQT) studies have limited the efficiency of the drug development pipeline. In this paper, we discuss the relevance of TQT trials as a tool for proarrhythmic risk prediction as a part of the debate regarding their usefulness.

Differentiating the Effect of an Opioid Agonist on Cardiac Repolarization From µ-Receptor-mediated, Indirect Effects on the QT Interval: A Randomized, 3-way Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects

PURPOSE

A thorough QT study was conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the effect of buprenorphine hydrochloride administered through a buccal soluble film under coverage of naltrexone to block confounding, secondary QT effects.

METHODS

Healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, partially blinded, 4-way crossover designed study. Subjects received buprenorphine 3 mg with naltrexone, naltrexone alone (with placebo films), placebo (placebo films and placebo naltrexone), and open-label moxifloxacin 400 mg with placebo naltrexone in separate in-house treatment periods. Naltrexone treatment (50 mg) was initiated 12 hours before buprenorphine and was given every 12 hours for a total of 4 doses. ECG data were extracted from a continuous recording predose and serially after dosing on the treatment day. ECG intervals were measured at a central ECG laboratory by using the high-precision QT technique. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate with Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and change-from-predose baseline QTcF (∆QTcF) was analyzed by using a mixed effect model.

FINDINGS

Fifty-eight subjects (35 males) with a mean age of 32 were enrolled into the study. Treatment with buprenorphine 3 mg resulted in a small QT effect with the largest mean naltrexone-corrected ∆QTcF reaching 5.8 msec at 8 hours' postdosing (upper bound of the 90% CI below 10 msec). Exposure response analysis with a linear model demonstrated a significant linear relationship between plasma levels and naltrexone-corrected ∆QTcF, with an estimated mean slope of 0.65 msec per nanogram/milliliter (90% CI, 0.22 to 1.08). Using the exposure response model, an effect on ∆QTcF of 4.5 msec (2.80 to 6.12) can be predicted at the observed geometric peak plasma level after administration of the 3-mg buprenorphine dose in this study (3.6 ng/mL [3.33 to 3.98]). Naltrexone alone did not have a relevant effect on the QTcF interval.

IMPLICATIONS

The present study showed that buprenorphine plasma levels up to 5 ng/mL had no effect on the QTc above the level of clinical concern.

Design and analysis considerations for thorough QT studies employing conventional (10 s, 12-lead) ECG recordings

The QT interval from the ECG cannot be measured precisely. The relationship of the QT interval to the RR interval within individuals across time and different RR values, and across individuals eludes complete understanding. Intrinsic beat-to-beat variability in QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc interval) is not trivial. Therefore, it is difficult to determine a valid and reliable estimate of the time for ventricular repolarization based on the QTc interval. Yet, it must be demonstrated that a drug does not result in an increase in the QTc interval that exceeds 5 ms with some reasonable degree of certainty to be quite confident that the drug does not convey some risk of ventricular tachydysrhythmia due to delayed ventricular repolarization. This demonstration can be a Herculean task due to the magnitude of variability in the QTc interval. Design features and analytical methods that might be used in the thorough QT study to improve the chances of demonstrating the true relationship between a drug and QTc interval are reviewed.

Repeated supratherapeutic dosing of strontium ranelate over 15 days does not prolong QT(c) interval in healthy volunteers

AIMS

The study was performed to assess the safety of strontium ranelate in accordance with the ICH, E14 guidelines for QT/QT(c) studies. Its primary objective was to compare supratherapeutic repeated dosing of strontium ranelate (4 g day⁻¹ for 15 days) with placebo on the largest time-matched mean QT(c) variation, from baseline to under treatment values, in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Ninety-six healthy male and female subjects (27.7 ± 7.5 years) were included to receive 1 day of placebo followed by 15 days of supratherapeutic repeated dosing of strontium ranelate (4 g day⁻¹), in a 4 month, randomized, placebo (16 days) and positive-controlled (single dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg preceded by 15 days of placebo), double-blind, double dummy, crossover design. Measurement of QT interval was performed automatically on the ECGs with subsequent manual onscreen over-reading by cardiologists using electronic callipers.

RESULTS

The largest time-matched difference in QT(c) I (individual QT correction for heart rate) between moxifloxacin 400 mg and placebo was observed at 2 h post dose (mean [95% CI] 10.62 [7.90, 13.35] ms). For strontium ranelate (4 g day⁻¹) the largest time-matched difference in QT(c) I compared with placebo was observed at 1 h post dose (mean [90% CI] 7.54 [5.17, 9.90] ms). No subject had a QT(c) greater than 480 ms during the study. Both moxifloxacin and strontium ranelate were well tolerated in healthy subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate that the administration of supratherapeutic repeated oral doses of strontium ranelate (4 g day⁻¹ for 15 days) does not lead to a prolongation of the QT/QT(c) interval above the threshold of regulatory concern.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between domperidone and ketoconazole leads to QT prolongation in healthy volunteers: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study

AIMS

To assess the steady-state pharmacokinetic and QT(c) effects of domperidone and ketoconazole, given alone and together.

METHODS

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study was carried out. Healthy subjects (14 men, 10 women; age 18-39 years; mean weight 73.5kg, range 53.8-98.8kg; 23 Europid, 1 Afro-Caribbean) received orally, for 7 days each, placebo, domperidone 10mg, four doses daily, at 4h intervals, ketoconazole 200mg 12-hourly and domperidone and ketoconazole together. The washout period was 15 days. Pharmacokinetics and serial 12-lead ECGs were assessed on day 7, and serial ECGs on day -1 and at follow-up. Two subjects withdrew before the third treatment period, so data were available for 22-24 subjects. RESULTS Ketoconazole tripled domperidone concentrations at steady-state. Domperidone, ketoconazole and their combination significantly increased QT(c) F in men. Overall adjusted mean differences from placebo were 4.20 (95% CI 0.77, 7.63), 9.24 (95% CI 5.85, 12.63) and 15.90 (95% CI 12.47, 19.33) ms, respectively. In women, QT(c) F was not significantly different from placebo on either domperidone or ketoconazole alone, or in combination. However, QT(c) was positively correlated with plasma drug concentrations, in both men and women. ΔQT(c) F increased by about 2ms per 10ngml(-1) rise in domperidone concentration, and per 1µgml(-1) rise in ketoconazole concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketoconazole tripled the plasma concentrations of domperidone. Domperidone and ketoconazole increased QT(c) F in men, whether given together or separately. The effect of domperidone alone was below the level of clinical importance. The negative result in women is unexplained.

Comparison of the IKr blockers moxifloxacin, dofetilide and E-4031 in five screening models of pro-arrhythmia reveals lack of specificity of isolated cardiomyocytes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Drug development requires the testing of new chemical entities for adverse effects. For cardiac safety screening, improved assays are urgently needed. Isolated adult cardiomyocytes (CM) and human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CM) could be used to identify pro-arrhythmic compounds. In the present study, five assays were employed to investigate their sensitivity and specificity for evaluating the pro-arrhythmic properties of I(Kr) blockers, using moxifloxacin (safe compound) and dofetilide or E-4031 (unsafe compounds).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Assays included the anaesthetized remodelled chronic complete AV block (CAVB) dog, the anaesthetized methoxamine-sensitized unremodelled rabbit, multi-cellular hESC-CM clusters, isolated CM obtained from CAVB dogs and isolated CM obtained from the normal rabbit. Arrhythmic outcome was defined as Torsade de Pointes (TdP) in the animal models and early afterdepolarizations (EADs) in the cell models.

KEY RESULTS

At clinically relevant concentrations (5-12 µM), moxifloxacin was free of pro-arrhythmic properties in all assays with the exception of the isolated CM, in which 10 µM induced EADs in 35% of the CAVB CM and in 23% of the rabbit CM. At supra-therapeutic concentrations (≥100 µM), moxifloxacin was pro-arrhythmic in the isolated rabbit CM (33%), in the hESC-CM clusters (18%), and in the methoxamine rabbit (17%). Dofetilide and E-4031 induced EADs or TdP in all assays (50-83%), and the induction correlated with a significant increase in beat-to-beat variability of repolarization.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Isolated cardiomyocytes lack specificity to discriminate between TdP liability of the I(Kr) blocking drugs moxifloxacin and dofetilide or E4031.

Protease inhibitor-associated QT interval prolongation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature on protease inhibitor (PI)-associated QT interval prolongation and risk for torsade de pointes in patients infected by HIV.

DATA SOURCES

Primary literature was identified through MEDLINE (1950-August 2011) and EMBASE (1980-August 2011), using the following search terms: antiretroviral agents, HIV, protease inhibitors, QTc, QT prolongation, and torsade de pointes.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English-language case reports of antiretroviral therapy-associated QT interval prolongation, studies of healthy volunteers, or studies that evaluated the impact of PIs on QT interval in patients infected with HIV were reviewed and selected. Article bibliographies and conference abstracts were also reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Several case reports, as well as in vitro data, have implicated PIs as a potential cause of QT interval prolongation and/or torsade de pointes. Saquinavir, therapeutically boosted with the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir, was the only PI shown to be associated with significant QT interval prolongation in studies with healthy volunteers. While 1 case control study in HIV-infected patients found that nelfinavir or efavirenz, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, increased the risk of QT interval prolongation, larger prospective studies have not demonstrated any significant increase in QT interval following exposure to PIs. Similar risk factors for QT interval prolongation seen in non-HIV-infected patients, such as older age, female sex, ethnicity, cardiac conditions, diabetes mellitus, and concomitant use of other QT interval-prolonging medications, especially methadone, were risk factors identified in studies of HIV-infected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PIs do not appear to independently predispose patients to QT interval prolongation. However, other risk factors (both HIV-related and non-HIV-related) may increase the risk of QT interval prolongation. Available data suggest that baseline and follow-up electrocardiogram monitoring are unnecessary precautions, but may be considered in patients who are initiating PI therapy and are on multiple medications with proarrhythmic potential and/or have multiple comorbidities, increasing the risk.

Thorough QT/QTc study of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir following multiple-dose administration of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses in healthy participants

The effect of saquinavir-boosted ritonavir at therapeutic (1000/100 mg twice daily [bid]) and supratherapeutic (1500/100 mg bid) doses was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled (moxifloxacin 400 mg) 4-way crossover thorough QT/QTc study. Least squares mean estimated study-specific QTc (QTcS) change from dense predose baseline (ddQTcS(dense)) was the primary endpoint. Greatest mean increase in ddQTcS(dense) occurred 12 hours postdose for the 1000/100-mg group (18.9 ms) and 20 hours for the 1500/10-mg group (30.2 ms). The upper 1-sided 95% confidence interval was >20 ms from 2 to 20 hours postdose in both groups. ddQTcB(dense) and ddQTcF(dense) were similar to ddQTcS(dense). No QTcS, QTcF, or QTcB measurements were >500 ms. One participant receiving 1000/100 mg and 3 receiving 1500/100 mg had a maximum ddQTcS(dense) >60 ms. More participants with ≥1 adverse event received saquinavir/ritonavir. PubMed search and Roche postmarketing data did not reveal publications or reports directly presenting the effect of saquinavir on QT/QTc or causing torsade de pointes.

Comparison of 5 methods of QT interval measurements on electrocardiograms from a thorough QT/QTc study: effect on assay sensitivity and categorical outliers

INTRODUCTION

We studied moxifloxacin-induced QT prolongation and proportion of categorical QTc outliers when 5 methods of QT measurement were used to analyze electrocardiograms (ECGs) from a thorough QT study.

METHODS

QT interval was measured by the threshold, tangent, superimposed median beat, automated global median beat, and longest QT methods in a central ECG laboratory in 2730 digital ECGs from 39 subjects during placebo and moxifloxacin treatment.

RESULTS

All 5 methods were able to demonstrate statistically significant moxifloxacin-induced QTcF prolongation. However, lower bound of 95% 1-sided confidence interval of QTcF prolongation did not exceed 5 milliseconds with the longest QT method. More QTcF outliers were observed with the longest QT and tangent methods, whereas the other 3 methods were comparable. QTcF values greater than 500 milliseconds were observed only with moxifloxacin by the tangent method, and with moxifloxacin and placebo by the longest QT method.

CONCLUSION

The method of QT measurement must be considered when interpreting individual thorough QT/QTc studies.

Levofloxacin can be used effectively as a positive control in thorough QT/QTc studies in healthy volunteers

AIMS

To characterize the effects of levofloxacin on QT interval in healthy subjects and the most appropriate oral positive control treatments for International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 QT/QTc studies.

METHODS

Healthy subjects received a single dose of levofloxacin (1000 or 1500 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg) or placebo in a four-period crossover design. Digital 12-lead ECGs were recorded in triplicate. Measurement of QT interval was performed automatically with subsequent manual onscreen over-reading using electronic callipers. Blood samples were taken for determination of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin concentrations.

RESULTS

Mean QTcI (QT interval corrected for heart rate using a correction factor that is applicable to each individual) was prolonged in subjects receiving moxifloxacin 400 mg compared with placebo. The largest time-matched difference in QTcI for moxifloxacin compared with placebo was observed to be 13.19 ms (95% confidence interval 11.21, 15.17) at 3.5 h post dose. Prolonged mean QTcI was also observed in subjects receiving levofloxacin 1000 mg and 1500 mg compared with placebo. The largest time-matched difference in QTcI compared with placebo was observed at 3.5 h post dose for both 1000 mg and 1500 mg of levofloxacin [mean (95%) 4.42 ms (2.44, 6.39) in 1000 mg and 7.44 ms (5.47, 9.42) in 1500 mg]. A small increase in heart rate was observed with levofloxacin during the course of the study. However, moxifloxacin showed a greater increase compared with levofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin can fulfil the criteria for a positive comparator. The ICH E14 guidelines recommend a threshold of around 5 ms for a positive QT/QTc study. The largest time-matched difference in QTc for levofloxacin suggests the potential for use in more rigorous QT/QTc studies. This study has demonstrated the utility of levofloxacin on the assay in measuring mean QTc changes around 5 ms.

The thorough QT/QTc study 4 years after the implementation of the ICH E14 guidance

The ICH E14 guidance on how to clinically assess a new drug's liability to prolong the QT interval was adopted in May 2005. A centre-piece of the guidance was the establishment of one single trial, the 'thorough QT/QTc study', intended to confidently identify drugs that may cause QT prolongation. Initially perceived as a great challenge, this study has rapidly become a standard component of all clinical development programs for new molecular entities. The study is normally conducted in healthy volunteers, includes both a positive and a negative (placebo) control and is stringently powered to exclude an effect on the QTc interval exceeding 10 ms. The E14 guidance was intentionally not very prescriptive and allowed sponsors and service providers to explore new methodologies. This has allowed for a rapid development of new methods during the first years after the guidance's implementation, such as computer-assisted algorithms for QT measurements. Regulators have worked in close collaboration with pharmaceutical industry to set standards for the design and conduct of the 'thorough QT/QTc study', which therefore has evolved as a key component of cardiac safety assessment of new drugs. This paper summarizes the requirements on the 'thorough QT/QTc study' with emphasis on the standard that has evolved based on interactions between regulators and sponsors and the experience from a large number of completed studies.

Update on the evaluation of a new drug for effects on cardiac repolarization in humans: issues in early drug development

Following reports of death from cardiac arrhythmias with drugs like terfenadine and cisapride, the International Conference for Harmonization formulated a guidance (E14) document. This specifies that all new drugs must undergo a 'thorough QT/QTc' (TQT) study to detect drug-induced QT prolongation, a surrogate marker of ventricular tachycardia, especially torsades de pointes (TdPs). With better understanding of data from several completed TQT studies, regulatory requirements have undergone some changes since the E14 guidance was implemented in October 2005. This article reviews the implications of the E14 guidance and the changes in its interpretation including choice of baseline QT, demonstration of assay sensitivity, statistical analysis of the effect of new drug and positive control, and PK-PD modelling. Some issues like use of automated QT measurements remain unresolved. Pharmaceutical companies too are modifying Phase 1 studies to detect QTc liability early in order to save time and resources. After the E14 guidance, development of several drugs that prolong QTc by >5 ms is being abandoned by sponsors. However, all drugs that prolong the QT interval do not increase risk of TdP. Researchers in regulatory agencies, academia and industry are working to find better biomarkers of drug-induced TdP which could prevent many useful drugs from being prematurely abandoned. Drug-induced TdP is a rare occurrence. With fewer drugs that prolong QT interval reaching the licensing stage, knowing which of these drugs are torsadogenic is proving to be elusive. Thus, paradoxically, the effectiveness of the E14 guidance itself has made prospective validation of new biomarkers difficult.

Absence of QTc prolongation in a thorough QT study with subcutaneous liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analog for treatment of type 2 diabetes

The objective of this study was to establish effects of liraglutide on the QTc interval. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, 51 healthy participants were administered placebo, 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg liraglutide once daily for 7 days each. Electrocardiograms were recorded periodically over 24 hours at the end of placebo and highest dosing periods. Four different models for QT correction were used: QTci, as the primary endpoint, and QTciL, QTcF, and QTcB as secondary endpoints. The upper bound of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval for time-matched, baseline-corrected, placebo-subtracted QTc intervals was <10 ms for all 4 correction methods. Moxifloxacin (400 mg) increased QTc intervals by 10.6 to 12.3 ms at 2 hours. There was no concentration-exposure dependency on QTc interval changes by liraglutide and no QTc thresholds above 500 ms or QTc increases >60 ms. The authors conclude that liraglutide caused no clinically relevant increases in the QTc interval.

Magnitude of QT prolongation associated with a higher risk of Torsades de Pointes

PURPOSE

Drug induced Torsades de Pointes (TdP) is a major concern for new drugs seeking regulatory approval. Prolongation of QT intervals greater than 60 millisecond or to longer than 500 millisecond in an individual patient has been considered to be associated with a higher risk. The purpose of this study is to identify values inferred from a population that predict a stronger potential for TdP.

METHODS

Prolongation data of 30 non-antiarrhythmic QT prolonging drugs were analysed. Depending on how strong the drugs were associated with TdP, they were categorized as strong or borderline torsadogens. The differences in mean QTc increases between the two groups were compared and cut-off values that distinguished strong from borderline drugs were searched for.

RESULTS

The average QTc increase of 19.3 millisecond of strong torsadogens was significantly greater than the 8.0 millisecond of borderline torsadogens. Prolongation greater than 12 millisecond in the context of monotherapy or 25 millisecond in the presence of metabolic inhibition and an upper bound of 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean QTc increase greater than 14 millisecond in monotherapy or 30.1 millisecond in combination therapy with metabolic inhibitors favoured a stronger association with TdP.

CONCLUSIONS

Drugs strongly associated with TdP have greater QTc increases than those with less concern. Several cut-off values have been noted to distinguish between them. These values may be helpful for evaluation of TdP risk for future QT prolonging drugs.

Effects of standard and supratherapeutic doses of nelfinavir on cardiac repolarization: a thorough QT study

This was a randomized, 4-way crossover, third-party-blinded study in 68 healthy subjects to assess the effect of nelfinavir on QTc interval. Treatments included (A) nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours on days 1-4, (B) nelfinavir 1250 mg every 12 hours on days 1-3 plus 3125 mg on day 4, (C) placebo, and (D) moxifloxacin 400 mg every 24 hours on days 1-4. Pharmacokinetics and triplicate 12-lead electrocardiograms were performed over 12 hours on days 1 and 4. Time-matched, placebo-subtracted, baseline-adjusted changes in QT intervals with Fridericia's (QTcF) correction were determined following nelfinavir and moxifloxacin administration. Neither dose of nelfinavir had a clinically relevant effect on the QTcF interval on day 4 (primary endpoint) and day 1 because at every time point the upper 90% confidence limit was below 10 milliseconds and, furthermore, the mean difference was below 5 milliseconds. Additionally, there was no clinically relevant effect on QTcB (Bazett's correction), uncorrected QT, or the RR interval on days 1 or 4. Pharmacokinetics confirmed adequate systemic exposure to nelfinavir and moxifloxacin. While nelfinavir exposure was higher in poor compared with extensive metabolizers of CYP2C19 isozyme, there were no corresponding significant differences in QTcF change from placebo. At clinically relevant, doses nelfinavir is unlikely to cause QTc prolongation.

Period correction of the QTc of moxifloxacin with multiple predose baseline ECGs is the least variable of 4 methods tested

This study compares 4 baseline correction methods on the effect of moxifloxacin on the QT/QTc interval: (1) day -1 time-matched baseline electrocardiograms (ECGs), (2) 3 triplicate predose ECGs, (3) 1 triplicate predose ECG, and (4) no baseline correction. Forty-four healthy subjects receive a single dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg), placebo, and 2 doses of an investigational agent in a 4-period crossover fashion. For all 4 methods, the largest mean difference from placebo in the moxifloxacin study-specific QTc is 11.97 to 13.23 ms and occurs at 3 to 4 hours postdose; the lower 90% confidence interval is greater than 5 ms from 2 to 8 hours. The average standard error of the mean is 1.36 ms for 3 triplicate predose ECGs, 1.40 ms for 1 triplicate predose ECG, 1.60 ms for day -1 time-matched baseline ECGs, and 1.65 ms for no baseline correction. Predose baseline methods (3 or 1 triplicate ECGs) are superior to the day -1 time-matched baseline correction or without baseline correction.

Near-thorough QT study as part of a first-in-man study

Detailed electrocardiographic (ECG) support was provided to a first-in-man, single-ascending-dose study that included 6 cohorts of 8 male volunteers each. In each cohort, 6 and 2 subjects received active compound and placebo, respectively. Long-term 12-lead ECGs were obtained on baseline day -1, dosing day 1, and day 2. Automatic QT-interval measurements were made at 63 time points (28 at baseline and 35 on treatment). Based on QT/RR distribution, 20% of measurements were visually verified. Baseline-corrected time-matched DeltaQTc values were obtained at 35 postdose time points. Placebo subjects of all cohorts were pooled. When 2 cohorts of the lowest, middle, and highest doses were pooled (12 subjects per active treatment group), the spreads of placebo-corrected DeltaDeltaQTc values were within the regulatory requirements (single-sided 95% confidence interval <10 milliseconds) at all time points. Thus, this ECG support of the first-in-man study provided data of regulatory acceptable accuracy at a small fraction of the cost of a full thorough QT study.