Design of the “Thorough QT Study”

A Phase 1 Clinical Study Evaluating the Effects of Cenobamate on the QT Interval

Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication for uncontrolled focal seizures. This thorough QT study assessed the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic cenobamate doses (maximum recommended dose, 400 mg/day) on correct QT interval (QTc) in healthy adults (N = 108) randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: (A) cenobamate (days 1-63) up-titrated by 50-mg increments weekly to a 200 mg/day therapeutic dose (day 35) and then by 100 mg weekly to a 500 mg/day supratherapeutic dose (day 63), with placebo-moxifloxacin (days -1 and 64); (B) moxifloxacin 400 mg (day -1; positive control), placebo-cenobamate (days 1-63), and placebo-moxifloxacin (day 64); and (C) placebo-moxifloxacin (day -1), placebo-cenobamate (days 1-64), and moxifloxacin 400 mg (day 64). The primary end point was baseline-adjusted, placebo-corrected QTc (ΔΔQTcF; corrected for heart rate [HR] by Fridericia's method) with cenobamate 200 and 500 mg/day. Baseline electrocardiographic parameters were balanced across groups. Mean ΔΔQTcF was negative throughout for cenobamate doses (largest: day 35, -10.8 milliseconds; day 63, -18.4 milliseconds). Based on concentration-QTc analysis, ∆∆QTcF effect was predicted as -9.85 and -17.14 milliseconds at mean peak plasma levels of therapeutic (200 mg/day; 23.06 μg/mL) and supratherapeutic (500 mg/day; 63.96 μg/mL) doses. Cenobamate had no clinically relevant prolonging effect on electrocardiographic parameters (eg, PR, QRS); HR effects were similar to placebo. Cenobamate showed slight dose-related shortening of QTc, but to a degree not known to be clinically relevant (no reductions ≤340 milliseconds). Cenobamate had no clinically relevant effects on HR or electrocardiographic parameters and no QTc-prolonging effect at therapeutic/supratherapeutic doses. Cenobamate is contraindicated in patients with short-QT syndrome and caution should be used when coadministering with drugs that shorten QT interval.

Detection of QTc effects in small studies--implications for replacing the thorough QT study

BACKGROUND

ECG assessment with exposure response analysis applied to data from First-in-Man studies has been proposed to replace the thorough QT study for the detection of small QT effects.

METHODS

Data from five thorough QT studies, three with moxifloxacin, one study with a drug with a large QTc effect (∼25 ms) and one with ketoconazole with a smaller QT effect (∼8 ms) were used. By subsampling, studies with 6-18 subjects on drug and six on placebo were simulated 1000 times per sample size to assess whether small QTc effects using ICH E14 criteria could be excluded and the impact of sample size on the estimate and variability of the slope of the concentration/QTc relation.

RESULTS

With a sample size of nine or more on drug and six on placebo, the fraction of "false negative studies" was at or below 5% with data from the studies with moxifloxacin and from the drug with a large QTc effect. With the same sample size and no underlying QTc effect (placebo), the fraction of studies in which an effect above 10 ms could be excluded was above 85%. A treatment effect in the linear concentration-effect model resulted in a lower proportion of "false negatives." Sample size had little influence on the average slope estimate of the concentration/QTc relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

For drugs with a QTc effect of around 12-14 ms, exposure response analysis applied to First-in-Man studies with careful ECG assessment can be used to replace the through QT study.

Early clinical development: evaluation of drug-induced torsades de pointes risk

Drug-induced arrhythmias or QT interval prolongation is one of the two most common reasons for drugs to be denied regulatory approval or to have warnings imposed on their clinical labelling. The assessment of torsades de pointes (TdP) risk during clinical development of a new pharmaceutical compound has been an issue of debate since the original description of drug-induced proarrhythmia. TdP risk assessment is complicated by the very low incidence (e.g., <1/100,000 patient years of exposure) of clinical events for non-antiarrhythmic agents and thus the improbable likelihood of observing even one event during clinical development. Thus surrogate methods of determining risk are necessary. A clinical approach to the issue of TdP risk assessment during drug development has been developed and implemented internationally. These efforts have markedly reduced the likelihood that drugs with unknown TdP risks will be commercialized, have resulted in fostering extensive productive pre-clinical and clinical research, and subsequent improved understanding of drug-induced proarrhythmia. Current research efforts are directed to increasing the efficiency of clinical QT assessment and the impact of pre-clinical assessment on clinical development. This article describes the clinical evaluation of TdP risk during drug development and how pre-clinical assessment can impact the early clinical development TdP risk assessment.