The role of an upstream promoter interaction in initiation of bacterial transcription

Targeting the Transcriptome Through Globally Acting Components

Transcription is a step in gene expression that defines the identity of cells and its dysregulation is associated with diseases. With advancing technologies revealing molecular underpinnings of the cell with ever-higher precision, our ability to view the transcriptomes may have surpassed our knowledge of the principles behind their organization. The human RNA polymerase II (Pol II) machinery comprises thousands of components that, in conjunction with epigenetic and other mechanisms, drive specialized programs of development, differentiation, and responses to the environment. Parts of these programs are repurposed in oncogenic transformation. Targeting of cancers is commonly done by inhibiting general or broadly acting components of the cellular machinery. The critical unanswered question is how globally acting or general factors exert cell type specific effects on transcription. One solution, which is discussed here, may be among the events that take place at genes during early Pol II transcription elongation. This essay turns the spotlight on the well-known phenomenon of promoter-proximal Pol II pausing as a step that separates signals that establish pausing genome-wide from those that release the paused Pol II into the gene. Concepts generated in this rapidly developing field will enhance our understanding of basic principles behind transcriptome organization and hopefully translate into better therapies at the bedside.

Crystal structure of the bacteriophage T4 late-transcription coactivator gp33 with the β-subunit flap domain of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Activated transcription of the bacteriophage T4 late genes, which is coupled to concurrent DNA replication, is accomplished by an initiation complex containing the host RNA polymerase associated with two phage-encoded proteins, gp55 (the basal promoter specificity factor) and gp33 (the coactivator), as well as the DNA-mounted sliding-clamp processivity factor of the phage T4 replisome (gp45, the activator). We have determined the 3.0 Å-resolution X-ray crystal structure of gp33 complexed with its RNA polymerase binding determinant, the β-flap domain. Like domain 4 of the promoter specificity σ factor (σ(4)), gp33 interacts with RNA polymerase primarily by clamping onto the helix at the tip of the β-flap domain. Nevertheless, gp33 and σ(4) are not structurally related. The gp33/β-flap structure, combined with biochemical, biophysical, and structural information, allows us to generate a structural model of the T4 late promoter initiation complex. The model predicts protein/protein interactions within the complex that explain the presence of conserved patches of surface-exposed residues on gp33, and provides a structural framework for interpreting and designing future experiments to functionally characterize the complex.

A new basal promoter element recognized by RNA polymerase core enzyme

This study contributes to the understanding of gene-specific transcription by identifying a new promoter element that is contacted directly by an evolutionarily conserved loop within the largest subunit of the core RNA polymerase

Bacterial promoters are recognized by RNA polymerase (RNAP) σ subunit, which specifically interacts with the −10 and −35 promoter elements. Here, we provide evidence that the β′ zipper, an evolutionarily conserved loop of the largest subunit of RNAP core, interacts with promoter spacer, a DNA segment that separates the −10 and −35 promoter elements, and facilitates the formation of stable closed promoter complex. Depending on the spacer sequence, the proposed interaction of the β′ zipper with the spacer can also facilitate open promoter complex formation and even substitute for interactions of the σ subunit with the −35 element. These results suggest that there exists a novel class of promoters that rely on interaction of the β′ zipper with promoter spacer, along with or instead of interactions of σ subunit with the −35 element, for their activity. Finally, our data suggest that sequence-dependent interactions of the β′ zipper with DNA can contribute to promoter-proximal σ-dependent RNAP pausing, a recently recognized important step of transcription control.

Transcription of the T4 late genes

This article reviews the current state of understanding of the regulated transcription of the bacteriophage T4 late genes, with a focus on the underlying biochemical mechanisms, which turn out to be unique to the T4-related family of phages or significantly different from other bacterial systems. The activator of T4 late transcription is the gene 45 protein (gp45), the sliding clamp of the T4 replisome. Gp45 becomes topologically linked to DNA through the action of its clamp-loader, but it is not site-specifically DNA-bound, as other transcriptional activators are. Gp45 facilitates RNA polymerase recruitment to late promoters by interacting with two phage-encoded polymerase subunits: gp33, the co-activator of T4 late transcription; and gp55, the T4 late promoter recognition protein. The emphasis of this account is on the sites and mechanisms of actions of these three proteins, and on their roles in the formation of transcription-ready open T4 late promoter complexes.

The role of interactions between phage and bacterial proteins within the infected cell: a diverse and puzzling interactome

Interactions between bacteriophage proteins and bacterial proteins are important for efficient infection of the host cell. The phage proteins involved in these bacteriophage-host interactions are often produced immediately after infection. A survey of the available set of published bacteriophage-host interactions reveals the targeted host proteins are inhibited, activated or functionally redirected by the phage protein. These interactions protect the bacteriophage from bacterial defence mechanisms or adapt the host-cell metabolism to establish an efficient infection cycle. Regrettably, a large majority of bacteriophage early proteins lack any identified function. Recent research into the antibacterial potential of bacteriophage-host interactions indicates that phage early proteins seem to target a wide variety of processes in the host cell - many of them non-essential. Since a clear understanding of such interactions may become important for regulations involving phage therapy and in biotechnological applications, increased scientific emphasis on the biological elucidation of such proteins is warranted.

6S RNA binding to Esigma(70) requires a positively charged surface of sigma(70) region 4.2

6S RNA is a small, non-coding RNA that interacts with sigma(70)-RNA polymerase and downregulates transcription at many promoters during stationary phase. When bound to sigma(70)-RNA polymerase, 6S RNA is engaged in the active site of sigma(70)-RNA polymerase in a manner similar enough to promoter DNA that the RNA can serve as a template for RNA synthesis. It has been proposed that 6S RNA mimics the conformation of DNA during transcription initiation, suggesting contacts between RNA polymerase and 6S RNA or DNA may be similar. Here we demonstrate that region 4.2 of sigma(70) is critical for the interaction between 6S RNA and RNA polymerase. We define an expanded binding surface that encompasses positively charged residues throughout the recognition helix of the helix-turn-helix motif in region 4.2, in contrast to DNA binding that is largely focused on the N-terminal region of this helix. Furthermore, negatively charged residues in region 4.2 weaken binding to 6S RNA but do not similarly affect DNA binding. We propose that the binding sites for promoter DNA and 6S RNA on region 4.2 of sigma(70) are overlapping but distinct, raising interesting possibilities for how core promoter elements contribute to defining promoters that are sensitive to 6S RNA regulation.

Without a license, or accidents waiting to happen

This is a memoir of circumstances that have shaped my life as a scientist, some of the questions that have excited my interest, and some of the people with whom I have shared that pursuit. I was introduced to transcription soon after the discovery of RNA polymerase and have been fascinated by questions relating to gene regulation since that time. My account touches on early experiments dealing with the ability of RNA polymerase to selectively transcribe its DNA template. Temporal programs of transcription that control the multiplication cycles of viruses (phages) and the precise mechanisms generating this regulation have been a continuing source of fascination and new challenges. A longtime interest in eukaryotic RNA polymerase III has centered on yeast and on the enumeration and properties of its transcription initiation factors, the architecture of its promoter complexes, and the mechanism of transcriptional initiation. These areas of research are widely regarded as separate, but to my thinking they have posed similar questions, and I have been unwilling or unable to abandon either one for the other. An additional interest in archaeal transcription can be seen as stemming naturally from this point of view.

Absolute gene occupancies by RNA polymerase III, TFIIIB, and TFIIIC in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A major limitation of chromatin immunoprecipitation lies in the challenge of measuring the immunoprecipitation effectiveness of different proteins and antibodies and the resultant inability to compare the occupancies of different DNA-binding proteins. Here we present the implementation of a quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation assay in the RNA polymerase III (pol III) system that allowed us to measure the absolute in vivo occupancy of pol III and its two transcription factors, TFIIIC and TFIIIB, on a subset of pol III genes. The crucial point of our analysis was devising a method that allows the accurate determination of the immunoprecipitation efficiency for each protein. We achieved this by spiking every immunoprecipitation reaction with the formaldehyde cross-linked in vitro counterparts of TFIIIB-, TFIIIC-, and pol III-DNA complexes, measuring the in vitro occupancies of the corresponding factors on a DNA probe and determining probe recovery by quantitative PCR. Analysis of nine pol III-transcribed genes with diverse sequence characteristics showed a very high occupancy by TFIIIB and pol III (pol III occupancy being generally approximately 70% of TFIIIB occupancy) and a TFIIIC occupancy that ranged between approximately 5 and 25%. Current data suggest that TFIIIC is released during transcription in vitro, and it has been proposed that TFIIIB suffices for pol III recruitment in vivo. Our findings point to the transient nature of the TFIIIC-DNA interaction in vivo, with no significant counter-correlation between pol III and TFIIIC occupancy and instead to a dependence of TFIIIB-DNA and TFIIIC-DNA complex maintenance in vivo on pol III function.

Dissection of the bacteriophage T4 late promoter complex

Activated transcription of the bacteriophage T4 late genes is generated by a mechanism that stands apart from the common modalities of transcriptional regulation: the activator is gp45, the viral replisome's sliding clamp; two sliding-clamp-binding proteins, gp33 and gp55, replace the host RNA polymerase (RNAP) sigma subunit. We have mutagenized, reconfigured and selectively disrupted individual interactions of the sliding clamp with gp33 and gp55 and have monitored effects on transcription. The C-terminal sliding-clamp-binding epitopes of gp33 and gp55 are perfectly interchangeable, but the functions of these two RNAP-sliding clamp connections differ: only the gp33-gp45 linkage is essential for activation, while loss of the gp55-gp45 linkage impairs but does not abolish activation. Formation of transcription-ready promoter complexes by the sliding-clamp-activated wild-type T4 RNAP resists competition by high concentrations of the polyanion heparin. This avid formation of promoter complexes requires both linkages of the T4 late RNAP to the sliding clamp. Preopening the promoter compensates for loss of the gp55-gp45 but not the gp33-gp45 linkage. We interpret the relationship of these findings and our prior analysis to the common model of transcriptional initiation in bacteria in terms of two parallel pathways, with two RNAP holoenzymes and two DNA templates: (1) gp55-RNAP and the T4 late promoter execute basal transcription; (2) gp55-gp33-RNAP and the T4 late promoter with its mobile enhancer, the T4 sliding clamp, execute activated transcription. gp55 and gp33 perform sigma-like functions, gp55 in promoter recognition and gp33 (as well as gp55) in enhancer recognition. gp33 operates the switch between these two pathways by repressing basal transcription.

Promoter specificity for 6S RNA regulation of transcription is determined by core promoter sequences and competition for region 4.2 of sigma70

6S RNA binds sigma70-RNA polymerase and downregulates transcription at many sigma70-dependent promoters, but others escape regulation even during stationary phase when the majority of the transcription machinery is bound by the RNA. We report that core promoter elements determine this promoter specificity; a weak -35 element allows a promoter to be 6S RNA sensitive, and an extended -10 element similarly determines 6S RNA inhibition except when a consensus -35 element is present. These two features together predicted that hundreds of mapped Escherichia coli promoters might be subject to 6S RNA dampening in stationary phase. Microarray analysis confirmed 6S RNA-dependent downregulation of expression from 68% of the predicted genes, which corresponds to 49% of the expressed genes containing mapped E. coli promoters and establishes 6S RNA as a global regulator in stationary phase. We also demonstrate a critical role for region 4.2 of sigma70 in RNA polymerase interactions with 6S RNA. Region 4.2 binds the -35 element during transcription initiation; therefore we propose one mechanism for 6S RNA regulation of transcription is through competition for binding region 4.2 of sigma70.

Regulatory circuit based on autogenous activation-repression: roles of C-boxes and spacer sequences in control of the PvuII restriction-modification system

Type II restriction-modification (R-M) systems comprise a restriction endonuclease (REase) and a protective methyltransferase (MTase). After R-M genes enter a new cell, MTase must appear before REase or the chromosome will be cleaved. PvuII and some other R-M systems achieve this delay by cotranscribing the REase gene with the gene for an autogenous transcription activator (the controlling or 'C' protein C.PvuII). This study reveals, through in vivo titration, that C.PvuII is not only an activator but also a repressor for its own gene. In other systems, this type of circuit can result in oscillatory behavior. Despite the use of identical, symmetrical C protein-binding sequences (C-boxes) in the left and right operators, C.PvuII showed higher in vitro affinity for O(L) than for O(R), implicating the spacer sequences in this difference. Mutational analysis associated the repression with O(R), which overlaps the promoter -35 hexamer but is otherwise dispensable for activation. A nonrepressing mutant exhibited poor establishment in new cells. Comparing promoter-operator regions from PvuII and 29 R-M systems controlled by C proteins revealed that the most-highly conserved sequence is the tetranucleotide spacer separating O(L) from O(R). Any changes in that spacer reduced the stability of C.PvuII-operator complexes and abolished activation.

Bacillus subtilis RNA Polymerase Recruits the Transcription Factor Spo0A∼P to Stabilize a Closed Complex during Transcription Initiation

The Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A approximately P activates transcription from the spoIIG promoter by stimulating a rate-limiting transition between the initial interaction of RNA polymerase with the promoter and initiation of RNA synthesis. Previous work showed that Spo0A exerts its effect on RNA polymerase prior to the formation of an open complex in which the DNA strands at the initiation site have been separated. To isolate the effect of Spo0A approximately P on events prior to DNA strand separation at spoIIG we studied RNA polymerase binding to DNA fragments that were truncated to contain only promoter sequences 5' to the -10 element by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. RNA polymerase bound to these fragments readily though highly reversibly, and polymerase-promoter complexes recruited Spo0A approximately P. Sequence-independent interactions between the RNA polymerase and the DNA upstream of the core promoter were important for RNA polymerase binding and essential for Spo0A approximately P recruitment, while sequence-specific Spo0A approximately P-DNA interactions positioned and stabilized RNA polymerase binding to the DNA. Spo0A approximately P decreased the dissociation rate of the complexes formed with truncated promoter templates which could contribute to the means by which Spo0A approximately P stimulates spoIIG expression.