Intravitreal triamcinolone for macular detachment following panretinal photocoagulation

EXUDATIVE MACULAR DETACHMENT FOLLOWING UNCOMPLICATED PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR DIABETIC VITREOUS HEMORRHAGE

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To describe diagnostic characteristics and management of exudative macular detachment, a rare complication of pars plana vitrectomy and endolaser for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage.

METHODS

Case report including multimodal imaging.

RESULTS

Forty-seven-year-old man with diabetes mellitus Type 2 and proliferative diabetic retinopathy underwent uncomplicated 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, Triesence-assisted hyaloid peeling, fill-in endolaser, and intravitreal bevacizumab injection in the left eye for nonclearing visually significant vitreous hemorrhage. On the first postoperative day, patient developed significant macular subretinal fluid. Multimodal imaging revealed numerous pigment epithelial detachments around optic nerve, and subretinal fluid throughout the macula on optical coherence tomography in the absence of retinal breaks on widefield raster, late deep leakage on fluorescein angiography, and corresponding hyperautofluorescence in the same region. Diagnosed with macular exudative retinal detachment, patient was treated with topical and systemic corticosteroids, with gradual resolution of subretinal fluid and visual acuity improvement.

DISCUSSION

Exudative retinal detachment following diabetic pars plana vitrectomy with endolaser has been described in as many as 8.78% of cases, however may be missed in the early postoperative period. Multimodal imaging including multiple pigment epithelial detachments on optical coherence tomography, hyperautofluorescence, and late deep leakage on fluorescein angiography can help differentiate this condition from rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and central serous chorioretinopathy, and guide management to include corticosteroids.

NOVEL OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY FINDINGS IN SEROUS MACULAR DETACHMENT AFTER PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION

PURPOSE

To describe a novel optical coherence tomography finding in a case of macular serous retinal detachment after pars plana vitrectomy and panretinal photocoagulation.

METHODS

Retrospective case report.

RESULTS

A 52 year old male with diabetes underwent uncomplicated pars plana vitrectomy with panretinal photocoagulation for non-clearing vitreous hemorrhage, Postoperative course was complicated by significantly decreased vision and a macular serous retinal detachment that was characterized on optical coherence tomography by a reticular network of hyperreflective bands in the subretinal space. Fluid and hyperreflective material in the subretinal space resolved by postoperative Week 6 with standard postoperative eye drops. However, persistent ellipsoid zone disruption was seen up to postoperative Week 20.

CONCLUSION

Extensive subretinal bands can be seen after panretinal photocoagulation. This novel finding can pose diagnostic and management challenges but may resolve with conservative medical management.

Serous retinal detachment after panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of visual impairment in working-age adults worldwide. Panretinal photocoagulation is a cornerstone in its management; however, it may include a range of side effects and complications, one of these being serous retinal detachment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for serous retinal detachment after panretinal photocoagulation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 24-year-old Saudi man with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes presented with bilateral progressive proliferative retinopathy in spite of several sessions of panretinal photocoagulation. After one additional such session, he developed bilateral serous retinal detachment and vision loss, which was managed with a single bilateral intravitreal bevacizumab injection. The serous retinal detachment subsided with partial recovery of vision.

CONCLUSIONS

Serous retinal detachment after panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy is a rare complication nowadays. In this case, it seems that excessive photocoagulation exceeded the energy-absorbing capacity of the retinal pigment epithelium, leading to a disruption of the blood-retinal barrier. A single injection of bilateral intravitreal bevacizumab was sufficient to control the serous retinal detachment. This effect may have been due to a reduction of vascular leakage resulting from the mechanism of action of this drug. No complications were noted from the injection. Caution should be exerted when attempting bilateral panretinal photocoagulation.

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of serous macular detachment in central retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) treatment on serous macular detachment in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

Ten eyes of 10 patients with CRVO (6 men and 4 women; age range, 54-78 years) made up the study population. The eligibility criteria for this study included clinically and angiographically detectable cystoid macular edema (CME) in which the presence of serous macular detachment was documented by optical coherence tomography (OCT). After IVTA (4 mg/0.1 mL) injection, visual and anatomical responses were observed.

RESULTS

In all eyes, after IVTA injection, CME and serous macular detachment regressed. At 3 months and 6 months, CME and serous macular detachment had recurred in 4 (40%) and 5 eyes (50%), respectively. Patients with recurrence were retreated. No eyes lost vision at 1 month, and all eyes had improvement. At 3 months, no eyes had lost vision from baseline, and 7 eyes (70%) had improvement. At 6 months, again no eyes had lost vision from baseline, and 6 eyes (60%) maintained improved visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that IVTA is effective treatment for serous macular detachment in patients with CRVO.

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide: a change in a paradigm

BACKGROUND

Based on experimental studies and clinical observations by Robert Machemer, Gholam Peyman and others, the vitreous cavity has increasingly been used as a reservoir of drugs for the direct treatment of intraocular diseases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The most widely injected drug so far has been triamcinolone acetonide for various intraocular neovascular and edematous diseases. Comparing the various diseases with respect to effect and side effects of the treatment, the best response in terms of gain in visual acuity has been achieved for intraretinal edematous diseases such as diffuse diabetic macular edema, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, and pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. In eyes with various types of noninfectious uveitis including acute or chronic sympathetic ophthalmia and Adamantiadis-Behçet's disease, visual acuity increased and the degree of intraocular inflammation decreased. Some studies have suggested that intra- vitreal triamcinolone may be useful as an angiostatic agent in eyes with iris neovascularization and proliferative ischemic retinopathies. Intravitreal triamcinolone may possibly be helpful as adjunct therapy for exudative age-related macular degeneration, particularly in combination with photodynamic therapy. In eyes with chronic, therapy-resistant ocular hypotony, intravitreal triamcinolone can induce an increase in intraocular pressure and may stabilize the eye. The complications of intravitreal triamcinolone therapy include secondary ocular hypertension in about 40% of the eyes injected; medically uncontrollable high intraocular pressure leading to antiglaucomatous surgery in about 1-2% of the eyes; posterior subcapsular cataract and nuclear cataract leading to cataract surgery in about 15-20% in elderly patients within 1 year after injection; postoperative infectious endophthalmitis with a rate of about 1:1,000; noninfectious endophthalmitis, perhaps due to a reaction to the solvent agent, and pseudoendophthalmitis with triamcinolone acetonide crystals appearing in the anterior chamber. Intravitreal triamcinolone injection can be combined with other types of intraocular surgery including cataract surgery, particularly in eyes with iris neovascularization. Cataract surgery performed some months after the injection does not show a markedly elevated complication rate. The injection may be repeated, if vision redecreases. In nonvitrectomized eyes, the duration of the effect and side effects of a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone is about 6-9 months for a dosage of about 20 mg, and about 2-4 months for a dosage of 4 mg. It has remained unclear so far, whether and how to remove the solvent agent. In the future, intravitreal triamcinolone may be combined with other antiangiogenic drugs for the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration or with neuroprotective drugs for treatment of diabetic retinopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an exponentially increasing number of mostly case-series studies, the intravitreal injection of triamcinolone may still be considered an experimental procedure until randomized studies have been presented.