Low-dose intraocular triamcinolone injection for intractable macular oedema and inflammation in patients with uveitis

Treatment Duration and Side Effect Profile of Long-Term Use of Intravitreal Preservative-Free Triamcinolone Acetonide in Uveitis

PURPOSE

Noninfectious uveitis has been treated historically with corticosteroid therapy in varying doses and routes. Triesence, a preservative-free sterile formulation of triamcinolone acetonide, has been used in a wide spectrum of ocular pathologies, but there have been few large studies validating its dosing or detailing long-term side effects in uveitic disease. The primary aim of this study was to describe the relative duration of action and side effects of 2 doses of preservative-free intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (PF-IVTA) in uveitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative consecutive case series.

METHODS

Charts of all patients receiving PF-IVTA (2 mg or 4 mg) in a defined time period (2012-2014) at the Cole Eye Institute were examined for patient demographics, time to treatment failure (TTF), use of systemic immunosuppression, use of intraocular pressure-lowering therapies, date of cataract surgery and glaucoma filtration surgery, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The final data set examined 514 injections in 214 eyes. Mean duration of follow-up was 1.5 years. There was similar demographic distribution between eyes that received 2 mg PF-IVTA only and eyes that received a combination of 4 + 2 mg PF-IVTA. No statistically significant difference in TTF between injection dosages was observed. There was a higher incidence of glaucoma filtering surgery and cataract surgery in eyes that received 4 + 2 mg PF-IVTA as well as a shorter time to glaucoma surgery, when compared to eyes that received 2 mg PF-IVTA alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study supports that 2 mg PF-IVTA displayed noninferior treatment duration to 4 mg PF-IVTA, and may carry a significantly lower side-effect profile of cataract development and glaucoma filtering surgery.

Intravitreal diclofenac for treatment of refractory uveitis-associated cystoid macular oedema: A before and after clinical study

BACKGROUND

Cystoid macular oedema (CME) is one of the important complications of uveitis leading to irreversible blindness. Currently, there is no gold standard treatment for this condition. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of single intravitreal diclofenac (IVD) injection on short-term outcome of refractory uveitis-associated CME.

METHODS

This was a prospective clinical study on 16 consecutive patients (16 eyes) with refractory uveitis-associated CME. Intravitreal injection of 500 μg/0.1 ml of diclofenac sodium was given to the patients. The clinical outcomes considered were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change and central macular thickness (CMT) changes in the pre- and postinjection periods. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 and 4 weeks after the injection.

RESULTS

Age of the patients varied from 18 to 59 years (mean ± SD: 39.5 ± 13.2 years). Ten patients (62.5%) were females. Statistically significant differences were found in the decrease of mean BCVA (logMAR) (p = 0.043) and mean CMT (p = 0.003) during the study period. There was no significant difference in the intraocular pressure (IOP) increase at the end of the study (p = 0.94).

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal diclofenac (IVD) may be a promising treatment for refractory uveitis-associated CME. Further clinical trials with a larger sample size should be conducted to confirm these findings and compare them with other treatments.

Clinical Outcomes of Intravitreal Preservative-Free Triamcinolone Preparation (Triesence®) for Cystoid Macular Oedema and Inflammation in Patients with Uveitis

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes of intravitreal benzyl alcohol-free triamcinolone acetonide suspension in uveitis-related macular oedema.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study of 66 injections to 44 eyes of 40 patients. Uveitis diagnosis, systemic and local therapy, intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT), number of injections, time to re-injection and side-effects were noted during 6-months minimum follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty eight percent of eyes received a single injection. 18% required 2 injections, and 13% received ≥3 injections with mean time to second and third injections of 25.5 and 52.7 weeks, respectively. 90% of injections were unilateral. Mean CRT reduced, and by 12-weeks visual acuity improvement >0.3logMar was achieved in 46%. Cataract progression (47%) and IOP>21 mmHg (45%) were the commonest adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Preservative-free triamcinolone is an additional option for uveitis-related macular oedema, particularly in unilateral cases, with favorable CRT and visual outcomes. Repeat injections may be necessary, and the period of efficacy varies between eyes.

Cystoid macular edema associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis resolved by a dexamethasone intravitreal implant

Uveitis, glaucoma, and cystoid macular edema frequently develop in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The authors describe a case of cystoid macular edema associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis that had not responded to intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and bevacizumab but improved significantly following intravitreal injection with a dexamethasone 0.7 mg implant.

A pilot study of intravitreal diclofenac versus intravitreal triamcinolone for uveitic cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of intravitreal diclofenac (IVD) versus intravitreal triamcinolone (IVT) on refractory uveitic cystoid macular edema (CME).

METHODS

In this pilot randomized clinical trial, 15 eyes were randomly assigned to an IVD group, patients (8 eyes) who received a single intravitreal injection of diclofenac (500 μg/0.1 mL), and an IVT group (7 eyes), cases who received a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone (2 mg). Change in best-corrected VA in logMAR at week 36 was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 and 24 weeks, central macular thickness (CMT), macular leakage, and potential injection-related complications.

RESULTS

In the IVD group, BCVA was more than the baseline values in 4 eyes at 36 weeks; however, within-group analysis disclosed no statistically significant changes in the mean BCVA in this group. Nonetheless, in the IVT group, mean BCVA improved significantly at 12, 24, and 36 weeks compared to the baseline values. It was 0.86 ± 0.37 at baseline and 0.63 ± 0.48, 0.62 ± 0.42, and 0.43 ± 0.49 logMAR at 12, 24, and 36 weeks, respectively. Mean CMT reduction diminished also significantly only in the IVT group. Nevertheless, comparing the mean BCVA and CMT changes, macular leakage, and the occurrence of any injection-related complications, no significant difference was observed between the groups at any of the follow-up visits.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrated the superiority of IVT over IVD in the treatment of refractory uveitic CME regarding both functional and anatomical outcomes. Further studies are warranted to confirm potential benefit of IVD observed in this study.

Interventions for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Uveitic macular edema is the major cause of reduced vision in eyes with uveitis.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of interventions in the treatment of uveitic macular edema.

Search strategy

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase. There were no language or data restrictions in the search for trials. The databases were last searched on December 1, 2011. Reference lists of included trials were searched. Archives of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Retina, the British Journal of Ophthalmology, and the New England Journal of Medicine were searched for clinical trials and reviews.

Selection criteria

Participants of any age and sex with any type of uveitic macular edema were included. Early, chronic, refractory, or secondary uveitic macular edema were included. We included trials that compared any interventions of any dose and duration, including comparison with another treatment, sham treatment, or no treatment.

Data collection and analysis

Best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome data including adverse effects were collected.

Conclusion

More results from randomized controlled trials with long follow-up periods are needed for interventions for uveitic macular edema to assist in determining the overall long-term benefit of different treatments. The only intervention with sufficiently robust randomized controlled trials for a meta-analysis was acetazolamide, which was shown to be ineffective in improving vision in eyes with uveitic macular edema, and is clinically now rarely used. Interventions showing promise in this disease include dexamethasone implants, immunomodulatory drugs and anti-vascular endothelial growth-factor agents. When macular edema has become refractory after multiple interventions, pars plana vitrectomy could be considered. The disease pathophysiology is uncertain and the course of disease unpredictable. As there are no clear guidelines from the literature, interventions should be tailored to the individual patient.

Review and update of intraocular therapy in noninfectious uveitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review new clinically relevant data regarding the intraocular treatment of noninfectious uveitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Triamcinolone acetonide, the most commonly used intravitreal corticosteroid for treatment of uveitis and uveitic macular oedema has a limited duration of action and is associated with a high risk of corticosteroid-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) rise and cataract. Recent advances have led to the development of sustained-release corticosteroid devices using different corticosteroids such as dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide. Treatment options for patients who have previously exhibited corticosteroid hypertensive response have also expanded through the use of new noncorticosteroid intravitreal therapeutics such as methotrexate and antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents.

SUMMARY

Ozurdex dexamethasone implant appears to have a better safety profile, and a slightly long-lasting effect than triamcinolone acetonide. The Retisert implant allows the release of corticosteroids at a constant rate for 2.5 years, but it requires surgical placement and its use is associated with a very high risk of cataract and requirement for IOP-lowering surgery. For patients who are steroid responders, methotrexate may offer a better alternative to corticosteroid treatment than anti-VEGF agents, but controlled trials are required to confirm this.

Intravitreal triamcinolone for persistent cystoid macular oedema in eyes with quiescent uveitis

BACKGROUND

To determine the outcome following injections of triamcinolone acetate (IVTA) in the treatment of persistent cystoid macular oedema (CMO) in quiescent, non-infectious uveitis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with inactive uveitis requiring/not requiring immunosuppressive therapy who received IVTA because of chronic CMO refractory to previous systemic steroids. Number of IVTA (re-)treatments, distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, mean foveal thickness, intraocular pressure, duration of CMO, type of uveitis and systemic therapy were assessed previous to and 1, 4, 12 weeks following each IVTA treatment.

RESULTS

Between March 2003 and May 2006, 24 eyes of 18 patients received between one and three IVTA injections. A resolution of chronic CMO was observed in 7/24 eyes (29.2%, 5 eyes after single injection of IVTA, 1 eye each after two and three injections of IVTA), a significant increase in distance visual acuity in 9/24 eyes (37.5%; 5 eyes with resolution of CMO, 4 eyes despite persistent CMO) and in near visual acuity in 13/24 eyes (54.6%; 6 eyes with resolution of CMO, 7 eyes despite persistent CMO).

CONCLUSIONS

IVTA might be considered as a treatment for patients with chronic CMO when persistent despite previous systemic steroid therapy. Even patients without sustained resolution of CMO after IVTA might benefit in terms of transiently increasing visual acuity, but progression of cataract and rise in intraocular pressure limit repeatability.

Intravitreal triamcinolone for intraocular inflammation and associated macular edema

Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is a corticosteroid that has many uses in the treatment of ocular diseases because of its potent anti-inflammatory and anti-permeability actions. Intraocular inflammation broadly referred to as uveitis can result from several causes, including the immune system and after ophthalmic surgery. One of the most common reasons for vision loss with uveitis is macular edema. TA has been used for many years as an intravitreal injection for the treatment of ocular diseases. Several case control studies have been reported showing the efficacy of TA in the treatment of intraocular inflammation and associated macular edema caused by Behcet's disease, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome, sympathetic ophthalmia and white dot syndromes. It has also been shown efficacious in cases of pars planitis and idiopathic posterior uveitis. Some authors have reported its use in postoperative cystoid macular edema. Many of the studies on the use of TA in controlling intraocular inflammation and concomitant macular edema showed its effect to be transient in many patients requiring reinjection. Complications can arise from intravitreal injection of TA including elevated intraocular pressure and cataract. Rarely, it can be associated with infectious and non-infectious endophthalmitis. TA may be useful as an adjuvant in the treatment of uveitis and its associated macular edema, especially in patients resistant or intolerant to standard treatment.

Inflammatory cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to update our current understanding and management of inflammatory cystoid macular edema.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cystoid macular edema is a common cause of visual loss in uveitis, which occurs predominantly in older patients with chronic uveitis forms and might be heralded by subclinical changes on optic coherence tomography. Cystoid macular edema is emerging as a major cause of visual loss in HIV-infected patients with immune recovery uveitis. Elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines and vascular endothelial growth factor were found in all types of cystoid macular edema. Treatment with anti-inflammatory and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs is widely applied for all forms of cystoid macular edema and usually has a beneficial, but temporary effect. So far, there are no clear guidelines for the treatment of subclinical cystoid macular edema in uveitis. The effect of vitrectomy in inflammatory cystoid macular edema is not yet clear and might become more important in the future. Recent advances in management include intravitreal drug delivery systems of cystoid macular edema-modifying drugs.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes current thoughts on inflammatory cystoid macular edema focusing on the new, clinically relevant findings. Upcoming data on aqueous constituents in cystoid macular edema and imaging with the new generation of optic coherence tomography offer the hope that a better treatment strategy will soon be established.

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide: a change in a paradigm

BACKGROUND

Based on experimental studies and clinical observations by Robert Machemer, Gholam Peyman and others, the vitreous cavity has increasingly been used as a reservoir of drugs for the direct treatment of intraocular diseases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The most widely injected drug so far has been triamcinolone acetonide for various intraocular neovascular and edematous diseases. Comparing the various diseases with respect to effect and side effects of the treatment, the best response in terms of gain in visual acuity has been achieved for intraretinal edematous diseases such as diffuse diabetic macular edema, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, and pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. In eyes with various types of noninfectious uveitis including acute or chronic sympathetic ophthalmia and Adamantiadis-Behçet's disease, visual acuity increased and the degree of intraocular inflammation decreased. Some studies have suggested that intra- vitreal triamcinolone may be useful as an angiostatic agent in eyes with iris neovascularization and proliferative ischemic retinopathies. Intravitreal triamcinolone may possibly be helpful as adjunct therapy for exudative age-related macular degeneration, particularly in combination with photodynamic therapy. In eyes with chronic, therapy-resistant ocular hypotony, intravitreal triamcinolone can induce an increase in intraocular pressure and may stabilize the eye. The complications of intravitreal triamcinolone therapy include secondary ocular hypertension in about 40% of the eyes injected; medically uncontrollable high intraocular pressure leading to antiglaucomatous surgery in about 1-2% of the eyes; posterior subcapsular cataract and nuclear cataract leading to cataract surgery in about 15-20% in elderly patients within 1 year after injection; postoperative infectious endophthalmitis with a rate of about 1:1,000; noninfectious endophthalmitis, perhaps due to a reaction to the solvent agent, and pseudoendophthalmitis with triamcinolone acetonide crystals appearing in the anterior chamber. Intravitreal triamcinolone injection can be combined with other types of intraocular surgery including cataract surgery, particularly in eyes with iris neovascularization. Cataract surgery performed some months after the injection does not show a markedly elevated complication rate. The injection may be repeated, if vision redecreases. In nonvitrectomized eyes, the duration of the effect and side effects of a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone is about 6-9 months for a dosage of about 20 mg, and about 2-4 months for a dosage of 4 mg. It has remained unclear so far, whether and how to remove the solvent agent. In the future, intravitreal triamcinolone may be combined with other antiangiogenic drugs for the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration or with neuroprotective drugs for treatment of diabetic retinopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an exponentially increasing number of mostly case-series studies, the intravitreal injection of triamcinolone may still be considered an experimental procedure until randomized studies have been presented.