1
|
Kennedy K, Sarohia G, Podbielski D, Pickard S, Tarride JE, Xie F. Systematic methodological review of health state values in glaucoma cost-utility analyses. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1417-1435. [PMID: 38411844 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01663-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Describing the characteristics and sources of health state utility values and reporting practice in the literature of cost-utility analyses facilitates an understanding of the level of the transparency, validity, and generalizability of cost-utility analyses. Improving the quality of reporting will support investigators in describing the incremental value of emerging glaucoma interventions. OBJECTIVE To describe the state of practice among published glaucoma cost-utility analysis studies, focusing on valuation of health and the quality of reporting. EVIDENCE REVIEW We searched several databases including Medline, CINHAL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Biosis previews, the Health Economic Evaluations Database, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED). We included full-text, English, published cost-utility analyses of glaucoma interventions with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the primary outcome measure to calculate incremental cost-utility ratios. Excluded studies were non-English language, reviews, editorials, protocols, or other types of economic studies (cost-benefit, cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness). Study characteristics, operational definitions of glaucoma health states and health state utilities were extracted. The original source of the health utility was reviewed to determine the scale of measurement and the source of preference weighting. Items from the Systematic Review of Utilities for Cost-Effectiveness (SpRUCE checklist) were used to assess the reporting and quality of health utilities in glaucoma CUA. FINDINGS 43 CUAs were included, with 11 unique sources of health utilities. A wide range of health utilities for the same Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson glaucoma health states were reported; ocular hypertension (0.84-0.95), mild (0.68-0.94), moderate (0.57-0.92), advanced (0.58-0.88), severe/blind (0.46-0.76), and bilateral blindness (0.26-0.5). Most studies reported the basis for using health utilities (34, 79%) and any assumptions or adjustments applied to the health utilities (22, 51%). Few studies reported a framework for assessing the relevance of health utilities to a decision context (8, 19%). Even fewer (3, 7%) applied a systematic search strategy to identify health utilities and used a structured assessment of quality for inclusion. Overall, reporting has not improved over time. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This review describes that few CUAs describe important rationale for using health state utility values. Including additional details on the search, appraisal, selection, and inclusion process of health utility values improves transparency, generalizability and supports the assessment of the validity of study conclusions. Future investigations should aim to use health utilities on the same scale of measurement across health states and consider the source and relevance to the decision context/purpose of conducting that cost-utility study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Kennedy
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T1Z3, Canada.
| | - Gurkaran Sarohia
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, 400, 10924, 107 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5H 0X5, Canada
| | | | - Simon Pickard
- College of Pharmacy-Pharmacy Systems Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Jean-Eric Tarride
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paleel F, Qin M, Tagalakis AD, Yu-Wai-Man C, Lamprou DA. Manufacturing and characterisation of 3D-printed sustained-release Timolol implants for glaucoma treatment. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2024:10.1007/s13346-024-01589-8. [PMID: 38578377 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-024-01589-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Timolol maleate (TML) is a beta-blocker drug that is commonly used to lower the intraocular pressure in glaucoma. This study focused on using a 3D printing (3DP) method for the manufacturing of an ocular, implantable, sustained-release drug delivery system (DDS). Polycaprolactone (PCL), and PCL with 5 or 10% TML implants were manufactured using a one-step 3DP process. Their physicochemical characteristics were analysed using light microscopy, scanning electronic microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) / thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The in vitro drug release was evaluated by UV-spectrophotometry. Finally, the effect of the implants on cell viability in human trabecular meshwork cells was assessed. All the implants showed a smooth surface. Thermal analysis demonstrated that the implants remained thermally stable at the temperatures used for the printing, and FTIR studies showed that there were no significant interactions between PCL and TML. Both concentrations (5 & 10%) of TML achieved sustained release from the implants over the 8-week study period. All implants were non-cytotoxic to human trabecular cells. This study shows proof of concept that 3DP can be used to print biocompatible and personalised ocular implantable sustained-release DDSs for the treatment of glaucoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fathima Paleel
- School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, BT9 7BL, Belfast, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, SE1 7EH, London, UK
| | - Mengqi Qin
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, SE1 7EH, London, UK
| | | | - Cynthia Yu-Wai-Man
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, SE1 7EH, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maresova K, Lestak J, Fus M, Weissova I. Effect of prostaglandins and beta blockers on progression of hypertensive and normotensive glaucomas. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2021; 165:189-191. [DOI: 10.5507/bp.2020.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
4
|
Fukuda Y, Kume A, Kashiwagi K. Medical Costs of and Changes in Glaucoma Treatment among Patients Newly Starting Glaucoma Care. Curr Eye Res 2021; 46:1695-1702. [PMID: 33843390 DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1912780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To use a medical claim database to investigate medical costs and treatment patterns among patients newly starting glaucoma care.Subjects and methods: Subjects registered in the Japan Medical Database Center (JMDC) from January 2005 to March 2016 who were newly diagnosed with glaucoma, started glaucoma treatment, and had treatment records covering more than five years were included in the analysis. All direct medical costs were collected for a period of up to ten years. Factors affecting medical costs were analyzed. Changes in hypotensive eyedrops and choices related to glaucoma surgery were also analyzed.Results: Out of approximately 1.42 million subjects, 2,393 satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The average total medical cost incurred per patient over a period of ten years was US$9,030, including US$1,214 during the initial year. The proportion of the total cost represented by the cost of hypotensive eyedrops increased from 5.2% to 10.6% over the ten-year period. Medical costs were higher in patients younger than ten years old than in patients of all other age groups. The number of ocular hypotensive eyedrops increased from 0.9 to 1.5 over the ten-year period. Medical costs were higher for subjects with secondary glaucoma than for other subjects. Sixty-three patients underwent trabeculotomy or trabeculectomy, and trabeculectomy was the preferred choice in later years.Conclusions: The total direct medical cost associated with glaucoma was US$9,030 for the first ten years. Drug costs gradually increased with treatment duration and patient age and varied by glaucoma type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Fukuda
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan
| | - Atsuki Kume
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan
| | - Kenji Kashiwagi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, Garg A, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, Ambler G, Bunce C, Wormald R, Nathwani N, Barton K, Rubin G, Morris S, Buszewicz M. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus drops for newly diagnosed ocular hypertension and glaucoma: the LiGHT RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-102. [PMID: 31264958 DOI: 10.3310/hta23310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) are habitually treated with intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering eyedrops. Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a safe alternative to drops and is rarely used as first-line treatment. OBJECTIVES To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in newly diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with OAG or OHT, treated with two treatment pathways: topical IOP-lowering medication from the outset (Medicine-1st) or primary SLT followed by topical medications as required (Laser-1st). We also compared the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the two pathways. DESIGN A 36-month pragmatic, unmasked, multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTINGS Six collaborating specialist glaucoma clinics across the UK. PARTICIPANTS Newly diagnosed patients with OAG or OHT in one or both eyes who were aged ≥ 18 years and able to provide informed consent and read and understand English. Patients needed to qualify for treatment, be able to perform a reliable visual field (VF) test and have visual acuity of at least 6 out of 36 in the study eye. Patients with VF loss mean deviation worse than -12 dB in the better eye or -15 dB in the worse eye were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they had congenital, early childhood or secondary glaucoma or ocular comorbidities; if they had any previous ocular surgery except phacoemulsification, at least 1 year prior to recruitment or any active treatment for ophthalmic conditions; if they were pregnant; or if they were unable to use topical medical therapy or had contraindications to SLT. INTERVENTIONS SLT according to a predefined protocol compared with IOP-lowering eyedrops, as per national guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was HRQoL at 3 years [as measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire]. Secondary outcomes were cost and cost-effectiveness, disease-specific HRQoL, clinical effectiveness and safety. RESULTS Of the 718 patients enrolled, 356 were randomised to Laser-1st (initial SLT followed by routine medical treatment) and 362 to Medicine-1st (routine medical treatment only). A total of 652 (91%) patients returned the primary outcome questionnaire at 36 months. The EQ-5D-5L score was not significantly different between the two arms [adjusted mean difference (Laser-1st - Medicine-1st) 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.01 to 0.03; p = 0.23] at 36 months. Over 36 months, the proportion of visits at which IOP was within the target range was higher in the Laser-1st arm (93.0%, 95% CI 91.9% to 94.0%) than in the Medicine-1st arm (91.3%, 95% CI 89.9% to 92.5%), with IOP-lowering glaucoma surgery required in 0 and 11 patients, respectively. There was a 97% probability of Laser-1st being more cost-effective than Medicine-1st for the NHS, at a willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year of £20,000, with a reduction in ophthalmology costs of £458 per patient (95% of bootstrap iterations between -£585 and -£345). LIMITATION An unmasked design, although a limitation, was essential to capture any treatment effects on patients' perception. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic tool used in multiple settings and may not have been the most sensitive tool to investigate HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS Compared with medication, SLT provided a stable, drop-free IOP control to 74.2% of patients for at least 3 years, with a reduced need for surgery, lower cost and comparable HRQoL. Based on the evidence, SLT seems to be the most cost-effective first-line treatment option for OAG and OHT, also providing better clinical outcomes. FUTURE WORK Longitudinal research into the clinical efficacy of SLT as a first-line treatment will specify the long-term differences of disease progression, treatment intensity and ocular surgery rates between the two pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN32038223. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 31. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gus Gazzard
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Evgenia Konstantakopoulou
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
| | - David Garway-Heath
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anurag Garg
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gareth Ambler
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Catey Bunce
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Wormald
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.,London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Neil Nathwani
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Keith Barton
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gary Rubin
- Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marta Buszewicz
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ribeiro I, Batel Marques F, Mendes D, Alves C. A Systematic Review of Economic Studies Evaluating Ophthalmic Drugs: An Analysis of the Health-state Utilities. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2020; 27:325-338. [PMID: 32691652 DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2020.1792938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the techniques used to derive health-state utilities (HSU) in the cost-utility studies (CUS) of ophthalmic drugs. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in Pubmed/Embase until October 2019. CUS evaluating ophthalmic drugs were included. Therapeutic area, technique to derive HSU and sources of HSU were extracted. It was assessed if the HSU and the other parameters of CUS were collected from the same population. The techniques to derive HSU used in the CUS were compared to the techniques recommended by the country-specific economic evaluation guidelines. RESULTS Seventy CUS were included. Forty-three (61.4%) used direct techniques to derive HSU, 19 (27.1%) used indirect, 1 (1.4%) used direct and indirect and the remaining (n = 7; 10.0%) used other or unknown techniques. Twelve (17.1%) CUS collected the HSU and the other parameters from the same population: nine (12.9%) retrieved utility data from experimental studies, two (2.9%) from observational and one (1.4%) from other sources. Forty-eight (68.6%) CUS collected the HSU and the other parameters from different populations: eight (11.4%) retrieved utility data from experimental studies, 33 (47.1%) from observational, one (1.4%) from both experimental and observational and six (8.6%) from other sources. It was not possible to identify the population from whom data were obtained in 10 (14.3%) CUS. Eleven (15.7%) CUS followed the recommendations of guidelines, 21 (30.0%) did not follow and for 38 (54.3%), it was not possible to assess. CONCLUSION Choosing different techniques to derive HSU may result in different results, which can preclude the comparison between cost-utility studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Ribeiro
- AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, CHAD - Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research , Coimbra, Portugal.,Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Francisco Batel Marques
- AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, CHAD - Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research , Coimbra, Portugal.,Laboratory of Social Pharmacy and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Diogo Mendes
- AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, CHAD - Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research , Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Carlos Alves
- AIBILI - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, CHAD - Centre for Health Technology Assessment and Drug Research , Coimbra, Portugal.,Laboratory of Social Pharmacy and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feldman RM, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JM, Weinreb RN. Current Knowledge and Attitudes Concerning Cost-Effectiveness in Glaucoma Pharmacotherapy: A Glaucoma Specialists Focus Group Study. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14:729-739. [PMID: 32184559 PMCID: PMC7064281 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s236030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rising healthcare costs motivate continued cost-reduction efforts. To help lower costs associated with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), a prevalent, progressive disease with substantial direct and indirect costs, clinicians need to understand the cost-effectiveness of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering pharmacotherapies. There is little published information on clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes about cost-effectiveness in glaucoma treatment. Purpose This pilot focus group study aimed to explore clinician attitudes and perspectives around the costs and cost drivers of glaucoma therapy; the implementation of cost-effectiveness decisions; the clinical utility of cost-effectiveness studies; and the cost-effectiveness of available treatments. Methods Six US glaucoma specialists participated in two separate teleconferencing sessions (three participants each), managed by an independent, skilled moderator (also a glaucoma specialist) using a discussion guide. Participants reviewed recent publications (n=25) on health economics outcomes research in glaucoma prior to the sessions. Results Participants demonstrated a clear understanding of the economic burden of glaucoma therapy and identified medications, diagnostics, office visits, and treatment changes as key cost drivers. They considered cost-effectiveness an appropriate component of treatment decision-making but identified the need for additional data to inform these decisions. Participants indicated that there were only a few recent studies on health economics outcomes in glaucoma which evaluate parameters important to patient care, such as quality of life and medication adherence, and that longitudinal data were scant. In addition to efficacy, participants felt patient adherence and side-effect profile should be included in economic evaluations of glaucoma pharmacotherapy. Recently approved medications were evaluated in this context. Conclusion Clinicians deem treatment decisions based on cost-effectiveness data as clinically appropriate. Newer IOP-lowering therapies with potentially greater efficacy and favorable side-effect and adherence profiles may help optimize cost-effectiveness. Future studies should include: clinicians’ perspectives; lack of commercial bias; analysis of long-term outcomes/costs; more comprehensive parameters; real-world (including quality-of-life) data; and a robust Markov model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - George A Cioffi
- Department of Ophthalmology, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NY, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bartelt-Hofer J, Ben-Debba L, Flessa S. Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Decision Analytic Modeling Insights. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2020; 4:5-12. [PMID: 31111447 PMCID: PMC7018915 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0141-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to review, compare and gain insight into economic evaluations in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with a focus on existing decision analytic models. METHODS A literature review was performed using clinical and specialized databases following best practices. Relevant inclusion criteria included the development of a decision analytic model, the assessment of POAG interventions, and a full economic evaluation in terms of costs and health-related outcomes. Model inputs and settings were extracted, compared and analyzed. Main study incremental outcomes were also reported. RESULTS The literature review identified 22 full articles in alignment with the eligibility criteria for a total of 15 countries and a wide range of years from 1983 to 2018. Interventions included as competing alternatives in the eligible studies were topical medications (33%), screening or diagnosis (33%), surgical interventions (10%), laser trabeculoplasty (10%) and minimally invasive surgeries (3%). Markov models using transition states were the most common type of modeling approach. Cost-utility models using a mid- to long-term time horizon with a national payer perspective were the most frequent type of economic evaluation identified. Model states commonly included disease severity levels, as defined by glaucoma staging systems, and other relevant events such as blindness and death. Authors did not sufficiently justify key modeling assumptions, inputs or the robustness of their findings. CONCLUSIONS Decision analytic models in POAG can reasonably guide future modeling research by revealing common practices, inputs and assumptions. Furthermore, this review revealed evidence gaps in terms of unexplored interventions and treatment sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Steffen Flessa
- Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tachkov K, Vassilev A, Kostova S. Modeling the Pharmacotherapy Cost and Outcomes of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma With Dry Eye. Front Public Health 2019; 7:363. [PMID: 31921735 PMCID: PMC6934000 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to analyze and model the cost and results of current outpatient pharmacotherapy practice in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma concomitant with dry-eye disease (POAG+DE). The point of view is that of the health care system and patients, and the time horizon was 1 year. Data were collected through a prospective, observational, real-life study of therapy practice in patients admitted to the specialized ophthalmology clinic at the Alexandrovska University Hospital in Sofia. Pharmacotherapy was recorded and analyzed by therapeutic group and INN. The probability of being prescribed preservative-free or non-free formulations was calculated, as were the cost of yearly therapy, reimbursed cost, and patient co-payment. A decision tree exploring the cost-effectiveness of preservative-free and preservative non-free formulations was built. Outcomes were recorded through three tests measuring tear film stability: TMS, NIBUT Ave, and ST. TMS values below 3, ST above 10 mm, and NIBUT Ave above 14 s were considered as indicators of good disease control. A total of 140 eyes were diagnosed with POAG, of which 64 had concomitant dry-eye disease and were included in the analysis. Monotherapy was prescribed to 34: 14 on preservative-free formulations and 20 on non-free. Meanwhile, 30 eyes received combination therapy: six on preservative-free and 24 on non-free. The monotherapy product was most commonly Prostaglandin Analogs (PG−73.5%), followed by beta-blockers (BB−26.5%). No carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (Ca AA) or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (alfa 2 AA) were prescribed as monotherapy. The majority of patients showed poor disease control according to all three measures. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 744 BGN for TMS and 131 BGN for NUBIT for each successfully controlled eye—far below three times GDP per capita. For ST, the ICER was negative, benefiting non-free formulations. Therapy of POAG+DED with preservative-free formulations is cost-effective according to the WHO threshold of three times GDP. The median costs of the two treatment modalities were similar. Current practice shows that patients experience a higher burden in terms of co-payment than do institutions such as the NHIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin Tachkov
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Anton Vassilev
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Stanislava Kostova
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brown GC, Brown MM. Patient Preference-Based Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prostamides for Open-Angle Glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2019; 35:145-160. [DOI: 10.1089/jop.2018.0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gary C. Brown
- Center for Value-Based Medicine®, Hilton Head, South Carolina
- Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- The Eye Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Melissa M. Brown
- Center for Value-Based Medicine®, Hilton Head, South Carolina
- Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- The Eye Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Development and calibration of a constrained resource health outcomes simulation model of hospital-based glaucoma services. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2017. [DOI: 10.1057/hs.2013.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
|
12
|
Sabale U, Ekman M, Granström O, Bergenheim K, McEwan P. Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin (Forxiga®) added to metformin compared with sulfonylurea added to metformin in type 2 diabetes in the Nordic countries. Prim Care Diabetes 2015; 9:39-47. [PMID: 24840612 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2014] [Revised: 04/15/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin (Forxiga(®)) added to metformin, compared with sulfonylurea (SU) added to metformin, in Nordic Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled on metformin. METHODS Data from a 52-week clinical trial comparing dapagliflozin and SU in combination with metformin was used in a Cardiff simulation model to estimate long term diabetes-related complications in a cohort of T2DM patients. Costs and QALYs were calculated from a healthcare provider perspective and estimated over a patient's lifetime. RESULTS Compared with metformin+SU, the cost per QALY gained with dapagliflozin+metformin was €7944 in Denmark, €5424 in Finland, €4769 in Norway, and €6093 in Sweden. Metformin+dapagliflozin was associated with QALY gains ranging from 0.236 in Norway to 0.278 in Sweden and incremental cost ranging from €1125 in Norway to €1962 in Denmark. Results were robust across both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results were driven by weight changes associated with each treatment. CONCLUSIONS Results indicate that metformin+dapagliflozin is associated with gains in QALY compared with metformin+SU in Nordic T2DM patients inadequately controlled on metformin. Dapagliflozin treatment is a cost-effective treatment alternative for Type 2 diabetes in all four Nordic countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Phil McEwan
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Monmouth, UK; Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thelen U, Schnober D, Schölzel S, Kristoffersen MS, Nelson LA, Stewart JA, Stewart WC. Long-term cost and efficacy analysis of latanoprost versus timolol in glaucoma patients in Germany. Int J Ophthalmol 2013; 6:155-9. [PMID: 23638415 DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.02.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2012] [Accepted: 02/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate 5-year effectiveness and cost between latanoprost or timolol monotherapy in a pilot trial. METHODS A retrospective, multi-center trial performed at 6 sites in Germany of patients who had a diagnosis of primary open-angle or pigmentary glaucoma, in at least one eye, initiated on monotherapy with latanoprost or timolol maleate. Qualified consecutive charts were reviewed in which 5-year efficacy, safety and cost data was abstracted. RESULTS Seventy-seoen latanoprost and 49 timolol patients were included, at the final visit no difference existed between the two groups in disc parameters including: rim area, rim area/disc area ratio, cup volume or vertical cup/disc ratio (P>0.05). There was no difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) between the initial latanoprost (17.4±2.6) and timolol (16.3±2.8mmHg) groups. There was less change in medicines over the follow-up period (0.1 vs 0.8) and fewer medications at the final visit (1.2 vs 1.8) with latanoprost compared to timolol. No patient treated with latanoprost discontinued therapy during follow-up, while 12% discontinued timolol mostly due to inadequate IOP control. Cost/year was less with initial timolol ($458±236) as compared to latanoprost ($552±202). CONCLUSION Patients begun on latanoprost or timolol and followed over 5 years may have similar clinical outcomes. However, timolol patients may require more medicines and medicine changes to control IOP for long-term, but at a lower cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Thelen
- Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat, Augenarztpraxis, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hagman J. Comparison of resource utilization in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma between two cities in Finland: is more better? Acta Ophthalmol 2013; 91 Thesis 3:1-47. [PMID: 23621767 DOI: 10.1111/aos.12141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy associated with neural rim loss of the optic disc and the retinal nerve fibre layer typically causing visual field (VF) deterioration. Generally, glaucomatous lesions in the eye and in the visual field progress slowly over the years. In population-based cross-sectional studies, the percentage of unilateral or bilateral visual impairment varied between 3-12%. In screening studies, 0.03-2.4% of patients have been found to suffer visual impairment. Glaucoma has previously been associated with substantial healthcare costs and resource consumption attributable to the treatment of the disease. The disease also causes reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with glaucoma. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS This study compares patients with diagnosed open-angle glaucoma from two geographically different regions in Finland. A total of 168 patients were examined, 85 subjects from an area with higher per patient treatment costs (Oulu) and 83 patients from a region with lower per patient treatment costs (Turku). All patients had a history of continuous glaucoma medication use for a period of 11 years. For each patient, the total direct costs from glaucoma treatment were calculated and the total amount of resource consumption was determined from registries and patient records. Each patient underwent a clinical examination with visual field assessment and fundus photography. These data were used to determine the current stage of disease for each patient. Health-related quality of life questionnaire (15D) was used in determining each patient's subjective HRQoL score. RESULTS When applying the current diagnostic criteria for open-angle glaucoma, a total of 40% of patients did not to display any structural or functional damage suggesting glaucoma after 11 years of continuous medical treatment and follow-up. Patients with higher glaucoma stage (worse disease) were found to have statistically higher treatment costs compared with those at lower disease stages. Resource consumption was also greater in the patients in higher glaucoma stage. Patients in the Oulu district consumed more resources, and glaucoma treatment was more expensive than in the Turku area. The total treatment cost in Oulu and Turku was 6010 € and 4452 €, respectively, for the whole 11-year period. There was no statistically significant difference in quality-of-life scores between the two areas. No difference was noted between the higher-spending and lower-spending areas in this respect. However, when the population was analysed as a whole, patients with higher glaucoma stage were found to have lower vision-based 15D scores compared with those at lower disease stages. This observation was made also at both districts independently. CONCLUSIONS Major cost source in open-angle glaucoma treatment is medication, up to 74% of annual costs. In addition, it seems that higher resource consumption and higher treatment costs do not increase the patients' HRQoL as assessed by the 15D instrument.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juha Hagman
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Holló G, Thelen U, Teus MA, Quaranta L, Ferkova S, Babić N, Misiuk-Hojlo M, Mikropoulos DG, Kaluzny BJ, Kozobolis V, Januleviciene I, Kóthy P, Camara C, Russo A, Krzyzanowska-Berkowska P, Cieślińska I, Stewart JA, Kristoffersen MS, Nelson LA, Stewart WC. Long-term outcomes of prostaglandin analog versus timolol maleate in ocular hypertensive or primary open-angle glaucoma patients in Europe. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2011; 27:493-8. [PMID: 21790326 DOI: 10.1089/jop.2011.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the direct costs of therapy over 5 years of a European monotherapy cohort begun on a prostaglandin (PTG) versus timolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS A retrospective, multicenter, active-controlled, observational study. Data were abstracted for European patients treated as initial monotherapy in 1996 or afterward, with 5 years of available records. RESULTS This study included 271 patients (166 on a PTG and 105 on timolol at baseline). The average cost/month/patient over 5 years was $45.47±12.61 for PTG and $31.50±15.47 for timolol (P<0.001, based on German prices). After 5 years, although there was no difference in number of glaucoma medicines prescribed between groups (1.0 PTGs and 1.1 timolol, P=0.41), the timolol group demonstrated a higher intraocular pressure (17.7±2.9 vs. 16.5±3.0 mm Hg, P<0.001), more medication changes (P=0.01), greater incidence of glaucomatous progression (P=0.04), and less patients persistent on original monotherapy (P<0.001) than the PTG cohort. CONCLUSIONS Patients originally on timolol monotherapy have a lower cost of care over 5 years than those started on a PTG. However, timolol patients during follow-up may demonstrate a higher intraocular pressure, more progression, more medication changes, and lower persistency of the original monotherapy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Economic considerations of the diagnosis and management for glaucoma in the developed world. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011; 22:102-9. [PMID: 21192264 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0b013e3283437bf0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review evaluates the last 18-month literature related to costs and glaucoma. The emphasis is to look at evidence as a big picture and evaluate the critical points and challenges in methodology, current knowledge and future research. RECENT FINDINGS On the basis of simulation models, treating glaucoma appears to be cost-effective compared with no treatment. The results of the simulation models are, however, not consistent regarding when to treat ocular hypertension and when comparing different therapeutic interventions. Most models simulated starting treatment with prostaglandins compared with other medications, whereas one study simulated also initial laser therapy which appeared to be cost saving compared with medical therapy. The models utilized input data both from randomized controlled trials (ideal outcomes) and observational studies (with incomplete and selective reporting). Models suffer from unreliability of data, for example data from randomized diagnostic trials, empirical data of utility values and glaucoma-induced visual disability are limited. SUMMARY As the number of economic evaluations increases, the interpretation and evaluation of their extensive reporting appears very challenging. The published studies highlight the range of uncertainties due to the shortages of our current knowledge and evidence. There is a need for reliable and 'realistic' data for economic evaluations, preferably data from pragmatic randomized trials of 'usual patients'. Similar to emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of care, there is a need to evaluate the expected payback and cost-effectiveness of research interventions. However, even high-quality evidence cannot help our patients if we do not adopt cost-effective interventions.
Collapse
|
17
|
Current World Literature. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011; 22:141-6. [DOI: 10.1097/icu.0b013e32834483fc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Kwag TY, Kwag JH, Kim YD, Yim HB, Paik HJ, Park CJ, Aman Shah B. AM, Kang KD. Economic Evaluation of Different Initial Treatments for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Markov Model. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2010. [DOI: 10.3341/jkos.2010.51.6.865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jee Hyun Kwag
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeon Deok Kim
- Glaucoma and Cataract Services, HanGil Eye Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hye Bin Yim
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Catholic University of Korea, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hae Jung Paik
- Department of Ophthalmology, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Chi Jun Park
- Department of Computer Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stewart WC, Stewart JA, Mychaskiw MA. Response to Anderson et al. Eye (Lond) 2009. [DOI: 10.1038/eye.2009.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|