In vivo plasmid DNA electroporation generates exceptionally high levels of epitope-specific CD8+ T-cell responses

Multi-antigen DNA vaccine delivered by polyethylenimine and Salmonella enterica in neuroblastoma mouse model

Neuroblastoma is an example of a difficult-to-treat tumor with high incidence of relapse. DNA vaccination could be applied as a relapse prophylactic option for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Its efficacy depends directly on a target antigen of choice and a delivery method. Three neuroblastoma-associated antigens (tyrosine hydroxylase, Survivin, PHOX2B) and two delivery methods were investigated. Our data suggest that antigen PHOX2B is a more immunogenic target that induces cellular immune response and tumor regression more effectively than tyrosine hydroxylase and Survivin. Immunogenicity testing revealed that the delivery of DNA vaccine by Salmonella enterica was accompanied by a stronger immune response (cytotoxicity and IFNγ production) than that by DNA-polyethylenimine conjugate. Nevertheless, intramuscular immunization with PEI led to higher decrease of tumor volume compared to that after oral gavage with Salmonella vaccine.

Enhancing DNA vaccine potency by modifying the properties of antigen-presenting cells

DNA vaccines represent a potentially promising approach for antigen-specific immunotherapy. Advances in our knowledge of the adaptive immune system have indicated that professional antigen-presenting cells, especially dendritic cells (DCs), play a key role in the generation of antigen-specific immune responses. Thus, the modification of the properties of DCs represents an important strategy for enhancing the potency of DNA vaccines. This review discusses strategies to increase the number of antigen-expressing DCs, enhance antigen expression, processing and presentation in DCs, promote the activation and function of DCs, and improve DC and T-cell interaction, in order to optimize DNA vaccine-elicited immune responses. Continuing progress in our understanding of DC and T-cell biology serves as a foundation for further improvement of DNA vaccine potency, which may lead to future clinical applications of DNA vaccines for the control of infectious diseases and malignancies.

Electric pulses applied prior to intramuscular DNA vaccination greatly improve the vaccine immunogenicity

Electroporation can improve intramuscular DNA vaccination efficacy but the exact antigen presentation mechanism remains unclear. We reported here that a similar immuno-potentiation effect was also observed by stimulating the skeletal muscles with electric pulses (EP) a few days prior to DNA inoculation (EP + n days + DNA). The application of EP by itself activated proinflammatory chemokine genes and stress genes. It also triggered an influx of inflammatory monocytes/macrophages (MPs). After DNA inoculation, the plasmids were seen taken up by these inflammatory MPs, which migrated to the draining LNs subsequently. The antibody responses results were fast and strong. Furthermore, MPs isolated from the draining LNs of EP + n days + DNA treated mice were capable of stimulating Ag specific CD4+ T cell proliferation in vitro. Based on these observations, we proposed that the local inflammation resulted from EP treatment played an important role in facilitating antigen presentation of the DNA vaccines.

In vivo plasmid DNA electroporation resulted in transfection of satellite cells and lasting transgene expression in regenerated muscle fibers

In vivo plasmid DNA electroporation resulted in elevated and lasting transgene expression in skeletal muscles. But the nature of the cells that contributed to sustained gene expression remains unknown. We followed the fate of plasmid DNA delivered with electroporation and systematically investigated the time course and location of transgene expression in muscle tissues both with GFP and luciferase. Furthermore, satellite cell activation after electroporation was confirmed by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry analysis. The activated satellite cells were shown to be able to uptake the injected plasmid DNA and express transgene products as regenerated myocytes. We found that cells with longer gene expression durations were mostly regenerated muscle fibers. In contrast, expression in pre-existing muscle fibers was rather transient. We also presented in this study that immune response to transgene products might hamper the lasting gene expression. Based on these observations, we proposed that the underlying mechanism for prolonged transgene expression in the muscles after electroporation is related to the activation and transfection of myogenic satellite cells which subsequently developed into regenerated muscle fibers.

Gene expression and immune response kinetics using electroporation-mediated DNA delivery to muscle

BACKGROUND

Injection of DNA encoding exogenic proteins into muscle tissue combined with electroporation often results in a transient increase of the encoded protein concentration in the muscle and the blood. The reduction is normally due to an immune response against the exogenic protein but other factors may also be involved. How various electroporation parameters affect the concentration kinetics of syngenic and exogenic proteins is studied in relation to immune response and muscle damage after electroporation-mediated DNA transfer to muscle.

METHODS

Electroporation was applied to mouse quadriceps and rat tibialis anterior muscles after injection of DNA encoding either secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP), beta-galactosidase (beta-gal), luciferase or a mouse IgG molecule. Protein concentrations in blood or muscle and antibody responses were measured for a period up to 3 months. Tissue inflammation and muscle cell damage were studied on muscle cross-sections and assessed by measuring the concentrations of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) in blood.

RESULTS

Mice with the highest SEAP concentration in blood at day 7 also had the highest rate of decrease afterwards, the strongest antibody responses against SEAP and the highest acute levels of CPK in blood. DNA-transfected muscle fibers were significantly reduced in number from days 7 to 14. Mononuclear cells surrounded the reporter gene expressing muscle fibers, thus indicating a cellular immune response. When using DNA encoding a syngenic protein the protein concentration in blood was relatively stabile over a 3-month period, but showed different kinetics for various electroporation parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the optimal electroporation parameters for DNA vaccination may be different from the optimal parameters for long-term expression of genes encoding syngenic proteins.

Gene therapy progress and prospects: electroporation and other physical methods

Over the last 5 years, physical methods of plasmid delivery have revolutionized the efficiency of nonviral gene transfer, in some cases reaching the efficiencies of viral vectors. In vivo electroporation dramatically increases transfection efficiency for a variety of tissues. Other methods with clinical precedent, pressure-perfusion and ultrasound, also improve plasmid gene transfer. Alternatives such as focused laser, magnetic fields and ballistic (gene gun) approaches can also enhance delivery. As plasmid DNA appears to be a safe gene vector system, it seems likely that plasmid with physically enhanced delivery will be used increasingly in clinical trials.

Immune responses to gene therapy vectors: influence on vector function and effector mechanisms

Circumventing the immune response to the vector is a major challenge with all vector types. Viral vectors are the most likely to induce an immune response, especially those, like adenovirus and AAV, which express immunogenic epitopes within the organism. The first immune response occurring after vector transfer emerges from the innate immune system, mainly consisting in a rapid (few hours) inflammatory cytokines and chemokines secretion around the administration site. This reaction is high with adenoviral vectors and almost null with AAV. It is noteworthy that plasmid DNA vectors, because of CpG stimulatory islets, also stimulate the innate immunity via the stimulation of TLR receptors on leukocytes. Specific immune response leading to antibodies production and T lymphocytes activation also occurs within a few days after vector introduction. Capsid antigens are mostly responsible for specific immunity toward adenoviruses, and are also involved in the response against AAV. In the former case only, however, viral gene-encoded proteins can also be immunogenic. The pre-existing humoral immunity coming from early infections with wild-type AAV or adenovirus can prevent efficient gene transfer with the corresponding vectors. In all cases, some parameters like route of administration, dose, or promoter type have been extensively described as critical factors influencing vector immunity. Strategies to fight against vector-induced immunity can come from the immunology field, since tolerance induction or immunosuppression are a possibility. Alterations to vector structure have also been extensively performed to circumvent the immune system and thus enhance gene transfer efficiency and safety.

DNA electrotransfer: its principles and an updated review of its therapeutic applications

The use of electric pulses to transfect all types of cells is well known and regularly used in vitro for bacteria and eukaryotic cells transformation. Electric pulses can also be delivered in vivo either transcutaneously or with electrodes in direct contact with the tissues. After injection of naked DNA in a tissue, appropriate local electric pulses can result in a very high expression of the transferred genes. This manuscript describes the evolution in the concepts and the various optimization steps that have led to the use of combinations of pulses that fit with the known roles of the electric pulses in DNA electrotransfer, namely cell electropermeabilization and DNA electrophoresis. A summary of the main applications published until now is also reported, restricted to the in vivo preclinical trials using therapeutic genes.

Electroporation for gene transfer to skeletal muscles: current status

Naked plasmid DNA can be used to introduce genetic material into a variety of cell types in vivo. However, such gene transfer and expression is generally very low compared with that achieved with viral vectors and so is unsuitable for clinical therapeutic application in most cases. This difference in efficiency has been substantially reduced by the introduction of in vivo electroporation to enhance plasmid delivery to a wide range of tissues including muscle, skin, liver, lung, artery, kidney, retina, cornea, spinal cord, brain, synovium, and tumors. The precise mechanism of in vivo electroporation is uncertain, but appears to involve both electropore formation and an electrophoretic movement of the plasmid DNA. Skeletal muscle is a favored target tissue for three reasons: there is a pressing need to develop effective therapies for muscular dystrophies; skeletal muscle can act as an effective platform for the long-term secretion of therapeutic proteins for systemic distribution; and introduction of DNA vaccines into skeletal muscle promotes strong humoral and cellular immune responses. All of these applications are significantly improved by the application of in vivo electroporation. Importantly, the increased efficiency of plasmid delivery following electroporation is seen in larger species as well as rodents, in contrast to the decreasing efficiencies with increasing body size for simple intramuscular injection of naked plasmid DNA. As this electroporation-enhanced non-viral gene delivery system works well in larger species and avoids the vector-specific immune responses associated with recombinant viruses, the prospects for clinical application are promising.