Erectile function and quality of life after interstitial radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Sexual function and rehabilitation after radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a review

The treatment of prostate cancer is partly guided by patient preferences. Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are the standard radical therapies for localized disease and render comparable oncologic outcomes. Considering that survival is high regardless of the chosen treatment, factors such as treatment-related toxicities affecting the patients' quality of life play an important role in their decision. Notably, post-treatment sexual dysfunction, which includes decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction has been shown to be an important and prevalent concern of prostate cancer survivors. In this literature review, we sought to characterize the sexual complications associated with radiation therapy and map the available sexual rehabilitation options for prostate cancer survivors experiencing sexual dysfunction as a result of radiation therapy. We identified medical, non-biomedical, counseling, and lifestyle modification options for prostate cancer survivors seeking sexual rehabilitation. Future research in this area should address the standardization of sexual side-effect reporting and investigate sexual outcomes and rehabilitation in more diverse groups and of transgender and nonheterosexual prostate cancer survivors.

The Male Lumpectomy: Rationale for a Cancer Targeted Approach for Prostate Cryoablation. A Review

Lumpectomy to treat breast cancer has revolutionized the management of that disease. Lumpectomy showed that the quality of life of the individual patient can successfully be integrated into the equation of cancer treatment, without major loss of cancer treatment efficacy. Prostate cancer raises many of the same issues that breast cancer does in women. Impotence and incontinence, affects the male self image and psyche no less than the loss of a breast does a woman. Management of prostate cancer ranges from no treatment at all (“watchful waiting”) to treatments in which the whole gland is destroyed (radiation therapy, cryosurgery) or removed (radical prostatectomy), with presently no treatment in between these extremes. Pathologic literature indicates, however, that 35% of prostate cancers are solitary and unilateral. In addition, long term studies have confirmed that cryoabltion for prostate cancer is an efficacious treatment. In this paper we will examine the rationale for a “male lumpectomy” using cryoablation and present preliminary data supporting it's role in prostate cancer management.

Sexual function and male cancer

Quality of life in general and sexual functioning in particular have become very important in cancer patients. Biological factors such as anatomic alterations, physiological changes and secondary effect of medical interventions may preclude normal sexual functioning even when sexual desire is intact. In spite of modern surgical techniques, improved chemotherapeutical drugs and sophisticated radiation techniques, still many patients complain of impaired sexual function after cancer treatment. A large number of instruments already exist to assess quality of life in cancer patients. It is important to standardize procedures and to use validated questionnaires. Collecting data on an ongoing basis before and long after treatment is mandatory, and control groups must be used. Patients should be offered sexual counselling and informed about the availability of therapies for sexual dysfunctions. In this paper we review the topic of sexual functioning after treatment (predominantly after radiotherapy) of the most common malignancies in men and give suggestions for treatment.

Psychosexual care in prostate cancer survivorship: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer in men. Due to improvements in medical care, the number of PC survivors is increasing. Current literature demonstrates survivors have significant unmet needs including psychosexual care. We assess patients psychosexual needs by systematic review of literature over the past 20 years up to May 2015 in order to see what issues need to be addressed within psychosexual care.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on PC survivorship and psychosexual care. The search strategy aimed to identify all references related to PC survivorship programme components (parts of survivorship programmes) AND survivorship AND psychosexual concerns. Search terms used were as follows: (PC OR prostate neoplasms) AND (survivorship OR survivor*) OR [psychosexual impairment or sexual dysfunction or erectile dysfunction (ED)] AND [comorbidity or quality of life (QoL)].

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 17 papers, examining unmet needs in psychosexual care post PC therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings of this review may change psychosexual care of PC survivors, as national and international guidance is needed.

Nerve-Sparing Cryoablation for the Treatment of Primary Prostate Cancer: the Preliminary Report

Background: To present a pilot study of nerve-sparing cryoablation for the treatment of primary prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Between 2008 and 2011, 9 patients underwent nerve-sparing cryoablation (unilateral 5, bilateral 4 patients). One neurovascular bundle (NVB) was spared on the side opposite the positive biopsy, and two NVBs were spared when indicated and possible. Just before the start of freezing, a 22-gauge spinal needle was placed into Denonvilliers fascia using a transperineal route, and normal saline was injected to separate the rectum from the prostate. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was sampled every 3 months for the first 2 years and then every 6 months thereafter. Patients were considered to have a stable PSA if they had two consecutive PSA measurements without a rise. Results: The follow-up was 4ᄋ-months (19-66 months). All patients had stable PSA levels at last follow-up. Potency (defined as an erection sufficient to complete intercourse to the satisfaction of the patient) was maintained in 4 of 9 patients, 5 were potent with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or intracavernosal injection. Conclusions: Nerve-sparing cryoablation, in which one or two neurovascular bundle is spared, showed the possibility of preserving potency in most patients without compromising cancer control. These preliminary results warrant further study.

Low-dose rate brachytherapy for men with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Localized prostate cancer is a slow growing tumor for many years for the majority of affected men. Low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) is short-distance radiotherapy using low-energy radioactive sources. LDR-BT has been recommended for men with low risk localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefit and harm of LDR-BT compared to radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and no primary therapy (NPT) in men with localized prostatic cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1950), and EMBASE (from 1980) were searched in June 2010 as well as online trials registers and reference lists of reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, controlled trials comparing LDR-BT versus RP, EBRT, and NPT in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data on study methods, participants, treatment regimens, observation period and outcomes were recorded by two reviewers independently.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified only one RCT (N = 200; mean follow up 68 months). This trial compared LDR-BT and RP. The risk of bias was deemed high. Primary outcomes (overall survival, cause-specific mortality, or metastatic-free survival) were not reported. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years follow up was not significantly different between LDR-BT (78/85 (91.8%)) and RP (81/89 (91.0%)); P = 0.875; relative risk 0.92 (95% CI: 0.35 to 2.42).For severe adverse events reported at 6 months follow up, results favored LDR-BT for urinary incontinence (LDR-BT 0/85 (0.0%) versus RP 16/89 (18.0%); P < 0.001; relative risk 0) and favored RP for urinary irritation (LDR-BT 68/85 (80.0%) versus RP 4/89 (4.5%); P < 0.001; relative risk 17.80, 95% CI 6.79 to 46.66). The occurrence of urinary stricture did not significantly differ between the treatment groups (LDR-BT 2/85 (2.4%) versus RP 6/89 (6.7%); P = 0.221; relative risk 0.35, 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.68). Long-term information was not available.We did not identify significant differences of mean scores between treatment groups for patient-reported outcomes function and bother as well as generic health-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rate brachytherapy did not reduce biochemical recurrence-free survival versus radical prostatectomy at 5 years. For short-term severe adverse events, low-dose rate brachytherapy was significantly more favorable for urinary incontinence, but radical prostatectomy was significantly more favorable for urinary irritation. Evidence is based on one RCT with high risk of bias.

The "male lumpectomy": focal therapy for prostate cancer using cryoablation results in 48 patients with at least 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The use of breast sparing surgery, i.e., "lumpectomy", revolutionized management of breast cancer. Lumpectomy confirmed that quality of life issues can successfully be addressed without compromising treatment efficacy. Complications of prostate cancer treatment, including impotence and incontinence, affect the male self image no less than the loss of a breast does a woman. Traditional thinking held that prostate cancer was multifocal and therefore not amenable to a focal treatment approach. Recent pathology literature indicates, however, that up to 25% of prostate cancers are solitary and unilateral. This raises the question of whether these patients can be identified and treated with a limited "lumpectomy" or focal cancer treatment.

METHODS

Focal cryoablation was planned to encompass the area of known tumor based on staging biopsies. PSAs were obtained every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with at least 2-year follow-up had focal cryoablation. Follow-up ranged from 2 years 10 years with a mean of 4.5 years; 45 of 48 patients (94%) have stable PSAs [American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) criteria] with no evidence for cancer, despite 25 patients being medium to high risk for recurrence. Of the 24 patients with stable PSAs who were routinely biopsied (n = 24) all were negative. No local recurrences were noted in areas treated. Potency was maintained to the satisfaction of the patient in of 36 of 40 patients who were potent preoperatively. Of the 48, all were continent.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results indicate a "male lumpectomy" in which the prostate tumor region itself is destroyed, appears to preserve potency in a majority of patients and limits other complications (particularly incontinence), without compromising cancer control. If confirmed by further studies and long-term follow-up, this treatment approach could have a profound effect on prostate cancer management.

Erectile dysfunction following radiotherapy and brachytherapy for prostate cancer: pathophysiology, prevention and treatment

OBJECTIVES

Although detrimental impact on sexual function following radiotherapy (RT) and brachytherapy decreases the quality of life of prostate cancer survivors, the etiology, pathophysiology, prophylaxis and treatment of this condition has not yet been fully clarified. We reviewed the published literature in terms of etiology, treatment and possible prevention of erectile dysfunction (ED) following RT and/or brachytherapy.

METHOD

We have reviewed the literature through a MEDLINE search. Prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, radiotherapy, brachytherapy, treatment and quality of life were used as keywords.

CONCLUSION

Both RT and brachytherapy result in high rates of ED. Although arterial damage seems to be the main cause of ED after RT, exposure of neurovascular bundle to high levels of radiation dose has been also implicated in some studies with brachytherapy. The radiation dose received by the corpora cavernosa at the crurae of the penis may also be important in the etiology of ED. The most important predictive factor of ED following RT is the treatment modality. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and vessel-sparing prostate radiotherapy are new techniques but those treatments may not guarantee complete preservation of the erectile function. Patients need to be correctly informed on the possible sequela of radiation-based treatments on their sexual well-being while planning their treatment. Patients should also be informed about the possible treatment modalities for ED, which may develop in due course.

Rationale for a "male lumpectomy," a prostate cancer targeted approach using cryoablation: results in 21 patients with at least 2 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer in men raises many of the same issues that breast cancer does in women. Complications of prostate cancer treatment, including impotence and incontinence, affect the self-image and psyche of a man no less than does the loss of a breast in a woman. We present a pilot study in which 21 patients were treated with a focal cryoablation procedure.

METHODS

Focal cryoablation was performed using biplane transrectal ultrasound if the tumor was confined to only one prostate lobe. Preoperative PSA values were recorded. Cryoablation was planned to encompass the area of known tumor. PSA values were obtained every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. Potency and continence status was obtained at the same intervals. Routine biopsy was obtained at 1 year.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients had focal cryoablation. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 105 months with a mean of 50 months. Twenty of 21 (95%) patients have stable PSA values with no evidence for cancer, despite 10 patients being at medium to high risk for recurrence. All patients biopsied (n = 19) were negative for tumor. Potency was maintained in 17 of 21 patients (80%). No other complications, including incontinence or fistula formation, were noted.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results indicate a "male lumpectomy," in which the prostate tumor region itself is destroyed, appears to preserve potency in a majority of patients and limits other complications, without compromising cancer control. If these results are confirmed by further studies and long-term follow-up, this treatment approach could have a profound effect on prostate cancer management.

"Male lumpectomy": focal therapy for prostate cancer using cryoablation

The introduction of breast-sparing surgery (ie, "lumpectomy") revolutionized the management of breast cancer. The use of lumpectomy showed that quality of life could be optimized without compromising treatment efficacy. Complications of prostate cancer treatment, including impotence and incontinence, adversely alter the male self-image similarly to the way the loss of a breast does for a woman. Traditional thinking holds that prostate cancer is multifocal and therefore is not amenable to focal treatment. However, histopathologic findings from published data have indicated that up to 25% of prostate cancers are solitary and unilateral. Furthermore, the significance of minute secondary cancers might be minimal. These observations raise the question of whether certain patients can be identified and treated with a limited "lumpectomy." In this study, focal cryoablation has been used to ablate the area of known cancer as determined by staging biopsies. The serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was obtained every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology (ASTRO) criteria for PSA recurrence were used. A total of 55 patients with > or = 1 year of follow-up had undergone focal cryoablation. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 10 years (mean, 3.6 years). At the original transrectal ultrasound biopsy, the mean and median numbers of cores taken were 9.9 and 10 (SD, +/- 3.5), respectively. Mean and median numbers of positive cores were 1.8 and 1 (SD, +/- 1.3), respectively. Of the 55 study patients, 52 (95%) had stable PSA levels with no evidence of cancer despite a medium to high risk for recurrence in 29 patients. All biopsy findings were negative among the 26 patients with a stable PSA level who had undergone routine biopsy at 1 year. No local recurrence was noted in treated areas. Potency was maintained in 44 (86%) of 51 patients. Of the 54 patients without previous prostate surgery or radiotherapy, all were continent. These preliminary results indicate that "male lumpectomy"--in which the prostate tumor region itself is destroyed--preserves potency in most patients and limits other complications (particularly incontinence) without compromising cancer control. Additional studies and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm that this treatment approach could have a profound effect on prostate cancer management.

Focal cryosurgery: encouraging health outcomes for unifocal prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Owing to the ability to better detect small-volume tumors, we have seen an increasing population of men with low-risk unifocal prostate cancer. We report our safety and efficacy experience of focal cryoablation of the prostate to maintain potency and preserve genitourinary function in men with localized, unifocal disease.

METHODS

From June 2002 to December 2005, 25 patients with primary unifocal prostate cancer were treated with focal cryoablation of the prostate. The patients were followed up with physical examinations, morbidity questionnaires, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations every 3 months for the first year and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. Patients with a PSA nadir greater than 1.0 ng/mL or a nadir plus 2 ng/mL underwent repeat biopsy to assess for cancer recurrence.

RESULTS

The median age was 68 years (range 48 to 78). The median preoperative PSA level was 6.0 ng/mL, and the postoperative PSA nadir was 2.4 ng/mL. The median follow-up was 28 months. Seventeen patients remained potent. No patients reported worsened lower urinary tract symptoms, incontinence, rectal pain, perineal discomfort, or fistula formation. The median PSA nadir was 2.4 ng/mL, and 40% of patients had a PSA nadir of less than 1.0 ng/mL. Of the 25 patients, 21 (84%) had not experienced biochemical failure, defined as a greater than 50% PSA nadir reduction. Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy, and prostate cancer was detected in the contralateral gland in 2 patients and in the area of previous cryosurgery in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal cryoablation of the prostate has exhibited minimal morbidity and promising efficacy in our 3-year observation. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine its role in the treatment of patients with low-risk unifocal prostate cancer.

Techniques, indications et résultats de la curiethérapie interstitielle par implants permanents dans le cancer localisé de la prostate

Permanent seed brachytherapy as a monotherapy is an appropriate treatment in patients with low risk localized prostate cancer such as intraprostatic cancer, T1-2 stage, PSA less than 10 ng/mL, low tumour volume, well differentiated cancer (Gleason score less than 7), gland size less than 50 mL, no micturition symptoms that could decompensate after implantation. A brachytherapy program needs a specialized multidisciplinary team with the collaboration of urologists, radiotherapists (authorized person to manipulate radioactive elements), and physicists. The 10-year oncologic and morbidity results have been published in the literature and are comparable to those of other standard treatments of localized prostate cancer such as radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy.

[The treatments of localized prostate cancer: the impact on sexuality]

Nowadays, taking into account the sexuality is an essential component of the management of prostate cancer patients. This implies the necessity for providing accurate, clear and transparent information about the potential adverse effects on the sexual functioning for each proposed treatment. This information is not only given to the patient, but also to his female partner. The association of extended radical prostatectomy (without preservation of neurovascular bundles) and androgen suppression therapy will be proposed for men with locally advanced prostate cancer at high-risk for recurrence. The impact of such combined management regarding sexual functioning is high in terms of erection and sexual interest. Early pharmacological treatment of erectile dysfunction (within the three months following surgical treatment) with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or intracavernous injections will allow an optimal recovery of a certain quality of erection. Moreover, monotherapy with bicalutamide will be associated with significant advantage in terms of sexual interest. The sexuality after treatment will certainly be different but will be accomplished.

Radiation therapy for prostate cancer and erectile (dys)function: the role of imaging

Incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) after radiotherapy reported in the literature varies from 7 to 72% after external-beam radiotherapy to 5-51% after brachytherapy. Most of these studies are retrospective, the definition of ED is variable and sexual functioning is frequently assessed by asking only one question. Already in the 1980's it was suggested that post-radiation ED was attributable to vascular damage. The most reliable method to assess vasculogenic ED is the use of the Doppler ultrasound. More recently, many studies have assessed the relationship between radiation dose and volume of the penile bulb and post-radiation ED, though the outcome is controversial. The penile structures and the neurovascular bundles are best seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore the use of a computer tomography scan/MRI image fusion can result in reducing the planning target volume and consequently the radiation dose to the penile bulb and bodies. If radiation induces vascular damage that causes ED, any means of reducing the dose to the pelvic vascular structures would likely decrease ED, therefore new radiation techniques such as the intensity modulated radiation therapy or the implant of fiducial markers can help decrease the margins and therefore ED.

Estimating the risk of long-term erectile, urinary and bowel symptoms resulting from prostate cancer treatment

Reports on long-term complications resulting from treatment for localized prostate cancer are very inconsistent. In order to estimate the risks of long-term erectile dysfunction, urine symptoms and bowel symptoms following prostatectomy (RP), external conventional or conformal beam radiation (ERT or CRT) and brachytherapy (BRT), 98 papers from the PubMed and Cochrane Clinical Trial databases were selected, reviewed and critically evaluated. The majority of papers were institution-based retrospective and prospective follow-up studies; only two of these studies measured the risk of developing more than one treatment complication. Due to differences in study designs and populations, it is difficult to directly compare studies and not meaningful to calculate summary estimates. In addition to focusing on randomized clinical trials and well-designed population based studies, future research should adopt standardized methodologies and should measure the risk of developing more than one treatment complication.

Erectile dysfunction and treatment of carcinoma of the prostate

Prostate cancer is the leading malignancy in men in the United States and causes more than 60,000 deaths annually. Treatment of prostate cancer, whether it be with surgery, radiation therapy, cryotherapy, or medical treatment, is associated with significant life-altering morbidity. Incontinence and erectile dysfunction (ED) too often are sequelae of these treatment alternatives. ED can be a significant complication and can alter the life of the patient with prostate cancer and his partner. Newer modifications of the radical prostatectomy with nerve-sparing techniques are the cornerstone of erection preservation. Time following radical prostatectomy has been shown to increase erectile function such that more patients have functional erections at 3 years than 1 year after surgery. With the advent of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, many men can have improved functional erections and return to active coitus. Prevention of ED also is an important management technique. Evidence is gathering that prophylaxis with regular vasoactive injection or daily PDE-5 agents may be an integral part of preservation of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle function. Combination medical therapy and surgical penile prosthesis implantation also are options for patients who do not respond to oral PDE-5 inhibitors.

Longitudinal assessment of changes in sexual function and bother in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy, with and without neoadjuvant androgen ablation: Data from CaPSURE

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without brachytherapy (BT) boost or brachytherapy monotherapy with and without short-term androgen ablation (<==6 months; STAD) on sexual function (SF) and sexual bother (SB) in men treated for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 992 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer enrolled in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor database were studied to assess treatment-related changes in SF and SB. Six treatment subgroups (EBRT - STAD, EBRT + STAD, BT - STAD, BT + STAD, EBRT + BT - STAD, EBRT + BT + STAD) were compared.

RESULTS

The greatest reported changes in SF occurred during the first 2 posttreatment years. Patients receiving BT reported greater SF and the least change in SF overall; those receiving EBRT + BT reported the greatest decline in SF. SF scores associated with STAD were initially lower than in patients without STAD; however by 1 year no statistically significant difference in SF or SB was noted.

CONCLUSION

Each treatment for prostate cancer can negatively affect SF and SB. Initial differences among treatment subgroups exist, but diminish with time. SF changes associated with EBRT +/- BT were statistically significant and those for BT were not. STAD appeared to confer only temporary and recoverable impairment of erectile function.

Sexual health recovery after prostatectomy, external radiation, or brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer

Each of the three most common contemporary treatments for localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy, can have adverse effects on sexual health. Sexual health outcome can be improved by treatment-specific factors, such as the use of nerve-sparing technique during radical prostatectomy, or worsened by the use of androgen deprivation before external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy. Contemporary studies that have used validated questionnaires to evaluate multiple components of patient-reported sexuality following prostate cancer treatments provide benchmarks of sexual outcome expectations that are of interest to patients selecting their prostate cancer treatment.

Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Localized Prostatic Carcinoma: The Piedmont Experience

The modern interstitial brachytherapy plays a first-rate role in the treatment of the organ-confined prostatic carcinoma as a substantial alternative to radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in selected patients.

Materials and Methods

In our Centre 50 patients with a localized prostatic carcinoma were treated with transperineal and transrectal ultrasound-guided permanent implantation of I-125 radioactive seeds. 35 patients also underwent a neoadjuvant hormonal-therapy. Main end points were the biochemical control of the neoplasia and the treatment complications during a 24 months follow-up.

Results

We had two biochemical neoplasia recurrences, both in the neoadjuvant group. The most frequently observed complications were: slight irritative symptoms (12%), severe irritative symptoms (30%), urinary retention (10%), hematuria (8%), loss of seeds (6%), erectile dysfunction (46%). Urinary incontinence, urethral stricture and proctitis were not observed.

Conclusions

So far no large clinical trial compared the clinical efficacy of interstitial brachytherapy versus the other “conventional” treatments options (radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy). The results of our study and the actual evidences, based on cohort observation studies and case-control ones comparing brachytherapy versus surgery or external irradiation, support the therapeutical value of permanent interstitial implant with regard to oncological results and complications.

The physical burden of prostate cancer

The physical burden of prostate cancer is considerable and affects quality of life in men with both localized and metastatic disease. This physical impact results as much from treatment for prostate cancer as from the disease itself. In advanced disease, although patients can experience considerable pain and discomfort from bony lesions, they also can experience bothersome fatigue and sleep disturbances from institution of hormone ablation therapy. In localized disease, although patients can have lower urinary tract symptoms from untreated prostate cancer, all aggressive treatments can result in urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction that can bother the patient and affect quality of life. Patients and providers must be vigilantly aware of the physical burden of prostate cancer when initiating treatment for this disease and during follow up after treatment. By being cognizant of the physical impact of prostate cancer on quality of life, providers can address patients' problems early in their course of treatment and maximize patients' HRQOL and overall satisfaction with care.

Health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Quality of life is of great concern to patients considering treatment options for prostate cancer. In the absence of clinical trial data clearly demonstrating that a particular treatment is superior to another for localized prostate cancer, in terms of cause specific survival, patients may value quality of life as much as quantity of life. The goal of this review is to familiarize the reader with the methodology of quality of life research and to review the recent literature on quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A structured MEDLINE review of literature on health related quality of life in prostate cancer for the years 1995 to 2001 was performed, and was augmented with highly relevant articles from additional selected journals.

RESULTS

In the case of advanced or metastatic disease, where the goal of treatment is palliation and symptom-free survival, quality of life often becomes the primary desired outcome. In localized disease all treatments affect health related quality of life, although the impact of each therapy on sexual, urinary and bowel function is unique.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a highly personal and subjective entity, health related quality of life can be assessed using rigorous and scientifically stringent methods from the field of psychometric test theory. A substantial amount of literature exists regarding the use of established and validated instruments for assessing the impact of prostate cancer and its treatment on health related quality of life. This information is of critical importance when counseling men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer regarding treatment choices and is also helpful in setting appropriate expectations for men with metastatic disease.

Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this survey was to identify factors associated with good sexual outcomes in a large group of survivors of localized prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

A postal survey was sent to 2636 men in the Cleveland Clinic Foundation's Prostate Cancer Registry who either were treated with definitive radiotherapy or underwent prostatectomy for localized prostate carcinoma. The survey asked about demographic items, past and current sexual functioning, partner's sexual function and health, and a number of factors hypothesized to affect sexual satisfaction. Standardized questionnaires included the Sexual Self-Schema Scale-Male Version, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), urinary and bowel symptom scales from the Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

The return rate was 49%, yielding a sample of 1236 men at an average of 4.3 years post-treatment. Comparing responders with nonresponders suggested that the sample may have been somewhat biased toward men who were more interested in maintaining sexual function. At the time they were diagnosed with prostate carcinoma, 36% of men had erectile dysfunction (ED). Within the past 6 months, however, 85% of men reported having ED. Only 13% of men were having reliable, firm erections spontaneously, and another 8% of men were having erections with the aid of a medical treatment. Men were as distressed about loss of desire and trouble having satisfying orgasms as they were about ED. Of the 84% of men who reported having a current sexual partner, 66% indicated that she had a sexual problem. Younger age was associated strongly with better sexual outcome (global IIEF score). With demographic factors taken into account, better sexual outcome was related significantly to medical factors, including not having neoadjuvant or current antiandrogen therapy, undergoing bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy or brachytherapy, and having better mental and physical health composite scores on the SF-36. Sexual factors that were associated with a better outcome included having normal erections before treatment for prostate carcinoma, choosing a treatment based on the hope that it would preserve sexual function, having more sexual partners in the past year, and having a sexually functional partner.

CONCLUSIONS

The great majority of men who survive prostate carcinoma do not achieve a return to functional sexual activity in the years after treatment. The priorities a man places on sexuality and on having a sexually functional partner are important factors in sexual satisfaction at follow-up, over and above the influence of age and medical factors.

Focal "nerve-sparing" cryosurgery for treatment of primary prostate cancer: a new approach to preserving potency

OBJECTIVES

To present a pilot study in which 9 patients treated with focal, unilateral nerve-sparing cryosurgery were followed for up to 6 years. Cryosurgery, in which the whole gland is frozen, has a high rate of impotence, similar to non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Before focal nerve-sparing cryosurgery, all patients underwent repeated biopsy on the side opposite the previous positive biopsy. One neurovascular bundle was spared on the side opposite the positive biopsy. Just before the start of freezing, a 22-gauge spinal needle was placed into Denonvilliers fascia using a transperineal route, and saline was injected to separate the rectum from the prostate. Combined hormone therapy was stopped in all patients postoperatively. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was obtained every 3 months for the first 2 years and then every 6 months thereafter. Patients were considered to have a stable PSA if they had two consecutive PSA measurements without a rise. All patients were strongly encouraged to undergo routine biopsies despite a stable PSA level.

RESULTS

Between June 1995 and November 2000, 9 patients underwent focal, nerve-sparing cryosurgery. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 72 months (mean 36). All patients had stable PSA levels at last follow-up. Six patients routinely biopsied had negative biopsies. Potency (defined as an erection sufficient to complete intercourse to the satisfaction of the patient) was maintained in 7 of 9 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal nerve-sparing cryosurgery, in which one neurovascular bundle is spared, appears to preserve potency in most patients without compromising cancer control. These preliminary results warrant further study.

[Does one have a sexual life after prostate cancer treatment? ]

The precise assessment of sexual dysfunction after treatment of prostatic cancer cannot be avoided in 2002. These iatrogenic complications may significantly alter the quality of life of the patients. In addition, sexual toxicity is progressively becoming a cardinal parameter for the treatment choice, both for the patient and the physician. Significant efforts allowed to reduce sexual toxicity after therapy in the recent years. As an example, nerve-sparing surgical techniques have been proposed, whenever reasonable. However, in spite of these surgical advances, data suggest that overall, the new irradiation techniques (conformal radiotherapy and brachytherapy) are responsible for less alteration of sexual life than surgery. Another potential advantage is that sildenafil (Viagra) is able to restore potency in a majority of cases after radiotherapy, while it is usually poorly effective after surgery.

[Localized cancer of the prostate. What to tell the patient?]

Answering the question from patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate is always difficult; choice of radiation therapy (versus prostatectomy), indications of brachytherapy frequency and severity of acute and late effects as rate of survival, local control, are among the most frequent inquiries. A part of the answers are not evident of due lack, consensus and the physicians need to speak honestly and give the most appropriate responses without improving anxiety and fears of the patient.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and older age are associated with adverse sexual health-related quality-of-life outcome after prostate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

Brachytherapy is increasingly used as a treatment for localized prostate cancer but information regarding long-term, postimplantation, patient-reported sexual health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) is scant. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is commonly administered with brachytherapy, yet its potentially adverse effects on subsequent sexual health have not been described using a validated HRQOL instrument. We used a validated HRQOL survey to characterize the significance of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and other baseline factors on postimplantation sexual function and impairment.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey using the expanded prostate cancer index composite HRQOL instrument was administered to all 114 localized prostate cancer patients who underwent ultrasound-guided, transperineal brachytherapy during a 4-year period and to 142 age-matched control men. Multivariable models measured the association of baseline factors and covariates with postimplantation sexual HRQOL.

RESULTS

Older age (P = 0.01) and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (P = 0.009) were independently associated with diminished sexual HRQOL after prostate brachytherapy. Among patients younger than 69 years old, 33% reported at least fair sexual function after brachytherapy alone compared with 19% of men after brachytherapy with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Of the age-matched control men younger than 69 years old, 78% reported at least fair sexual function. Among patients older than 69 years, 26% reported at least fair sexual function after brachytherapy alone compared with 5% after brachytherapy with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and 61% of age-matched controls reported at least fair sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy are independent, significant determinants of sexual HRQOL after prostate brachytherapy. These factors should be taken into consideration when counseling patients with localized prostate cancer regarding the expected, postimplantation sexual HRQOL outcome.

Sexual (dys)function after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a review

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer has become the most common nonskin malignant neoplasm in older men in Western countries. As treatment efficacy has improved, issues related to posttherapy quality of life and sexual functioning have become more important.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We discuss the various methods used to evaluate erectile and sexual dysfunction and the definition of potency. The etiologies of erectile dysfunction after external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for prostate cancer are also reviewed. The literature is summarized, and comparative studies of radiation and surgery are surveyed briefly.

RESULTS

Rates of erectile dysfunction vary from 6 to 84% after external beam radiotherapy and from 0 to 51% after brachytherapy. In most of the studies, the analysis is retrospective, the definition of erectile dysfunction is not clear, only one question about sexual functioning is asked, and nonvalidated instruments are used. The etiology of erectile dysfunction after radiation for prostate cancer is not completely understood.

CONCLUSIONS

Because erectile function is only one component of sexual function, it is necessary to assess sexual desire, satisfaction, frequency of intercourse, and other such factors when evaluating the effects of therapy. Patients should be offered sexual counseling and informed about the availability of effective treatments for erectile dysfunction, such as sildenafil, intracavernosal injection, and vacuum devices.

Management of erectile dysfunction secondary to treatment for localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Management options for localized prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy, external radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and watchful waiting. Improvements in treatment techniques have resulted in fewer side effects. Nevertheless, long-term complications such as erectile dysfunction (ED) continue to affect a significant percentage of men treated for prostate cancer and can have a distressing and debilitating effect on the patient's quality of life.

METHODS

The author reviews both the prevalence and the current options for the management of ED secondary to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.

RESULTS

The ability to preserve potency after prostate cancer treatment is controversial, with reports ranging from 10%-90%. For patients complaining of impotence, efficacious alternatives are available such as oral drugs, intraurethral alprostadil, vacuum devices, intracavernous injections, and penile prostheses.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual function is an integral part of patient satisfaction and quality of life. Although ED is a frequent complication of definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer, a variety of treatment options are now available to maximize quality of life despite age and other comorbidities.