Ultrafiltration improves aortic compliance in haemodialysis patients

Fluid-structure interactions of peripheral arteries using a coupled in silico and in vitro approach

Vascular compliance is considered both a cause and a consequence of cardiovascular disease and a significant factor in the mid- and long-term patency of vascular grafts. However, the biomechanical effects of localised changes in compliance cannot be satisfactorily studied with the available medical imaging technologies or surgical simulation materials. To address this unmet need, we developed a coupled silico-vitro platform which allows for the validation of numerical fluid-structure interaction results as a numerical model and physical prototype. This numerical one-way and two-way fluid-structure interaction study is based on a three-dimensional computer model of an idealised femoral artery which is validated against patient measurements derived from the literature. The numerical results are then compared with experimental values collected from compliant arterial phantoms via direct pressurisation and ring tensile testing. Phantoms within a compliance range of 1.4-68.0%/100 mmHg were fabricated via additive manufacturing and silicone casting, then mechanically characterised via ring tensile testing and optical analysis under direct pressurisation with moderately statistically significant differences in measured compliance ranging between 10 and 20% for the two methods. One-way fluid-structure interaction coupling underestimated arterial wall compliance by up to 14.7% compared with two-way coupled models. Overall, Solaris™ (Smooth-On) matched the compliance range of the numerical and in vivo patient models most closely out of the tested silicone materials. Our approach is promising for vascular applications where mechanical compliance is especially important, such as the study of diseases which commonly affect arterial wall stiffness, such as atherosclerosis, and the model-based design, surgical training, and optimisation of vascular prostheses.

Kidney disease parameters, metabolic goal achievement, and arterial stiffness risk in Chinese adult people with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

To investigate the arterial stiffness (AS) risk within urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) categories and the joint effect between kidney disease parameters and metabolic goal achievement on AS risk in adult people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

A total of 27 439 Chinese participants with T2D from 10 National Metabolic Management Centers (MMC) were categorized into four albuminuria/decreased eGFR groups. The criteria for decreased eGFR and AS were eGFR <90 ml/min/1.73 m2 and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity value >the 75th percentile (1770.0 cm/s). Three metabolic goals were defined as glycated hemoglobin <7%, BP <130/80 mmHg, andlow-density lipoprotein cholesterol <2.6 mmol/L.

RESULTS

After full adjustment, odds ratios (ORs) for AS were highest for albuminuria and decreased eGFR (2.23 [1.98-2.52]) and were higher for albuminuria and normal eGFR (1.52 [1.39-1.67]) than for those with nonalbuminuria and decreased eGFR (1.17 [1.04-1.32]). Both UACR and eGFR in the subgroup or overall population independently correlated with AS risk. The achievement of ≥2 metabolic goals counteracted the association between albuminuria and AS risk (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.80-1.07; p = .311). When the metabolic goals added up to ≥2 for patients with decreased eGFR, they showed significantly lower AS risk (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56-0.74; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both higher UACR and lower eGFR are determinants of AS risk, with UACR more strongly related to AS than eGFR in adults with T2D. The correlation between albuminuria/decreased eGFR and AS was modified by the achievement of multiple metabolic elements.

Inter- and intradialytic fluid volume changes and vascular stiffness parameters in patients on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Whether fluid overload is associated with vascular stiffness parameters in hemodialysis (HD) patients has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that interdialytic fluid accumulation increases vascular stiffness parameters, which improves with intradialytic ultrafiltration.

METHODS

Fluid overload and vascular stiffness parameters were assessed in 39 HD patients (20 with and 19 without fluid overload) and compared to 26 healthy controls. Fluid status was assessed 15 minutes before the mid-week HD session by bio-impedance spectroscopy. Following this, ambulatory pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) were measured for 24 hours before another mid-week HD session and then for 5 hours starting 30 minutes before and ending 30 minutes after the session.

RESULTS

HD patients had significant fluid overload compared to healthy controls (2.0±2.4 vs. -0.2±0.6 L; P<0.001) and baseline PWV was higher (10.3±1.7 vs. 8.8±1.4 m/s; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between PWV and AIx in fluid overloaded and non-fluid overloaded HD patients prior to, or during the HD session. AIx of non-fluid overloaded HD patients improved after the HD session (P = 0.04). Average 24-hour AIx was higher in fluid overloaded HD patients (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Inter- and intradialytic changes in fluid volume were only weakly related to vascular stiffness parameters in HD patients. Although there was a modest reduction in AIx in non-fluid overloaded HD patients after the dialysis session, fluid removal did not improve vascular stiffness parameters during the HD session. We speculate that the effect of fluid overload correction on vascular stiffness parameters requires long-term adjustments in the vasculature.

Contribution of volume overload to the arterial stiffness of hemodialysis patients

Arterial stiffness is evaluated with the measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV), while overhydration (OH) and nutritional status are evaluated with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). In this study, we investigated the effect of a single dialysis session on arterial stiffness, hydration status, and laboratory parameters. The observational, cross-sectional, cohort study included 71 HD patients with mean age 64 ± 16 yrs. A Complior device was used to perform PWV measurements. The patients were examined immediately before and 15 min after a mid-week hemodialysis session. Body fluids and nutritional status were studied using a Body Composition Monitor (BCM), Fresenius Medical Care. Clinical and laboratory data were also analyzed. Multivariate regression analysis of PWV before HD showed that an OH increase of 1 L relate to a PWV parameter rise before HD of 0.523 m/s. Multivariate regression analysis of PWV after HD showed that a rise of central SBP after HD of 10 mmHg relate to a PWV increase after HD of 0.707 m/s. Our data indicate that hydration status and blood pressure may be major determinants of PWV in HD patients.

Changes in Vascular Tone Occur Early During Hemodialysis Treatments Independently of Volume Reduction

Hypotension commonly occurs during hemodialysis (HD). Hypotension can result from an absolute reduction in plasma volume following excessive ultrafiltration or from a reduction in vascular tone. We hypothesized that changes in vascular tone could occur during dialysis. Aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) was measured in 197 HD patients, mean age 63.3 ± 16.6 years, 62% male, 49% diabetic, during a single HD session. aPWV did not change (9.6 ± 2.2 vs. 9.6 ± 2.2 m/s) with HD. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) declined from 151 ± 31 to 147 ± 32 after 20 min and to 140 ± 36 mm Hg on completion of HD (P < 0.05), with an ultrafiltration volume of 2.2 ± 0.9 L over a 3.9 ± 0.4 h HD session. Aortic SBP declined from 154 ± 32 to 146 ± 29 after 20 min and 143 ± 35 at the end of HD, P < 0.001. Aortic augmentation index (Aortic Aix) decreased from 65% (52-79%) to 36.7% (23.3-52.9%) by 20 min and to 34.3 (15.1-49.1%) on completion of HD (P < 0.05), and brachial augmentation index (brachial Aix) from 5.7% (-25.2 to 27.5%) to -1.9% (-2.2 to 30.1%) and -6.6% (-44 to 22.7%), respectively, P < 0.05. Diastolic reflection area (DRA) increased from 36.7 (27.9-46.3) to 40.4 (32.2-51) after 20 min and 47.1 (34.2-60.5) on completion of HD, P < 0.05. We report changes in arterial tone within 20 min of starting HD, when minimal ultrafiltration has occurred, suggesting that volume changes may not be the only predisposing cause of intradialytic hypotension. The combination of a fall in SBP and a rise in DRA would suggest a reduction in coronary blood flow in keeping with reports of "myocardial stunning" during HD.

Ambulatory recording of wave reflections and arterial stiffness during intra- and interdialytic periods in patients treated with dialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Wave reflections and arterial stiffness are independent cardiovascular risk factors in ESRD. Previous studies in this population included only static recordings before and after dialysis. This study investigated the variation of these indices during intra- and interdialytic intervals and examined demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables related to arterial function in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Between February 2013 and May 2014, a total of 153 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis in five dialysis centers of northern Greece underwent ambulatory BP monitoring with the newly introduced Mobil-O-Graph device (IEM, Stolberg, Germany) over a midweek dialysis session and the subsequent interdialytic period. Mobil-O-Graph is an oscillometric device that records brachial BP and pulse waves and estimates, via generalized transfer function, aortic BP, augmentation index (AIx) as a measure of wave reflections, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) as an index of arterial stiffness.

RESULTS

AIx was lower during dialysis than in the interdialytic period of dialysis-on day (Day 1) (mean±SD, 24.7%±9.7% versus 26.8%±9.4%; P<0.001). In contrast, PWV remained unchanged between these intervals (9.31±2.2 versus 9.29±2.3 m/sec; P=0.60). Both AIx and PWV increased during dialysis-off day (Day 2) versus the out-of-dialysis period of Day 1 (28.8%±9.8% versus 26.8%±9.4% [P<0.001] and 9.39±2.3 versus 9.29±2.3 m/sec [P<0.001]). Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02 to 1.15), female sex (OR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.64 to 34.81), diabetic status (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.76 to 17.48), and higher mean BP (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.27) were associated with higher odds of high AIx; higher heart rate was associated with lower odds (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.80) of high AIx. Older age (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.58) and higher mean BP (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.27) were independent correlates of high PWV.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a gradual interdialytic increase in AIx, whereas PWV was only slightly elevated during Day 2. Future studies are needed to elucidate the value of these ambulatory measures for cardiovascular risk prediction in ESRD.

Does hemodiafiltration reduce vascular stiffness measured by aortic pulse wave velocity compared with high-flux hemodialysis?

Hemodialfiltration (HDF) has been reported to reduce the frequency of intradialytic hypotension compared with hemodialysis (HD). We wished to determine whether HDF resulted in improvement of arterial stiffness compared with HD. We reviewed peripheral blood pressure and pulse wave velocity measurements in a cross-sectional analysis of stable HDF and HD outpatients. One hundred forty-one HDF patients were matched to 148 HD patients in terms of age, sex, prevalence of diabetes, peripheral blood pressure, and body mass. Pulse wave velocity was not different between the HD and HDF cohorts (median 9.1 [8.0-10.7] m/s vs. 9.7 [8.5-11.6] m/s). Similarly, there were no differences in central aortic pressure (149.2 ± 30.9 mmHg vs. 151.9 ± 35.2 mmHg), or aortic (39 [25.1-51.2]% vs. 38.6 [25.8-51.4]%) and brachial (3.8 [-24.3 to 26.9]% vs. 3 [-22.4 to 27.1]%) augmentation indices, respectively. Pulse wave velocity did not differ between adult patients treated by HD and HDF, and similarly, there were no differences in central aortic pressure, aortic or brachial augmentation indices, and cardiac diastolic perfusion. Our study suggests that HDF does not appear to offer any benefit over HD in terms of vascular stiffness.

Assessment of arterial stiffness using applanation tonometry

Augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) assess functional and structural aspects of the vascular wall and are independent markers of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Like blood pressure, many factors, genetic, structural, and physiological, affect AIx and PWV. AIx and PWV can be assessed noninvasively using applanation tonometry. The technique is simple, but comes with a number of practical and technical limitations that have not been well documented and (or) explored. This review considers pulse wave analysis in the context of cardiovascular disease, and considers its limitations. Data are presented indicating that the placement of the probe is critical, and that the amplitude of the obtained signal is related to the variability in measurements. On a more theoretical note, issues are discussed regarding the applied transfer functions that are built in the devices to assess central AIx from peripheral waveforms. Altogether, PWV and its analysis are useful additions to the arsenal of parameters that can be used to assess vascular health and to estimate vascular risk. Yet, our analysis underscores the necessity for precise operating procedures, and calls for transparency regarding the applied transfer functions of commercial devices.

Membrane Bioincompatibility and Ultrafiltration Effects on Pulse Wave Analysis during Haemodialysis

Membrane bioincompatibility was demonstrated by successive white blood cell counts and C3a generation. Pulse wave analysis was obtained by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) in a sequential way: basal, after 30 minutes with nul ultrafiltration, and after a complete dialysis with ultrafiltration. At 15 minutes of haemodialysis, significant decrease in leukocyte count occurred: 6801 ± 1186 versus 4412 ± 1333 (P < 0.001), while C3a levels sharply increased from 427 ± 269 to 3501 ± 1638 ng/mL (P < 0.000). No changes were observed in augmentation index without ultrafiltration: 26.1 ± 11.1 versus 26.6 ± 12.4. Only aortic systolic blood pressure was lower at 15 minutes: 120.1 ± 17.7 versus 110.4 ± 25.8 mmHg (P = 0.009), in agreement with a reduction in brachial systolic blood pressure: 135.1 ± 18.1 versus 122.7 ± 27.4 mmHg (P = 0.01), without changes in aortic or brachial diastolic blood pressure. Important changes in pulse wave analysis were observed after a complete haemodialysis session: augmentation index 29.9 ± 10.1 versus 18.6 ± 15.0, aortic systolic blood pressure 139.8 ± 25.5 versus 119.4 ± 28.5 mmHg (P < 0.00), without changes in aortic diastolic blood pressure. In summary, haemodialysis with cellulose diacetate acutely induced a transient state of immunoactivation due to bioincompatibility, this phenomenon was nondetectable by pulse wave analysis. Complete haemodialysis session led to important changes in pulse wave analysis.

Hemodialysis reduces augmentation index but not aortic or brachial pulse wave velocity in dialysis-requiring patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Arterial stiffening characterizes the vasculature of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and is a strong predictor of their cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Previous studies evaluating the effect of hemodialysis on large artery elasticity gave contradictory results. This study aimed to investigate the impact of hemodialysis on arterial stiffness and wave reflections on chronic hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

A total of 51 stable ESRD patients on maintenance hemodialysis were evaluated before and after the first and second dialysis session of the week. Arterial stiffness was assessed by measuring aortic and brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV). Central arterial pressure waveform parameters were estimated by radial artery applanation tonometry. Heart rate-adjusted augmentation index [AIx(75)] was used as measure of wave reflections.

RESULTS

During both dialysis sessions systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) at brachial artery and central aorta were reduced. AIx(75) was decreased in first and second weekly dialysis session (27.5 ± 1.2 vs. 21.0 ± 1.5, p < 0.001 and 24.7 ± 1.2 vs. 20.5 ± 1.5, p < 0.001, respectively). In contrast, aortic and brachial PWV remained unchanged during both dialysis sessions. Changes in AIx(75) during hemodialysis were associated with changes in central aortic SBP, PP and ejection duration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that hemodialysis does not acutely affect arterial stiffness, but reduces wave reflections from periphery. This dissociation between effects of hemodialysis on PWV and AIx(75) may reflect differential impact on large and small branches of the arterial tree.

Current perspectives on diagnosis of heart failure in long-term dialysis patients

Cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney failure treated using dialysis. The risk of cardiovascular events is estimated to be at least 2- to 10-fold higher in dialysis patients than in age-, race-, and sex-matched persons with normal kidney function. A significant proportion of cardiovascular events in long-term dialysis patients is caused by heart failure, and the presence of heart failure is predictive of a poor prognosis. Despite the significant morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure, very few therapeutic options are proved to prevent and treat the progression of this complication in dialysis patients. There are several potential reasons for this, chiefly reflecting both challenges with diagnosis due to the coexistence of volume overload and a paucity of adequately powered prospective randomized controlled trials that examine the efficacy of different therapeutic options in dialysis patients with cardiac disease or heart failure. Thus, unlike in the general population, very few advances have been made in managing this severe complication in dialysis patients. In this article, an overview of the prevalence, severity, and risk factors for heart failure in maintenance dialysis patients is provided and the diagnosis of heart failure in these patients is revisited.

Acute improvement of aortic mechanics following hemodialysis in patients with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that distensibility of the aorta is decreased in patients with end-stage renal failure, while the underlying mechanisms are unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the distensibility of the aorta in patients at the end stage of chronic renal failure before and after hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

The diameter of the ascending aorta and distensibility were assessed in 48 patients on HD (31 men, 17 women, aged 45+/-14 years) and in 27 normal subjects (17 men, 10 women, aged 44+/-14 years). The diameter of the aorta was evaluated by M-mode in the parasternal long-axis view.

RESULTS

Aortic distensibility was significantly lower in patients on HD before HD (1.9+/-0.7 cm(2) x dyn(-1) x 10(-6)) than in normal control subjects (3.8+/-1.0 cm(2) x dyn(-1) X 10(-6), p< 0.0001). After dialysis, it increased to 2.6+/-1.2 (p < 0.05 compared with baseline, p < 0.001 compared with controls). The change of aortic distensibility correlated with age (R(2) = 0.629 p < 0.001) and ultrafiltration volume (R(2) = 0.168, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic distensibility in patients with end-stage renal disease is significantly lower than in normal subjects, and it is significantly improved after HD.

Noninvasive continuous monitoring of digital pulse waves during hemodialysis

Intermittent hemodynamic instability during hemodialysis treatment is a frequent complication in patients with end-stage renal failure. A noninvasive method for continuous hemodynamic monitoring is needed. We used noninvasive digital photoplethysmography and an algorithm for continuous, investigator-independent, automatic analysis of digital volume pulse in 10 healthy subjects and in 20 patients with end-stage renal failure during the hemodialysis session. The reflective index was defined representing the diastolic component of the digital pulse wave. The properties of the reflective index were studied in healthy control subjects (n=10). An increased reflective index was due to increased peripheral pulse wave reflection (e.g., vasoconstriction). During a hemodialysis session, the reflective index increased significantly from 36+/-3 arbitrary units to 41+/-3 arbitrary units (n=20; p<0.05) measured using digital photoplethysmography. This increase appeared in 15 of the 20 patients with end-stage renal failure. Our data establish digital photoplethysmography as a noninvasive, reliable, and sensitive method for continuous monitoring during the hemodialysis session.