Bailey HD, Bower C, Krishnaswamy J, Coates HL. Newborn hearing screening in Western Australia.
Med J Aust 2002;
177:180-5. [PMID:
12175320 DOI:
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04728.x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2001] [Accepted: 04/12/2002] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM
To report the preliminary findings of a pilot program to screen newborn babies for congenital bilateral permanent hearing loss.
SETTING
The five largest maternity hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. Screening was gradually introduced over seven months from February to August 2000.
PARTICIPANTS
All babies born at these hospitals after the introduction of hearing screening until 30 June 2001.
METHODS
One or both of two automated screening devices were used: one measuring transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and the other automated auditory brainstem responses (AABR). If a "pass" was not obtained in both ears, screening was repeated. All babies who did not obtain a pass in either ear at follow-up were referred for audiological assessment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Prevalence of permanent bilateral hearing loss.
RESULTS
Of 13 214 eligible babies, 12 708 (96.2%) received screening. The main reason for missing screening was early hospital discharge (309; 2.3%). Of the screened babies, 99% had a pass response in both ears at either the initial or follow-up screen. Twenty-three babies were referred for audiological assessment, and nine were diagnosed with bilateral permanent hearing loss (0.68/1000; 95% CI, 0.31-1.28).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite our program meeting process quality indicators, our detection rate was low. Before extending the program to smaller hospitals, we need to validate our screening instruments and put in place a system to monitor false negative results.
Collapse