Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection and monitoring of the Ph-positive clone in chronic myelogenous leukemia: comparison with metaphase banding analysis

Chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective comparison of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis for the definition of complete cytogenetic response: a study of the GIMEMA CML WP

In chronic myeloid leukemia, different methods are available to monitor the response to therapy: chromosome banding analysis (CBA), interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH), and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-Q-PCR). The GIMEMA CML WP (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Adulto Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Working Party) has performed a prospective study to compare CBA and I-FISH for the definition of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR). Samples (n = 664) were evaluated simultaneously by CBA and I-FISH. Of 537 cases in CCgR, the number of positive nuclei by I-FISH was less than 1% in 444 cases (82.7%). Of 451 cases with less than 1% positive nuclei by I-FISH, 444 (98.4%) were classified as CCgR by CBA. The major molecular response rate was significantly greater in cases with I-FISH less than 1% than in those with I-FISH 1% to 5% (66.8% vs 51.6%, P < .001) and in cases with CCgR and I-FISH less than 1% than in cases with CCgR and I-FISH 1% to 5% (66.1% vs 49.4%, P = .004). I-FISH is more sensitive than CBA and can be used to monitor CCgR. With appropriate probes, the cutoff value of I-FISH may be established at 1%. These trials are registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00514488 and NCT00510926.

Utility of peripheral blood dual color, double fusion fluorescentin situhybridization forBCR/ABLfusion to assess cytogenetic remission status in chronic myeloid leukemia

The molecular signature of BCR-ABL fusion in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) provides a unique tool for diagnosis and monitoring of tumor burden during therapy. The gold standard in this regard is conventional bone marrow cytogenetics. Peripheral blood fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) offers the possibility of a less invasive, more practical alternative method in terms of both cost and turnaround time. In the present study, we examined 296 paired samples from 65 patients with CML and demonstrate a tight correlation, in quantifying BCR-ABL burden between bone marrow cytogenetics, bone marrow dual color, double fusion (D-FISH), and peripheral blood D-FISH (P < 0.0001 for each). Furthermore, we demonstrate that peripheral blood D-FISH can be used as a surrogate for cytogenetic studies in monitoring cytogenetic remission status.

Molecular monitoring in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia

Imatinib has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Given the high rates of complete cytogenetic remission achieved with imatinib therapy, molecular monitoring of BCR-ABL transcript levels by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction has become the method of choice to assess the amount of residual disease below the cytogenetic threshold. BCR-ABL transcript levels measured at specific times during therapy may predict durable cytogenetic remission and prolonged progression-free survival or, on the contrary, failure and suboptimal response, thus directing clinical decisions. Recently, recommendations have been established for harmonizing the methodologies used to measure BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with CML, allowing results to be expressed on a standardized comparable international scale. Rising levels of BCR-ABL transcripts indicate the need for an analysis of kinase mutations, the major mechanism of imatinib resistance. The early detection and the characterization of these mutations may allow timely and appropriate treatment to overcome resistance.

Automated detection of residual leukemic cells by consecutive immunolabeling for CD10 and fluorescence in situ hybridization for ETV6/RUNX1 rearrangement in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Among the various methods available for analyzing minimal residual disease, a new procedure for the cell-based approaches using consecutive phenotypic and genotypic analysis as revealed by immunofluorescent labeling and subsequent fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been developed. We are introducing a fluorescent microscopy-based technique by which not only cellular targets and immunological marker positivity, but also the FISH pattern was identified by automated scanning. For the latter one translocation-specific FISH pattern recognition was accomplished by using an automated scanning mode for the 3D determination of valid distances between FISH signals, to define the cutoff value for the shortest green-red spot distance differentiating positive cells from negative ones. The procedure was tested with CD10(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line harboring the t(12;21)(p13;q22) resulting in the ETV6/RUNX1 rearrangement (formerly TEL/AML1), as well as peripheral blood lymphocytes of healthy individuals. Using the combined, automated method, a sensitivity of 98.67% and a specificity of 99.97% were obtained. The mean false positivity + 2 standard deviations cutoff level (0.09%) allows detection of leukemic cells with high accuracy, even a bit below the tumor load dilution of 10(-3), a value reported to be critical in clinical decision making.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia

The unique molecular characteristic of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the disease-causing ABL (9q34) to BCR (22q11) translocation, has provided an invaluable tool for disease diagnosis and monitoring of treatment response. The traditional standard in this regard is bone marrow karyotype, also known as conventional cytogenetics (CC), which reveals a shortened chromosome 22, the Philadelphia chromosome, t(9;22)(q34;q11). CC in CML has also been effectively used for monitoring the response to drug therapy. However, this particular laboratory test misses submicroscopic BCR/ABL translocations and is suboptimal for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. Both fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) feature higher sensitivity in terms of both diagnosis and MRD assessment in CML, compared to CC. Another advantage of these alternative tests is their effective applicability to peripheral blood specimens. The current review highlights the practical literature with respect to the use of FISH for CML whereas the use of RT-PCR has been extensively covered in recent communications.

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Monitoring of BCR-ABL-Positive Neutrophils in Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients during the Primary Stage of Imatinib Mesylate Therapy

We describe a method for monitoring chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with imatinib that uses fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect BCR-ABL in peripheral blood (PB) granulocytes. First, we compared this method, termed Neutrophil-FISH, with interphase FISH (i-FISH) analysis of bone marrow (BM), i-FISH analysis of PB mononuclear cells, and conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA) of BM in 30 consecutive CML patients. We found the percentage of BCR-ABL-positive neutrophils as determined by Neutrophil-FISH to correlate best with the percentage of Philadelphia chromosome-positive metaphases in the BM determined by CCA (y = 0.8818x + 5.7249; r(2) = 0.968). We then performed a serial Neutrophil-FISH study of 10 chronic-phase CML patients treated with imatinib and found that the technique could clearly separate imatinib responders from nonresponders within 12 weeks of drug administration. There was a significant difference in the percentages of BCR-ABL-positive neutrophils between responder (mean 3 SD, 18.2% 3 11.8%) and nonresponder (82.4% 3 5.1%) groups at 12 weeks (P < .0001, Student t test).Together with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis, Neutrophil-FISH represents another useful method for monitoring CML patients during the primary myelosuppressive stage of imatinib therapy because it is a quick, simple, and reliable method for assessing cytogenetic response.

A novel tricolor, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization method to detect BCR/ABL fusion in cells with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) associated with deletion of DNA on the derivative chromosome 9 in chronic myelocytic leukemia

Dual-color, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (D-FISH) can accurately detect and quantify cells with BCR/ABL fusion in <1% of 500 nuclei in 80% of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) and t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). The remaining patients have one of three forms of atypical D-FISH patterns; these patterns have different sensitivities to detect disease. Neoplastic cells with one ABL, one BCR, and one BCR/ABL fusion are particularly problematic, because normal cells with coincidental overlap have the same pattern. For these patients, the normal cutoff for D-FISH is >23%. We tested a new method that incorporates an aqua-labeled probe for the argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) gene into the conventional BCR/ABL D-FISH probe set. This tricolor D-FISH (TD-FISH) method takes advantage of the aqua-labeled ASS probe to distinguish between neoplastic and normal cells. We used TD-FISH to study 20 normal specimens and 35 specimens from 20 patients with known loss of both BCR and ABL from the derivative chromosome 9. The results show that TD-FISH effectively discriminates between cells with overlapping BCR and ABL signals from cells with true BCR/ABL fusion and improves the ability to quantify minimal residual disease from >23% to >1% of 500 interphase nuclei.

Correlation between BCR-ABL expression and tumor burden is restricted to the transition from minor to major cytogenetic response in interferon treated CML patients

The interferon treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia has been monitored by investigating the tumour burden as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and the expression of BCR-ABL chimera determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. These parameters were obtained from the peripheral blood of 51 untreated and 104 follow-up patient samples. Poor correlation (r=0.31) was found between BCR-ABL expression and tumor load in all samples as well as in untreated patients, and this correlation was even less in all follow-up cases (r=0.28). Regarding chimera expression five order of magnitude difference existed in the untreated patients and this value dropped to two in those with complete cytogenetic response. Only the major and the complete cytogenetic response groups differed significantly (p<0.001) in the BCR-ABL expression from that of patients at diagnosis. Among the different cytogenetic response groups the only significant difference (p<0.01) in the BCRABL expression was obtained between the major and the minor responders. In the individual patients not only correlated changes of residual tumour mass and chimera expression, but mainly independent changes of these two parameters were observed. This indicates that the BCR-ABL expression and the tumor burden are largely independent variables.

Progress with chronic myelogenous leukemia: a personal perspective over four decades

Our understanding and treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) has progressed since 1960 in parallel with work on cancer in general. CML provided the first evidence of a specific genetic change associated with a human cancer (the Philadelphia chromosome) and the clonal nature of these disorders. With improved cytogenetic and molecular techniques over subsequent decades, the specific genetic rearrangements of CML and many other tumors were defined and the complex mechanisms of carcinogenesis gradually unraveled. During this period, improved treatments for CML (chemotherapy, interferon, bone marrow transplantation) were implemented, and therapy targeted to the specific genetic change in the leukemic cells has recently been brought to promising clinical trials. Similar efforts are under way for other human cancers, and although the problem is enormously complex, there is real hope for major improvements in controlling these disorders.

Minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients

In many ways, chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) serves as a paradigm for the utility of molecular methods in the diagnosis of malignancy or for monitoring the response of the patient to therapy. The Philadelphia (Ph) translocation provides an elegant example of how cytogenetic findings provided the starting point for understanding the genetic mechanisms involved in leukaemogenesis. The degree of reduction in tumour load after therapy is an important prognostic factor for CML patients. Several approaches have been introduced that can specifically detect the Ph translocation or its products; these approaches include fluorescent in situ hybridization, Southern blotting, western blotting and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Because non-quantitative RT-PCR analysis after therapy gives only limited information, quantitative or semiquantitative RT-PCR assays have been developed that enable the kinetics of residual BCR-ABL transcripts to be monitored over time in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, interferon-alpha, or STI571 therapy.

Comparison of chromosome banding analysis, interphase- and hypermetaphase-FISH, qualitative and quantitative PCR for diagnosis and for follow-up in chronic myeloid leukemia: a study on 350 cases

For the diagnosis of CML and for monitoring of treatment response the detection of the t(9;22)(q34;q11) or the BCR-ABL rearrangement is necessary. Chromosome banding analysis (CA) is still the gold standard but other techniques like Southern blot, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are available. We analyzed 350 CML patients at different stages of disease in parallel with CA, interphase-FISH (IP-FISH), hypermetaphase-FISH (HM-FISH) and RT-PCR. In 20 cases with no Ph(+) metaphases in CA, HM-FISH detected 0.2 to 10% BCR-ABL(+)metaphases. After IP-FISH 107 samples were judged as negative. However, in 17 of these samples HM-FISH detected BCR-ABL(+) metaphases (0.3-11%), and in eight cases CA detected Ph(+) metaphases (2.5-25%). A comparison of IP-FISH performed on uncultivated cells vs cells cultivated for 48 h in 70 cases revealed a higher proportion of BCR-ABL+ cells in the cultivated samples. If nested PCR was negative, all other methods were negative in all cases too. In addition, 94 cases were evaluated using real-time PCR (LightCycler technology). The BCR-ABL/cABL ratio measured showed a high correlation with all other methods. Interestingly, a wide range in the BCR-ABL/ABL ratio was observed especially in patients who showed 100% Ph-positive metaphases in CA. In conclusion, CA, IP-FISH, HM-FISH and real-time PCR give reliable results but differences due to measurement of different target structures have to be kept in mind when using these data for definition of remission status.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia: laboratory diagnosis and monitoring

Rapid developments have occurred both in laboratory medicine and in therapeutic interventions for the management of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). With a wide array of laboratory tests available, selecting the appropriate test for a specific diagnostic or therapeutic setting has become increasingly difficult. In this review, we first discuss, from the point of view of laboratory medicine, the advantages and disadvantages of several commonly used laboratory assays, including cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and qualitative and quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We then discuss, from the point of view of clinical care, the test(s) of choice for the most common clinical scenarios, including diagnosis and monitoring of the therapeutic response and minimal residual disease in patients treated with different therapies. The purpose of this review is to help clinicians and laboratory physicians select appropriate tests for the diagnosis and monitoring of CML, with the ultimate goal of improving the cost-effective usage of clinical laboratories and improving patient care.

Cytogenetics of chronic myeloid leukaemia

The standard Philadelphia (Ph) translocation t(9;22), its variants and a proportion of Ph-negative cases are positive for the BCR-ABL fusion gene, as determined by molecular analysis. Extensive deletions of chromosome 9 and 22 derived sequences around the translocation breakpoints on the derivative 9 are seen in 10-30% of patients at diagnosis and may confer a worse prognosis. Additional cytogenetic changes can occur in the few months before or during disease progression and are often specific for blast morphology; however, the molecular basis of the most common additional cytogenetic abnormalities is largely unknown. Cytogenetics is important for monitoring patient response to treatment but is increasingly being replaced by the more sensitive and less invasive techniques of RT-PCR and FISH.

PBPC mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: quantification of bcr/abl-positive cells by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and competitive PCR

BACKGROUND

Autografting of normal stem cells mobilized after chemotherapy is increasingly used in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Thus, quantification of possible contamination of progenitor cell apheresis with breakpoint cluster region (bcr)/Abelson murine leukemia (abl)-positive cells is of great clinical interest.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Two molecular methods were compared to quantify bcr/abl positivity in leukapheresis components obtained after mobilizing chemotherapy in six patients with CML. To document the efficacy of in vivo purging, the leukapheresis procedures were monitored with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantitative competitive PCR (QC-PCR) as a ratio of bcr/abl:abl.

RESULTS

From the first to the last leukapheresis, bcr/abl positivity in FISH increased from a median of 11 percent to 33 percent. For bcr/abl transcripts, a simultaneous increase in consecutive leukapheresis procedures was seen. The median percentage of bcr cells in a bcr/abl:abl ratio was 3.1 percent in the first apheresis. In the last apheresis after the mobilization with mRNA, the QC-PCR showed a median of 19.5 percent. FISH and QC-PCR showed a statistical significant increase of bcr/abl positivity from the first to the last apheresis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both FISH and QC-PCR were reliable methods of quantifying bcr/abl positivity, and they allowed selection of the optimal apheresis component for autologous transplantation. In both methods, a significant increase in bcr/abl positivity was seen from the first to the last leukapheresis. With FISH, results can be obtained within 24 hours. This method may prevent additional contaminated leukapheresis in case of increasing percentages of bcr/abl-positive cells.

Detection and quantification of residual disease in chronic myelogenous leukemia

The degree of tumor load reduction after therapy is an important prognostic factor for patients with CML. Conventional metaphase analysis has been considered to be the 'gold standard' for evaluating patient response to treatment but this technique normally requires bone marrow aspiration and is therefore invasive. The frequency of cytogenetic analyses can be considerably reduced if patients are also monitored by molecular methods, which can be performed on peripheral blood specimens. Of the various techniques available, most attention has been paid to RT-PCR for BCR-ABL mRNA since this is by far the most sensitive. Simple, non-quantitative RT-PCR analysis gives only limited information on patients after treatment. Quantitative RT-PCR assays have been developed to monitor the kinetics of residual BCR-ABL transcripts over time. Variables in the quantitative PCR assay may be controlled for by quantification of transcripts of a normal gene (eg ABL or glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, G6PD) as an internal standard. After allogeneic stem cell transplantation, most patients become RT-PCR negative, often after a period of low level positivity that may persist for several months. Those patients destined to relapse are characterized by the reappearance and/or rising levels of BCR-ABL transcripts. In contrast, for patients treated with interferon-alpha (IFN) residual disease is rarely, if ever, eliminated. The actual level of minimal residual disease in complete cytogenetic responders to IFN correlates with the probability of relapse. New quantitative real time procedures promise to simplify the protocols that are currently in use, but standardization and the introduction of rigorous, internationally accepted controls are required to enable RT-PCR to become a robust and routine basis for therapeutic decisions.

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization overcomes pitfalls of G-banding analysis with special reference to underestimation of chromosomal aberration rates

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is suitable for detecting different types of chromosome aberrations on interphase nuclei even in specimens with no or few chromosome metaphases. However, it is not known why FISH is superior to conventional G-banding analysis. The sensitivity of interphase FISH was compared to that of G-banding analysis in 288 leukemia/lymphoma patients for 10 different types of chromosome aberrations: t(9;22) (M- and m-BCR), t(8;21), 11q23 abnormalities, t(15;17), del(5)/-5, del(13)/-13, +8, -7, and +12. The results revealed that t(15;17) positive cells could not proliferate well in culture, leading to underestimation of abnormality by G-banding. Monosomy 7 in acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) as well as trisomy 12 and deletion chromosome 13 in chronic lymphocytic leukemias (CLL) were also severely underestimated by G-banding. On the other hand, no discrepancies were observed in t(8;21), t(9;22), translations involving 11q23, or in trisomy 8. These findings indicate the superiority of interphase FISH over conventional cytogenetics for detecting chromosome abnormalities in small clones, especially for monosomy 7 or (15;17) translocations.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia: biology and therapy

Chronic myelogenous leukemia is a myeloproliferative disorder. It is characterized by a biphasic or triphasic clinical course in which a benign chronic phase is followed by transformation into an accelerated and blastic phase. On a cytogenetic and molecular level, most patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia demonstrate BCR-ABL fusion genes in hematopoietic progenitor cells, which result from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22; this translocation leads to a shortened chromosome 22, called the Philadelphia chromosome. Translation of the fusion products yields chimeric proteins of variable size that have increased tyrosine kinase activity. Conventional chemotherapy with hydroxyurea or busulfan can achieve hematologic control but cannot modify the natural disease course, which inevitably terminates in a rapidly fatal blastic phase. Since its introduction in the 1980s, allogeneic stem-cell transplantation has provided the groundwork for a cure of chronic myelogenous leukemia. However, few patients are eligible for this treatment because of donor availability and age restrictions. Therapy with interferon-alpha alone or in combination with cytarabine suppresses the leukemic clone, produces cytogenetic remissions, and prolongs survival. It is an effective alternative first-line treatment for patients ineligible for transplantation. New drugs active against chronic myelogenous leukemia may show increased activity in the transformed phases of the disease. Novel therapies and concepts are developing rapidly; targeted molecules are tyrosine kinases, ras, and messenger RNA through antisense oligonucleotides. Alternative transplantation options, such as stem cells from autologous sources and matched unrelated donors, are expanding. Immunomodulation by adoptive immunotherapy and vaccine strategies hold significant promise for the cure of chronic myelogenous leukemia.