Safety and efficacy of STI-571 (imatinib mesylate) in patients with bcr/abl-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT)

The chimeric ubiquitin ligase SH2-U-box inhibits the growth of imatinib-sensitive and resistant CML by targeting the native and T315I-mutant BCR-ABL

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by constitutively active fusion protein tyrosine kinase BCR-ABL. Although the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) against BCR-ABL, imatinib, is the first-line therapy for CML, acquired resistance almost inevitably emerges. The underlying mechanism are point mutations within the BCR-ABL gene, among which T315I is notorious because it resists to almost all currently available inhibitors. Here we took use of a previously generated chimeric ubiquitin ligase, SH2-U-box, in which SH2 from the adaptor protein Grb2 acts as a binding domain for activated BCR-ABL, while U-box from CHIP functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase domain, so as to target the ubiquitination and degradation of both native and T315I-mutant BCR-ABL. As such, SH2-U-box significantly inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in CML cells harboring either the wild-type or T315I-mutant BCR-ABL (K562 or K562R), with BCR-ABL-dependent signaling pathways being repressed. Moreover, SH2-U-box worked in concert with imatinib in K562 cells. Importantly, SH2-U-box-carrying lentivirus could markedly suppress the growth of K562-xenografts in nude mice or K562R-xenografts in SCID mice, as well as that of primary CML cells. Collectively, by degrading the native and T315I-mutant BCR-ABL, the chimeric ubiquitin ligase SH2-U-box may serve as a potential therapy for both imatinib-sensitive and resistant CML.

KIT (CD117) expression in a subset of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients

We have previously described the expression of CD44, CD90, CD117 and CD133 in NSCLC tumors, adjacent normal lung, and malignant pleural effusions (MPE). Here we describe the unique subset of tumors expressing CD117 (KIT), a potential therapeutic target. Tumor and adjacent tissue were collected from 58 patients. Six MPE were obtained before therapy. Tissue was paraffin embedded for immunofluorescent microscopy, disaggregated and stained for flow cytometry or cryopreserved for later culture. The effect of imatinib on CD117(high)/KIT+ tumors was determined on first passage cells; absolute cell counts and flow cytometry were readouts for drug sensitivity of cell subsets. Primary tumors divided into KIT(neg) and KIT+ by immunofluorescence. By more sensitive flow cytometric analysis, CD117+ cytokeratin+ cells were detected in all tissues (1.1% of cytokeratin+ cells in normal lung, 1.29% in KIT "negative" tumors, 40.7% in KIT+ tumors, and 0.4% in MPE). In KIT+/CD117(high), but not KIT+/CD117(low) tumors, CD117 was overexpressed 3.1-fold compared to normal lung. Primary cultures of CD117(high) tumors were sensitive to imatinib (5 µM) in short term culture. We conclude that NSCLC tumors divide into CD117(low) and CD117(high). Overexpression of CD117 in CD117(high) NSCLC supports exploring KIT as a therapeutic target in this subset of patients.

Update on practical aspects of the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib mesylate

Imatinib (imatinib mesylate, Gleevec(R) [formerly known as STI571], Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) is a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with all phases of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Imatinib is remarkably effective as treatment for CML in the chronic phase (at a dosage of 400 mg/d) and the accelerated phase (at 600 mg/d). At this time, it remains to be seen whether the chronic phase of CML can be extended sufficiently in some patients so that they are functionally "cured," and also whether the increased rate of major molecular response induced by doses of imatinib higher than 400 mg/d will further improve overall survival of patients with CML in the chronic phase. The value of molecular monitoring of response in patients with CML in the chronic phase is examined. Although imatinib 800 mg/d can induce dramatic responses in patients with myeloid blast crisis, lymphoid blast crisis, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), the responses are usually incomplete and of short duration. We discuss the role of imatinib in relation to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (particularly in younger patients), recognizing that the data upon which any decisions can be made are relatively immature. Finally, recent data on new tyrosine kinase inhibitors capable of overcoming primary or acquired resistance to imatinib are reviewed.

Allo-hematopoietic cell transplantation for Ph chromosome-positive ALL: impact of imatinib on relapse and survival

The utility of imatinib in either the pre- or post-transplant period for Ph chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL is uncertain. In addition, there have been recent concerns regarding imatinib and cardiac toxicity. We investigated the outcome of 32 patients with Ph+ ALL who received an allo-hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) at the University of Minnesota between 1999 and 2006. The median age at HCT was 21.9 years (range: 2.8-55.2). All patients were conditioned with CY and TBI. GVHD prophylaxis was CsA based. Of the 32 patients, 15 received imatinib therapy pre- or post-HCT (imatinib group) and 17 patients received either no imatinib (n=11) or only after relapse (n=6) (non-imatinib group). Overall survival, relapse-free survival and relapse at 2 years was 61, 67 and 13% for the imatinib group as compared with 41, 35 and 35% for the non-imatinib group (P=0.19, 0.12 and 0.20, respectively). Cardiac toxicity and TRM at 2 years were similar between groups. Thus, patients treated with imatinib in either the pre- or post-transplant setting had trends toward improved outcomes and no increase in cardiac toxicity. We suggest that imatinib be included in the peri-transplant management of all patients with Ph+ ALL.

Autologous stem cells collected after debulking by high dose chemotherapy in late phase chronic myeloid leukemia may improve Imatinib efficacy

The current curative therapeutic option for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase is still allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). For the patients who are not candidates for allogeneic SCT, Imatinib is the treatment of choice. It was found that high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue prolongs the disease-free survival and may also restore sensitivity to interferon. Here we report the results of Imatinib treatment in three late-phase CML patients who were submitted to autologous SCT following resistance to interferon. Complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response were achieved in the three cases. Imatinib has the potential to induce late molecular remissions during the course of treatment and its effect may be optimized by a previous autologous SCT in this type of patients.

BNP as a marker of the heart failure in the treatment of imatinib mesylate

Since its introduction 6 years ago, imatinib mesylate, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been a phenomenon in treating chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) with remarkably superior cytogenetic and molecular response rates at all stages of CML followed by longer progression free survival. Despite its extraordinarily high efficacy, adverse effects of imatinib mesylate such as edema, liver toxicity and fluid retention syndromes have been reported. Here we, for the first time, report development of heart failure in patients on imatinib mesylate medication and the possibility of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a potential diagnostic (or predicting) marker for heart failure. Since plasma BNP levels in the two patients were exceptionally high, we then explored the possibility of genetic association of BNP with the development of heart failure to find no positive association.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia

There never has been a more difficult time to advise patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Until recently,the options comprised noncurative but relatively nontoxic chemotherapy or potentially curative allogeneic stem cell transplantation,with its attendant morbidity and mortality. There now is the additional option of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate that has been in clinical practice for almost 5 years. Although data are emerging regarding the efficacy of imatinib, solid evidence of any prolongation in survival will be delayed for several years. Future management of CML will continue to depend on a combination of approaches that use allografting and targeted drug therapy. The next decade undoubtedly will witness the introduction of a number of agents capable of inhibiting signal transduction pathways,perhaps controlling CML in cases of primary or acquired imatinib resistance. In the absence of long-term outcome data for imatinib,it remains reasonable to propose that young patients with newly diagnosed CML who have HLA-identical or well-matched unrelated donors should undergo allogeneic transplantation using a standard or nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Similarly,patients who fail to respond to imatinib should be rescued with a transplant strategy. The role of molecular monitoring in these two strategies cannot be underestimated.

Imatinib Mesylate in the Treatment of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Imatinib mesylate binds to the inactive conformation of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, suppressing the Philadelphia chromosome-positive clone in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Clinical studies of imatinib have yielded impressive results in the treatment of all phases of CML. With the higher rates of complete cytogenetic response with imatinib, molecular monitoring of disease has become mandatory in assessing response and determining prognosis. The practical aspects of the treatment of CML with imatinib are discussed. The emergence of imatinib resistance, albeit in a small percentage of patients, has prompted an evaluation of innovative treatment strategies.

Cardiac morbidity in advanced chronic myelogenous leukaemia patients treated by successive allogeneic stem cell transplantation with busulphan/cyclophosphamide conditioning after imatinib mesylate administration

Imatinib mesylate is useful for facilitating allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in advanced-phase chronic myelogenous leukaemia (AP-CML) patients. However, although the side-effects of imatinib are usually minor, cardiac morbidity can develop as a latent adverse effect post SCT when a myeloablative SCT is given to patients taking imatinib. Two AP-CML patients who were treated with imatinib manifested severe cardiac dysfunction after an allo-SCT, whereas cardiac morbidity was not observed in 45 other patients who had not received imatinib. It would appear that exposure to imatinib may have an adverse impact on the heart in AP-CML patients who receive an allo-SCT conditioned with busulphan/cyclophosphamide.

Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation with filgrastim in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia achieving complete cytogenetic response with imatinib, without increasing disease burden as measured by quantitative real-time PCR

Imatinib mesylate (Glivec) is a selective inhibitor of bcr-abl tyrosine kinase, the product of the Philadelphia chromosome, which is the hallmark of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). With imatinib, complete cytogenetic response (CCR) can be achieved in over 70% of newly diagnosed patients with CML. However, the optimal long-term management of patients who achieve CCR after imatinib is unknown. With longer follow-up, it is anticipated that some patients are likely to progress and become candidates for autologous transplantation. We studied filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 32 patients who have achieved CCR with imatinib. Our data demonstrate that (1) the target CD34(+) cell yields of >/=2.0 x 10(6)/kg were attained with filgrastim 10 microg/kg/day, in 9/18 (50%) of patients during uninterrupted imatinib therapy, and in 10/14 (70%) when imatinib was temporarily withheld. The median CD34(+) cell yield per aphaeresis was 0.70 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.14-2.18) and 2.90 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.15-8.71) in the two groups, respectively (P&<0.005). (2) The cell yields did not correlate with the duration of imatinib administration. (3) There was no impact of the mobilisation procedure on the level of leukaemia as measured by serial blood bcr-abl levels using real-time quantitative PCR with either protocol. (4) bcr-abl remained detectable at low levels in the harvests in most but not all patients. In conclusion, filgrastim can safely be used to mobilise PBSC in patients who have achieved CCR with imatinib, but CD34(+) cell yields are significantly improved when imatinib is temporarily withheld.