Reversal of an antiestrogen-mediated cell cycle arrest of MCF-7 cells by viral tumor antigens requires the retinoblastoma protein-binding domain

Case report: 16-yr life history and genomic evolution of an ER+ HER2- breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in women. Limited studies have been done on the genomic evolution between primary and metastatic breast cancer. We reconstructed the genomic evolution through the 16-yr history of an ER+ HER2- breast cancer patient to investigate molecular mechanisms of disease relapse and treatment resistance after long-term exposure to hormonal therapy. Genomic and transcriptome profiling was performed on primary breast tumor (2002), initial recurrence (2012), and liver metastasis (2015) samples. Cell-free DNA analysis was performed at 11 time points (2015-2017). Mutational analysis revealed a low mutational burden in the primary tumor that doubled at the time of progression, with driver mutations in PI3K-Akt and RAS-RAF signaling pathways. Phylogenetic analysis showed an early branching off between primary tumor and metastasis. Liquid biopsies, although initially negative, started to detect an ESR1 E380Q mutation in 2016 with increasing allele frequency until the end of 2017. Transcriptome analysis revealed 721 (193 up, 528 down) genes to be differentially expressed between primary tumor and first relapse. The most significantly down-regulated genes were TFF1 and PGR, indicating resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. The most up-regulated genes included PTHLH, S100P, and SOX2, promoting tumor growth and metastasis. This phylogenetic reconstruction of the life history of a single patient's cancer as well as monitoring tumor progression through liquid biopsies allowed for uncovering the molecular mechanisms leading to initial relapse, metastatic spread, and treatment resistance.

Translating RB1 predictive value in clinical cancer therapy: Are we there yet?

The retinoblastoma RB1 gene has been identified in the 80s as the first tumor suppressor. RB1 loss of function, as well alterations in its pathway, occur in most human cancers and often have prognostic value. RB1 has a key role in restraining cell cycle entry and, along with its family members, regulates a myriad of cellular processes and affects cell response to a variety of stimuli, ultimately determining cell fate. Consistently, RB1 status is a crucial determinant of the cell response to antitumoral therapies, impacting on the outcome of both traditional and modern anti-cancer strategies, including precision medicine approaches, such as kinase inhibitors, and immunotherapy. Despite many efforts however, the predictive value of RB1 status in the clinical practice is still underused, mainly owing to the complexity of RB1 function, to differences depending on the cellular context and on the therapeutic strategies, and, not-lastly, to technical issues. Here, we provide an overview of studies analyzing the role of RB1 in response to conventional cytotoxic and cytostatic therapeutic agents in different cancer types, including hormone dependent ones. We also review RB1 predictive value in the response to the last generation CDK4/6 inhibitors, other kinase inhibitors, and immunotherapy and discuss new emerging non-canonical roles of RB1 that could impact on the response to antitumoral treatments.

Non-canonical functions of the RB protein in cancer

The canonical model of RB-mediated tumour suppression developed over the past 30 years is based on the regulation of E2F transcription factors to restrict cell cycle progression. Several additional functions have been proposed for RB, on the basis of which a non-canonical RB pathway can be described. Mechanistically, the non-canonical RB pathway promotes histone modification and regulates chromosome structure in a manner distinct from cell cycle regulation. These functions have implications for chemotherapy response and resistance to targeted anticancer agents. This Opinion offers a framework to guide future studies of RB in basic and clinical research.

Minireview: The Link Between ERα Corepressors and Histone Deacetylases in Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer

Approximately 70% of breast cancers express the estrogen receptor (ER)α and are treated with the ERα antagonist, tamoxifen. However, resistance to tamoxifen frequently develops in advanced breast cancer, in part due to a down-regulation of ERα corepressors. Nuclear receptor corepressors function by attenuating hormone responses and have been shown to potentiate tamoxifen action in various biological systems. Recent genomic data on breast cancers has revealed that genetic and/or genomic events target ERα corepressors in the majority of breast tumors, suggesting that the loss of nuclear receptor corepressor activity may represent an important mechanism that contributes to intrinsic and acquired tamoxifen resistance. Here, the biological functions of ERα corepressors are critically reviewed to elucidate their role in modifying endocrine sensitivity in breast cancer. We highlight a mechanism of gene repression common to corepressors previously shown to enhance the antitumorigenic effects of tamoxifen, which involves the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs) to DNA. As an indicator of epigenetic disequilibrium, the loss of ERα corepressors may predispose cancer cells to the cytotoxic effects of HDAC inhibitors, a class of drug that has been shown to effectively reverse tamoxifen resistance in numerous studies. HDAC inhibition thus appears as a promising therapeutic approach that deserves to be further explored as an avenue to restore drug sensitivity in corepressor-deficient and tamoxifen-resistant breast cancers.

RB1 dual role in proliferation and apoptosis: cell fate control and implications for cancer therapy

Inactivation of the retinoblastoma (RB1) tumor suppressor is one of the most frequent and early recognized molecular hallmarks of cancer. RB1, although mainly studied for its role in the regulation of cell cycle, emerged as a key regulator of many biological processes. Among these, RB1 has been implicated in the regulation of apoptosis, the alteration of which underlies both cancer development and resistance to therapy. RB1 role in apoptosis, however, is still controversial because, depending on the context, the apoptotic cues, and its own status, RB1 can act either by inhibiting or promoting apoptosis. Moreover, the mechanisms whereby RB1 controls both proliferation and apoptosis in a coordinated manner are only now beginning to be unraveled. Here, by reviewing the main studies assessing the effect of RB1 status and modulation on these processes, we provide an overview of the possible underlying molecular mechanisms whereby RB1, and its family members, dictate cell fate in various contexts. We also describe the current antitumoral strategies aimed at the use of RB1 as predictive, prognostic and therapeutic target in cancer. A thorough understanding of RB1 function in controlling cell fate determination is crucial for a successful translation of RB1 status assessment in the clinical setting.

Phylogenetic and functional analysis of sequence variation of human papillomavirus type 31 E6 and E7 oncoproteins

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) are the causative agents of cervical and other anogenital cancers as well as a subset of head and neck cancers. The E6 and E7 oncoproteins of HPV contribute to oncogenesis by associating with the tumour suppressor protein p53 and pRb, respectively. For HPV types 16 and 18, intratypic sequence variation was shown to have biological and clinical significance. The functional significance of sequence variation among HPV 31 variants was studied less intensively. HPV 31 variants belonging to different variant lineages were found to have differences in persistence and in the ability to cause high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. In the present study, we started to explore the functional effects of natural sequence variation of HPV 31 E6 and E7 oncoproteins. The E6 variants were tested for their effects on p53 protein stability and transcriptional activity, while the E7 variants were tested for their effects on pRb protein level and also on the transcriptional activity of E2F transcription factors. HPV 31 E7 variants displayed uniform effects on pRb stability and also on the activity of E2F transcription factors. HPV 31 E6 variants had remarkable differences in the ability to inhibit the trans-activation function of p53 but not in the ability to induce the in vivo degradation of p53. Our results indicate that natural sequence variation of the HPV 31 E6 protein may be involved in the observed differences in the oncogenic potential between HPV 31 variants.

The other side of the coin: the tumor-suppressive aspect of oncogenes and the oncogenic aspect of tumor-suppressive genes, such as those along the CCND-CDK4/6-RB axis

Although cancer-regulatory genes are dichotomized to oncogenes and tumor-suppressor gene s, in reality they can be oncogenic in one situation but tumor-suppressive in another. This dual-function nature, which sometimes hampers our understanding of tumor biology, has several manifestations: (1) Most canonically defined genes have multiple mRNAs, regulatory RNAs, protein isoforms, and posttranslational modifications; (2) Genes may interact at different levels, such as by forming chimeric RNAs or by forming different protein complexes; (3) Increased levels of tumor-suppressive genes in normal cells drive proliferation of cancer progenitor cells in the same organ or tissue by imposing compensatory proliferation pressure, which presents the dual-function nature as a cell-cell interaction. All these manifestations of dual functions can find examples in the genes along the CCND-CDK4/6-RB axis. The dual-function nature also underlies the heterogeneity of cancer cells. Gene-targeting chemotherapies, including that targets CDK4, are effective to some cancer cells but in the meantime may promote growth or progression of some others in the same patient. Redefining "gene" by considering each mRNA, regulatory RNA, protein isoform, and posttranslational modification from the same genomic locus as a "gene" may help in better understanding tumor biology and better selecting targets for different sub-populations of cancer cells in individual patients for personalized therapy.

The p53-estrogen receptor loop in cancer

Tumor suppressor p53 maintains genome stability by regulating diverse cellular functions including cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence and metabolic homeostasis. Mutations in the p53 gene occur in almost all human cancers with a frequency of up to 80%. However, it is only 20% in breast cancers, 18% in endometrial cancers and 1.5% in cervical cancers. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) plays a pivotal role in hormone-dependent cancer development and the status of ERα is used for designing treatment strategy and for prognosis. A closer look at the cross-talk between p53 and ERα has revealed that their activities are mutually regulated. This review will summarize the current body of knowledge on p53, ERα and ERβ in cancer. Clinical correlations between estrogen receptors and p53 status have also been reported. Thus, this review will discuss the relationship between p53 and ERs at both the molecular and clinical levels.

Expression ratio of CCND1 to CDKN2A mRNA predicts RB1 status of cultured cancer cell lines and clinical tumor samples

Background

The retinoblastoma product (RB1) is frequently deregulated in various types of tumors by mutation, deletion, or inactivation through association with viral oncoproteins. The functional loss of RB1 is recognized to be one of the hallmarks that differentiate cancer cells from normal cells. Many researchers are attempting to develop anti-tumor agents that are preferentially effective against RB1-negative tumors. However, to identify patients with RB1-negative cancers, it is imperative to develop predictive biomarkers to classify RB1-positive and -negative tumors.

Results

Expression profiling of 30 cancer cell lines composed of 16 RB1-positive and 14 RB1-negative cancers was performed to find genes that are differentially expressed between the two groups, resulting in the identification of an RB1 signature with 194 genes. Among them, critical RB1 pathway components CDKN2A and CCND1 were included. We found that microarray data of the expression ratio of CCND1 and CDKN2A clearly distinguished the RB1 status of 30 cells lines. Measurement of the CCND1/CDKN2A mRNA expression ratio in additional cell lines by RT-PCR accurately predicted RB1 status (12/12 cells lines). The expression of CCND1/CDKN2A also correlated with RB1 status in xenograft tumors in vivo. Lastly, a CCND1/CDKN2A assay with clinical samples showed that uterine cervical and small cell lung cancers known to have a high prevalence of RB1-decifiency were predicted to be 100% RB1-negative, while uterine endometrial or gastric cancers were predicted to be 5-22% negative. All clinically normal tissues were 100% RB1-positive.

Conclusions

We report here that the CCND1/CDKN2A mRNA expression ratio predicts the RB1 status of cell lines in vitro and xenograft tumors and clinical tumor samples in vivo. Given the high predictive accuracy and quantitative nature of the CCND1/CDKN2A expression assay, the assay could be utilized to stratify patients for anti-tumor agents with preferential effects on either RB1-positive or -negative tumors.

Targeting the RB-pathway in cancer therapy

The RB-pathway, consisting of inhibitors and activators of cyclin-dependent kinases, the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB), and the E2F-family of transcription factors, plays critical roles in the regulation of cell cycle progression and cell death. Components of this pathway, particularly p16Ink4a, cyclin D1, and RB, are frequently altered in sporadic human cancers to promote deregulated cellular proliferation. The consistent disruption of the RB-pathway in human cancers raises the possibility of exploiting tumor-specific RB-pathway defects to improve the efficacy of current therapies and to develop new therapeutic strategies. This article discusses how the RB-pathway status impacts the cellular responses to cytotoxic, cytostatic, and hormone therapies, and how the components of the RB-pathway may be directly targeted to treat cancer.

Tailoring to RB: tumour suppressor status and therapeutic response

The retinoblastoma tumour suppressor (RB) is a crucial regulator of cell-cycle progression that is invoked in response to a myriad of anti-mitogenic signals. It has been hypothesized that perturbations of the RB pathway confer a synonymous proliferative advantage to tumour cells; however, recent findings demonstrate context-specific outcomes associated with such lesions. Particularly, loss of RB function is associated with differential response to wide-ranging therapeutic agents. Thus, the status of this tumour suppressor may be particularly informative in directing treatment regimens.

G1 arrest and expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in tamoxifen-treated MCF-7 human breast cancer cells

Treatment of exponentially growing MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells with tamoxifen (TAM) inhibits cell growth in a dose-dependent manner. However, the molecular basis for the drug's activity and its relationship to the cell cycle have not yet been clearly established. In this study, we analyzed cell cycle-related proteins used for immunoblotting and flow cytometry in TAM-treated MCF-7 cells. In addition, the ratio of apoptosis in the cell was analyzed using labeling of DNA strand breaks (TdT assay). In flow-cytometric DNA distribution analysis, the S-phase fraction showed a marked decrease and a concomitant increase in G1- and G2-phase cells accompanying the inhibitory effect of TAM; these changes were time- and dose-dependent. Immunoblotting revealed that the levels of p53 and p21(WAF1/CIP1) in TAM-treated cells increased in a time- and dose-dependent manner, whereas those of p27(KIP1) and p16 slightly increased or remained unchanged. Furthermore, cyclin D3 and B showed sharp decreases, in contrast with p53 and p21(WAF1/CIP1) DNA-apoptosis dual analysis using flow cytometry revealed that the TAM-treated samples contained apoptotic cells, the majority of which were arrested in G1 or G2 and showed suppression of Bcl-2 protein. These results suggest that the tumorigenic effect of TAM on MCF-7 cells arises through antitumor effects that are due to the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, especially p21(WAF1/CIP1) and these are regulated by the decrease of wild-type p53. The proposed mechanism is similar to that underlying the cytotoxic effects of other agents and ionizing irradiation that cause DNA damage.

Functional ablation of pRb activates Cdk2 and causes antiestrogen resistance in human breast cancer cells

Estrogens are required for the proliferation of hormone dependent breast cancer cells, making estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors amenable to endocrine therapies such as antiestrogens. However, resistance to these agents remains a significant cause of treatment failure. We previously demonstrated that inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) family tumor suppressors causes antiestrogen resistance in MCF-7 cells, a widely studied model of estrogen responsive human breast cancers. In this study, we investigate the mechanism by which pRb inactivation leads to antiestrogen resistance. Cdk4 and cdk2 are two key cell cycle regulators that can phosphorylate and inactivate pRb, therefore we tested whether these kinases are required in cells lacking pRb function. pRb family members were inactivated in MCF-7 cells by expressing polyomavirus large tumor antigen (PyLT), and cdk activity was inhibited using the cdk inhibitors p16^INK4A and p21^Waf1/Cip1. Cdk4 activity was no longer required in cells lacking functional pRb, while cdk2 activity was required for proliferation in both the presence and absence of pRb function. Using inducible PyLT cell lines, we further demonstrated that pRb inactivation leads to increased cyclin A expression, cdk2 activation and proliferation in antiestrogen arrested cells. These results demonstrate that antiestrogens do not inhibit cdk2 activity or proliferation of MCF-7 cells in the absence of pRb family function, and suggest that antiestrogen resistant breast cancer cells resulting from pRb pathway inactivation would be susceptible to therapies that target cdk2.

c-Myc suppresses p21WAF1/CIP1 expression during estrogen signaling and antiestrogen resistance in human breast cancer cells

Estrogen rapidly induces expression of the proto-oncogene c-myc. c-Myc is required for estrogen-stimulated proliferation of breast cancer cells, and deregulated c-Myc expression has been implicated in antiestrogen resistance. In this report, we investigate the mechanism(s) by which c-Myc mediates estrogen-stimulated proliferation and contributes to cell cycle progression in the presence of antiestrogen. The MCF-7 cell line is a model of estrogen-dependent, antiestrogen-sensitive human breast cancer. Using stable MCF-7 derivatives with inducible c-Myc expression, we demonstrated that in antiestrogen-treated cells, the elevated mRNA and protein levels of p21(WAF1/CIP1), a cell cycle inhibitor, decreased upon either c-Myc induction or estrogen treatment. Expression of p21 blocked c-Myc-mediated cell cycle progression in the presence of antiestrogen, suggesting that the decrease in p21 is necessary for this process. Using RNA interference to suppress c-Myc expression, we further established that c-Myc is required for estrogen-mediated decreases in p21(WAF1/CIP1). Finally, we observed that neither c-Myc nor p21(WAF1/CIP1) is regulated by estrogen or antiestrogen in an antiestrogen-resistant MCF-7 derivative. The p21 levels in the antiestrogen-resistant cells increased when c-Myc expression was suppressed, suggesting that loss of p21 regulation was a consequence of constitutive c-Myc expression. Together, these studies implicate p21(WAF1/CIP1) as an important target of c-Myc in breast cancer cells and provide a link between estrogen, c-Myc, and the cell cycle machinery. They further suggest that aberrant c-Myc expression, which is frequently observed in human breast cancers, can contribute to antiestrogen resistance by altering p21(WAF1/CIP1) regulation.

Cyclin D1 expression is dependent on estrogen receptor function in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells

The development of resistance to tamoxifen, the most common antiestrogen used in the treatment of breast cancer, is a frequent and severe clinical problem. Tamoxifen-resistant tumors are still capable of responding to other hormonal therapies such as those that downregulate estrogen receptor expression. Mechanisms leading to acquisition of tamoxifen-resistant but hormone-sensitive growth are not completely understood. In tamoxifen-sensitive breast cancer cells, tamoxifen inhibits, whereas estrogen induces, expression of cyclin D1, a key cell cycle regulatory protein. Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 can lead to antiestrogen resistance. Thus, to determine whether cyclin D1 is involved in the growth of tamoxifen-resistant cells, we developed several tamoxifen-resistant variants from MCF-7 cells. These variants grow in the absence of estrogen or in the presence of tamoxifen, but their growth is inhibited by estrogen receptor downregulators. We show here that cyclin D1 expression is maintained at comparable levels in all tamoxifen-resistant variants, whereas pS2, another estrogen-regulated protein, is not. The addition of physiological levels of estrogen further stimulates cyclin D1 expression and proliferation. In contrast, treatment with estrogen receptor downregulators decreases cyclin D1 expression and proliferation. Thus, changes in cyclin D1 expression upon second-line hormonal therapy may predict hormonal sensitivity of tamoxifen-resistant tumors. These studies suggest that estrogen receptor mediates cyclin D1 expression and growth of tamoxifen-resistant tumors.

Multifactorial activities of nonsteroidal antiestrogens against leukemia

The antileukemic activity of nonsteroidal antiestrogens was investigated. Tamoxifen, clomiphene and nafoxidine caused a decrease in viability of the estrogen receptor-negative T-lymphoblastic leukemia cell line CCRF/CEM, nafoxidine being the most active. A combination of clomiphene and genistein resulted in a synergistic cytotoxic effect when applied to Molt-3, another T-lymphblastic leukemic cell line. The antiestrogens arrested the cells at G(0)/G(1) phase and induced apoptosis. Using the CCRF/VCR(1000) cell line, which is resistant to vincristine, it was observed that the effect of nafoxidine on modulating drug resistance was manifested at a lower concentration than that causing a direct cytotoxic effect. Nafoxidine inhibited the Pgp pump activity as measured by rhodamine 123 efflux. Combination with verapamil was found to be more effective in abrogating the pump activity. This study points to the multifactorial activities of nonsteroidal antiestrogens against lymphoblastic leukemia and implies their potential use in clinical treatment as antileukemic drugs.

Involvement of G1/S cyclins in estrogen-independent proliferation of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells

Estrogen receptor-mediated transcription is enhanced by overexpression of G1/S cyclins D1, E or A in the presence as well in the absence of estradiol. Excess of G1/S cyclins also prevents the inhibition of transactivation of estrogen receptor (ER) by the pure antiestrogen ICI 182780. Cyclin D1 mediates this transactivation independent of complex formation to its CDK4/6 partner. This raises the possibility that overexpression of G1/S cyclins renders growth of ER-positive breast cancer hormone-independent and resistant to treatment with antiestrogens. Transient transfection of ER-positive breast cancer cell lines T47D and MCF7 with G1/S cyclins could overcome the growth arrest induced by ICI 182780 treatment. The ability of various cyclin D1 mutants to overcome the ICI 182780 mediated growth arrest corresponded with their ability to stimulate cyclin A- and E2F- promoter based reporter activities in the presence of ICI 182780. Transfection of a mutant cyclin D1 (cyclin D1-KE) that was unable to bind CDK4 and was reported to transactivate ER in the presence of ICI 182780, could not stimulate proliferation in ICI 182780 treated cells. On the other hand, cyclin D1-LALA, which is unable to stimulate ERE transactivation, could overcome the ICI 182780 cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, transient transfection of T47D cells using cyclin D1 together with a catalytic inactive mutant of CDK4 (CDK4-DN) indicated that the observed effect is due to binding to CDK inhibitors. However, a moderate, sixfold overexpression of cyclin D1 in stably transfected MCF7 cells did not overcome the ICI 182780 mediated growth arrest. These results indicate that CDK-independent transactivation of the estrogen receptor by cyclin D1 is by itself, not sufficient to result in estradiol-independent growth of breast cancer cells, whereas a vast overexpression of G1/S cyclins is able to do so, most likely by capturing of CDK inhibitors.