1
|
Seo MY, Rhee K. Caspase-mediated cleavage of the centrosomal proteins during apoptosis. Cell Death Dis 2018; 9:571. [PMID: 29752437 PMCID: PMC5948218 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-018-0632-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 04/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The centrosome is the major microtubule-organizing center and plays important roles in intracellular transport, cellular morphology, and motility. In mitotic cells, centrosomes function as spindle poles to pull a set of chromosomes into daughter cells. In quiescent cells, primary cilia are originated from the centrosomes. Given its involvement in various cellular processes, it is little surprising that the organelle would also participate in apoptotic events. However, it remains elusive how the centrosome changes in structure and organization during apoptosis. Apoptosis, a programmed cell death, is required for homeostatic tissue maintenance, embryonic development, stress responses, etc. Activation of caspases generates a cascade of apoptotic pathways, explaining much of what happens during apoptosis. Here, we report the proteolytic cleavage of selected centrosomal proteins in apoptotic cells. SAS-6, a cartwheel component of centrioles, was specifically cleaved at the border of the coiled-coil domain and the disordered C-terminus. Pericentrin, a scaffold of pericentriolar material, was also cleaved during apoptosis. These cleavages were efficiently blocked by the caspase inhibitors. We propose that the caspase-dependent proteolysis of the centrosomal proteins may destabilize the configuration of a centrosome. Loss of centrosomes may be required for the formation of apoptotic microtubule networks, which are essential for apoptotic fragmentation. This work demonstrates the first centrosomal targets by caspases during apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Young Seo
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
| | - Kunsoo Rhee
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kang J, Goodman B, Zheng Y, Tantin D. Dynamic regulation of Oct1 during mitosis by phosphorylation and ubiquitination. PLoS One 2011; 6:e23872. [PMID: 21897860 PMCID: PMC3163677 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2011] [Accepted: 07/27/2011] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Transcription factor Oct1 regulates multiple cellular processes. It is known to be phosphorylated during the cell cycle and by stress, however the upstream kinases and downstream consequences are not well understood. One of these modified forms, phosphorylated at S335, lacks the ability to bind DNA. Other modification states besides phosphorylation have not been described. Methodology/Principal Findings We show that Oct1 is phosphorylated at S335 in the Oct1 DNA binding domain during M-phase by the NIMA-related kinase Nek6. Phospho-Oct1 is also ubiquitinated. Phosphorylation excludes Oct1 from mitotic chromatin. Instead, Oct1pS335 concentrates at centrosomes, mitotic spindle poles, kinetochores and the midbody. Oct1 siRNA knockdown diminishes the signal at these locations. Both Oct1 ablation and overexpression result in abnormal mitoses. S335 is important for the overexpression phenotype, implicating this residue in mitotic regulation. Oct1 depletion causes defects in spindle morphogenesis in Xenopus egg extracts, establishing a mitosis-specific function of Oct1. Oct1 colocalizes with lamin B1 at the spindle poles and midbody. At the midbody, both proteins are mutually required to correctly localize the other. We show that phospho-Oct1 is modified late in mitosis by non-canonical K11-linked polyubiquitin chains. Ubiquitination requires the anaphase-promoting complex, and we further show that the anaphase-promoting complex large subunit APC1 and Oct1pS335 interact. Conclusions/Significance These findings reveal mechanistic coupling between Oct1 phosphorylation and ubquitination during mitotic progression, and a role for Oct1 in mitosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinsuk Kang
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Ben Goodman
- Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution of Washington/HHMI, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Yixian Zheng
- Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution of Washington/HHMI, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Dean Tantin
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Müller H, Schmidt D, Steinbrink S, Mirgorodskaya E, Lehmann V, Habermann K, Dreher F, Gustavsson N, Kessler T, Lehrach H, Herwig R, Gobom J, Ploubidou A, Boutros M, Lange BMH. Proteomic and functional analysis of the mitotic Drosophila centrosome. EMBO J 2010; 29:3344-57. [PMID: 20818332 PMCID: PMC2957212 DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2010.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2010] [Accepted: 08/04/2010] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Regulation of centrosome structure, duplication and segregation is integrated into cellular pathways that control cell cycle progression and growth. As part of these pathways, numerous proteins with well-established non-centrosomal localization and function associate with the centrosome to fulfill regulatory functions. In turn, classical centrosomal components take up functional and structural roles as part of other cellular organelles and compartments. Thus, although a comprehensive inventory of centrosome components is missing, emerging evidence indicates that its molecular composition reflects the complexity of its functions. We analysed the Drosophila embryonic centrosomal proteome using immunoisolation in combination with mass spectrometry. The 251 identified components were functionally characterized by RNA interference. Among those, a core group of 11 proteins was critical for centrosome structure maintenance. Depletion of any of these proteins in Drosophila SL2 cells resulted in centrosome disintegration, revealing a molecular dependency of centrosome structure on components of the protein translation machinery, actin- and RNA-binding proteins. In total, we assigned novel centrosome-related functions to 24 proteins and confirmed 13 of these in human cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Müller
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Schmidt
- Leibniz Institute for Age Research—Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena, Germany
| | - Sandra Steinbrink
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Signaling and Functional Genomics and University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ekaterina Mirgorodskaya
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Verena Lehmann
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Habermann
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Dreher
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Niklas Gustavsson
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Kessler
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans Lehrach
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralf Herwig
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johan Gobom
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aspasia Ploubidou
- Leibniz Institute for Age Research—Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena, Germany
| | - Michael Boutros
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Signaling and Functional Genomics and University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bodo M H Lange
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lim HH, Zhang T, Surana U. Regulation of centrosome separation in yeast and vertebrates: common threads. Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19:325-33. [PMID: 19576775 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2008] [Revised: 03/04/2009] [Accepted: 03/05/2009] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The assembly of a bipolar spindle is crucial for symmetric partitioning of duplicated chromosomes during cell division. Centrosomes (spindle pole body [SPB] in yeast) constitute the two poles of this bipolar structure and serve as microtubule nucleation centers. A eukaryotic cell enters the division cycle with one centrosome and duplicates it before spindle formation. A proteinaceous link keeps duplicated centrosomes together until it is severed at onset of mitosis, enabling centrosomes to migrate away from each other and assemble a characteristic mitotic spindle. Hence, centrosome separation is crucial in assembly of a bipolar spindle. Whereas centrosome (or SPB) duplication has been characterized in some detail, the separation process is less well understood. Here, we review recent studies that uncover new players and provide a greater understanding of the regulation of centrosome (or SPB) separation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Hwa Lim
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Proteos, 138673 Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kurepa J, Wang S, Li Y, Zaitlin D, Pierce AJ, Smalle JA. Loss of 26S proteasome function leads to increased cell size and decreased cell number in Arabidopsis shoot organs. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2009; 150:178-89. [PMID: 19321709 PMCID: PMC2675745 DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.135970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2009] [Accepted: 03/18/2009] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Although the final size of plant organs is influenced by environmental cues, it is generally accepted that the primary size determinants are intrinsic factors that regulate and coordinate cell proliferation and cell expansion. Here, we show that optimal proteasome function is required to maintain final shoot organ size in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Loss of function of the subunit regulatory particle AAA ATPase (RPT2a) causes a weak defect in 26S proteasome activity and leads to an enlargement of leaves, stems, flowers, fruits, seeds, and embryos. These size increases are a result of increased cell expansion that compensates for a reduction in cell number. Increased ploidy levels were found in some but not all enlarged organs, indicating that the cell size increases are not caused by a higher nuclear DNA content. Partial loss of function of the regulatory particle non-ATPase (RPN) subunits RPN10 and RPN12a causes a stronger defect in proteasome function and also results in cell enlargement and decreased cell proliferation. However, the increased cell volumes in rpn10-1 and rpn12a-1 mutants translated into the enlargement of only some, but not all, shoot organs. Collectively, these data show that during Arabidopsis shoot development, the maintenance of optimal proteasome activity levels is important for balancing cell expansion with cell proliferation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmina Kurepa
- Plant Physiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology Program, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Centrosomes nucleate microtubules that form the mitotic spindle and regulate the equal division of chromosomes during cell division. In cancer, centrosomes are often found amplified to greater than two per cell, and these tumor cells frequently have aneuploid genomes. In this review, we will discuss the cellular factors that regulate the proper duplication of the centrosome and how these regulatory steps can lead to abnormal centrosome numbers and abnormal mitoses. In particular, we highlight the newly emerging role of the Breast Cancer 1 (BRCA1) ubiquitin ligase in this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish Sankaran
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salisbury JL. A mechanistic view on the evolutionary origin for centrin-based control of centriole duplication. J Cell Physiol 2007; 213:420-8. [PMID: 17694534 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Mounting evidence implicates the protein centrin as a key regulator of centriole duplication, yet it remains to be determined just how centrin functions in this process. Recent studies suggest that centrin exerts both spatial and temporal control over centriole duplication through its role as a component of centriole precursor structures and through periodic cell-cycle specific changes in its abundance. Here, an overview of centrin and its role in centrosome dynamics is presented. Finally, a speculative model for just how centrin may operate to control centriole duplication is proposed with the intention to stimulate future advances in this area. This model provides an evolutionary basis for the preservation of essential features of the yeast spindle pole body (SPB) with the origin of the complex structure of the mammalian centriole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Salisbury
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tumor Biology Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
During interphase, the centrosome concentrates cell stress response molecules, including chaperones and proteasomes, into a proteolytic center. However, whether the centrosome functions as proteolytic center during mitosis is not known. In this study, cultured mammalian cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG 132 and spindle morphology in mitotic cells was characterized in order to address this issue. Proteasome inhibition during mitosis leads to the formation of additional asters that cause the assembly of multipolar spindles. The cause of this phenomenon was investigated by inhibiting microtubule-based transport and protein synthesis. These experimental conditions prevented the formation of supernumerary asters during mitosis. In addition, the expression of dsRed without proteasome inhibition led to the fragmentation of spindle poles. These experiments showed that the formation of extra asters depends on intact microtubule-based transport and protein synthesis. These results suggest that formation of supernumerary asters is due to excessive accumulation of proteins at the spindle poles and consequently fragmentation of the centrosome. Together, this leads to the conclusion that the centrosome functions as proteolytic center during mitosis and proteolytic activity at the spindle poles is necessary for maintaining spindle pole integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anka G Ehrhardt
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, 01605, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Agathanggelou A, Cooper WN, Latif F. Role of the Ras-association domain family 1 tumor suppressor gene in human cancers. Cancer Res 2005; 65:3497-508. [PMID: 15867337 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-4088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 302] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, the list of tumor suppressor genes (or candidate TSG) that are inactivated frequently by epigenetic events rather than classic mutation/deletion events has been growing. Unlike mutational inactivation, methylation is reversible and demethylating agents and inhibitors of histone deacetylases are being used in clinical trails. Highly sensitive and quantitative assays have been developed to assess methylation in tumor samples, early lesions, and bodily fluids. Hence, gene silencing by promoter hypermethylation has potential clinical benefits in early cancer diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and prevention. The hunt for a TSG located at 3p21.3 resulted in the identification of the RAS-association domain family 1, isoform A gene (RASSF1A). RASSF1A falls into the category of genes frequently inactivated by methylation rather than mutational events. This gene is silenced and frequently inactivated by promoter region hypermethylation in many adult and childhood cancers, including lung, breast, kidney, gastric, bladder, neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, gliomas and it has homology to a mammalian Ras effector (i.e., Nore1). RASSF1A inhibits tumor growth in both in vitro and in vivo systems, further supporting its role as a TSG. We and others identified the gene in 2000, but already there are over a 150 publications demonstrating RASSF1A methylation in a large number of human cancers. Many laboratories including ours are actively investigating the biology of this novel protein family. Thus far, it has been shown to play important roles in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and microtubule stability. This review summarizes our current knowledge on genetic, epigenetic, and functional analysis of RASSF1A tumor suppressor gene and its homologues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Agathanggelou
- Section of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Division of Reproductive and Child Health, The Institute of Biomedical Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Friedman JR, Larris B, Le PP, Peiris TH, Arsenlis A, Schug J, Tobias JW, Kaestner KH, Greenbaum LE. Orthogonal analysis of C/EBPbeta targets in vivo during liver proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:12986-91. [PMID: 15317935 PMCID: PMC516505 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0402875101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPbeta), a basic-leucine zipper transcription factor, is an important effector of signals in physiologic growth and cancer. The identification of direct C/EBPbeta targets in vivo has been limited by functional compensation by other C/EBP family proteins and the low stringency of the consensus sequence. Here we use the combined power of expression profiling and high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify direct and biologically relevant targets of C/EBPbeta. We identified 25 potential C/EBPbeta targets, of which 88% of those tested were confirmed as in vivo C/EBPbeta-binding sites. Six of these genes also displayed differential expression in C/EBPbeta-/- livers. Computational analysis revealed that bona fide C/EBPbeta target genes can be distinguished by the presence of binding motifs for specific additional transcription factors in the vicinity of the C/EBPbeta site. This approach is generally applicable to the discovery of direct, biologically relevant targets of mammalian transcription factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Friedman
- Department of Genetics, Bioinformatics Core, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Henriksen J, Aagesen TH, Maelandsmo GM, Lothe RA, Myklebost O, Forus A. Amplification and overexpression of COPS3 in osteosarcomas potentially target TP53 for proteasome-mediated degradation. Oncogene 2003; 22:5358-61. [PMID: 12917637 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
In sarcomas, the TP53 tumour suppressor pathway may be altered either by TP53 mutations or by amplification of MDM2, encoding a protein that inhibits TP53 and targets it for 26S-proteasome degradation. However, in the majority of the analysed clinical samples, neither of these types of aberrations are found, suggesting that additional mechanisms are involved. The present study shows that COPS3, located in 17p11 and encoding a component of the proteasome pathway, is more frequently amplified in osteosarcomas (OS) than is MDM2. We present detailed analysis of TP53 mutations and MDM2 and COPS3 expression levels in a set of 23 OS. Our results show that none of the tumours with COPS3 amplification had MDM2 amplification nor TP53 mutations, consistent with the hypothesis that one of the three aberrations is sufficient. The results suggest that inactivation of otherwise intact TP53 by aberrations in the proteasome pathway may contribute to the characteristic aneuploidy observed in OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jørn Henriksen
- Department of Tumour Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guardavaccaro D, Kudo Y, Boulaire J, Barchi M, Busino L, Donzelli M, Margottin-Goguet F, Jackson PK, Yamasaki L, Pagano M. Control of meiotic and mitotic progression by the F box protein beta-Trcp1 in vivo. Dev Cell 2003; 4:799-812. [PMID: 12791266 DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00154-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 308] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
SCF ubiquitin ligases, composed of three major subunits, Skp1, Cul1, and one of many F box proteins (Fbps), control the proteolysis of important cellular regulators. We have inactivated the gene encoding the Fbp beta-Trcp1 in mice. beta-Trcp1(-/-) males show reduced fertility correlating with an accumulation of methaphase I spermatocytes. beta-Trcp1(-/-) MEFs display a lengthened mitosis, centrosome overduplication, multipolar metaphase spindles, and misaligned chromosomes. Furthermore, cyclin A, cyclin B, and Emi1, an inhibitor of the anaphase promoting complex, are stabilized in mitotic beta-Trcp1(-/-) MEFs. Indeed, we demonstrate that Emi1 is a bona fide substrate of beta-Trcp1. In contrast, stabilization of beta-catenin and IkappaBalpha, two previously reported beta-Trcp1 substrates, does not occur in the absence of beta-Trcp1 and instead requires the additional silencing of beta-Trcp2 by siRNA. Thus, beta-Trcp1 regulates the timely order of meiotic and mitotic events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Guardavaccaro
- Department of Pathology and New York University Cancer Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|