Maximum androgen-blockade with medical or surgical castration in advanced prostate cancer: A meta-analysis of nine published randomized controlled trials and 4128 patients using flutamide

Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Focus on Cognitive Function and Mood

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the United States. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, and some studies have shown that the use of anti-androgen drugs is related to a reduction in cognitive function, mood changes, diminished quality of life, dementia, and possibly Alzheimer's disease. ADT has potential physiological effects such as a reduction in white matter integrity and a negative impact on hypothalamic functions due to the lowering of testosterone levels or the blockade of downstream androgen receptor signaling by first- and second-generation anti-androgen drugs. A comparative analysis of prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT and Alzheimer patients identified over 30 shared genes, illustrating common ground for the mechanistic underpinning of the symptomatology. The purpose of this review was to investigate the effects of ADT on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life, as well as to analyze the relationship between ADT and Alzheimer's disease. The evaluation of prostate cancer patient cognitive ability via neurocognitive testing is described. Future studies should further explore the connection among cognitive deficits, mood disturbances, and the physiological changes that occur when hormonal balance is altered.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High-Risk Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

Simple Summary

Androgen deprivation therapy alone is commonly performed for metastatic prostate cancer but is generally not recommended for the treatment of high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. In this article, we will discuss the position, indications, and future possibilities of ADT for high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer.

Abstract

The recommended treatment for high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer is radical prostatectomy plus extended pelvic lymph node dissection or radiation therapy plus long-term androgen deprivation therapy. However, some patients are treated with androgen deprivation therapy alone for various reasons. In this review, we will discuss the position, indications, complications, and future prospects of androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for the treatment of prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues is standard treatment for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer. GnRH agonist therapy results in an initial testosterone flare, and increased metabolic and cardiovascular risks. The GnRH antagonist relugolix is able to reduce serum testosterone levels in men with prostate cancer without inducing testosterone flare. In the HERO Phase III trial, relugolix was superior to leuprolide acetate at rapidly reducing testosterone and continuously suppressing testosterone, with faster post-treatment recovery of testosterone levels. Relugolix was associated with a 54% lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than leuprolide acetate. As the first oral GnRH antagonist approved for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, relugolix offers a new treatment option.

Early versus deferred standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard androgen suppression therapy (AST) using surgical or medical castration is considered a mainstay of advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treatment. AST can be initiated early when disease is asymptomatic or deferred when patients suffer symptoms of disseminated prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of early versus deferred standard AST for advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

For this Cochrane Review update, we performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science; last searched November 2018) and two clinical trial registers, with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status. We also searched bibliographies of included studies and conference proceedings (last searched January 2019).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a direct comparison of early versus deferred standard AST. We excluded all other study designs. Participants included had advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer receiving surgical or medical castration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently classified studies and abstracted data. The primary outcomes were time to death of any cause and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were time to disease progression, time to death from prostate cancer, adverse events and quality of life. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the certainty of evidence according to GRADE. We performed subgroup analyses for advanced but non-metastatic disease (T2-4/N+ M0), metastatic disease (M1), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified seven new RCTs since publication of the original review in 2002. In total, we included 10 RCTs.Primary outcomesEarly AST probably reduces the risk of death from any cause over time (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 0.90; moderate-certainty evidence; 4767 participants). This corresponds to 57 fewer deaths (95% CI 80 fewer to 31 fewer) per 1000 participants at 5 years for the moderate risk group and 23 fewer deaths (95% CI 32 fewer to 13 fewer) per 1000 participants at 5 years in the low risk group. We downgraded for study limitations. Early versus deferred AST may have little or no effect on serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.16; low-certainty evidence; 10,575 participants) which corresponds to 6 more serious adverse events (6 fewer to 18 more) per 1000 participants. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and selective reporting.Secondary outcomesEarly AST probably reduces the risk of death from prostate cancer over time (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84; moderate-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 62 fewer prostate cancer deaths per 1000 (95% CI 87 fewer to 31 fewer) at 5 years for the moderate risk group and 24 fewer death from prostate cancer (95% CI 34 fewer to 12 fewer) per 1000 men at 5 years in the low risk group. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations.Early AST may decrease the rate of skeletal events (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.80; low-certainty evidence) corresponding to 23 fewer skeletal events per 1000 (95% CI 31 fewer to 7 fewer). We downgraded for study limitations and imprecision. It may also increase fatigue (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.62; low-certainty evidence), corresponding to 31 more men with this complaint per 1000 (95% CI 18 more to 48 more). We downgraded for study limitations and imprecision. It may increase the risk of heart failure (RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.33; low-certainty evidence) corresponding to 27 more events per 1000 (95% CI 3 more to 69 more). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations and imprecision.Global quality of life is probably similar after two years as assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire (mean difference -1.56, 95% CI -4.50 to 1.38; moderate-certainty evidence) with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Early AST probably extends time to death of any cause and time to death from prostate cancer. It may slightly decrease the rate of skeletal events. Rates of serious adverse events and quality of life may be similar. It may increase fatigue and may increase the risk of heart failure. Better quality trials would be particularly important to better understand the outcomes related to possible treatment-related harm, for which we only found low-certainty evidence.

Efficacy and safety of combined androgen blockade with antiandrogen for advanced prostate cancer

Background

Combined androgen blockade (cab) is a promising treatment modality for prostate cancer (pca). In the present meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of first-line cab using an antiandrogen (aa) with castration monotherapy in patients with advanced pca.

Methods

PubMed, embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials (rcts) published through 12 December 2016. Hazard ratios (hrs) with 95% confidence intervals (cis) were determined for primary outcomes: overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (pfs). Subgroup analyses were performed for Western compared with Eastern patients and use of a nonsteroidal aa (nsaa) compared with a steroidal aa (saa).

Results

Compared with castration monotherapy, cab using an aa was associated with significantly improved os (n = 14; hr: 0.90; 95% ci: 0.84 to 0.97; p = 0.003) and pfs (n = 13; hr: 0.89; 95% ci: 0.80 to 1.00; p = 0.04). No significant difference in os (p = 0.71) and pfs (p = 0.49) was observed between the Western and Eastern patients. Compared with castration monotherapy, cab using a nsaa was associated with significantly improved os (hr: 0.88; 95% ci: 0.82 to 0.95; p = 0.0009) and pfs (hr: 0.85; 95% ci: 0.73 to 0.98; p = 0.007)-a result that was not achieved with cab using a saa. The safety profiles of cab and monotherapy were similar in terms of adverse events, including hot flushes, impotence, and grade 3 or 4 events, with the exception of risk of diarrhea and liver dysfunction or elevation in liver enzymes, which were statistically greater with cab using an aa.

Conclusions

Compared with castration monotherapy, first-line cab therapy with an aa, especially a nsaa, resulted in significantly improved os and pfs, and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced pca.

Drug development for noncastrate prostate cancer in a changed therapeutic landscape

The unprecedented progress in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is only beginning to be realized in patients with noncastrate disease. This slow progress in part reflects the use of trial objectives focused on time-to-event end points, such as time to metastasis and overall survival, which require long follow-up durations and large sample sizes, and has been further delayed by the use of approved therapies that are effective at the time of progression. Our central hypotheses are that progress can be accelerated, and that outcomes can be improved by shifting trial objectives to response measures occurring early that solely reflect the effects of the treatment. To test these hypotheses, a continuously enrolling multi-arm, multi-stage randomized trial design, analogous to that used in the STAMPEDE trial, has been developed. Eligibility is focused on patients with incurable disease or those with a high risk of death with any form of monotherapy alone. The primary objective is to eliminate all disease using a multimodality treatment strategy. End points include pathological complete response and an undetectable level of serum prostate-specific antigen, with recovery of serum testosterone levels. Both are binary, objective, and provide an early, quantitative indication of efficacy.

Comparison of bone mineral loss by combined androgen block agonist versus GnRH in patients with prostate cancer: A 12 month-prospective observational study

The multi-centre, prospective, observational study was designed to examine the efficacy of continuous combined androgen block (CAB) vs. GnRH agonist monotherapy in terms of bone mineral density (BMD) change during 12 months post-androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in Asian prostate cancer patients. Multiple regression analysis and estimated the 10-year probability of major fractures among the patients with Fracture Risk Assessment Tool were conducted to investigate the underlying factors affecting BMD. Paired t-test to evaluate the change of BMD from baseline to 12 month, and two sample t-test to examine the difference of BMD changes were used between two groups. BMD significantly decreased in both the CAB and GnRH groups, with no group wise differences. The proportion of osteopenia or osteoporosis was slightly increased after the 12-month post-ADT. Ten-year probability of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fracture was approximately 3% and 5%, respectively. In conclusion, a significant decrease of BMD by 12-month ADT was observed without any differences between the two groups, whereas ADT-related BMD loss did not induce detrimental effects on bone health in terms of increased bone fracture risk. This was the first prospective study on BMD changes as a predictor of fracture during ADT in an Asian population.

Targeting the androgen receptor in prostate and breast cancer: several new agents in development

Prostate cancer (PCa) and breast cancer (BCa) share similarities as hormone-sensitive cancers with a wide heterogeneity of both phenotype and biology. The androgen receptor (AR) is a hormone receptor involved in both benign and malignant processes. Targeting androgen synthesis and the AR pathway has been and remains central to PCa therapy. Recently, there has been increased interest in the role of the AR in BCa development and growth, with results indicating AR co-expression with estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptors, across all intrinsic subtypes of BCa. Targeting the AR axis is an evolving field with novel therapies in development which may ultimately be applicable to both tumor types. In this review, we offer an overview of available agents which target the AR axis in both PCa and BCa and provide insights into the novel drugs in development for targeting this signaling pathway.

Sequencing current therapies in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer

The standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer is androgen deprivation therapy. However, progressive, metastatic disease usually develops, giving rise to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Great improvements have been made recently in the management of mCRPC, with current approved treatments including chemotherapy, androgen receptor-targeted agents, immunotherapies and radiopharmaceuticals. While the emergence of multiple effective therapies is encouraging, devising a treatment strategy can be difficult and it is becoming increasingly important, and challenging, to identify factors that influence the ideal timing of specific therapies. Considering where to place these agents in the treatment schedule of mCRPC, or whether these agents should be sequenced or combined to derive the optimal benefit for the patient, is not yet clear. Furthermore, cross-resistance may exist between these agents, which may ultimately influence treatment decisions and sequence choices. Preliminary data are emerging regarding the safety and activity for sequential treatment regimens, but there are currently no prospective studies. As prostate cancer is highly heterogeneous clinically, it is likely that no single treatment sequence will be optimal for all patients. However, at present, there are no validated biomarkers to guide individualized treatment for mCRPC. Here we review available data for the different mCRPC treatments, discussing potential sequencing of agents and possible cross-resistance or synergy among the recently approved and emerging therapies.

Combined blockade of testicular and locally made androgens in prostate cancer: a highly significant medical progress based upon intracrinology

Recently two drugs, namely the antiandrogen MDV-3100 and the inhibitor of 17α-hydroxylase abiraterone have been accepted by the FDA for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with or without previous chemotherapy, with a prolongation of overall survival of 2.2-4.8 months. While medical (GnRH agonist) or surgical castration reduces the serum levels of testosterone by about 97%, an important concentration of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone remains in the prostate and activates the androgen receptor (AR), thus offering an explanation for the positive data obtained in CRPC. In fact, explanation of the response observed with MDV-3100 or enzalutamide in CRPC is essentially a blockade of the action or formation of intraprostatic androgens. In addition to the inhibition of the action or formation of androgens made locally by the mechanisms of intracrinology, increased AR levels and AR mutations can be involved, especially in very advanced disease. Future developments look at more efficient inhibitors of the action or formation of intraprostatic androgens and starting treatment earlier when blockade of androgens can exert long-term control and even cure prostate cancer treated at a stage before the appearance of metastases. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Essential role of DHEA'.

Targeted prodrug approaches for hormone refractory prostate cancer

Due to the propensity of relapse and resistance with prolonged androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), there is a growing interest in developing non-hormonal therapeutic approaches as alternative treatment modalities for hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Although the standard treatment for HRPC consists of a combination of ADT with taxanes and anthracyclines, the clinical use of chemotherapeutics is limited by systemic toxicity stemming from nondiscriminatory drug exposure to normal tissues. In order to improve the tumor selectivity of chemotherapeutics, various targeted prodrug approaches have been explored. Antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) and gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) strategies leverage tumor-specific antigens and transcription factors for the specific delivery of cytotoxic anticancer agents using various prodrug-activating enzymes. In prostate cancer, overexpression of tumor-specific proteases such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is being exploited for selective activation of anticancer prodrugs designed to be activated through proteolysis by these prostate cancer-specific enzymes. PSMA- and PSA-activated prodrugs typically comprise an engineered high-specificity protease peptide substrate coupled to a potent cytotoxic agent via a linker for rapid release of cytotoxic species in the vicinity of prostate cancer cells following proteolytic cleavage. Over the past two decades, various such prodrugs have been developed and they were effective at inhibiting prostate tumor growth in rodent models; several of these prodrug approaches have been advanced to clinical trials and may be developed into effective therapies for HRPC.

Bench-to-bedside development of agonists and antagonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone for treatment of advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the standard of care for treating patients with hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer (PCa) for 3 decades. The agonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), also called gonadotropin-releasing hormone, are still the most frequently used form of medical ADT.

ADT AND LHRH ANALOGS

The application of agonists of LHRH has improved and modernized the treatment of advanced PCa; millions of patients have benefited from therapy with LHRH agonists as a preferred alternative to surgical castration, as the psychological effects and perpetuity of orchiectomy are undesirable for most men. Despite their efficacy, agonists of LHRH have several shortcomings, including initial surge in testosterone, producing exacerbation of clinical symptoms, and microsurges in testosterone that might occur after each administration. A new, alternate approach to ADT is emerging with the improvements in antagonists of LHRH. This class of LHRH analogues produces a direct and immediate blockade of pituitary LHRH receptors and leads to a more rapid suppression of testosterone without an initial surge or subsequent microsurges. Degarelix, a third-generation LHRH antagonist, is the only antagonist with a low histamine-releasing activity that is currently on the market for clinical use in advanced PCa with improved testosterone suppression, better control of follicle-stimulating hormone and prostate-specific antigen, and which offers a prolonged delay to progression and more favorable effects on serum alkaline phosphatase.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LHRH agonists are still the mainstay for treatment of advanced PCa, antagonists of LHRH offer an alternative as a pharmacological approach.

GnRH agonists and the rapidly increasing use of combined androgen blockade in prostate cancer

The discovery of medical castration with GnRH agonists in 1979 rapidly replaced surgical castration and high doses of estrogens for the treatment of prostate cancer. Soon afterwards, it was discovered that androgens were made locally in the prostate from the inactive precursor DHEA of adrenal origin, a mechanism called intracrinology. Taking into account these novel facts, combined androgen blockade (CAB) using a pure antiandrogen combined with castration in order to block the two sources of androgens was first published in 1982. CAB was the first treatment shown in randomized and placebo-controlled trials to prolong life in prostate cancer, even at the metastatic stage. Most importantly, the results recently obtained with the novel pure antiandrogen enzalutamide as well as with abiraterone, an inhibitor of 17α-hydroxylase in castration-resistant prostate cancer, has revitalized the CAB concept. The effects of CAB observed on survival of heavily pretreated patients further demonstrates the importance of the androgens made locally in the prostate and are a strong motivation to apply CAB to efficiently block all sources of androgens earlier at start of treatment and, even better, before metastasis occurs. The future of research in this field thus seems to be centered on the development of more potent blockers of androgens formation and action in order to obtain better results at the metastatic stage and, for the localized stage, reduce the duration of treatment required to achieve complete apoptosis and control of prostate cancer proliferation before it reaches the metastatic or noncurable stage.

Genetic factors underlying discordance in chromatin accessibility between monozygotic twins

BACKGROUND

Open chromatin is implicated in regulatory processes; thus, variations in chromatin structure may contribute to variations in gene expression and other phenotypes. In this work, we perform targeted deep sequencing for open chromatin, and array-based genotyping across the genomes of 72 monozygotic twins to identify genetic factors regulating co-twin discordance in chromatin accessibility.

RESULTS

We show that somatic mutations cause chromatin discordance mainly via the disruption of transcription factor binding sites. Structural changes in DNA due to C:G to A:T transversions are under purifying selection due to a strong impact on chromatin accessibility. We show that CpGs whose methylation is specifically regulated during cellular differentiation appear to be protected from high mutation rates of 5'-methylcytosines, suggesting that the spectrum of CpG variations may be shaped fully at the developmental level but not through natural selection. Based on the association mapping of within-pair chromatin differences, we search for cases in which twin siblings with a particular genotype had chromatin discordance at the relevant locus. We identify 1,325 chromatin sites that are differentially accessible, depending on the genotype of a nearby locus, suggesting that epigenetic differences can control regulatory variations via interactions with genetic factors. Poised promoters present high levels of chromatin discordance in association with either somatic mutations or genetic-epigenetic interactions.

CONCLUSION

Our observations illustrate how somatic mutations and genetic polymorphisms may contribute to regulatory, and ultimately phenotypic, discordance.

Agonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the first-line standard of care for treating patients with hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer (PCa) for many decades. The agonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), also called gonadotropin-releasing hormone, are still the most frequently used form of medical ADT.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the available data and most recent information concerning the use of LHRH agonists in advanced PCa. This article also reviews the discovery and development of LHRH agonists and summarizes the clinical evidence for their efficacy in PCa.

EXPERT OPINION

The introduction and application of agonists of LHRH has modernized and improved the treatment of advanced PCa. The life-saving benefits of LHRH agonists are well established, yet underestimated. Despite their efficacy, agonists of LHRH have several disadvantages or drawbacks including disease flare. The approach to ADT has been recently further refined with the development of the LHRH antagonist degarelix. Degarelix, a highly clinically effective third-generation LHRH antagonist, is currently available in most countries for therapy of advanced PCa. This new drug offers attractive alternatives to LHRH agonists for treatment of advanced PCa. A therapy for castration-resistant PCa based on a targeted cytotoxic analog of LHRH, AEZS-108, is also emerging.

Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of MR molecular imaging probes using J591 mAb-conjugated SPIONs for specific detection of prostate cancer

Carcinoma of the prostate is the most frequent diagnosed malignant tumor in men and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in this group. The cure rate of prostate cancer is highly dependent on the stage of disease at the diagnosis and early detection is key to designing effective treatment strategies. The objective of the present study is to make a specific MR imaging probe for targeted imaging of cancer cells. We take advantage of the fact that many types of prostate cancer cells express high levels of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on their cell surface. The imaging strategy is to use superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), attached to an antibody (J591) that binds to the extracellular domain of PSMA, to specifically enhance the contrast of PSMA-expressing prostate cancer cells. Conjugation of mAb J591 to commercial SPIONs was achieved using a heterobifunctional linker, sulfo-SMCC. Two types of prostate cancer cell lines were chosen for experiments: LNCaP (PSMA+) and DU145 (PSMA-). MRI and cell uptake experiments demonstrated the high potential of the synthesized nanoprobe as a specific MRI contrast agent for detection of PSMA-expressing prostate cancer cells.

Steroid derivatives as pure antagonists of the androgen receptor

BACKGROUND

While the androgens of testicular origin (representing about 50% of total androgens in men over 50 years) can be completely eliminated by surgical or medical castration with GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonists or antagonists, the antiandrogens currently available as blockers of androgen binding to the androgen receptor (AR), namely bicalutamide (BICA), flutamide (FLU) and nilutamide have too weak affinity to completely neutralize the other 50% of androgens made locally from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the prostate cancer tissue by the mechanisms of intracrinology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Series of steroid derivatives having pure and potent antagonistic activity on the human and rodent AR were synthesized. Assays of AR binding and activity in carcinoma mouse Shionogi and human LNCaP cells as well as in vivo bioavailability measurements and in vivo prostate weight assays in the rat were used.

RESULTS

The chosen lead steroidal compound, namely EM-5854, has a 3.7-fold higher affinity than BICA for the human AR while EM-5855, an important metabolite of EM-5854, has a 94-fold higher affinity for the human AR compared to BICA. EM-5854 and EM-5855 are 14 times more potent than BICA in inhibiting androgen (R1881)-stimulated prostatic specific antigen (PSA) secretion in human prostatic carcinoma LNCaP cells in vitro. MDV3100 has a potency comparable to bicalutamide in these assays. Depending upon the oral formulation, EM-5854 is 5- to 10-times more potent than BICA to inhibit dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-stimulated ventral prostatic weight in vivo in the rat while MDV3100 has lower activity than BICA in this in vivo model. These data are supported by respective 40-fold and 105-fold higher potencies of EM-5854 and EM-5855 compared to BICA to inhibit cell proliferation in the androgen-sensitive Shionogi carcinoma cell model.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present preclinical results data need evaluation in clinical trials in men, combination of the data obtained in vitro in human LNCaP cells as indicator of potency in the human prostate and the data on metabolism evaluated in vivo on ventral prostate weight in the rat, could suggest the possibility of a 70- to 140-fold higher potency of EM-5854 compared to bicalutamide (Casodex) for the treatment of prostate cancer in men.

The impact of adjuvant therapy in patients with biochemical recurrence on prostate cancer progression and mortality five years after radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

The clinical significance of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) due to prostate cancer (PCa) is not unambiguous, sometimes being independent from the real progression. BCR is followed by a greater risk of adverse events and almost always results with the necessity for implementation of adjuvant therapy (AT). The aim of the following study was to examine the impact of AT in patients with BCR together with PCa progression and mortality 5-years after RP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred forty-seven patients after RP, who were treated in the period from 1995 to 2009, underwent the retrospective analysis. They were divided into three groups according to the applied AT after prior BCR diagnosis. The first group (n - 39) included patients treated with radiotherapy, along with hormonotherapy. The second group (n - 63) covers patients receiving hormonotherapy only. The third group (n - 145) consists of patients without BCR. Five-year general and disease-specific survival was evaluated and choice prognostic factors were compared.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival was 74.2% in group I, 88.3% in group II, and 98.7% in group III. Diseasespecific survival was: 76.9%, 90.5%, and 100% (p = 0.001), respectively. BCR was diagnosed in 102 (41.5%) patients; while in another 24 (23.5%) of them progression was diagnosed after the AT was applied.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of BCR 5-years after RP is greater in patients with high initial concentration of PSA, higher Gleason score, and clinical advancement. Five-year overall and disease-specific survivals are higher among patients after hormonotherapy alone compared to those after both radio- and hormonotherapy.

Role of maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer

Androgen ablation is the mainstay treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC). Researchers proposed that maximum androgen blockade (MAB) therapy with antiandrogen agent in combination with castration might result in a better outcome among patients with advanced PC. In the last two decades, numerous trials and pooled data analyses were conducted to optimize the role of MAB in the treatment of metastatic PC. Non-steroidal antiandrogens administered as part of MAB proved to have a small (3%) survival benefit, however, the magnitude of this difference is of questionable clinical significance. Available evidence suggests that MAB should not be routinely offered to patients with metastatic PC, however, it should remain a reasonable option when discussing management. The standard first line treatment should be a monotherapy, consisting of orchiectomy or LHRH agonist. MAB still has a role as a short-term therapy (2-4 weeks). The ongoing large sample population based prospective studies may add new dimensions in the use of MAB in treatment of the prostate cancer in future.

Individualized decision-making for older men with prostate cancer: balancing cancer control with treatment consequences across the clinical spectrum

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent non-skin cancer among men and is the second leading cause of cancer death in men. PCa has an increased incidence and prevalence in older men. Age-associated incidence is on the rise due to increased screening in the older population. This has led to a sharp rise in the detection of early stage PCa. Given the indolent nature of many prostatic malignancies, a large proportion of older men with PCa will ultimately die from other causes. As a result, physicians and patients are faced with the challenge of identifying optimal treatment strategies for localized PCa, biochemically recurrent PCa and later-stage PCa. Age-related changes can impact tolerance of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy in men with metastatic disease and shift the risk-benefit ratio of these treatments. Tools such as the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can help estimate remaining life expectancy and can help predict treatment-related morbidity and mortality in older men. Application of CGA in older men with PCa is important to help individualize and optimize treatment strategies. Research that integrates multidisciplinary and multidimensional assessment of PCa and the patient's overall health status is needed.

Prenatal programming by testosterone of hypothalamic metabolic control neurones in the ewe

Ewes treated prenatally with testosterone develop metabolic deficits, including insulin resistance, in addition to reproductive dysfunctions that collectively mimic polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), a common endocrine disease in women. We hypothesised that metabolic deficits associated with prenatal testosterone excess involve alterations in arcuate nucleus (ARC) neurones that contain either agouti-related peptide (AgRP) or pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC). Characterisation of these neurones in the ewe showed that immunoreactive AgRP and POMC neurones were present in separate populations in the ARC, that AgRP and POMC neurones co-expressed either neuropeptide Y or cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript, respectively, and that each population had a high degree of co-localisation with androgen receptors. Examination of the effect of prenatal testosterone exposure on the number of AgRP and POMC neurones in adult ewes showed that prenatal testosterone excess significantly increased the number of AgRP but not POMC neurones compared to controls; this increase was restricted to the middle division of the ARC, was mimicked by prenatal treatment with dihydrotestosterone, a non-aromatisable androgen, and was blocked by co-treatment of prenatal testosterone with the anti-androgen, flutamide. The density of AgRP fibre immunoreactivity in the preoptic area, paraventricular nucleus, lateral hypothalamus and dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus was also increased by prenatal testosterone exposure. Thus, ewes that were exposed to androgens during foetal life showed alterations in the number of AgRP-immunoreactive neurones and the density of fibre immunoreactivity in their projection areas, suggestive of permanent prenatal programming of metabolic circuitry that may, in turn, contribute to insulin resistance and an increased risk of obesity in this model of PCOS.

Androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: are rising concerns leading to falling use?

OBJECTIVE

To describe patterns of initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a population-based cohort of patients with prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with prostate cancer in Ontario, Canada, who started ≥90 days of ADT at age ≥66 years in 1995-2005 were classified by ADT regimen: medical castration [oestrogen and/or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist); orchidectomy; antiandrogen monotherapy; combined androgen blockade (CAB) medical (medical castration plus antiandrogen); CAB surgical (orchidectomy plus antiandrogen). Indications for ADT were as follows: neoadjuvant (short-term before prostatectomy or radiation therapy); adjuvant (long-term with prostatectomy or radiation therapy); metastatic disease; biochemical recurrence; primary (localized disease); other. We examined trends in ADT regimen and indication over time.

RESULTS

The number of patients initiating ADT increased from 1995 to 2001 (2106-2916 per year) and declined thereafter to 2200-2300 annually (total n= 26,809). However, prostate cancer prevalence doubled over these years, and the rate of ADT initiation decreased from 16 to 7 per 100 person-years. Patterns varied by regimen and indication. Medical castration increased from 12% of all ADT in 1995 to 47% in 2005; orchidectomy decreased from 17 to 4%. Use for metastatic disease remained stable, but adjuvant therapy increased from <3% of all ADT in 1995 to 13% in 2005. Primary therapy was the most common indication, but decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

ADT initiation has fallen and marked changes occurred in treatment patterns for prostate cancer. Changes might be driven by increasing awareness of potential harms and costs, and by new evidence supporting ADT for specific indications.

Blockade of testicular and adrenal androgens in prostate cancer treatment

Prostate cancer is the most hormone sensitive of all cancers. However, any hormonal therapeutic strategy must take into account the fact that two almost equivalent sources of androgens act in the prostate, namely testosterone of testicular origin, and the locally produced androgens testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) derived from dehydroepiandrosterone of adrenal origin. Combined androgen blockade--medical or surgical castration plus a pure antiandrogen--would, therefore, be the logical first-line treatment for prostate cancer, although castration or an antiandrogen alone is still chosen in the majority of cases. Although long-term control, or even cure, is possible when combined androgen blockade is used when the tumor is localized, resistance to treatment invariably develops in patients when start of treatment is delayed until the disease has become metastatic. This observation can be explained either by elevated levels of the androgen receptor, which can increase the response to low levels of androgens and also modify the response to antiandrogens; or by local biosynthesis of androgens. Research to identify new and more potent antiandrogens, as well as blockers of peripheral and adrenal androgen biosynthesis--such as abiraterone--could be of great importance.

Evidence-based medicine: comparative analysis of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues in combination with external beam radiation and surgery in the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues are a cornerstone in the management of many clinical situations in prostate cancer patients. The multiplicity of drugs make it difficult to decide which is the best drug to prescribe to each patient. Whether or not the different luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues belong to the same drug class is only merely supposed. This study adds a systematic review of the literature in order to determine whether or not the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues available for prescription belong to the same drug class (same family, similar chemical structure, mechanism of action, and efficacy). The current evidence available is not enough to support a presumed drug class effect of the various analogues in the treatment of prostate carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

• To study whether luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues are agents of the same pharmacological class, i.e. whether they have the same clinical effect, using an evidence-based medicine approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

• We reviewed the evidence on the alleged 'drug class effect' among analogues and the existing bibliographic support for their use in various medical indications. We used PubMed as the main search source. Evidence level and degree of recommendation were assigned to each conclusion based on the 'Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network'.

RESULTS

• There are no studies designed to answer the question of class effect between LHRH analogues or agonists. Reviews and meta-analyses have been performed on many other issues related to therapeutic management either with analogues alone, or in combination with radiation therapy and surgery. • Direct comparisons do not allow definitive conclusions to be reached. Indirect evidence is obtained from randomized studies comparing the different LHRH analogues with other treatments used to obtain androgen deprivation. Other issues related to pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that can support either the existence or non-existence of class effect were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

• The current available evidence is not enough to support a presumed class effect of the drug among the different analogues in the treatment of prostate carcinoma in its various clinical situations.

Efficacy of maximal androgen blockade versus castration alone in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer: a retrospective clinical experience from a Chinese medical centre

In this retrospective study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and toxicities of maximal androgen blockade (MAB) versus castration alone in Chinese patients with advanced prostate cancer. From 1996 to 2004, 608 patients with advanced prostate cancer were included in the study. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups according to different therapeutic regimens. Of the 608 patients, 300 patients were treated with MAB (castration plus nonsteroidal antiandrogens) and the remaining 308 were treated with castration alone. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates of these patients were 73.7% and 56%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, MAB was associated with not only the improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) (increased by 10 months) but also a 20.6% reduction in mortality risk compared with castration alone. In contrast, the efficacy of MAB was not superior to castration alone for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Interestingly, among patients with MAB, those using bicalutamide had a longer PFS than those using flutamide; this was especially so in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Almost all of the toxicities due to the hormone therapy were mild to moderate and manageable. To conclude, in China, hormone therapies, including MAB and castration alone, have been standard treatments for advanced prostate cancer. For patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, castration alone might be adequately practical and efficient. In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, however, MAB has superior efficacy over castration alone. It is clear that MAB should be considered the first-line standard treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Maximal androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer

Prostate cancer has now become one of the leading types of cancer in urban India. It is now the third most common cancer in Delhi. As we advance in health care with the resultant increase in longevity, we will be seeing more of advanced carcinoma prostate. Since the early 1980.s, there have been many trials on MAB. However, the question remains whether these agents actually make a difference? The role of MAB is probably limited to the prevention of the beta are reaction in patients on LHRH agonists. The non steroidal antiandrogens have a marginal benefit of increased overall survival by approximately 3% to 5% at 5 ve years. There may be a role for MAB in patients with metastatic carcinoma of prostate, low volume metastases, patients with M 1 disease with absence of metastases in the skull, ribs, long bones, and soft tissues excluding lymph nodes.

Hormonal therapy of prostate cancer

Of all cancers, prostate cancer is the most sensitive to hormones: it is thus very important to take advantage of this unique property and to always use optimal androgen blockade when hormone therapy is the appropriate treatment. A fundamental observation is that the serum testosterone concentration only reflects the amount of testosterone of testicular origin which is released in the blood from which it reaches all tissues. Recent data show, however, that an approximately equal amount of testosterone is made from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) directly in the peripheral tissues, including the prostate, and does not appear in the blood. Consequently, after castration, the 95-97% fall in serum testosterone does not reflect the 40-50% testosterone (testo) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) made locally in the prostate from DHEA of adrenal origin. In fact, while elimination of testicular androgens by castration alone has never been shown to prolong life in metastatic prostate cancer, combination of castration (surgical or medical with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist) with a pure anti-androgen has been the first treatment shown to prolong life. Most importantly, when applied at the localized stage, the same combined androgen blockade (CAB) can provide long-term control or cure of the disease in more than 90% of cases. Obviously, since prostate cancer usually grows and metastasizes without signs or symptoms, screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is absolutely needed to diagnose prostate cancer at an 'early' stage before metastasis occurs and the cancer becomes non-curable. While the role of androgens was believed to have become non-significant in cancer progressing under any form of androgen blockade, recent data have shown increased expression of the androgen receptor (AR) in treatment-resistant disease with a benefit of further androgen blockade. Since the available anti-androgens have low affinity for AR and cannot block androgen action completely, especially in the presence of increased AR levels, it becomes important to discover more potent and purely antagonistic blockers of AR. The data obtained with compounds under development are promising. While waiting for this (these) new anti-androgen(s), combined treatment with castration and a pure anti-androgen (bicalutamide, flutamide or nilutamide) is the only available and the best scientifically based means of treating prostate cancer by hormone therapy at any stage of the disease with the optimal chance of success and even cure in localized disease.

Maximal androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer

Maximal androgen blockade (MAB) refers to the combination of medical (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist) or surgical castration with an anti-androgen for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. A substantial body of basic research has improved our understanding of the interactions between the anti-androgens, the androgen receptor, and androgen response elements in the genome. Anti-androgens act by two primary mechanisms: inhibition of ligand (androgen) binding to the androgen receptor, and inhibition of androgen-independent activation of the receptor. The latter mechanism occurs via several pathways, including inhibiting nuclear co-activators, activating co-suppressors, and inhibiting transcription of a variety of androgen-regulated genes. It is more accurate to refer to these compounds as androgen-receptor antagonists, since they inhibit activation whether this is androgen-mediated or not. Within the class of non-steroidal anti-androgens, there is variation in the degree to which ligand-independent activation is inhibited. Over the last 25 years, approximately 30 clinical trials have addressed the benefit of MAB versus monotherapy. Most of these trials have evaluated flutamide or nilutamide. Several meta-analyses suggest a modest survival benefit of these drugs, amounting to an 8% mortality reduction at 5 years. Preclinical data and two randomized trials -- one historic and one current -- suggest that bicalutamide may be a more effective drug in this respect. This requires confirmation pending further maturity of the current trial, which is the only one directly comparing bicalutamide plus castration to castration alone. In prostate cancer patients at high risk for mortality (based on extent of disease or prostate-specific antigen kinetics), combination therapy with bicalutamide should be considered in preference to monotherapy.

Management of asymptomatic rise in prostatic-specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer

Biochemical failure after curative-intent therapies is an increasingly common dilemma confronting patients and physicians. No definition of biochemical failure exists that can be applied to all forms of treatment and that is not to some degree affected by the follow-up interval, pretreatment prognostic factors, or the frequency of prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Available imaging techniques lack sensitivity in detection of occult micrometastases. Prognostic factors such as tumor characteristics and PSA kinetics should be considered when recommending second-line therapies. For those patients with suspected localized recurrence, second-line treatment with salvage therapies may provide long-term disease control. Hormonal therapy, although most commonly employed for PSA recurrence, is of palliative benefit only. Currently, the most appropriate therapeutic intervention for asymptomatic patients with evidence of biochemical failure remains undefined.

The role of hormonal treatment in prostate cancer

In 1941 Huggins and Hodges published for the first time the favorable effects of surgical castration and estrogen treatment on the progression of metastatic prostate cancer. However, this hormonal therapy is not without side effects. Since this pioneering milestone in history of prostate cancer, a further tremendous innovation did not take place. Today, due to intensive clinical, biochemical, nuclear-biological and molecular-biological research, many hormone active treatment variations are available. Besides traditional hormonal therapy, surgical or chemical castration, maximal androgen blockade, nontraditional forms of hormonal therapy, intermittent hormonal therapy, antiandrogens, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, and their combinations, we discuss options toward creating an increased number of side effect-oriented offers of hormonal treatment options, guaranteeing a longer and more comfortable exhaustion of the individual hormonal period of response and probably a longer survival. The prerequisite is a closer-than-ever monitoring by tumor marker and an early observation of symptomatic changes.

Pharmacotherapy for prostate cancer, with emphasis on hormonal treatments

For more than half a century, hormonal therapy has been one of the cornerstones of prostate cancer therapy. However, the position and timing of androgen deprivation therapy is continuously challenged. Nowadays, it is often combined with other types of treatment in a multi-modal approach, especially with radiation therapy. Besides the well-known luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists, several developments have been introduced (e.g., luteinising hormone-releasing hormone antagonists or improved depot formulations achieving a better pharmacokinetic slope and lower testosterone levels). Research developments include a better understanding of the different gonadotropin-releasing hormone isoforms, the ligand-independent transformation of the androgen receptor and androgen receptor overexpression in hormone-insensitive disease. Prostate cancer, previously thought to be chemotherapy insensitive, is now treated at the metastatic stage by taxane-based chemotherapies. The combination of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy is currently studied at various stages of the disease, as early as localised or locally advanced prostate cancer. It is very likely that, in the future, pharmacological treatment for prostate cancer will include combination therapies rather than monotherapies. The authors suggest an in-depth re-evaluation of the place of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer.

Chemical synthesis and biological activities of 16α-derivatives of 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol as antiandrogens

In our efforts to develop compounds with therapeutic potential as antiandrogens, we synthesized a series of 5alpha-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol derivatives with a fixed side-chain length of 3-methylenes at C-16alpha, but bearing a diversity of functional groups at the end. Among these, the chloride induced the best antiproliferative activity on androgen-sensitive Shionogi cells. Substituting the OH at C-3 by a methoxy group showed the importance of the OH. Moreover, its transformation into a ketone increased the androgen receptor (AR) binding but decreased the antiproliferative activity and induced a proliferative effect on Shionogi cells. These results confirm the importance of keeping a 5alpha-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol nucleus instead of a dihydrotestosterone nucleus. Variable side-chain lengths of 2-, 3-, 4-, and 6-methylenes at C-16alpha were investigated and the optimal length was found to be 3-methylenes. Although exhibiting a weak AR binding affinity, 16alpha-(3'-chloropropyl)-5alpha-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol (15) provided an antiproliferative activity on Shionogi cells similar to that of pure non-steroidal antiandrogen hydroxy-flutamide (77% and 67%, respectively, at 0.1 microM). The new steroidal compound, 15, thus constitutes a good starting point for development of future antiandrogens with a therapeutic potential against prostate cancer.

Importance of the intracrine metabolism of adrenal androgens in androgen-dependent prostate cancer

The metabolic pathways of androgens and processes by which androgens induce re-growth after androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer have not been fully elucidated. In this study, finasteride decreased PSA secretion in medium containing testosterone, androstenedione, androstenediol and dehydroepiandrosterone, whereas dihydrotestosterone (DHT)- and hydroxy-flutamide-induced PSA production was not inhibited by finasteride in LNCaP-FGC cells. The present data show that adrenal androgen precursors do not directly interact with androgen receptors (ARs) but are converted to DHT via the intraprostatic metabolic pathways, resulting in the induction of LNCaP activity. This is the first report confirming this mechanism experimentally and also suggest the use of combined therapies that target ARs and prevent the formation of DHT within prostate cancer cells to achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy.

Abarelix for injectable suspension: first-in-class gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for prostate cancer

Abarelix, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with its indication for advanced symptomatic prostate cancer, represents the newest category of hormonal therapy introduced in the past 15 years. Results from Phase II and III clinical trials demonstrate the advantages of abarelix over commonly used luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy: abarelix does not cause a surge in serum testosterone that can precipitate a flare phenomenon or worsening of disease, particularly dangerous for patients with metastatic, symptomatic disease, and produces medical castration more quickly. Abarelix was also demonstrated to promptly and substantially reduce follicle-stimulating hormone levels to lower than LHRH agonist. Study results demonstrate effective anticancer responses during extended exposure to abarelix: improvements in pain score and/or analgesic use, improvements in urinary symptoms (including urinary catheter removal) and complete avoidance of bilateral orchiectomy for patients undergoing at least 12 weeks of treatment. In Phase III clinical trials, abarelix demonstrated a similar overall safety profile when compared with LHRH agonist monotherapy, and a superior safety profile when compared with LHRH agonist plus antiandrogen combination therapy. Abarelix patients experienced a greater incidence of immediate-onset systemic allergic reactions as compared with control arms.

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the treatment of prostate cancer: A review of their discovery, development, and place in therapy

BACKGROUND

Early identification of the biological activity of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) paved the way for the synthesis of analogues with enhanced potency and biological properties. Early testing in animal models and humans provided insight into the potential clinical uses of these substances, and, within 10 years, LHRH-agonist therapy had become available for use in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). Over time, the role of LHRH-agonist therapy has expanded to include use as part of multimodal treatment regimens throughout the course of the disease.

OBJECTIVES

This article reviews the discovery and development of LHRH agonists and summarizes the clinical evidence for their efficacy in PC.

METHODS

Relevant clinical studies were identified through searches of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE through May 2006. The main search terms were prostate cancer and LHRH agonist.

RESULTS

Results of the initial therapeutic trials of sustained-release depot formulations of LHRH agonists in patients with PC were reported in the mid-1980s, indicating that these agents were effective and well tolerated in improving clinical symptoms and producing medical castration. Longer-term studies and subsequent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials in patients with advanced PC found no significant differences in overall survival when single-therapy androgen suppression was achieved through the use of LHRH-agonist therapy or orchiectomy. Randomized trials have reported significant improvements in disease-free and overall survival in patients with locally advanced or high-grade PC treated with LHRH agonists in addition to radiotherapy. Several prospective randomized trials have reported decreases in rates of positive surgical margins with short-term (6 weeks to 4 months) neoadjuvant LHRH-agonist therapy in patients with stage T1 to T3a PC undergoing prostatectomy. Definitive comparisons of immediate and delayed treatment in patients with biochemical relapse have not been reported. However, the results of several studies suggest that immediate LHRH-agonist therapy (or orchiectomy) may improve the course of disease progression and survival. The risks of long-term treatment (eg, osteoporosis; fracture; anabolic loss of muscle mass, with a tendency toward weight gain) must be considered carefully in patients who are likely to receive chronic LHRH-agonist therapy. Intermittent schedules have been developed to reduce the adverse effects associated with LHRH-agonist therapy; some reports support sparing effects on bone and muscle mass and relative improvements in toxicities during off-therapy periods, whereas others have documented continuing decreases in bone mineral density (BMD), with the rate of bone loss highest during the early cycles of therapy. Bisphosphonate therapy has been shown to increase BMD in patients with PC and may therefore be beneficial when overt symptoms of osteopenia or osteoporosis are present.

CONCLUSIONS

LHRH-agonist therapy has been the mainstay of treatment for advanced PC for >20 years. Clinical evidence supports expanding use of these agents at an earlier stage of disease and as part of multimodal regimens that include radiotherapy. There is a need for further study of the efficacy of adjuvant LHRH-agonist therapy along with prostatectomy, in patients with biochemical failure, in intermittent regimens, and in conjunction with cytotoxic therapies in late-stage disease.

Management of the Patient with a Rising PSA Alone

PSA-only recurrence after definitive RP or RT for PCA is an increasingly com-mon scenario. The very definition of advanced prostate cancer is changing. Multimodal therapy improves cancer-specific outcomes especially in men with high-risk disease. After RP, a detectable serum PSA has been considered suggestive of PCA recurrence. After RT, the ASTRO definition of BCR has been widely used to define BCR. Both of these definitions of BCR are subject to dispute. The kinetics of a rising PSA (PSA doubling time) appears to be the best surrogate marker for disease risk, clinical progression, and ultimately cancer-specific death. Therapeutic options include salvage RT after primary RP or systemic HT through surgical/chemical castration, antiandrogens, or nontraditional HT. Re-cent studies suggest that early HT can provide modest survival benefits, but at both an economic cost and decreased quality of life. The diminished side effects of an oral antiandrogen are appealing, and may be as efficacious as castration therapies in low-volume disease. More clinical trials are needed to determine the best treatments, alone and in combination. The potential opportunities for novel therapeutic agents with low associated morbidity are great.

Combined androgen blockade: an update

The use of combined androgen blockade therapy in prostate cancer management remains controversial. This article reviews the effect of the different non-steroid androgens in blocking androgen-independent activation of the androgen receptor in the androgen-depleted environment, and the potential benefit of bicalutamide in comparison to the first generation of anti-androgens (flutamide and nilutamide). An estimate of the benefit of combined therapy with bicalutamide suggests there is a high probability that bicalutamide 50 mg as combined therapy provides a survival advantage over castration alone. This treatment must be balanced against the potential for an increase in side-effects and a consequent adverse effect on the patient's quality of life.

Stepping-stones to the further advancement of androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Androgen-deprivation therapy has remained the critical therapeutic option for patients with advanced prostate cancer for over 60 years. Patients with poorly differentiated prostate cancer have low dihydrotestosterone levels in the prostate. After androgen-deprivation therapy, dihydrotestosterone levels in the prostate remain at approximately 25% of the level measured before therapy. The addition of a nonsteroidal anti-androgen to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog or surgical castration significantly reduces the risk of all causes of death by 8%, which translates into a small, but significant, improvement in the 5-year survival of 2.9% over castration alone. The biologically aggressive prostate cancer cells may have an androgen receptor with heightened sensitivity to low dihydrotestosterone levels from the early stage of androgen-dependent disease. It is necessary to consider the androgen environment and the status of the androgen receptor in the prostate in order to improve the clinical efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy and the quality of life of patients.

Actualización del tratamiento del cáncer de próstata avanzado y de sus complicaciones

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the leading cause of cancer in Spain, among men older than 65. 1,200 new cases out of every 100,000 males are diagnosed with prostate cancer on an annual basis. In the United States, this illness represents the second leading cause of death due to cancer in males. In those patients whose prostate tumors progress after surgery or radiotherapy, or have metastatic disease when diagnosed, a systemic approach in order to improve their quality of life and overall survival is mandatory. First line hormone therapies usually reach a proper control of the tumor maintaining an acceptable quality of life. However, most of these tumors becomes androgen-independent over time and behave as a more aggressive cancer type. In these patients, combination therapy protocols have recently demonstrated a benefit not only in terms of symptoms control and response rates but also in improving survival. In addition, several new molecules are currently under study. The accurate knowledge of the symptoms due to disease spreading as well as treatment's side effects is necessary to provide an appropriate palliative management that contributes to an improvement of the quality of life in advanced prostate cancer patients.

Treating the Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Therapy

As increasing numbers of men are living longer with prostate cancer, larger proportions will eventually present to our collective practices with increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Such PSA relapses, conservatively estimated to affect approximately 50,000 men each year, have become the most common form of advanced prostate cancer. Salvage radiation therapy and salvage prostatectomy have important roles in our therapeutic armamentarium and should be valid options for young, healthy men. Counseling patients regarding expectations for cancer control and treatment morbidity has become better because of reports from larger series of patients who have had salvage radiation therapy and surgery. Some patients may not be appropriate candidates for salvage local therapies. A growing body of evidence suggests early hormonal therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) and could alter cancer-specific survival. This benefit seems to be greatest when hormonal therapy is initiated while PSA levels are low, before clinically measurable disease becomes apparent. However, there is a cost to be paid in side effects and health care dollars when androgen deprivation is administered over prolonged periods. The nonsteroidal antiandrogen agent bicalutamide could offer PFS equivalent to that seen with castration without the complications of androgen deprivation. Observational data seem to indicate that individuals at high risk could also receive benefit from therapy administered before PSA detection. The potential opportunities for novel therapeutic agents with low associated morbidity are great.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in the treatment of prostate cancer

In 1979, the first prostate cancer patient was treated with a GnRH agonist at the Laval University Medical Center in Quebec City, Canada, thus rapidly leading to the worldwide replacement of surgical castration and high doses of estrogens. The discovery of medical castration with GnRH agonists was soon followed by fundamental changes in the endocrine therapy of prostate cancer. Most importantly, the excellent tolerance accompanying the treatment with GnRH agonists has been a key factor that permitted a series of studies demonstrating a major reduction in the death rate from prostate cancer ranging from 31 to 87% at 5 yr of follow-up in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. In fact, a one third reduction in prostate cancer deaths has been calculated in the metaanalysis of all available studies. The general acceptance of this discovery by patients and physicians is illustrated by world sales above 3.0 billion U.S. dollars in 2003. Although extremely efficient in achieving complete medical castration and well tolerated, with no other side effects than the expected hypoandrogenicity, GnRH agonists should not be administered alone. In fact, shortly after discovery of the castration effects of GnRH agonists, we observed that approximately 50% of androgens remain in the prostate after castration, thus leading to the recognition of the role of adrenal dehydroepiandrosterone as an important source of the androgens synthesized locally in the prostate and in many peripheral target tissues. We therefore developed combined androgen blockade (CAB), whereby the androgens of both testicular and adrenal origins are blocked simultaneously at start of treatment with the combination of a GnRH agonist to block the testis and a pure antiandrogen to block the action of the androgens produced locally. CAB, first used in advanced metastatic disease, has been the first treatment shown to prolong life in prostate cancer. Most interestingly, in 2002, we made the observation that CAB alone given continuously for 6.5 yr or more leads to cure of the disease in at least 90% of cases, thus suggesting that androgen blockade combining a GnRH agonist and a pure antiandrogen could well be the most efficient treatment of localized prostate cancer, and thus offering the possibility of practically eliminating death from prostate cancer.

Biochemical recurrence after definitive prostate cancer therapy. Part II: Treatment strategies for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer*

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Through the prostate-specific antigen era, the proportion of men less than 55 years old with newly diagnosed prostate cancer more than doubled to almost 15%. As increasing numbers of men are living longer with prostate cancer, larger proportions will eventually present to our collective practices with rising prostate-specific antigen levels. Such prostate-specific antigen relapses, conservatively estimated to affect approximately 50 000 men each year, have become the most common form of advanced prostate cancer in the current period.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing evidence suggests that early hormonal therapy improves progression-free survival and may alter the cancer-specific survival. However, there is a cost to pay in side-effects when androgen deprivation is administered over prolonged periods. The non-steroidal anti-androgen bicalutamide may offer an equivalent progression-free survival to castration without the complications of androgen deprivation. Observational data seem to indicate that high-risk individuals (i.e. those with high-grade, high-stage disease or a prostate-specific antigen doubling time less than 12 months) may also receive benefit from early therapy.

SUMMARY

The definition of advanced prostate cancer has changed. Multimodal therapy improves cancer-specific outcomes especially in men with high-risk disease. The potential opportunities for novel therapeutic agents with low associated morbidity are great.

Current status of endocrine therapy in localized prostate cancer: cure has become a strong possibility

It is clear that all available means should be taken to diagnose prostate cancer early and to use efficient therapy immediately in order to prevent prostate cancer from migrating to the bones where treatment becomes extremely difficult and cure or even long-term control of the disease is an exception. The only means of preventing prostate cancer from migrating to the bones and becoming incurable is efficient treatment at the localized stage of the disease. In fact, since radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy and brachytherapy can achieve cure in about 50% of cases, these approaches are all equally valid choices as first treatment of localized prostate cancer. However, in view of the current knowledge and available data, nowadays, androgen blockade should also be considered as first line treatment. While showing the high efficacy of hormonal therapy in localized prostate cancer, present knowledge clearly indicate that long-term treatment with the best available hormonal drugs, somewhat similar to the 5 years of Tamoxifen in breast cancer, is required for optimal control of prostate cancer. It is also clear from the data analyzed that combined androgen blockage alone could well be an efficient therapy of localized prostate cancer while it has already been recognized as the best therapy for metastatic disease. This paper presents and discusses the current knowledge available on the use and results of endocrine therapy in localized prostate cancer.