Salvage prostate cryoablation after primary interstitial brachytherapy failure: a feasible approach

Issues Critical to the Successful Application of Cryosurgical Ablation of the Prostate

The techniques of present-day cryosurgery performed with multiprobe freezing apparatus and advanced imaging techniques yield predictable and encouraging results in the treatment of prostatic and renal cancers. Nevertheless, and not unique to cryosurgical treatment, the rates of persistent disease demonstrate the need for improvement in technique and emphasize the need for proper management of the therapeutic margin. The causes of persistent disease often relate to a range of factors including selection of patients, understanding of the extent of the tumor, limitations of the imaging techniques, and failure to freeze the tumor periphery in an efficacious manner. Of these diverse factors, the one most readily managed, but subject to therapeutic error, is the technique of freezing the tumor and appropriate margin to a lethal temperature [Baust, J. G., Gage, A. A. The Molecular Basis of Cryosurgery. BJU Int 95, 1187–1191 (2005)]. This article describes the recent experiments that examine the molecular basis of cryosurgery, clarifies the actions of the components of the freeze-thaw cycle, and defines the resultant effect on the cryogenic lesion from a clinical perspective. Further, this review addresses the important issue of management of the margin of the tumor through adjunctive therapy. Accordingly, a goal of this review is to identify the technical and future adjunctive therapeutic practices that should improve the efficacy of cryoablative techniques for the treatment of malignant lesions.

Current salvage methods for recurrent prostate cancer after failure of primary radiotherapy

We reviewed the current salvage methods for patients with local recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy (RT), using a search of relevant Medline/PubMed articles published from 1982 to 2008, with the following search terms: 'radiorecurrent prostate cancer, local salvage treatment, salvage radical prostatectomy (RP), salvage cryoablation, salvage brachytherapy, salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)', and permutations of the above. Only articles written in English were included. The objectives of this review were to analyse the eligibility criteria for careful selection of appropriate patients and to evaluate the oncological results and complications for each method. There are four whole-gland re-treatment options (salvage RP, salvage cryoablation, salvage brachytherapy, salvage HIFU) for RT failure, although others might be in development or investigations. Salvage RP has the longest follow-up with acceptable oncological results, but it is a challenging technique with a high complication rate. Salvage cryoablation is a feasible option, especially using third-generation technology, whereby the average biochemical disease-free survival rate is 50-70% and there are fewer occurrences of severe complications such as recto-urethral fistula. Salvage brachytherapy, with short-term cancer control, is comparable to other salvage methods but depends on cumulative dosage limitation to target tissues. HIFU is a relatively recent option in the salvage setting. Both salvage brachytherapy and HIFU require more detailed studies with intermediate and long-term follow-up. As these are not prospective, randomized studies and the definitions of biochemical failure varied, there are limited comparisons among these different salvage methods, including efficacy. In the focal therapy salvage setting, the increased use of thermoablative methods for eligible patients might contribute to reducing complications and maintaining quality of life. The problem to effectively salvage patients with locally recurrent disease after RT is the lack of diagnostic examinations with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to detect local recurrence at an early curable stage. Therefore, a more strict definition of biochemical failure, improved imaging techniques, and accurate specimen mapping are needed as diagnostic tools. Furthermore, universal selection criteria and an integrated definition of biochemical failure for all salvage methods are required to determine which provides the best oncological efficacy and least comorbidity.

Energy-based ablative therapy of prostate cancer: high-intensity focused ultrasound and cryoablation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is an update on the role of the two minimally invasive techniques in primary therapy of organ-confined prostate cancer: as a salvage option after standard-therapy failure and for focal ablation of index tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Energy-based ablative techniques are of growing interest for today's heterogeneous spectrum of prostate cancer. At present, primary high-intensity focused ultrasound appears to be a valid alternative to active surveillance protocols in low-risk cancers and, in older patients, to standard therapy. Morbidity is low, although postoperative impotence occurs frequently. Cryoablation has higher morbidity, even with third-generation conformal technology. With radiorecurrent cancer the potential radiation damage of the rectal wall renders transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound more hazardous. Third-generation cryoablation seems to give better cancer control with lower morbidity in this situation. Unfortunately, long-term outcome data from controlled trials are not available.

SUMMARY

These minimally invasive techniques are not magic bullets, and patients must be informed accordingly. Focal ablation of the prostate segment with the index cancer would minimize morbidity and therefore appears highly appealing. Its success depends on correct localization of the lesion. Until this is achieved with sufficient reliability by appropriate biopsy or imaging techniques it remains strictly experimental.