Are myeloma patients with renal failure candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation?

First Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Recommendations From a Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium

The availability of effective therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) has sparked debate on the role of first line autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), particularly in standard-risk patients. However, treatment for individuals with high-risk disease continues to display suboptimal outcomes. With novel therapies used earlier, practice is changing rapidly in the field of MM. Presently, quadruplet induction therapy incorporating an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug prior to ASCT followed by maintenance therapy stands as the foremost strategy for attaining deep and sustained responses in transplant eligible MM (TEMM). This Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium (CGC) proposes consensus recommendations for the first line treatment of TEMM. To address the needs of physicians and people diagnosed with MM, this document focuses on ASCT eligibility, induction therapy, mobilization and collection, conditioning, consolidation, and maintenance therapy, as well as, high-risk populations, management of adverse events, assessment of treatment response, and monitoring for disease relapse. The CGC will periodically review the recommendations herein and update as necessary.

Modest survival benefits of autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma with renal impairment: a critical appraisal of the pre-antibody era

The benefit of high-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with renal insufficiency (RI) is debated. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of HDM-ASCT in MM patients with RIs, and the findings were compared with real-world data. The study included 26 articles, 13 of which were pooled for meta-analysis. We compared three different types of MM patients with RI against MM patients with normal renal function (NRF). These patients were: MM patients with RI at the time of transplantation; MM patients with RI at the time of diagnosis; MM patients with RI at diagnosis but with NRF at transplantation. The meta-analysis indicated that MM patients with RIs conditioned with melphalan ≤ 140 mg/m2 followed by ASCT had transplant-related mortality rates comparable to those without RIs. The complete response rates post-ASCT were similar between MM patients with RIs and those with NRF. Although progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically similar between the groups, MM patients with RIs had significantly poorer overall survival (OS) than those with NRF. The real-world data supported these findings. With a reduced dose of melphalan, ASCT is safe and effective for MM patients with RI. MM patients with RI have similar complete response rates and PFS after ASCT compared to MM patients with NRF. The lower OS in MM patients with RI indicates the need for further research to improve OS in these patients.

Comparison of Renal Function before and after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Egyptian Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Renal Insufficiency: A Retrospective Study

Renal failure is a common feature of multiple myeloma (MM) that occurs in 20%-40% of newly diagnosed patients with MM and is the result of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains. Many studies have examined the effect of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in MM patients with renal impairment and the safety of performing the transplantation in patients with renal failure. This study aimed to compare renal function before and after ASCT in Egyptian MM patients with renal insufficiency to evaluate the effect of ASCT on renal recovery. Our study included 31 MM patients with renal impairment out of 400 patients who met the criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group for symptomatic MM. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula was compared before and after the transplant. Only four patients (12.9%) were dependent on dialysis. Six of those with a history of hemodialysis (HD) who were either dependent on dialysis or dialyzed according to need achieved independence from HD. There was no significant correlation between the degree of renal impairment and the disease's status at the time of transplantation (P = 0.86). The study showed significant improvements in serum creatinine levels compared with its value before the transplant (P = 0.016) and in eGFR (P = 0.004). In total, 45% of patients achieved renal improvement, shown by a 25% increase in GFR above the baseline. There was a significant improvement of renal function after ASCT in MM patients with renal impairment.

Impact of timing of stem cell return following high dose melphalan in multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: a single center experience

High dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard consolidation in transplant eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The timing between HDM administration and hematopoietic stem cell return (HSCR) varies among institutions, with a 'rest period' of 48 hours (h) employed by some for patients with renal impairment (RI). We investigated the differences in hematopoietic recovery and HDM toxicity between MM patients with RI who had HSCR after 24 vs 48 h from HDM. Fifty MM patients with RI (48 h group; n = 31 and 24 h group; n = 19) were included. No statistically significant differences were noted in surrogates for hematopoietic recovery and HDM toxicity between both groups. Only one death occurred in the 24 h group. No patients required renal replacement therapy. Therefore, a 24 h period between HDM and AHSC infusion appears safe for MM patients with RI.

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: Multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a hemato-nephrological term referring to a heterogeneous group of kidney disorders characterized by direct or indirect kidney injury caused by a monoclonal immunoglobulin (MIg) produced by a B cell or plasma cell clone that does not meet current hematologic criteria for therapy. MGRS-associated kidney diseases are diverse and can result in the development of end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The diagnosis is typically made by nephrologists through a kidney biopsy. Many distinct pathologies have been identified and they are classified based on the site or composition of the deposited Mig, or according to histological and ultrastructural findings. Therapy is directed towards the identified underlying clonal population and treatment decisions should be coordinated between hematologists and nephrologists in a multidisciplinary fashion, depend on the type of MGRS, the degree of kidney function impairment and the risk of progression to ESKD.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma patients with chronic kidney disease: a safe and effective option

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a frequent complication in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with adverse outcomes. The use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has improved disease outcomes, however, the safety and efficacy of ASCT in patients with CKD has been the subject of debate. To investigate this, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 370 MM patients who underwent their first ASCT, including those with mild, moderate and severe CKD as well as normal renal function at the time of transplant. No significant difference in ASCT-related mortality, Progression-Free or Overall Survival was noted between the different renal function groups. A decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1-year of >8.79% was associated with poorer overall survival (p < 0.001). The results of this study show that ASCT is a safe and effective option for myeloma patients with CKD, including those on dialysis. Patients who demonstrate renal deterioration at 1-year post-transplant should be closely monitored as this is a predictor for poor survival.

Impact of autologous stem cell transplantation on long term renal function and associated progression-free and overall survival in multiple myeloma

The long-term impact of Autologous hematopietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on renal function, and the impact of renal function on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with multiple myeloma are not known. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 885 patients at our institution. We used linear mixed effect models to study the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and a joint model approach to assess associations between the eGFR, PFS and OS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted at days 0, 100, 180, and 365 post-SCT. eGFR post-ASCT was significantly lower than at day 0 but stabilized at approximately 80 mL/min/1.73 m2. There was no association between eGFR and PFS or OS.; However, relapsed disease and ISS stage were associated with shorter PFS and OS. This data suggests that although there is a modest decline in eGFR post-ASCT, it is not associated with an adverse impact on PFS or OS. KEY POINTS Advanced MM stage at diagnosis was associated with reduced eGFR at all stages of chronic kidney disease. eGFR was not associated with PFS or OS in any of the analyses, but disease-related factors prior to ASCT were all associated with reduced eGFR, PFS and OS. ASCT did not adversely impact kidney function and mitigated the risk of CKD on outcomes in MM.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma with Renal Failure: Friend or Foe?

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM), but the clinical response and renal curative effect in MM patients with renal failure (RF) remain controversial. The myeloma kidney disease has different types, and most are due to the direct toxic effects of light chain. Although ASCT can effectively clear the light chain, the data of renal function improvement are still limited. We reviewed the published literatures, focusing on the prospective studies, the retrospective analysis studies, and the case reports. RF patients who received ASCT displayed a low survival rate (OS: HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.020 to 3.720; I² = 64.9%, P = 0.014) and a shorter EFS/PFS (EFS/PFS: HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.090 to 2.140; I² = 0%, P = 0.669). However, ASCT was feasible and could have the similar clinical response outcomes compared with the normal renal function (CR: OR 1.013, 95% CI 0.569 to 1.804; I² = 48.5%, P = 0.101; PR: OR 1.013, 95% CI 0.342 to 1.226; I² = 46.3%, P = 0.144). Moreover, MM with RF after ASCT had a good improvement of renal function and melphalan is still an important factor affecting the treatment of ASCT.

Induction Therapy with Novel Agents and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Overcomes the Adverse Impact of Renal Impairment in Multiple Myeloma

We investigated the impact of renal impairment (RI) on the outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) patients following induction and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Among 349 patients who received a first ASCT for MM, 86 (24.6%) had RI at diagnosis, defined as estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m² according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. Post induction reversal of renal function occurred in 68 (79%) patients including complete renal response in 37.2%. Two hundred and fifty-one patients had received novel agents for induction; posttransplant complete response (CR) rates were 71.4% for patients with renal impairment (RI) versus 67.2% in those without RI, p = 0.23. The quality of stem cell collection and days to engraftment were similar except that patients with RI required higher transfusion numbers of packed red cells (p < 0.002) and platelets (p < 0.007). The median overall survival (OS) was 96 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.80–119.20) for patients with eGFR ≥40 mL/min, n = 195) versus 62 months (95% CI 28.7–95.3) for 56 patients with RI (eGFR <40 mL/min), p = 0.15. The 5-year OS was 64.6% versus 54.4%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 52 months (95% CI 36.3–67.7) for patients with eGFR ≥40 mL/min versus “not reached” for those with eGFR <40 mL/min p = 0.87; and the 5-year PFS was 48.1% versus 51%, respectively. We conclude that induction with novel agents results in reversal of renal dysfunction in the majority of patients. Consolidation with Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) overcomes the adverse impact of RI on survival.

Impact of renal impairment on outcomes after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study

Background

Renal impairment (RI) is a negative prognostic factor in Multiple Myeloma (MM) and affected patients are often excluded from autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, it remains unclear whether historically inferior outcome data still hold true.

Methods

From a total of 475 eligible MM patients who had undergone ASCT between 1998 and 2016, 374 were included in this multi-centric retrospective cohort study. Renal function was determined both at the time of MM diagnosis and ASCT by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR according to the MDRD formula, RI defined as eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m²). Patients were categorized into 3 groups: A) no RI diagnosis and ASCT, B) RI at diagnosis with normalization before ASCT and C) RI both at the time of diagnosis and ASCT. Log-rank testing was used for overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) analysis.

Conclusion

While severe RI at MM diagnosis confers a risk of shorter OS, MM progression after ASCT is not affected by any stage of renal failure. It can be concluded that ASCT can be safely carried out in MM patients with mild to moderate RI and should be pro-actively considered in those with severe RI.

Results

When comparing all groups, no difference in OS and PFS was found (p = 0.319 and p = 0.904). After further stratification according to the degree of RI at the time of diagnosis, an OS disadvantage was detected for patients with an eGFR < 45 ml/min/m². PFS was not affected by any RI stage.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4926-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The treatment of paraprotein-related kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myeloma kidney and amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis remain the principal kidney complications of paraproteins. In this review, we update readers to many of the recent advances which have occurred in the care and outcomes for patients with these presentations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Myeloma kidney has historically caused a severe acute kidney injury with very poor outcomes. The combination of new diagnostic techniques, enabling a rapid diagnosis and novel chemotherapy agents has transformed these poor outcomes for the better. Two multicentre randomized controlled trials have recently evaluated if the removal of free light chains by high cut-off haemodialysis improves renal outcomes beyond effective chemotherapy alone. Although we await the full articles of these studies to be published, abstracts suggested the studies will have contradictory primary results. In the field of AL amyloidosis, there are now novel criteria for the risk stratification of kidney outcomes which can be used in combination with markers of early kidney response to provide clinicians with powerful tools to guide patient discussions.

SUMMARY

Across both AL amyloidosis and myeloma kidney patient outcomes continue to improve. Principally this improvement has been driven by the continuing development of novel chemotherapy agents in this field.

Multiple myeloma treatment at relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation: A practical analysis

Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in the field of multiple myeloma. Introduction of the so-called novel agents, proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), and improved supportive care have resulted in significantly better outcome. Standard first line treatment in fit patients include PI and IMiD based induction, high dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and consolidation/maintenance. However, despite these progresses MM remains incurable for the majority of patients and most patients will relapse. Next generation PI (carfilzomib, ixazomib) and IMiD (pomalidomide) and new therapeutic classes: monoclonal antibody (elotuzumab, daratumumab) and pan-deacetylase inhibitors (panobinostat) have been successfully evaluated in relapse multiple myeloma. Some of these new agents are now approved for multiple myeloma treatment at relapse. However choosing the most appropriate treatment at relapse may be difficult. This review sum up the most important studies and provide evidence to choose the most relevant therapeutic strategy for relapse after ASCT, based on disease, patient and previous treatment related parameters.

Current treatments for renal failure due to multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Renal impairment (RI) is one of the most common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). RI is present in almost 20% of MM patients at diagnosis and in 40%-50% of patients during the course of their disease. Areas covered: Biology along with tools for diagnosis and management of RI are reported in this paper. Papers published in PubMed and reported abstracts up to May 2016 were used. Expert opinion: Moderate and severe RI increases the risk of early death; thus rapid intervention and initiation of anti-myeloma treatment is essential and improves renal outcomes in RI patients. Bortezomib and dexamethasone triplet combinations are the current standard of therapy for MM patients with acute kidney injury due to cast nephropathy; they offer high rates of both anti-myeloma response and renal recovery. Thalidomide and lenalidomide may be used in bortezomib refractory patients. In the relapsed/refractory setting additional treatment options such as carfilzomib, pomalidomide and monoclonal antibodies are available; however, there is limited data for their effects on patients with RI. High dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered in otherwise eligible patients with RI. Finally, high cut-off hemodialysis membranes do not seem to offer significant additive effects on anti-myeloma therapies.

Managing renal complications in multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

About 20-40% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will present with some degree of renal impairment (RI) and about 25% of patients will experience RI at later disease stages. Patients with MM and RI have poorer overall survival and are at higher risk of early death.

AREAS COVERED

The mechanisms of acute renal damage in MM are covered and the issues around diagnosis and renal evaluation response are discussed. The importance of optimal supportive care is stressed and the role and effectiveness of different anti-myeloma agents covered including the role of high cut-off hemodialysis, autologous stem cell transplantation and kidney transplant. Expert commentary: Outcomes of patients with RI and rates of renal recovery have improved with the use of novel anti-myeloma agents. Bortezomib-dexamethasone backbone regimes (±third agent) are the current first choice in newly diagnosed patients. In relapsed/refractory disease additional treatment options include newer novel agents.

International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Myeloma-Related Renal Impairment

Purpose

The aim of the International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practical recommendations for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma–related renal impairment (RI).

Methods

Recommendations were based on published data through December 2015, and were developed using the system developed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group.

Recommendations

All patients with myeloma at diagnosis and at disease assessment should have serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and electrolytes measurements as well as free light chain, if available, and urine electrophoresis of a sample from a 24-hour urine collection (grade A). The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, preferably, or the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula should be used for the evaluation of estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with stabilized serum creatinine (grade A). International Myeloma Working Group criteria for renal reversibility should be used (grade B). For the management of RI in patients with multiple myeloma, high fluid intake is indicated along with antimyeloma therapy (grade B). The use of high-cutoff hemodialysis membranes in combination with antimyeloma therapy can be considered (grade B). Bortezomib-based regimens remain the cornerstone of the management of myeloma-related RI (grade A). High-dose dexamethasone should be administered at least for the first month of therapy (grade B). Thalidomide is effective in patients with myeloma with RI, and no dose modifications are needed (grade B). Lenalidomide is effective and safe, mainly in patients with mild to moderate RI (grade B); for patients with severe RI or on dialysis, lenalidomide should be given with close monitoring for hematologic toxicity (grade B) with dose reduction as needed. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (with melphalan 100 mg/m2 to 140 mg/m2) is feasible in patients with RI (grade C). Carfilzomib can be safely administered to patients with creatinine clearance > 15 mL/min, whereas ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone can be safely administered to patients with creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min (grade A).

Optimizing the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment

Renal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma. It is found in about 20% to 25% of patients at diagnosis and in ≤ 50% at some point during the disease course. The presence of renal insufficiency diminishes patients' quality of life and has been associated with increased mortality, although the outcomes of patients after successful induction therapy have been comparable to those with normal renal function. Therefore, the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment is a major challenge and should aim to achieve remission in a large proportion of patients. New drugs introduced to treat multiple myeloma during the past decade have an established place in the treatment of patients with renal failure. Bortezomib appears to be most beneficial in this setting and, combined with other drugs, provides a chance for rapid remission and related improvement of renal function. Immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide and lenalidomide have also been used successfully in patients with renal insufficiency, although for the latter drug appropriate dose adjustments are necessary. The presence of renal failure is not a contraindication to autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients eligible for this procedure. Among the classic cytotoxic agents, bendamustine, in particular, should be considered for patients with renal insufficiency. Appropriate supportive care is also extremely important in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and renal failure. It can include plasmapheresis and removal of free light chains with high cut-off hemodialysis, adapted dosages of bisphosphonates, and avoidance of drugs and conditions that can impair renal function.

How I treat monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS)

Recently, the term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) was introduced to distinguish monoclonal gammopathies that result in the development of kidney disease from those that are benign. By definition, patients with MGRS have B-cell clones that do not meet the definition of multiple myeloma or lymphoma. Nevertheless, these clones produce monoclonal proteins that are capable of injuring the kidney resulting in permanent damage. Except for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis with heart involvement in which death can be rapid, treatment of MGRS is often indicated more to preserve kidney function and prevent recurrence after kidney transplantation rather than the prolongation of life. Clinical trials are rare for MGRS-related kidney diseases, except in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis. Treatment recommendations are therefore based on the clinical data obtained from treatment of the clonal disorder in its malignant state. The establishment of these treatment recommendations is important until data can be obtained by clinical trials of MGRS-related kidney diseases.

Bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation overcomes the negative prognostic impact of renal impairment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a subgroup analysis from the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial

Renal impairment is frequent in patients with multiple myeloma and is correlated with an inferior prognosis. This analysis evaluates the prognostic role of renal impairment in patients with myeloma treated with bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation within a prospective randomized phase III trial. Eight hundred and twenty-seven newly diagnosed myeloma patients in the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial were randomized to receive three cycles of vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) or bortezomib, adriamycin, dexamethasone (PAD) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and maintenance with thalidomide 50 mg daily (VAD-arm) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (PAD-arm). Baseline serum creatinine was less than 2 mg/dL (Durie-Salmon-stage A) in 746 patients and 2 mg/dL or higher (stage B) in 81. In myeloma patients with a baseline creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL the renal response rate was 63% in the VAD-arm and 81% in the PAD-arm (P=0.31). The overall myeloma response rate was 64% in the VAD-arm versus 89% in the PAD-arm with 13% complete responses in the VAD-arm versus 36% in the PAD-arm (P=0.01). Overall survival at 3 years for patients with a baseline creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL was 34% in the VAD-arm versus 74% in the PAD-arm (P<0.001) with a progression-free survival rate at 3 years of 16% in the VAD-arm versus 48% in the PAD-arm (P=0.004). Overall and progression-free survival rates in the PAD-arm were similar in patients with a baseline creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL or <2 mg/dL. We conclude that a bortezomib-containing treatment before and after autologous stem cell transplantation overcomes the negative prognostic impact of renal impairment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR213 and at www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN 64455289.

Melphalan 180 mg/m2 can be safely administered as conditioning regimen before an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma patients with creatinine clearance 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or lower with use of palifermin for cytoprotection: results of a phase I trial

High-dose melphalan 140 mg/m2 is the standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with renal insufficiency (RI). Palifermin as a cytoprotective agent has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the intensity and duration of oral mucositis (OM) in patients who receive intensive chemotherapy/radiotherapy. There is no prospective data on the use of palifermin in patients with MM with RI.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

creatinine clearance ≤60 mL/minute/1.73 m2, age >18 years, no dialysis, no active OM, and a suitable candidate for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Melphalan dose ranged from 140 to 200 mg/m2 and escalated at the increment of 20 mg/m2. Six dosages of palifermin 60 mcg/kg/day were given intravenously between day -5 to day +3. Dose escalations were to stop if dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred at melphalan dose in ≥2 of 3 patients, with that dose declared as the maximal administered dose and the level below where ≤1 of 6 patients had DLTs was considered the maximally tolerated dose (MTD). Nineteen patients were enrolled from June 2007 to June 2011. Data on 15 evaluable patients is reported as 4 patients were removed. Median age was 59 years (range, 36-67 years). The overall incidence of OM ≥ grade 3 was 53% (8 of 15) and a median duration of ≥grade 3 OM was 6.5 days (range, 3-42 days). One patient in L2 (melphalan 160 mg/m2) developed atrial fibrillation on day +9. Two patients in L4 (melphalan 200 mg/m2) developed grade 4 OM, hence reaching DLT. No DLT was observed in 6 patients enrolled in L3 (melphalan 180 mg/m2). Palifermin has permitted safe dose escalation of melphalan up to 180 mg/m(2) in patients with RI.

Novel approaches for reducing free light chains in patients with myeloma kidney

Myeloma kidney is a tubulointerstitial pathology that accounts for approximately 80-90% of severe acute kidney injury in patients with multiple myeloma. Unless there is rapid intervention, progressive irreversible damage from interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy occurs. Work over the past decade has demonstrated that an early sustained reduction in serum concentrations of pathogenic monoclonal free light chains (FLCs) leads to improved renal recovery rates. In turn, an early improvement in renal function is associated with improved patient survival. An early reduction in FLC levels should therefore become standard of care, although the optimum mechanisms to achieve this depletion of FLCs remain to be determined. To provide a coordinated, cross-disciplinary approach to research in this disease, the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group was formed. In this Review, we address the current state of knowledge in the management of myeloma kidney.

Novel therapeutic agents for the management of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment

Renal impairment is a major complication of multiple myeloma. Patients presenting with severe renal impairment represent a greater therapeutic challenge and generally have poorer outcome. However, once patients with renal impairment achieve remission, their outcomes are comparable with those of patients without renal impairment. Therapies that offer substantial activity in this setting are needed. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide have substantially improved the survival of patients with multiple myeloma. Here we review the pharmacokinetics, activity, and safety of these agents in patients with renal impairment. Bortezomib can be administered at the full approved dose and schedule in renally impaired patients; similarly, no dose reductions are required with thalidomide. The pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide is affected by its renal route of excretion, and dose adjustments are recommended for moderate/severe impairment. Substantial evidence has emerged showing that these novel agents improve outcomes of patients with renal impairment, including impairment reversal. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide (at the recommended doses) are active options for patients with mild to moderate impairment, although limited data are available for thalidomide. Information on lenalidomide-based combinations is still emerging, but the available data indicate considerable activity. Substantial evidence indicates that bortezomib-high-dose dexamethasone with or without a third drug (e.g., cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, or doxorubicin) is an appropriate option for patients with any degree of renal impairment.

Long-term reversibility of renal dysfunction associated to light chain deposition disease with bortezomib and dexamethasone and high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation

A 63-year-old woman presented with progressive renal insufficiency, until a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 12 mL/min. A renal biopsy demonstrated glomerular deposition of immunoglobulin κlight chain. The presence of a small population of monoclonal plasmacytes producing an only light κmonoclonal component was demonstrated and Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (BD) was provided as initial therapy. After seven courses of therapy, renal function improved without dialysis requirements up to a GFR 31 mL/min. Under hematological complete response (HCR) the patient underwent high dose of melphalan (HDM) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Fifty-four months later the patient remains in HCR and the GFR has progressively improved up to 48 mL/min. This report describes a notably renal function improvement in a patient with Light Chain Deposition Disease after therapy with BD followed by HDM, which can support this treatment as a future option for these patients.

Evolving role of high dose stem cell therapy in multiple myeloma

Conventional chemotherapy has been used in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However the development of autologous stem cell transplant represented a major advance in its therapy. Complete response (CR) rates to the tune of 40-45% were seen and this translated into improvements in progression-free survival and also overall survival in some studies. As a result the autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) is the standard of care in eligible patients and can be carried out with low treatment-related mortality. Allogenic transplant carries the potential for cure but the high mortality associated with the myeloablative transplant has made it unpopular. Reduced Intensity Stem Cell Transplants (RIST) have been tried with varying success but with a high degree of morbidity as compared to the ASCT. Introduction of newer agents like thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib and liposomal doxorubicin into the induction regimens has resulted in higher CR and very good partial response rates (VGPR) as well as improvement in ease of administration. These drugs have also proved useful in patients with adverse cytogenetics. Recent trials suggest that this has translated into improvements in response rates post-ASCT. There is a suggestion that patients achieving CR/nCR or VGPR after induction therapy should be placed on maintenance and ASCT then could be used as a treatment strategy at relapse. All these trends however await confirmation from further trials. Tandem transplants have been used to augment the results obtained with ASCT and have demonstrated their utility in patients who achieved only a partial response or stable disease in response to the first transplant as well as patients with adverse cytogenetics. Incorporation of bortezomib along with melphalan into the conditioning regimen has also been tried. RIST following ASCT has been tried with varying success but does not offer any major advantage over ASCT and is associated with higher morbidity. It is hoped that recent advances in therapy will contribute greatly to improved survival.

[New insights in the treatment of myeloma with renal failure]

Renal failure, mostly related to myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN), is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM), which occurs in up to 50% of patients during the course of the disease. Persistent renal failure in MM is associated with poor survival. Treatment of MCN relies on urgent symptomatic measures (alkalinisation, rehydration, correction of hypercalcemia, and withdrawal of nephrotoxic drugs), with rapid introduction of chemotherapy to efficiently reduce the production of monoclonal light chains (LC). Recent studies suggest that, in patients with MM and severe renal failure due to MCN, rapid removal of circulating LC, through intensive hemodialysis sessions using a new generation high cut-off dialysis membrane, might result in dialysis withdrawal in most patients. If the development of intensive therapy and new efficient chemotherapy agents (thalidomide, bortezomib, lenalidomide) has transformed the care and prognosis of MM, the modalities and safety of these therapeutic regimens in patients with renal failure remain to be defined. The association of bortezomib with dexamethasone should be considered currently as first-line treatment in patients with MM and impaired renal function.

Plerixafor Dosing and Administration in a Patient with Dialysis-Dependent Renal Failure

Objective:

To report on the use of plerixafor in a patient with multiple myeloma and dialysis-dependent renal failure.

Case Summary:

A 38-year-old man with multiple myeloma and dialysis-dependent renal failure was evaluated for stem cell transplantation. Stem cell mobilization with 6 doses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 μg/kg/day yielded an inadequate maximum pre-apheresis CD34+ count of 5.6 cells/μL. The patient was treated with a postdialysis subcutaneous dose of plerixafor 160 μg/kg after 4 days of G-CSF therapy. After a single dose of plerixafor, the patient's pre-apheresis CD34+ count was 125.6 cells/μL. After 1 apheresis session, the stem cell collection yield was 5.33 × 105 CD34+ cells/kg. There were no observed plerixafor toxicities. The patient underwent successful autologous stem cell transplantation. Times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 12 and 15 days, respectively. At 100-day follow-up, the patient's myeloma was in remission and he met all criteria for durable engraftment.

Discussion:

Renal impairment is a common comorbidity in patients with multiple myeloma. Plerixafor is a chemokine receptor 4 antagonist approved for use to mobilize stem cells for collection and subsequent autologous transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. To date, there is limited information on safe and effective dosing and administration of plerixafor in patients who are dialysis-dependent. This report describes the use of plerixafor in a patient with multiple myeloma and dialysis-dependent renal failure.

Conclusions:

Based on our experience, we are instituting a policy to administer plerixafor at Food and Drug Administration–approved renal adjustment doses in patients on hemodialysis, with dialysis sessions scheduled prior to plerixafor administration and repeated as necessary after apheresis and prior to subsequent plerixafor doses. If clinically feasible, dialysis should be held during the days required to collect stem cells.

Renal Impairment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group

Renal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula is the recommended method for the assessment of renal function in patients with MM with stabilized serum creatinine. In acute renal injury, the RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney disease) and Acute Renal Injury Network criteria seem to be appropriate to define the severity of renal impairment. Novel criteria based on eGFR measurements are recommended for the definition of the reversibility of renal impairment. Rapid intervention to reverse renal dysfunction is critical for the management of these patients, especially for those with light chain cast nephropathy. Bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone is considered as the treatment of choice for such patients. There is limited experience with thalidomide in patients with myeloma with renal impairment. Thus, thalidomide can be carefully administered, mainly in the context of well-designed clinical trials, to evaluate if it can improve the rapidity and probability of response that is produced by the combination with bortezomib and high-dose dexamethasone. Lenalidomide is effective in this setting and can reverse renal insufficiency in a significant subset of patients, when it is given at reduced doses, according to renal function. The role of plasma exchange in patients with suspected light chain cast nephropathy and renal impairment is controversial. High-dose melphalan (140 mg/m2) and autologous stem-cell transplantation should be limited to younger patients with chemosensitive disease.

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in Taiwan: the evolution of therapy, stem cell transplantation and new treatment agents

Multiple myeloma is a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia with clinical heterogeneity. As of now, two key questions need to be answered before starting to treat a newly diagnosed myeloma patient. One is whether the patient is a candidate for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support and the other is risk stratification. As novel therapeutics have emerged, it is increasingly important to introduce a risk-adapted approach. The heterogeneity of the disease is established, for the most part, by disease biology, predominantly genetics. Cytogenetic analysis by either banding technique or fluorescent in situ hybridization is able to identify high-risk subpopulations. The new international staging system based on beta2-microglobulin and albumin levels in serum is also very helpful in defining the high-risk group (stage 3). This group of patients may not respond well to high-dose chemotherapy and require early introduction of newer treatments such as the bortezomib-containing regimen. The main factor in determining the eligibility for stem cell transplants is age. Based on the current literature and situation in Taiwan, we suggest stem cell transplantation if the patient is younger than 55 years of age. Each case should be considered individually if the age of the patient is between 55 and 70 years. Finally, we have also reviewed the status and the treatment of multiple myeloma in Taiwan. Fortunately, there has been an improvement in awareness, diagnosis and treatment. Cytogenetic studies have been applied in risk evaluations, but are limited in a few centers due to lack of availability. With the exception of the agent lenalidomide, new novel agents are available for treating of myeloma in Taiwan.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may reverse renal failure in patients with multiple myeloma

Approximately 20% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have renal failure at diagnosis, and about 5% are dialysis-dependent. Many of these patients are considered ineligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) because of a high risk of treatment-related toxicity. We evaluated the outcome of 46 patient with MM and renal failure, defined as serum creatinine >2 mg/dL sustained for >1 month before the start of preparative regimen. Patients received auto-HSCT at our institution between September 1997 and September 2006. Median serum creatinine and creatinine clearance (CrCl) at auto-HSCT were 2.9 mg/dL (range: 2.0-12.5) and 33 mL/min (range: 8.7-63), respectively. Ten patients (21%) were dialysis-dependent. Median follow-up in surviving patients was 34 months (range: 5-81). Complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) after auto-HSCT were seen in 9 (22%) and 22 (53%) of the 41 evaluable patients, with an overall response rate of 75%. Two patients (4%) died within 100 days of auto-HSCT. Grade 2-4 nonhematologic adverse events were seen in 18 patients (39%) and included cardiac arrythmias, pulmonary edema, and hyperbilirubinemia. Significant improvement in renal function, defined as an increase in flomerular filtration rate (GFR) by 25% above baseline, was seen in 15 patients (32%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 36% and 64%, respectively. In conclusion, auto HSCT can be offered to patients with MM and renal failure with acceptable toxicity and with a significant improvement in renal function in approximately one-third of the transplanted patients. In this analysis, a melphalan (Mel) dose of 200 mg/m(2) was not associated with an increase in toxicity or nonrelapse (Mel) mortality (NRM).

Detection of renal impairment as one specific comorbidity factor in multiple myeloma: multicenter study in 198 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVES

Comorbidity factors have been reported in cancer patients to predict progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Renal impairment (RI) is postulated as one negative prognostic factor in multiple myeloma (MM). The study aim was to detect the best way to define RI and the impact of different RI stages on MM outcome.

METHODS

In this multicenter analysis, we determined RI [serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault] and other prognostic factors in 198 MM patients to ascertain their value on PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Median serum creatinine was 0.9 mg/dL in all patients, whereas the eGFR - being decreased with a median of 80 mL/min/1.73 m(2)- allowed to detect early stages of RI. Via univariate analysis, we observed increasing hazard ratios (HRs) for impaired OS with deteriorating eGFR: with eGFR(MDRD)<90 and <30, HRs were 1.3 and 2.9, respectively. Multivariate analysis determined RI with eGFR<30 and <50 as well as age >59 yr as most important variables for OS. By incorporating eGFR<30 as the most relevant factor determined via multivariate analysis and beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)-MG) in a novel MM-risk score, we identified patients with significantly differing OS: median survival with 0, 1 or 2 risk factors were 71, 48, and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that RI is frequent in MM, best detected via eGFR determination and an important prognostic factor. eGFR in combination with beta(2)-MG allows definitive risk stratification with largely differing survival in MM.

Chronic kidney disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review

Advances in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have broadened its indications for use and resulted in more long-term HCT survivors. Some survivors develop chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the incidence and risk factors are unclear. We performed a systematic review of studies identified from databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index), conference abstracts and reference lists from selected manuscripts. From 927 manuscripts, 28 patient cohorts were identified in which 9317 adults and children underwent HCT and 7317 (79%) survived to at least 100 days, permitting inclusion of 5337 (73% of survivors) in quantitative analyses. Although definitions and measurements varied widely, approximately 16.6% of HCT patients developed CKD and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m(2)) decreased by 24.5 after 24 months. This decrease was greater amongst patients undergoing allogeneic HCT (DeltaeGFR = -40.0 versus -18.6 for autologous transplants). Several commonly reported risk factors for CKD were investigated, including acute renal failure, total body irradiation, graft versus host disease and long-term cyclosporine use. In conclusion, CKD following HCT is likely to be common; however, prospective studies with uniform definitions of CKD and risk factors are needed to confirm these findings and better define the underlying mechanisms to promote therapies that prevent this complication.

Pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure in multiple myeloma

Renal failure is a frequent complication in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) that causes significant morbidity. In the majority of cases, renal impairment is caused by the accumulation and precipitation of light chains, which form casts in the distal tubules, resulting in renal obstruction. In addition, myeloma light chains are also directly toxic on proximal renal tubules, further adding to renal dysfunction. Adequate hydration, correction of hypercalcemia and hyperuricemia and antimyeloma therapy should be initiated promptly. Recovery of renal function has been reported in a significant proportion of patients treated with conventional chemotherapy, especially when high-dose dexamethasone is also used. Severe renal impairment and large amount of proteinuria are associated with a lower probability of renal recovery. Novel agents, such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide, have significant activity in pretreated and untreated MM patients. Although there is limited experience with thalidomide and lenalidomide in patients with renal failure, data suggest that bortezomib may be beneficial in this population. Clinical studies that have included newly diagnosed and refractory patients indicate that bortezomib-based regimens may result in rapid reversal of renal failure in up to 50% of patients and that full doses of bortezomib can be administered without additional toxicity.

Role of stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) was introduced in the treatment of multiple myeloma in the 1980s. In the autologous setting, the use of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow has markedly improved feasibility. In fit patients who have normal renal function and are younger than 65 years of age, randomized studies have shown the superiority of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) compared with conventional chemotherapy. ASCT is now considered the standard of care in this population of patients. It is currently challenged, however, by the introduction of novel agents, such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide. The role of allogenic SCT remains controversial, even with reduced intensity conditionings. Prospective studies still are needed to evaluate the impact of both autologous and allogeneic SCT in this new era.

Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with renal impairment: results from the APEX phase 3 study

Renal impairment is associated with poor prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM). This subgroup analysis of the phase 3 Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions (APEX) study of bortezomib vs high-dose dexamethasone assessed efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed MM with varying degrees of renal impairment (creatinine clearance (CrCl) <30, 30-50, 51-80 and >80 ml min(-1)). Time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and safety were compared between subgroups with CrCl < or =50 ml min(-1) (severe-to-moderate) and >50 ml min(-1) (no/mild impairment). Response rates with bortezomib were similar (36-47%) and time to response rapid (0.7-1.6 months) across subgroups. Although the trend was toward shorter TTP/OS in bortezomib patients with severe-to-moderate vs no/mild impairment, differences were not significant. OS was significantly shorter in dexamethasone patients with CrCl < or =50 vs >50 ml min(-1) (P=0.003), indicating that bortezomib is more effective than dexamethasone in overcoming the detrimental effect of renal impairment. Safety profile of bortezomib was comparable between subgroups. With dexamethasone, grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and discontinuations for AEs were significantly elevated in patients with CrCl < or =50 vs >50 ml min(-1). These results indicate that bortezomib is active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed MM with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. Efficacy/safety were not substantially affected by severe-to-moderate vs no/mild impairment.

Melphalan: old and new uses of a still master drug for multiple myeloma

The treatment of multiple myeloma has seen significant changes from the initial use of melphalan to the introduction of stem cell transplantation and, most recently, to the era of novel targeted agents. Melphalan still remains as a reference drug for combination regimens, including emerging newer therapeutic options, either used at a standard dose for initial or salvage treatments in patients who are not eligible for more intensive therapies, or in conjunction with new molecules within high-dose chemotherapy programs. In this review, the authors analyze old and novel regimens, including melphalan for the treatment of newly diagnosed or relapsed/resistant patients with multiple myeloma in the clinical settings of standard chemotherapy, as well as autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Melphalan and its role in the management of patients with multiple myeloma

Melphalan is an alkylating agent approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and ovarian cancer. The combination of oral melphalan and prednisone was first introduced in the 1960s and remains the standard therapy for elderly multiple myeloma patients. High-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell support became the standard treatment for younger patients since the 1990s. The occurrence of drug resistance is the major limiting factor for the long-term success of this therapy, and relapse always occurs. In recent years, advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of myeloma and the mechanism of drug resistance have led to the development of novel targeted therapies that are able to overcome resistance and show additive or synergistic effects with melphalan. Thalidomide, its immunomodulatory derivative lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, in combination with oral melphalan in the elderly and with intravenous melphalan in younger patients, are changing the traditional treatment paradigm of multiple myeloma.

Clinical Impact of Bortezomib in Frontline Regimens for Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Standard frontline therapy for multiple myeloma comprises cytoreductive therapy with or without consolidative high-dose therapy plus stem cell transplantation (HDT-SCT). Despite therapeutic advances, the disease remains incurable; most patients relapse following frontline treatment and die within 5 years of diagnosis. New options are required to enhance and prolong response, and improve survival, particularly for elderly patients and those with renal dysfunction. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the ability of bortezomib to enhance the activity of commonly used myeloma agents, an observation validated through clinical studies in both the relapsed and frontline settings. This review focuses on the growing body of clinical evidence showing the effectiveness of bortezomib and bortezomib-based combinations in newly diagnosed patients, characterized by high overall response rates and consistently high rates of complete response. A number of studies incorporating bortezomib as part of induction therapy have demonstrated no adverse impact of bortezomib on stem cell harvest and engraftment in patients proceeding to transplantation. The higher rates of complete response typically associated with bortezomib treatment may potentially improve clinical outcomes in this setting. Final results from ongoing phase III studies of bortezomib-based combinations versus standard regimens will help define the optimal use of bortezomib as a standard component of frontline therapy for multiple myeloma. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Current Standards for First-Line Therapy of Multiple Myeloma

Current standards of care for first-line treatment of multiple myeloma are evolving rapidly because of the introduction of regimens based on novel agents with unique mechanisms of action: the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide. These regimens are becoming increasingly widely used, offering substantially greater benefit to patients in terms of higher response rates and, more importantly, prolonged response durations and survival compared with established standard first-line treatment strategies. A notable aspect of many of these emerging treatment options is the very high rates of complete response (CR) reported, previously only seen with transplantation-based strategies. Achievement of CR is prognostic for improved overall survival; therefore, the higher rates and quality of responses seen with the new regimens might substantially improve patient outcomes versus established standards of care. For example, addition of each of the 3 novel agents to melphalan/prednisone results in higher overall response rates and CR rates, as well as prolonged progression-free and overall survival, compared with melphalan/prednisone alone. Similar substantial improvements in response are seen with addition of the 3 agents to single-agent dexamethasone and the use of bortezomib or thalidomide in VAD (vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone)-like regimens, as induction therapies before stem cell transplantation and in patients not proceeding to transplantation. Ultimately, these novel regimens might obviate the need for stem cell transplantation in a sizeable proportion of patients. The emergence of these new therapeutic options appears likely to significantly alter the first-line treatment paradigm for patients with multiple myeloma.

Role of autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to improve survival in patients with multiple myeloma in randomized trials and is the standard of care for eligible patients. Recent randomized trials suggest a survival benefit with tandem ASCT, notably for patients failing to achieve a very good response to initial transplantation. Other randomized trials, as well as smaller phase II trials and retrospective studies, have allowed us to improve the process of ASCT in terms of the stem cell collection, conditioning regimens, and extension of the therapy to a wider patient population. The introduction of thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib have changed the paradigm for treatment of myeloma and significantly improved the outcome for these patients. The role of ASCT will clearly be redefined in the coming years with improvements in other therapies.