Detection of BRAF mutation in Chinese tumor patients using a highly sensitive antibody immunohistochemistry assay

The rapidly changing field of predictive biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide in both men and women, however mortality in the US and EU are recently declining in parallel with the gradual cut of smoking prevalence. Consequently, the relative frequency of adenocarcinoma increased while that of squamous and small cell carcinomas declined. During the last two decades a plethora of targeted drug therapies have appeared for the treatment of metastasizing non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Personalized oncology aims to precisely match patients to treatments with the highest potential of success. Extensive research is done to introduce biomarkers which can predict the effectiveness of a specific targeted therapeutic approach. The EGFR signaling pathway includes several sufficient targets for the treatment of human cancers including NSCLC. Lung adenocarcinoma may harbor both activating and resistance mutations of the EGFR gene, and further, mutations of KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. Less frequent but targetable genetic alterations include ALK, ROS1, RET gene rearrangements, and various alterations of MET proto-oncogene. In addition, the importance of anti-tumor immunity and of tumor microenvironment has become evident recently. Accumulation of mutations generally trigger tumor specific immune defense, but immune protection may be upregulated as an aggressive feature. The blockade of immune checkpoints results in potential reactivation of tumor cell killing and induces significant tumor regression in various tumor types, such as lung carcinoma. Therapeutic responses to anti PD1-PD-L1 treatment may correlate with the expression of PD-L1 by tumor cells. Due to the wide range of diagnostic and predictive features in lung cancer a plenty of tests are required from a single small biopsy or cytology specimen, which is challenged by major issues of sample quantity and quality. Thus, the efficacy of biomarker testing should be warranted by standardized policy and optimal material usage. In this review we aim to discuss major targeted therapy-related biomarkers in NSCLC and testing possibilities comprehensively.

Clinicopathological features of incidentally detected metastatic thyroid papillary carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes of non-thyroid cancer patients: a retrospective analysis of 31cases

BACKGROUND

The incidental finding of thyroid inclusions in lymph nodes of neck dissections of non-thyroid cancer patients is an unusual event. It is still controversial for pathologists about whether this represents benign inclusions or metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). This study is to analyze clinicopathological features of such cases in an attempt to explore their clinical implications.

METHODS

Pathological data were searched for incidentally detected PTC of cervical lymph nodes in non-thyroid cancer cases. Clinicopathological characteristics were reevaluated and recorded. BRAF V600E protein expression and sequencing analysis was then performed in cases with sufficient tissues.

RESULTS

31 patients had an incidental finding of PTC in lymph nodes of patients with non-thyroid cancer. BRAF immunohistochemical staining were performed in 17 metastatic lymph nodes with sufficient tumor tissues, and 6 were positive. BRAF V600E point mutation was detected in 5 of 6 BRAF V600E positive cases. Subsequent imaging examinations of the thyroid showed no nodules or calcifications/benign nodules in 20 patients, and suspected malignant nodules in 5 patients. 12 patients underwent total thyroidectomy or ipsilateral lobectomy, and 6 showed PTC in postoperative pathological examinations. The remaining 19 patients without surgery were kept under active surveillance, and no one had recurrence of PTC.

CONCLUSION

Incidentally discovered PTC in lymph nodes has usually interpreted as metastasis from a clinical occult thyroid primary cancer, but primary PTC was not always detected. This suggests it could be double occult lesions. With regards to concurrence with highly malignant tumor, most patients could keep regular surveillance.

Molecular Analysis of Colorectal Cancers Suggests a High Frequency of Lynch Syndrome in Indonesia

Simple Summary

The incidence of young people <50 years old who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), termed as early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), accounted for nearly 30% of the total CRC patients in Indonesia, which is about three times higher than what is being reported in Europe, the UK and USA. Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary type of CRC that is associated with a younger age of onset. Detecting LS has been long reported to be a cost-effective strategy to provide aid in the diagnosis or management of the individual or at-risk family members. The aim of this retrospective study was to screen for Lynch Syndrome in Indonesian CRC patients using simple and robust polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular testing, known as N_LyST (Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test). To our knowledge, we are the first to study and observe a potentially higher frequency of LS (13.85%) among CRC patients in Indonesia (n = 231). This may partially contribute to the reported much higher rate of EOCRC found in the country.

Abstract

There is about three times higher incidence of young patients <50 years old with colorectal cancer, termed EOCRC, in Indonesia as compared to Europe, the UK and USA. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of Lynch Syndrome (LS) in Indonesian CRC patients. The previously described Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test (N_LyST) was used in this project. N_LyST is a robust high-resolution melting (HRM)-based test that has shown 100% concordance with standard reference methods, including capillary electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. The test consisted of five mononucleotide microsatellite markers (BAT25, BAT26, BCAT25, MYB, EWSR1), BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 region C promoter for methylation (using bisulphite-modified DNA). A total of 231 archival (2016–2019) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissues from CRC patients collected from Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta, Indonesia, were successfully tested and analysed. Among those, 44/231 (19.05%) were MSI, 25/231 (10.82%) were harbouring BRAF V600E mutation and 6/231 (2.60%) had MLH1 promoter methylation. Almost all—186/197 (99.45%)—MSS cases were MLH1 promoter unmethylated, while there were only 5/44 (11.36%) MSI cases with MLH1 promoter methylation. Similarly, only 9/44 (20.45%) of MSI cases were BRAF mutant. There were 50/231 (21.65%) EOCRC cases, with 15/50 (30%) regarded as MSI, as opposed to 29/181 (16.02%) within the older group. In total, 32/231 patients (13.85%) were classified as “Probable Lynch” (MSI, BRAF wildtype and MLH1 promoter unmethylated), which were enriched in EOCRC as compared to older patients (24% vs. 11.05%, p = 0.035). Nonetheless, 30/50 (76.00%) cases among the EOCRC cases were non-LS (sporadic) and were significantly associated with a left-sided tumour. The overall survival of both “Probable Lynch” and non-LS (sporadic) groups (n = 227) was comparable (p = 0.59), with follow up period of 0–1845 days/61.5 months. Stage, node status, histological grading and ECOG score were significantly associated with patient overall survival (p < 0.005), yet only ECOG was an independent factor for OS (HR: 4.38; 95% CI: 1.72–11.2; p = 0.002). In summary, this study is the first to reveal a potentially higher frequency of LS among CRC patients in Indonesia, which may partially contribute to the reported much higher number of EOCRC as compared to the incidence in the West.

Circulating Tumor DNA Harboring the BRAFV600E Mutation May Predict Poor Outcomes of Primary Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients

Background: The significance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in primary papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is yet to be well established. This study aimed to clarify whether ctDNA carrying the BRAF^V600E mutation in plasma from primary PTC patients before and after surgery can predict outcomes. Methods: Twenty-two primary PTC patients without distant metastasis, who underwent surgical resection at the University of Tokyo Hospital, were eligible for this study. Genomic DNA of the primary tumor was extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens, and the BRAF^V600E mutation was detected by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Pre- and postsurgery ctDNAs were extracted from matched plasma samples obtained from 22 patients and analyzed for the BRAF^V600E mutation using ddPCR. Results: The BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in 16 of 22 (73%) primary tumors. Five of 16 (31%) cases carrying the BRAF^V600E mutation in their tumors showed the identical mutation in presurgery plasma. Extrathyroidal extension of the primary tumor correlated significantly with the BRAF^V600E mutation in presurgery ctDNA (p = 0.025). In the five patients carrying the BRAF^V600E mutation in presurgery ctDNA, the fractional abundance of the BRAF^V600E alleles to the total BRAF alleles in the primary tumor was significantly higher than that in the 11 patients without mutated BRAF in presurgery ctDNA (mean, 34% vs. 17%) (p < 0.01). Moreover, one patient with the mutated BRAF^V600E in the primary tumor showed the identical mutation not in presurgery ctDNA but in postsurgery ctDNA. This patient had regional lymph node recurrence six months after surgery. Conclusions: Presurgery ctDNA with the BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in 31% of cases with primary PTCs carrying the identical mutation. Detection of the BRAF^V600E mutation in presurgery plasma can provide information on the increased fractional abundance of the mutated BRAF^V600E alleles and local progression of the primary tumor. Furthermore, the fractional abundance of the mutated BRAF^V600E in postsurgery ctDNA might predict PTC recurrence.

A modified screening strategy for Lynch syndrome among MLH1-deficient CRCs: Analysis from consecutive Chinese patients in a single center

BACKGROUND

The low prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation in colorectal cancers (CRCs) in Chinese populations has stimulated concern about the efficacy of BRAF mutation analysis for Lynch syndrome (LS) screening.

METHODS

In total, 169 of 4104 consecutive CRC patients with absent MLH1 staining were analyzed to compare the utility of the BRAF V600E mutation testing with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis in the Chinese population. Germline genetic testing was performed in patients with wild-type BRAF/methylated MLH1.

RESULTS

Compared with BRAF genotyping, the use of MLH1 methylation testing alone to evaluate patients with MLH1 deficiency reduced referral rates for germline testing by 1.8-fold (82.8% vs. 47.1%). However, 6 patients harboring MLH1 promoter methylation were verified to have LS through germline genetic testing. It is notable that all 6 patients had a family history of CRC in at least 1 first-degree relative (FDR) or second-degree relative (SDR). The combination of MLH1 promoter methylation analysis and a family history of CRC could preclude significantly more patients from germline genetic testing than from BRAF mutation testing alone (45.5% vs. 17.2%, p<0.001) and decrease the number of misdiagnosed LS patients with MLH1 promoter methylation.

CONCLUSION

The combination of a family history of CRC with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis showed better performance than BRAF mutation testing in the selection of patients in the Chinese population for germline genetic testing.

BRAF V600E as an accurate marker to complement fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in the guidance of thyroid surgery in the Chinese population: evidence from over 1000 consecutive FNAs with follow-up

BACKGROUND

Currently, several commercial molecular tests have been developed for reclassifying thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine needle aspiration cytology. These tests are quite expensive and not available in China. Previous studies demonstrated a very high prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation in Asian people. A high incidence may result in a robust sensitivity. We conducted this study to determine the prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation and its ability to reclassify cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules in the Chinese population.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and October 2018, consecutive patients who underwent a fine needle aspiration procedure and agreed to provide materials for molecular analysis in our hospital were recruited in this study. All were followed up until they had a thyroidectomy and a final pathological diagnosis or until January 2019 (those did not have surgery).

RESULTS

A total of 1960 patients were included in this study. Until January 2019, 1240 patients underwent surgery. Using histopathological diagnosis as a gold standard, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the BRAF V600E mutational analysis for the discrimination of benign nodules from cancer in thyroid fine needle aspiration samples were 83.3% (81.0-85.3%) and 96.0% (77.7-99.8%), respectively, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95, P < 0.001). Among cases with indeterminate cytology, BRAF-positive cases were showing malignancy in the final pathology, and BRAF-negative cases were showing safer to be followed up.

CONCLUSION

The BRAF V600E mutation is highly prevalent in the Chinese population and can accurately complement cytopathology in the guidance of thyroid surgery.Mini-abstract: The BRAF V600E mutation has both high specificity and sensitivity to predict thyroid malignancy in the Chinese population. It can accurately complement cytopathology in the guidance of thyroid surgery.

Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma

With the increasing incidence of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), it is important to risk-stratify patients who may have a more aggressive tumor biology. The present study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with PTC, which may provide a significant reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. In total, 1,045 patients with PTC [313 with PT microcarcinoma (PTMC) and 732 with non-PTMC] between August 2016 and August 2019 were investigated. The B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) V600E mutation was tested in all samples. The clinical data (sex, age, tumor location, sample type and pathological features) were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent risk factors for LNM. A total of 181/313 (57.8%) PTMC cases and 145/732 (19.8%) non-PTMC cases had a BRAF V600E mutation. In the PTMC cases, significant differences in sex and sample type were identified (BRAF V600E mutation vs. wild-type). In the non-PTMC cases, significant differences in sex and age were identified (BRAF V600E mutation vs. wild-type). Female sex and tumor diameter ≤1 cm were significant independent predictors of LNM in PTC. In PTMC, female sex was a significant independent predictor of LNM. A bilateral tumor was an independent protective factor for LNM in PTC, PTMC and non-PTMC. The BRAF V600E mutation rate of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology was higher compared with FFPE in PTMC (P=0.018). In contrast to previous studies, the results of the present study suggested that being female and having a tumor of diameter ≤1 cm were risk factors for LNM, and that the BRAF wild-type of PTMC may be more aggressive than other types. Notably, the position of the tumor in the bilateral thyroid was also an independent protective factor for LNM. Therefore, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration should be recommended for gene analysis (BRAF V600E) in PTMC. In addition, clinicians should consider an individualized treatment according to gene mutations, sex, age, tumor size and the location of the tumor, in order to achieve an improved therapeutic efficacy.

VE1 immunohistochemistry is an adjunct tool for detection of BRAFV600E mutation: Validation in thyroid cancer patients

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy among other endocrine tumors, and BRAF^V600E is a frequent genetic mutation occurring in the disease. Although different molecular techniques, most importantly sequencing has been widely recognized as a gold standard but molecular diagnosis remains an expensive, laborious, and time‐intensive process. Recently, immunohistochemistry (IHC) with anti‐BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody has increased practical utility and implemented clinically for the detection of BRAF^V600E mutation. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of VE1 IHC for detecting the BRAF^V600E mutation frequency and clinical implementation in diagnostic laboratories. In this study, 72 formalin fixed paraffin‐embedded tissues (FFPE) were used to determine the BRAF^V600E mutation status using IHC and Sanger sequencing. The mutation was found in 29% and 28% cases using IHC and Sanger sequencing, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed 100% sensitivity, 98.07% specificity, 95.2% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. Notably, significant associations were found between BRAF^V600E status and tumor stage, tumor focality, and extrathyroidal extensions, respectively. VE1 IHC was found to be a highly sensitive, specific, and diagnostically accurate method in this cohort. Therefore, BRAF^V600E detection through IHC has been considered as the best tailored technique for routine pathology laboratories.

Prevalence of BRAFV600E mutation in Asian series of papillary thyroid carcinoma-a contemporary systematic review

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), the most common malignancy of the endocrine system, is frequently driven by BRAFV600E mutation, which was reported in 35-60% cases in Western series. Numerous studies have recently emerged from Asian countries and regions; however sufficient summary is lacking to date. BRAF mutation serves as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in thyroid cancer, therefore establishing a rate of BRAF on the national scale could be of practical significance. We performed systematic reviews of available literature to investigate the prevalence of BRAF mutation in series of PTC from various Asian countries and regions. Out of the total 3,966 reports identified via initial screening, 138 studies encompassing over 40,000 PTCs were included for the final analysis. A vast majority (90.2%) of PTCs with known BRAF status were from East Asia, including China, South Korea, and Japan, with BRAF mutation rates of 71.2%, 75.5%, and 70.6%, respectively. Less abundant Indian and Saudi Arabian series found 45.6% and 46.3% prevalence of BRAFV600E in PTC, respectively. Much limited evidence was available from Thailand, Iran, Kazakhstan, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, Hong Kong, Philippines, Vietnam, Iraq, and Myanmar. No relevant publications were found from other highly populated countries, such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Malaysia. After grouping by geographic region, we found that the highest rate of BRAFV600E was reported in the PTC series from East Asia (76.4%). Much lower rate (45-48%) was seen in PTC cohorts from South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East while the Southeast Asian series were in between (57%). Further subgroup analysis revealed that studies employing fresh frozen tissue and fine-needle aspirates showed higher rates of BRAF compared to those used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. We found that the PTC series enrolled patients' cohorts after 2010 demonstrated a higher rate of BRAF compared to the earlier series. Finally, pediatric PTCs had lower BRAF prevalence compared to the baseline rate for the country. In conclusion, despite considerable among and within countries heterogeneity, the Asian PTC series showed a higher prevalence of BRAFV600E mutation than that in Western series. Causes of geographic heterogeneity, whether genuine (etiology, genetics) or methodology-related should be further investigated.

VE1 Immunohistochemistry Improves the Limit of Genotyping for Detecting BRAFV600E Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Detection of BRAF^V600E is useful for making diagnosis and risk stratification of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Molecular testing, however, is not always available for routine clinical use. To assess the clinical utility and reliability of VE1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detecting BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC, VE1 IHC was performed on the tissue microarrays of 514 patients with PTC and was compared with Sanger sequencing results. Of 514 PTC cases, 433 (84.2%) were positive for VE1 expression. Among 6 discordant cases between VE1 IHC and Sanger sequencing, 3 initial VE1-false negative cases turned out to be true false negative on repeat testing, and 3 VE1-false positive cases showed BRAF^V600E mutation using digital PCR analysis. PTCs with low variant allele fraction were positive for VE1 IHC but were not detected using sequencing. VE1 IHC showed 99.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 96.4% negative predictive value. The BRAF^V600E mutation was significantly associated with older age, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage. In conclusion, VE1 IHC is a reliable method for detecting BRAF^V600E mutation in PTC specimens.

Distinct clinical phenotype and genetic testing strategy for Lynch syndrome in China based on a large colorectal cancer cohort

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition syndrome. We performed a large-scale study to assess a screening strategy for identifying LS in Chinese CRC patients in routine clinical testing. A total of 4,195 eligible CRCs were universally screened. Then, 8.7% of CRCs were detected with dMMR. The incidence of LS was 2.7% (115 of 4,195) in this cohort; among patients over 70 years of age, only 0.3% (2 of 678) were diagnosed as LS. Then, 17.4% of LS cases showed large genomic deletions/duplications. LS probands developed CRCs predominantly at proximal colon location. The frequency of BRAF V600E mutation among Chinese CRCs was significantly lower than that among Western populations, and MLH1 promoter methylation significantly improved the efficiency of genetic screening for LS among MLH1-deficient patients. A comprehensive molecular testing strategy that includes detection of large genomic rearrangements is imperative for the diagnosis of LS. Among CRC patients aged 70 years or younger, a selective strategy for LS screening might be considered for routine clinical testing.

Integrin β4 promotes invasion and anoikis resistance of papillary thyroid carcinoma and is consistently overexpressed in lymphovascular tumor thrombus

Although the majority of papillary thyroid cancers (PTC) are indolent, a subset of PTCs behaves aggressively due to extensive invasion and distant metastasis. Integrin β4, a member of the integrin family, has been shown to enhance the progression in some malignancies; however, its role in PTC remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that β4 overexpression was associated with extrathyroid extension, lymph node metastasis, high TNM stage, and poor overall survival based on The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. Immunohistochemistry showed that β4 expression was significantly upregulated in the tumors with infiltrating growth pattern, as well as those with positive lymphovascular invasion. Moreover, β4 was invariably overexpressed in the lymphovascular tumor thrombi, which has not been reported before. After shRNA-induced knockdown of β4 in vitro, the migration, invasion and scratch repair ability of the tumor cells were significantly reduced. Furthermore, β4 reduction decreased anchorage-independent growth and increased anoikis. The bioinformatics analysis revealed that approximately 70 pathways were significantly dysregulated in the high β4 expression group. The MAPK pathway and propanoate metabolism were located in the network center of those pathways. Taken together, our results suggest that β4 could promote the tumor's aggressiveness by enhancing invasion and antagonizing anoikis. The upregulated expression of β4 in the tumor thrombi is intrinsically linked to its role in strengthening the anoikis resistance.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry in Thyroid Histopathology

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in evaluating thyroid surgical specimens may facilitate diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, with potential therapeutic implications. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the analytic validity of IHC in detecting BRAFV600E mutations in thyroid cancer (primary or metastatic). We screened citations from three electronic databases (until December 20, 2018), supplemented by a hand search of authors' files and cross-references of reviews. Citations and full-text papers were independently reviewed in duplicate, and consensus was achieved on inclusion of papers. Two reviewers independently critically appraised and abstracted data from included papers. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted for sensitivity and specificity estimates. We reviewed 1499 unique citations and 93 full-text articles. We included 1 systematic review and 30 original articles. The published review (from 2015) needed to be updated as there were multiple subsequent original studies. The pooled sensitivity of IHC in detecting a BRAFV600E mutation was 96.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] at 94.1%, 98.3%) (29 studies, including 2659 BRAFV600E mutant tumors). The IHC pooled specificity was 86.3% (95% CI 80.7%, 90.4%) (28 studies, including 1107 BRAFV600E wild-type specimens). These meta-analyses were subject to statistically significant heterogeneity, partly explained by antibody type (sensitivity and specificity) and tissue/tumor type (specificity). In conclusion, BRAF IHC is highly sensitive and reasonably specific in detecting the BRAFV600E mutation; however, there is some variability in analytic performance.

BRAFV600E mutation analysis in fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens for diagnosis of thyroid nodules: The influence of false-positive and false-negative results

Background

The accurate evaluation of BRAF^V600E mutation in preoperative fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens is important for making management decisions in thyroid nodules (TNs). The aim of this study was to assess the false‐positive and false‐negative BRAF^V600E mutations in thyroid FNAC specimens and their influence on diagnosis of TN.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 292 nodules in 269 patients who underwent BRAF^V600E mutation analysis using amplification refractory mutation system‐quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (ARMS‐qPCR) both in FNAC specimens and formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue samples after surgery. The false‐positive and false‐negative mutations for BRAF^V600E analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FNAC specimens were recorded, with reference to the results of BRAF^V600E mutation analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FFPE tissue sample. Diagnostic performances of FNAC, BRAF^V600E mutation analysis in FNAC specimens, BRAF^V600E mutation analysis in FFPE tissue sample, and the combination of FNAC and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis for predicting thyroid malignancy were assessed.

Results

The false‐positive and false‐negative mutations for BRAF^V600E analysis using ARMS‐qPCR in FNAC specimens were 10.1% (19/189) and 7.1% (7/98), respectively. FNAC combined with preoperative BRAF^V600E mutation analysis significantly increased the diagnostic sensitivity from 75.7% to 92.3%, and accuracy from 78.7% to 90.6% in comparison with FNAC alone (both P < .001). No significant differences were found between the combination of FNAC and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis in FNAC specimens and the combination of FNAC and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis in FFPE tissue sample (sensitivity: 92.3% vs 91.9%; accuracy: 90.6% vs 91.3%; both P > .05).

Conclusions

FNAC combined with preoperative BRAF^V600E mutation analysis can significantly increase the diagnostic performance in comparison with FNAC alone. False‐positive and false‐negative BRAF^V600E mutation results are found in preoperative FNAC specimens, whereas it does not affect the overall auxiliary diagnosis of TNs.

Comparison of diagnostic methods for the detection of a BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid cancer

The most common genetic alteration identified in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) encodes a valine to glutamic acid change at position 600 (V600E) in the BRAF proto-oncoprotein. The most accurate and reliable method for detecting this BRAF mutation has not yet been determined. In the present study, the sensitivity, specificity and feasibility of diagnostic methods for BRAF mutations were assessed. BRAF mutational analysis was performed by Sanger DNA sequencing, using the Cobas^® 4800 BRAF V600 test and by immunohistochemistry (IHC). A total of 185 tumor tissues samples were analyzed using the three assays. BRAF mutations were identified in 76.2% of samples by Sanger sequencing, 78.9% of samples by Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 test and 76.8% of samples by IHC. Complete concordance for the three methods was observed in 92.4% of samples. Sensitivity and specificity of Sanger sequencing were 97.2 and 95.2%. Sensitivity and specificity of the Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 test were 99.3 and 90.5%. Sensitivity and specificity of IHC were 98.6 and 97.6%. Furthermore, the presence of a BRAF mutation was significantly associated with extrathyroid extension and multifocality (P<0.05), but not associated with age, sex, lymph node metastasis, central node metastasis, lateral node metastasis, Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage or tumor size in patients with PTC. These results suggest that a combination of IHC and the Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Test kit for V600E mutation analysis is the most efficient and reliable method in routine practice. Accurate screening for BRAF mutation may contribute to improving the risk stratification of PTC.

Utility of BRAF VE1 Immunohistochemistry as a Screening Tool for Colorectal Cancer Harboring BRAF V600E Mutation

Background

BRAF mutation has been recognized as an important biomarker of colorectal cancer (CRC) for targeted therapy and prognosis prediction. However, sequencing for every CRC case is not cost-effective. An antibody specific for BRAF V600E mutant protein has been introduced, and we thus examined the utility of BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry for evaluating BRAF mutations in CRC.

Methods

Fifty-one BRAF-mutated CRCs and 100 age and sexmatched BRAF wild-type CRCs between 2005 and 2015 were selected from the archives of Asan Medical Center. Tissue microarrays were constructed and stained with BRAF VE1 antibody.

Results

Forty-nine of the 51 BRAF-mutant CRCs (96.1%) showed more than moderate cytoplasmic staining, except for two weakly stained cases. Six of 100 BRAF wild-type cases also stained positive with BRAF VE1 antibody; four stained weakly and two stained moderately. Normal colonic crypts showed nonspecific weak staining, and a few CRC cases exhibited moderate nuclear reactivity (3 BRAF-mutant and 10 BRAF wild-type cases). BRAF-mutated CRC patients had higher pathologic stages and worse survival than BRAF wild-type patients.

Conclusions

BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry showed high sensitivity and specificity, but occasional nonspecific staining in tumor cell nuclei and normal colonic crypts may limit their routine clinical use. Thus, BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry may be a useful screening tool for BRAF V600E mutation in CRCs, provided that additional sequencing studies can be done to confirm the mutation in BRAF VE1 antibody-positive cases.

Distinct MET Protein Localization Associated With MET Exon 14 Mutation Types in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The MET gene has been recognized as a potential important therapeutic target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to investigate the MET exon 14 mutations in a cohort of Chinese patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

We tested 461 NSCLCs for MET exon 14 mutations by sequencing whole exon 14 and its flanking introns. The protein expression was determined by immunohistochemical analysis.

RESULTS

In this study, we identified MET exon 14 mutations in 9 (2.0%) of 461 NSCLCs. Of these 9 mutations, 7 (77.8%) were located in the splice sites of MET exon 14, with MET overexpression in 6. One point mutation c.3010C>T (p.Arg1004Ter) was nonsense mutation with no MET expression. One insertion mutation was within exon 14 of MET with MET overexpression. MET protein localization in tumor cells with MET exon 14 mutations was different between mutation types. Three point mutations that disrupted the splice donor site of intron 14 were membranous staining, whereas the other mutations were cytoplasmic staining. Patients with MET exon 14 splice site mutations were significantly older. The incidence of MET exon 14 mutations in sarcomatoid carcinoma was significantly higher than in other histologic types (P = .034).

CONCLUSION

Distinct MET protein localization is associated with MET exon 14 mutation types in patients with NSCLC. Different MET exon 14 mutation types were identified in a subset of Chinese patients with NSCLC who could possibly benefit from MET targeted therapy.

Immunohistochemistry with Anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) Mouse Monoclonal Antibody is a Sensitive Method for Detection of the BRAF V600E Mutation in Colon Cancer: Evaluation of 120 Cases with and without KRAS Mutation and Literature Review

The major aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody in colorectal tumors with and without KRAS mutation. KRAS and BRAF are two major oncogenic drivers of colorectal cancer (CRC) that have been frequently described as mutually exclusive, thus the BRAF V600E mutation is not expected to be present in the cases with KRAS mutation. In addition, a review of 25 studies comparing immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody with BRAF V600E molecular testing in 4041 patient samples was included. One-hundred and twenty cases with/without KRAS or BRAF mutations were acquired. The tissue were immunostained with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody with OptiView DAB IHC detection kit. The KRAS mutated cases with equivocal immunostaining were further evaluated by Sanger sequencing for BRAF V600E mutation. Thirty cases with BRAF V600E mutation showed unequivocal, diffuse, uniform, positive cytoplasmic staining and 30 cases with wild-type KRAS and BRAF showed negative staining with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody. Out of 60 cases with KRAS mutation, 56 cases (93.3%) were negative for BRAF V600E mutation by IHC. Four cases showed weak, equivocal, heterogeneous, cytoplasmic staining along with nuclear staining in 25-90% of tumor cells. These cases were confirmed to be negative for BRAF V600E mutation by Sanger sequencing. Overall, IHC with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody using recommended protocol with OptiView detection is optimal for detection of BRAF V600E mutation in CRC. Our data are consistent with previous reports indicating that KRAS and BRAF V600E mutation are mutually exclusive.

Racial Differences in Cancer Susceptibility and Survival: More Than the Color of the Skin?

Epidemiological studies point to race as a determining factor in cancer susceptibility. In US registries recording cancer incidence and survival by race (distinguishing 'black versus white'), individuals of African ancestry have a globally increased risk of malignancies compared with Caucasians and Asian Americans. Differences in socioeconomic status and health-care access play a key role. However, the lesser disease susceptibility of Hispanic populations with comparable lifestyles and socioeconomic status as African Americans (Hispanic paradox) points to the concomitant importance of genetic determinants. Here, we overview the molecular basis of racial disparity in cancer susceptibility ranging from genetic polymorphisms and cancer-driver gene mutations to obesity, chronic inflammation, and immune responses. We discuss implications for race-adapted cancer screening programs and clinical trials to reduce disparities in cancer burden.

Association between BRAFV600E mutation and the clinicopathological features of solitary papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

The B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF)^V600E mutation is an important oncogene in the development of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and has been identified as a risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with PTC. However, whether the BRAF^V600E mutation is a prognostic marker in patients with solitary papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (sPTMC) has not yet been established. The present study aimed to identify the association between BRAF^V600E mutation and the clinicopathological features of patients with sPTMC. A total of 108 patients with sPTMC who underwent surgery at the Cancer Institute and Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between December 2010 and December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Exon 15 of the BRAF gene was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing was performed to detect the BRAF^V600E mutation. Statistical analysis was subsequently performed using SPSS software (version 16.0). The association between BRAF^V600E mutation and clinicopathological features of sPTMC was tested with the χ² test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. There were 27 males and 81 females in the cohort, who were aged between 22 and 66 years old, with an average age of 42 years. The BRAF^V600E mutation was found in 59 out of 108 (54.6%) patients with sPTMC. The presence of the BRAF^V600E mutation was demonstrated to be significantly associated with extrathyroidal extension (P=0.019), advanced Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage (P=0.007) and the presence of autoimmune thyroiditis (P=0.010). The BRAF^V600E mutation was not significantly associated with gender, anatomic location or subtype of sPTMC (P>0.05). In addition, the BRAF^V600E mutation indicated poor prognosis in patients with sPTMC. These results suggest that the BRAF^V600E mutation is a risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with sPTMC. This knowledge will aid in the risk stratification and post-operative management of patients with sPTMC.

Is immunohistochemistry of BRAF V600E useful as a screening tool and during progression disease of melanoma patients?

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice the gold standard method to assess BRAF status in patients with metastatic melanoma is based on molecular assays. Recently, a mutation-specific monoclonal antibody (VE1), which detects the BRAF V600E mutated protein, has been developed. With this study we aimed to confirm the clinical value of the VE1 Ventana® antibody, as today a univocal validated and accredited immunohistochemical procedure does not exist, to preliminary detect BRAF status in our routine diagnostic procedures. Moreover, we explored the biological meaning of BRAF immunohistochemical labeling both as a predictor marker of response to target therapy and, for the first time, as a player of acquired tumor drug resistance.

METHODS

We analyzed a retrospective series of 64 metastatic melanoma samples, previously investigated for molecular BRAF status, using a fully automatized immunohistochemical method. We correlated the data to the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients and their clinical outcome.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and the specificity of the Ventana® VE1 antibody were 89.2 and 96.2% respectively, while the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 97.1 and 86.2%, respectively. For six mutated patients the histological sample before treatment and when disease progressed was available. The immunohistochemical BRAF V600E expression in the specimens when disease progressed was less intense and more heterogeneous compared to the basal expression. Multivariate analysis revealed that a less intense grade of positive expression is an independent predictor of a less aggressive stage at diagnosis (p = 0.0413).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings encourage the introduction of immunohistochemistry as a rapid screening tool for the assessment of BRAF status in melanoma patients in routine diagnostic procedures and prepare the ground for other studies to highlight the role of immunohistochemical BRAF V600E expression in patients at the time of progression.

Establishment of a Flexible Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Platform for Detecting Prevalent Deafness Mutations Associated with Variable Degree of Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Koreans

Many cutting-edge technologies based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been employed to identify candidate variants responsible for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, these methods have limitations preventing their wide clinical use for primary screening, in that they remain costly and it is not always suitable to analyze massive amounts of data. Several different DNA chips have been developed for screening prevalent mutations at a lower cost. However, most of these platforms do not offer the flexibility to add or remove target mutations, thereby limiting their wider use in a field that requires frequent updates. Therefore, we aimed to establish a simpler and more flexible molecular diagnostic platform based on ethnicity-specific mutation spectrums of SNHL, which would enable bypassing unnecessary filtering steps in a substantial portion of cases. In addition, we expanded the screening platform to cover varying degrees of SNHL. With this aim, we selected 11 variants of 5 genes (GJB2, SLC26A4, MTRNR1, TMPRSS3, and CDH23) showing high prevalence with varying degrees in Koreans and developed the U-TOP™ HL Genotyping Kit, a real-time PCR-based method using the MeltingArray technique and peptide nucleic acid probes. The results of 271 DNA samples with wild type sequences or mutations in homo- or heterozygote form were compared between the U-TOP™ HL Genotyping Kit and Sanger sequencing. The positive and negative predictive values were 100%, and this method showed perfect agreement with Sanger sequencing, with a Kappa value of 1.00. The U-TOP™ HL Genotyping Kit showed excellent performance in detecting varying degrees and phenotypes of SNHL mutations in both homozygote and heterozygote forms, which are highly prevalent in the Korean population. This platform will serve as a useful and cost-effective first-line screening tool for varying degrees of genetic SNHL and facilitate genome-based personalized hearing rehabilitation for the Korean population.

Immunohistochemistry as a reliable method for detection of BRAF-V600E mutation in melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current published literature

BACKGROUND

The BRAF-V600E mutation is associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in melanoma patients. Identification of this mutation is clinically important as we now have Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies, such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors, which have been shown to retard disease progression in these patients. Detection of BRAF-V600E by genetic analysis using polymerase chain reaction is the gold standard method for melanoma cases. However, immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a VE1 antibody is rapidly emerging as a trustworthy method for the determination of mutation status in patients' specimens. Our objective in this study was to assess the reliability of IHC compared with genetic methods for successful identification of BRAF-V600E mutation in melanoma tissue specimens.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was performed for studies comparing IHC with genetic analysis for the detection of BRAF in melanoma patients published through May 28, 2015. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive, and negative likelihood ratios were calculated using a bivariate model. Logit estimates of sensitivity and specificity with their respective variances were used to plot a hierarchical receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q- and I-squared statistics.

RESULTS

An initial literature search resulted in 287 articles. After two independent reviews and consensus-based discussion to resolve disparities, 21 studies involving a total of 1687 cases met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity of IHC for BRAF-V600E detection was 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.94-0.98), specificity 1.00; 95% CI (0.97-1.00), positive likelihood ratio 194.2; 95% CI (37.6-1003.3), negative likelihood ratio 0.04; 95% CI (0.02-0.07), and diagnostic odds ratio 5503 (1199-25,263), as compared with genetic analysis. A high heterogeneity was observed between these studies (Q value of 40.17 & I(2) = 95%; 95% CI (91-99, P < 0.001) which may be explained by studies using different cutoff values for labeling IHC as positive. High accuracy of IHC was depicted by area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curve which was 0.99; 95 % CI (0.98-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis demonstrates that IHC is highly sensitive and specific for the detection of BRAF-V600E in melanoma cases. IHC is likely to be useful in BRAF mutation detection because it is highly comparable with the genetic methods. Any negative or low staining cases may be selected to undergo genetic analysis based on other clinical and histopathologic features.

Comparison of the Prognostic Utility of the Diverse Molecular Data among lncRNA, DNA Methylation, microRNA, and mRNA across Five Human Cancers

INTRODUCTION

Advances in high-throughput technologies have generated diverse informative molecular markers for cancer outcome prediction. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) and DNA methylation as new classes of promising markers are emerging as key molecules in human cancers; however, the prognostic utility of such diverse molecular data remains to be explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We proposed a computational pipeline (IDFO) to predict patient survival by identifying prognosis-related biomarkers using multi-type molecular data (mRNA, microRNA, DNA methylation, and lncRNA) from 3198 samples of five cancer types. We assessed the predictive performance of both single molecular data and integrated multi-type molecular data in patient survival stratification, and compared their relative importance in each type of cancer, respectively. Survival analysis using multivariate Cox regression was performed to investigate the impact of the IDFO-identified markers and traditional variables on clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Using the IDFO approach, we obtained good predictive performance of the molecular datasets (bootstrap accuracy: 0.71-0.97) in five cancer types. Impressively, lncRNA was identified as the best prognostic predictor in the validated cohorts of four cancer types, followed by DNA methylation, mRNA, and then microRNA. We found the incorporating of multi-type molecular data showed similar predictive power to single-type molecular data, but with the exception of the lncRNA + DNA methylation combinations in two cancers. Survival analysis of proportional hazard models confirmed a high robustness for lncRNA and DNA methylation as prognosis factors independent of traditional clinical variables.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides insight into systematically understanding the prognostic performance of diverse molecular data in both single and aggregate patterns, which may have specific reference to subsequent related studies.

Automated PCR detection of BRAF mutations in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy study

BACKGROUND

Testing for BRAF mutations in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is important in the screening pathway for Lynch syndrome and is of prognostic value to guide management. This is a diagnostic accuracy study of the Idylla system, a novel and automated alternative PCR system.

METHODS

100 consecutive formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded CRC resection cases were tested for BRAF mutations using the Idylla automated platform and compared with standard (Cobas) PCR.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the Idylla BRAF test was 100% and the specificity was 96%. Only one discordant Idylla positive/standard PCR negative result occurred and on Droplet Digital PCR demonstrated a mutation not identified by traditional PCR in this case.

CONCLUSION

This study has validated the Idylla system for BRAF testing in CRC and demonstrated a possibly greater sensitivity, in addition to cost effectiveness and shorter turnaround time, when compared with standard PCR.

Immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma

The V600E mutation in the B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) gene is a common genetic change in cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) that appears to play a key role in the development and progression of this disease. We sought to assess the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical detection of this mutation with a V600E mutated BRAF antibody in a Chinese PTC cohort. In this study, we used fully automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay with a BRAF V600E (VE1) mouse monoclonal primary antibody to screen for the BRAF V600E mutation in 556 cases of PTC. Moreover, to verify the IHC staining results, real-time PCR was applied to detect this mutation in the same patient cohort. Among the 556 cases in the examined primary PTC cohort, 414 (74.5%) cases and 419 (75.4%) cases were positive for the BRAF V600E mutation by IHC staining and by real-time PCR, respectively. The real-time PCR results indicated that the sensitivity and specificity of IHC staining for the BRAF V600E mutation were 98.8% and 100%, respectively. The BRAF V600E mutation was common among Chinese patients with primary PTC, and was strongly correlated with older patient age and the conventional subtype of PTC but was not associated with parameters of clinicopathological aggressiveness. The fully automated IHC is a reliable technique that can serve as an alternative to molecular biological approaches for the routine detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in PTC patients.

The Clinicopathological Features of BRAF Mutated Papillary Thyroid Cancers in Chinese Patients

The BRAF(V600E) mutation is commonly found in papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs) at different frequencies in different regions. However, the association between the BRAF(V600E) mutation and clinicopathological features in Chinese PTC patients is unknown. A total of 543 Chinese patients with histologically confirmed PTC were enrolled in this study. For the BRAF mutation assay, the target fragments were amplified and sequenced with an ABI 3500 gene analyzer. In 170 of 543 samples (31.3%), the BRAF(V600E) mutation was detected. In the bivariate analysis, the BRAF(V600E) mutation showed an association with bilaterality, tumor size, extrathyroidal invasion, and lymph node metastases (LNM). However, in the multivariate analysis, the BRAF(V600E) mutation was positively related to only tumor size (>1 cm) and extrathyroidal invasion. In addition, the multivariate analysis also showed that the age at diagnosis (<45 y) and tumor size (>1 cm) were independent predictors for LNM. In this study, the BRAF(V600E) mutation is positively associated with worse prognostic factors, including larger tumor size and the tumor extending to the thyroid capsule or extrathyroidal region; however, it is not an independent predictor for LNM.