Mechanistic insights into the recognition of 5-methylcytosine oxidation derivatives by the SUVH5 SRA domain

Mechanistic insights into allosteric regulation of methylated DNA and histone H3 recognition by SRA and SET domains of SUVH5 and the basis for di-methylation of lysine residue

Su-(var)3-9 homologue 5 (SUVH5), a member of SUVH family of histone lysine methyltransferase (HKMT) in Arabidopsis, is involved in epigenetic regulation of chromatin by recognizing 5-methyl-cytosine (5mC), in both CpG and non-CpG DNA context, through SRA domain and simultaneously performing the di-methylation of lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9) through SET domain. Here, we establish that the SET domain of SUVH5 allosterically restricts the SRA domain to the 5mC containing strand(s) of fully methylated CpG, hemi-methylated CpG and methylated CpHpH DNA. In addition, SET domain enhances the binding affinity of the SRA-SET dual domains to fully-mCpG but not to hemi-mCpG. Also, the recognition of methylated DNA by the SRA positively influences the recognition of H3K9 by the SET domain. Our further studies revealed that the SET domain recognizes the "A(R/K)KST" motif present in H3K9 and in other histone H2A variants. Further, computational analyses and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations explain the bases for robust mono-MTase but weak di-MTase activities of SUVH5. Given that the majority of eukaryotic proteins, including those involved in epigenetic gene regulation, contain more than one domain, our study suggests that understanding the allosteric regulation among multiple domains of proteins is relevant for unravelling biological outcomes.

Structure and Mechanism of Plant DNA Methyltransferases

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mark conserved in eukaryotes from fungi to animals and plants, where it plays a crucial role in regulating gene expression and transposon silencing. Once the methylation mark is established by de novo DNA methyltransferases, specific regulatory mechanisms are required to maintain the methylation state during chromatin replication, both during meiosis and mitosis. Plant DNA methylation is found in three contexts; CG, CHG, and CHH (H = A, T, C), which are established and maintained by a unique set of DNA methyltransferases and are regulated by plant-specific pathways. DNA methylation in plants is often associated with other epigenetic modifications, such as noncoding RNA and histone modifications. This chapter focuses on the structure, function, and regulatory mechanism of plant DNA methyltransferases and their crosstalk with other epigenetic pathways.

Structure and mechanism of histone methylation dynamics in Arabidopsis

Histone methylation plays a central role in regulating chromatin state and gene expression in Arabidopsis and is involved in a variety of physiological and developmental processes. Dynamic regulation of histone methylation relies on both histone methyltransferase "writer" and histone demethylases "eraser" proteins. In this review, we focus on the four major histone methylation modifications in Arabidopsis H3, H3K4, H3K9, H3K27, and H3K36, and summarize current knowledge of the dynamic regulation of these modifications, with an emphasis on the biochemical and structural perspectives of histone methyltransferases and demethylases.

Roles of MEM1 in safeguarding Arabidopsis genome against DNA damage, inhibiting ATM/SOG1-mediated DNA damage response, and antagonizing global DNA hypermethylation

Arabidopsis methylation elevated mutant 1 (mem1) mutants have elevated levels of global DNA methylation. In this study, such mutant alleles showed increased sensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). In mem1 mutants, an assortment of genes engaged in DNA damage response (DDR), especially DNA-repair-associated genes, were largely upregulated without MMS treatment, suggestive of activation of the DDR pathway in them. Following MMS treatment, expression levels of multiple DNA-repair-associated genes in mem1 mutants were generally lower than in Col-0 plants, which accounted for the MMS-sensitive phenotype of the mem1 mutants. A group of DNA methylation pathway genes were upregulated in mem1 mutants under non-MMS-treated conditions, causing elevated global DNA methylation, especially in RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM)-targeted regions. Moreover, MEM1 seemed to help ATAXIA-TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED (ATM) and/or SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 (SOG1) to fully activate/suppress transcription of a subset of genes regulated simultaneously by MEM1 and ATM and/or SOG1, because expression of such genes decreased/increased consistently in mem1 and atm and/or sog1 mutants, but the decreases/increases in the mem1 mutants were not as dramatic as in the atm and/or sog1 mutants. Thus, our studies reveals roles of MEM1 in safeguarding genome, and interrelationships among DNA damage, activation of DDR, DNA methylation/demethylation, and DNA repair.

Comprehensive Analysis of the SUV Gene Family in Allopolyploid Brassica napus and Its Diploid Ancestors

SUV (the Suppressor of variegation [Su(var)] homologs and related) gene family is a subgroup of the SET gene family. According to the SRA domain and WIYLD domain distributions, it can be divided into two categories, namely SUVH (the Suppressor of variegation [Su(var)] homologs) and SUVR (the Suppressor of variegation [Su(var)] related). In this study, 139 SUV genes were identified in allopolyploid Brassica napus and its diploid ancestors, and their evolutionary relationships, protein properties, gene structures, motif distributions, transposable elements, cis-acting elements and gene expression patterns were analyzed. Our results showed that the SUV gene family of B. napus was amplified during allopolyploidization, in which the segmental duplication and TRD played critical roles. After the separation of Brassica and Arabidopsis lineages, orthologous gene analysis showed that many SUV genes were lost during the evolutionary process in B. rapa, B. oleracea and B. napus. The analysis of the gene and protein structures and expression patterns of 30 orthologous gene pairs which may have evolutionary relationships showed that most of them were conserved in gene structures and protein motifs, but only four gene pairs had the same expression patterns.

Helical and β-Turn Conformations in the Peptide Recognition Regions of the VIM1 PHD Finger Abrogate H3K4 Peptide Recognition

The PHD finger-containing VARIANT IN METHYLATION/ORTHRUS (VIM/ORTH) family of proteins in Arabidopsis consists of functional homologues of mammalian UHRF1 and is required for the maintenance of DNA methylation. Comparison of the sequence with those of other PHD fingers implied that VIM1 and VIM3 PHD could recognize lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4) through interactions mediated by a conserved aspartic acid. However, our calorimetric and modified histone peptide array binding studies suggested that neither H3K4 nor other histone marks are recognized by VIM1 and VIM3 PHD fingers. Here, we report a 2.6 Å resolution crystal structure of the VIM1 PHD finger and demonstrate significant structural changes in the putative H3 recognition segments in contrast to canonical H3K4 binding PHD fingers. These changes include (i) the H3A1 binding region, (ii) strand β1 that forms an intermolecular β-sheet with the H3 peptide, and (iii) an aspartate-containing motif involved in salt bridge interaction with H3K4, which together appear to abrogate recognition of H3K4 by the VIM1 PHD finger. To understand the significance of the altered structural features in the VIM1 PHD that might prevent histone H3 recognition, we modeled a chimeric VIM1 PHD (chmVIM1 PHD) by grafting the peptide binding structural features of the BHC80 PHD onto the VIM1 PHD. Molecular dynamics simulation and metadynamics analyses revealed that the chmVIM1 PHD-H3 complex is stable and also showed a network of intermolecular interactions similar to those of the BHC80 PHD-H3 complex. Collectively, this study reveals that subtle structural changes in the peptide binding region of the VIM1 PHD abrogate histone H3 recognition.

Mechanism of DNA cleavage by the endonuclease SauUSI: a major barrier to horizontal gene transfer and antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Acquisition of foreign DNA by Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin resistance genes, is thwarted by the ATP-dependent endonuclease SauUSI. Deciphering the mechanism of action of SauUSI could unravel the reason how it singularly plays a major role in preventing horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in S. aureus. Here, we report a detailed biochemical and structural characterization of SauUSI, which reveals that in the presence of ATP, the enzyme can cleave DNA having a single or multiple target site/s. Remarkably, in the case of multiple target sites, the entire region of DNA flanked by two target sites is shred into smaller fragments by SauUSI. Crystal structure of SauUSI reveals a stable dimer held together by the nuclease domains, which are spatially arranged to hydrolyze the phosphodiester bonds of both strands of the duplex. Thus, the architecture of the dimeric SauUSI facilitates cleavage of either single-site or multi-site DNA. The structure also provides insights into the molecular basis of target recognition by SauUSI. We show that target recognition activates ATP hydrolysis by the helicase-like ATPase domain, which powers active directional movement (translocation) of SauUSI along the DNA. We propose that a pile-up of multiple translocating SauUSI molecules against a stationary SauUSI bound to a target site catalyzes random double-stranded breaks causing shredding of the DNA between two target sites. The extensive and irreparable damage of the foreign DNA by shredding makes SauUSI a potent barrier against HGT.

Mechanistic insights into recognition of symmetric methylated cytosines in CpG and non-CpG DNA by UHRF1 SRA

Non-CpG DNA methylation (non-mCpG) is enriched in the genome of brain neurons and germline cells in mammals. Accumulation of non-mCpG during postnatal brain development correlates with gene regulation and inactivation of distal regulatory elements. Recently, UHRF1 has been found to contribute to de novo non-CpG methylation, however, whether UHRF1 could recognize non-mCpG is unknown. Here, we have demonstrated through calorimetric measurements that the UHRF1 SRA can recognize mCpH and fully-mCpHpG, types of non-mCpG. Our ITC binding studies endorse the preferential reading of hemi-mCpG by UHRF1 SRA and also show 6-fold weaker binding for fully-mCpG than hemi-mCpG. Despite presence of symmetrical (5-methyl cytosine) 5mCs, stoichiometry of 1:1 for UHRF1 SRA binding to fully-mCpG indicates that UHRF1 SRA may not form a stable complex with fully-mCpG DNA. Contrarily, UHRF1 SRA recognizes fully-mCpHpG with a stoichiometry of 2:1 protein to DNA duplex with binding affinity higher than fully-mCpG. Our crystal structure of UHRF1 SRA bound to fully-mCpHpG DNA reveals dual flip-out mechanism of 5mC recognition. Metadynamics studies corroborates with ITC data that UHRF1 SRA could not form a stable complex with fully-mCpG DNA. Altogether, this study demonstrates that UHRF1 SRA recognizes non-mCpG DNA and exhibits contrasting mechanisms for hemi-mCpG and fully-mCpHpG DNA recognition.

Systematic analysis of the binding behaviour of UHRF1 towards different methyl- and carboxylcytosine modification patterns at CpG dyads

The multi-domain protein UHRF1 is essential for DNA methylation maintenance and binds DNA via a base-flipping mechanism with a preference for hemi-methylated CpG sites. We investigated its binding to hemi- and symmetrically modified DNA containing either 5-methylcytosine (mC), 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC), 5-formylcytosine (fC), or 5-carboxylcytosine (caC). Our experimental results indicate that UHRF1 binds symmetrically carboxylated and hybrid methylated/carboxylated CpG dyads in addition to its previously reported substrates. Complementary molecular dynamics simulations provide a possible mechanistic explanation of how the protein could differentiate between modification patterns. First, we observe different local binding modes in the nucleotide binding pocket as well as the protein's NKR finger. Second, both DNA modification sites are coupled through key residues within the NKR finger, suggesting a communication pathway affecting protein-DNA binding for carboxylcytosine modifications. Our results suggest a possible additional function of the hemi-methylation reader UHRF1 through binding of carboxylated CpG sites. This opens the possibility of new biological roles of UHRF1 beyond DNA methylation maintenance and of oxidised methylcytosine derivates in epigenetic regulation.

The finger loop of the SRA domain in the E3 ligase UHRF1 is a regulator of ubiquitin targeting and is required for the maintenance of DNA methylation

The Su(var)3–9, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax (SET) and really interesting new gene (RING) finger–associated (SRA) protein domain is conserved across bacteria and eukaryota and coordinates extrahelical or “flipped” DNA bases. A functional SRA domain is required for ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING finger domains 1 (UHRF1) E3 ubiquitin ligase activity toward histone H3, a mechanism for recruiting the DNA methylation maintenance enzyme DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). The SRA domain supports UHRF1 oncogenic activity in colon cancer cells, highlighting that UHRF1 SRA antagonism could be a cancer therapeutic strategy. Here we used molecular dynamics simulations, DNA binding assays, in vitro ubiquitination reactions, and DNA methylation analysis to identify the SRA finger loop as a regulator of UHRF1 ubiquitin targeting and DNA methylation maintenance. A chimeric UHRF1 (finger swap) with diminished E3 ligase activity toward nucleosomal histones, despite tighter binding to unmodified or asymmetric or symmetrically methylated DNA, uncouples DNA affinity from regulation of E3 ligase activity. Our model suggests that SRA domains sample DNA bases through flipping in the presence or absence of a cytosine modification and that specific interactions of the SRA finger loop with DNA are required for downstream host protein function. Our findings provide insight into allosteric regulation of UHRF1 E3 ligase activity, suggesting that UHRF1's SRA finger loop regulates its conformation and function.

Mechanistic insights into plant SUVH family H3K9 methyltransferases and their binding to context-biased non-CG DNA methylation

DNA methylation functions in gene silencing and the maintenance of genome integrity. In plants, non-CG DNA methylation is linked through a self-reinforcing loop with histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylation (H3K9me2). The plant-specific SUPPRESSOR OF VARIEGATION 3-9 HOMOLOG (SUVH) family H3K9 methyltransferases (MTases) bind to DNA methylation marks and catalyze H3K9 methylation. Here, we analyzed the structure and function of Arabidopsis thaliana SUVH6 to understand how this class of enzyme maintains methylation patterns in the genome. We reveal that SUVH6 has a distinct 5-methyl-dC (5mC) base-flipping mechanism involving a thumb loop element. Autoinhibition of H3 substrate entry is regulated by a SET domain loop, and a conformational transition in the post-SET domain upon cofactor binding may control catalysis. In vitro DNA binding and in vivo ChIP-seq data reveal that the different SUVH family H3K9 MTases have distinct DNA binding preferences, targeting H3K9 methylation to sites with different methylated DNA sequences, explaining the context biased non-CG DNA methylation in plants.

Biochemical and dynamic basis for combinatorial recognition of H3R2K9me2 by dual domains of UHRF1

UHRF1 is a multi-domain protein comprising of a tandem tudor (UHRF1 TTD), a PHD finger, and a SET and RING-associated domain. It is required for the maintenance of CG methylation, heterochromatin formation and DNA repair. Isothermal titration calorimetry binding studies of unmodified and methylated lysine histone peptides establish that the UHRF1 TTD binds dimethylated Lys9 on histone H3 (H3K9me2). Further, MD simulation and binding studies reveal that TTD-PHD of UHRF1 (UHRF1 TTD-PHD) preferentially recognizes dimethyl-lysine status. Importantly, we show that Asp145 in the binding pocket determines the preferential recognition of the dimethyl-ammonium group of H3K9me2. Interestingly, PHD finger of the UHRF1 TTD-PHD has a negligible contribution to the binding affinity for recognition of K9me2 by the UHRF1 TTD. Surprisingly, Lys4 methylation on H3 peptide has an insignificant effect on combinatorial recognition of R2 and K9me2 on H3 by the UHRF1 TTD-PHD. We propose that subtle variations of key residues at the binding pocket determine status specific recognition of histone methyl-lysines by the reader domains.

Computational characterization of substrate and product specificities, and functionality of S-adenosylmethionine binding pocket in histone lysine methyltransferases from Arabidopsis, rice and maize

Histone lysine methylation by histone lysine methyltransferases (HKMTs) has been implicated in regulation of gene expression. While significant progress has been made to understand the roles and mechanisms of animal HKMT functions, only a few plant HKMTs are functionally characterized. To unravel histone substrate specificity, degree of methylation and catalytic activity, we analyzed Arabidopsis Trithorax-like protein (ATX), Su(var)3-9 homologs protein (SUVH), Su(var)3-9 related protein (SUVR), ATXR5, ATXR6, and E(Z) HKMTs of Arabidopsis, maize and rice through sequence and structure comparison. We show that ATXs may exhibit methyltransferase specificity toward histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4) and might catalyse the trimethylation. Our analyses also indicate that most SUVH proteins of Arabidopsis may bind histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9). We also predict that SUVH7, SUVH8, SUVR1, SUVR3, ZmSET20 and ZmSET22 catalyse monomethylation or dimethylation of H3K9. Except for SDG728, which may trimethylate H3K9, all SUVH paralogs in rice may catalyse monomethylation or dimethylation. ZmSET11, ZmSET31, SDG713, SDG715, and SDG726 proteins are predicted to be catalytically inactive because of an incomplete S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) binding pocket and a post-SET domain. E(Z) homologs can trimethylate H3K27 substrate, which is similar to the Enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 of humans. Our comparative sequence analyses reveal that ATXR5 and ATXR6 lack motifs/domains required for protein-protein interaction and polycomb repressive complex 2 complex formation. We propose that subtle variations of key residues at substrate or SAM binding pocket, around the catalytic pocket, or presence of pre-SET and post-SET domains in HKMTs of the aforementioned plant species lead to variations in class-specific HKMT functions and further determine their substrate specificity, the degree of methylation and catalytic activity.