1
|
Abe J, Iritani R, Tsuchida K, Kamimura Y, West SA. A solution to a sex ratio puzzle in Melittobia wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2024656118. [PMID: 33972440 PMCID: PMC8157915 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024656118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The puzzling sex ratio behavior of Melittobia wasps has long posed one of the greatest questions in the field of sex allocation. Laboratory experiments have found that, in contrast to the predictions of theory and the behavior of numerous other organisms, Melittobia females do not produce fewer female-biased offspring sex ratios when more females lay eggs on a patch. We solve this puzzle by showing that, in nature, females of Melittobia australica have a sophisticated sex ratio behavior, in which their strategy also depends on whether they have dispersed from the patch where they emerged. When females have not dispersed, they lay eggs with close relatives, which keeps local mate competition high even with multiple females, and therefore, they are selected to produce consistently female-biased sex ratios. Laboratory experiments mimic these conditions. In contrast, when females disperse, they interact with nonrelatives, and thus adjust their sex ratio depending on the number of females laying eggs. Consequently, females appear to use dispersal status as an indirect cue of relatedness and whether they should adjust their sex ratio in response to the number of females laying eggs on the patch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Abe
- Faculty of Liberal Arts, Meijigakuin University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 244-8539, Japan;
- Research Institute for Integrated Science, Kanagawa University, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 159-1293, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Iritani
- RIKEN Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
| | - Koji Tsuchida
- Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 501-1193 Gifu, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Kamimura
- Department of Biology, Keio University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan
| | - Stuart A West
- Department of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cornetti L, Fields PD, Ebert D. Genomic characterization of selfing in the cyclic parthenogen Daphnia magna. J Evol Biol 2021; 34:792-802. [PMID: 33704857 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Inbreeding refers to the fusion of related individuals' gametes, with self-fertilization (selfing) being an extreme form of inbreeding-involving gametes produced by the same individual. Selfing is expected to reduce heterozygosity by an average of 50% in one generation; however, little is known about the empirical variation on a genome level surrounding this figure and the factors that affect variation. We selfed genotypes of the cyclic parthenogen Daphnia magna and analysed whole genomes of mothers and selfed offspring, observing the predicted 50% heterozygosity reduction on average. We also saw substantial variation around this value and significant differences among mother-offspring pairs. Crossover analysis confirmed the known trend of recombination occurring more often towards the telomeres. This effect was shown, through simulations, to increase the variance of heterozygosity reduction compared to when a uniform distribution of crossovers was used. Similarly, we simulated inbred line production after several generations of selfing and we observed higher variance in achieved homozygosity when we consider a higher recombination rate towards the telomeres. Our empirical and simulation study highlights that the expected mean values of heterozygosity reduction show remarkable variation, which can help understand, for example, differences among inbred individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Cornetti
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter D Fields
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dieter Ebert
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leung K, Ras E, Ferguson KB, Ariëns S, Babendreier D, Bijma P, Bourtzis K, Brodeur J, Bruins MA, Centurión A, Chattington SR, Chinchilla‐Ramírez M, Dicke M, Fatouros NE, González‐Cabrera J, Groot TVM, Haye T, Knapp M, Koskinioti P, Le Hesran S, Lyrakis M, Paspati A, Pérez‐Hedo M, Plouvier WN, Schlötterer C, Stahl JM, Thiel A, Urbaneja A, van de Zande L, Verhulst EC, Vet LEM, Visser S, Werren JH, Xia S, Zwaan BJ, Magalhães S, Beukeboom LW, Pannebakker BA. Next-generation biological control: the need for integrating genetics and genomics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2020; 95:1838-1854. [PMID: 32794644 PMCID: PMC7689903 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Biological control is widely successful at controlling pests, but effective biocontrol agents are now more difficult to import from countries of origin due to more restrictive international trade laws (the Nagoya Protocol). Coupled with increasing demand, the efficacy of existing and new biocontrol agents needs to be improved with genetic and genomic approaches. Although they have been underutilised in the past, application of genetic and genomic techniques is becoming more feasible from both technological and economic perspectives. We review current methods and provide a framework for using them. First, it is necessary to identify which biocontrol trait to select and in what direction. Next, the genes or markers linked to these traits need be determined, including how to implement this information into a selective breeding program. Choosing a trait can be assisted by modelling to account for the proper agro-ecological context, and by knowing which traits have sufficiently high heritability values. We provide guidelines for designing genomic strategies in biocontrol programs, which depend on the organism, budget, and desired objective. Genomic approaches start with genome sequencing and assembly. We provide a guide for deciding the most successful sequencing strategy for biocontrol agents. Gene discovery involves quantitative trait loci analyses, transcriptomic and proteomic studies, and gene editing. Improving biocontrol practices includes marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and microbiome manipulation of biocontrol agents, and monitoring for genetic variation during rearing and post-release. We conclude by identifying the most promising applications of genetic and genomic methods to improve biological control efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelley Leung
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenPO Box 111039700 CCGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Erica Ras
- Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and AgricultureVienna International CentreP.O. Box 1001400ViennaAustria
| | - Kim B. Ferguson
- Laboratory of GeneticsWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Simone Ariëns
- Group for Population and Evolutionary Ecology, FB 02, Institute of EcologyUniversity of BremenLeobener Str. 528359BremenGermany
| | | | - Piter Bijma
- Animal Breeding and GenomicsWageningen University & ResearchPO Box 3386700 AHWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Kostas Bourtzis
- Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and AgricultureVienna International CentreP.O. Box 1001400ViennaAustria
| | - Jacques Brodeur
- Institut de Recherche en Biologie VégétaleUniversité de Montréal4101 Sherbrooke EstMontréalQuebecCanadaH1X 2B2
| | - Margreet A. Bruins
- Laboratory of GeneticsWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Alejandra Centurión
- Group for Population and Evolutionary Ecology, FB 02, Institute of EcologyUniversity of BremenLeobener Str. 528359BremenGermany
| | - Sophie R. Chattington
- Group for Population and Evolutionary Ecology, FB 02, Institute of EcologyUniversity of BremenLeobener Str. 528359BremenGermany
| | - Milena Chinchilla‐Ramírez
- Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Centro de Protección Vegetal y BiotecnologíaUnidad Mixta Gestión Biotecnológica de Plagas UV‐IVIACarretera CV‐315, Km 10'746113MoncadaValenciaSpain
| | - Marcel Dicke
- Laboratory of EntomologyWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Nina E. Fatouros
- Biosystematics GroupWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Joel González‐Cabrera
- Department of Genetics, Estructura de Recerca Interdisciplinar en Biotecnología i Biomedicina (ERI‐BIOTECMED)Unidad Mixta Gestión Biotecnológica de Plagas UV‐IVIA, Universitat de ValènciaDr Moliner 5046100BurjassotValenciaSpain
| | - Thomas V. M. Groot
- Koppert Biological SystemsVeilingweg 142651 BEBerkel en RodenrijsThe Netherlands
| | - Tim Haye
- CABIRue des Grillons 12800DelémontSwitzerland
| | - Markus Knapp
- Koppert Biological SystemsVeilingweg 142651 BEBerkel en RodenrijsThe Netherlands
| | - Panagiota Koskinioti
- Insect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and AgricultureVienna International CentreP.O. Box 1001400ViennaAustria
- Department of Biochemistry and BiotechnologyUniversity of ThessalyBiopolis41500LarissaGreece
| | - Sophie Le Hesran
- Laboratory of EntomologyWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
- Koppert Biological SystemsVeilingweg 142651 BEBerkel en RodenrijsThe Netherlands
| | - Manolis Lyrakis
- Institut für PopulationsgenetikVetmeduni ViennaVeterinärplatz 11210ViennaAustria
- Vienna Graduate School of Population GeneticsVetmeduni ViennaVeterinärplatz 11210ViennaAustria
| | - Angeliki Paspati
- Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Centro de Protección Vegetal y BiotecnologíaUnidad Mixta Gestión Biotecnológica de Plagas UV‐IVIACarretera CV‐315, Km 10'746113MoncadaValenciaSpain
| | - Meritxell Pérez‐Hedo
- Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Centro de Protección Vegetal y BiotecnologíaUnidad Mixta Gestión Biotecnológica de Plagas UV‐IVIACarretera CV‐315, Km 10'746113MoncadaValenciaSpain
| | - Wouter N. Plouvier
- INRA, CNRS, UMR 1355‐7254400 Route des ChappesBP 167 06903Sophia Antipolis CedexFrance
| | | | - Judith M. Stahl
- CABIRue des Grillons 12800DelémontSwitzerland
- Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension CenterUniversity of California Berkeley9240 South Riverbend AvenueParlierCA93648USA
| | - Andra Thiel
- Group for Population and Evolutionary Ecology, FB 02, Institute of EcologyUniversity of BremenLeobener Str. 528359BremenGermany
| | - Alberto Urbaneja
- Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Centro de Protección Vegetal y BiotecnologíaUnidad Mixta Gestión Biotecnológica de Plagas UV‐IVIACarretera CV‐315, Km 10'746113MoncadaValenciaSpain
| | - Louis van de Zande
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenPO Box 111039700 CCGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Eveline C. Verhulst
- Laboratory of EntomologyWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Louise E. M. Vet
- Laboratory of EntomologyWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
- Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO‐KNAW)Droevendaalsesteeg 106708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Sander Visser
- Institute of EntomologyBiology Centre CASBranišovská 31370 05České BudějoviceCzech Republic
- Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaBranišovská 1760370 05České BudějoviceCzech Republic
| | - John H. Werren
- Department of BiologyUniversity of RochesterRochesterNY14627USA
| | - Shuwen Xia
- Animal Breeding and GenomicsWageningen University & ResearchPO Box 3386700 AHWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Bas J. Zwaan
- Laboratory of GeneticsWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Sara Magalhães
- cE3c: Centre for Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental ChangesFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaEdifício C2, Campo Grande1749‐016LisbonPortugal
| | - Leo W. Beukeboom
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenPO Box 111039700 CCGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Bart A. Pannebakker
- Laboratory of GeneticsWageningen University & ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708 PBWageningenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Development and characterization of 15 novel polymorphic microsatellite loci for two important bot flies (Diptera, Oestridae) by next-generation sequencing. Parasitol Res 2020; 119:2829-2835. [PMID: 32705375 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-020-06824-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cephenemyia stimulator and Oestrus ovis are two important parasitic bot flies (Oestridae) species causing myiasis, with a potential negative impact on the welfare of the host. Using next-generation sequencing approach and bioinformatics tools, a large panel of possible microsatellites loci was obtained in both species. Primer pairs were designed for 15 selected microsatellite loci in C. stimulator and other 15 loci in O. ovis for PCR amplification. Loci amplification and analysis were performed in four populations of each species. The results demonstrated that all selected loci were polymorphic, with the number of alleles ranging from 2 to 6 per locus in C. stimulator and 3 to 13 per locus in O. ovis. This is the first time to describe these microsatellite loci for C. stimulator and O. ovis. These two sets of microsatellite markers could be further used for biogeographic and population genetics studies.
Collapse
|