Significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Real-world evidence of cisplatin versus carboplatin in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Though concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin remains a standard of care for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), carboplatin has alternatively been used without sufficient supportive evidences. Thus, we evaluated an efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin CCRT compared with cisplatin in LA-NPC patients.

METHODS

Patients with LA-NPC treated with CCRT were identified through the Thai multicenter head and neck cancer database. Patient tolerability and survival were analyzed and compared between regimens. Survivals were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by the log-rank test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 135 of 980 patients (13.8%) were treated with carboplatin. Patients treated with carboplatin were significantly associated with older age (p < 0.001), smoking (p = 0.003), more comorbidity (p = 0.014), kidney disease (p = 0.016), and lower baseline creatinine clearance (p < 0.001). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was used significantly more in the cisplatin group than carboplatin group (p < 0.001). Patients who received carboplatin were associated with delay (p = 0.049) and hospitalization (p = 0.006), whereas cisplatin CCRT had more dose reduction (p = 0.001). Patients treated with cisplatin had CCRT interruption from grade 3-4 mucositis (p = 0.019) more than carboplatin, whereas carboplatin had more grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients treated with cisplatin and carboplatin was 59% and 49%, respectively (p = 0.128). Cisplatin or carboplatin CCRT was not a significant predictor for OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin CCRT provided acceptable efficacy and tolerability profiles in real-world practice. Carboplatin should be considered as an alternative regimen, particularly in cisplatin-ineligible patients with LA-NPC treated with CCRT.

Prognostic value of the cervical lymph node necrosis ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Whether cervical lymph node necrosis (CNN) is an independent adverse prognostic factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has not been determined. In this study, the CNN ratio was graded quantitatively to explore the prognostic value in NPC.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a total of 648 pathologically confirmed as NPC. We outlined metastatic lymph nodes and necrotic area of lymph nodes slice by slice on the magneticresonanceimages (MRI) cross section, and calculated the corresponding CNN ratio.

RESULTS

The median CNN ratio (17.37 %) was taken as the cut-off point, 256 (39.51 %) patients were divided into CNN1 group (<17.37 %, n = 128) and CNN2 group (≥17.37 %, n = 128), 392 (60.49 %) patients without lymph nodes necrosis were CNN0. Among the CNN0, CNN1 and CNN2 groups, five-year overall survival (OS) was 82.4 %, 76.6 % and 71.1 %, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) was 91.3 %, 91.1 % and 90.5 %, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was 83.7 %, 78.5 % and 68.7 %, progression-free survival (PFS) was 78.3 %, 71.7 % and 61.6 % respectively. By multivariate analysis, CNN was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.003), DMFS (P = 0.019) and PFS (P = 0.007). More than 3 cycles of chemotherapy significantly increased OS (P = 0.024) and DMFS (P = 0.015) in the CNN1 group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that CNN is one of the factors with the negative prognosis of NPC. The CNN ratio might be used as one of the reference factors in the formulation of individualized treatment plan.

Improved overall survival is associated with adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for N3 nasopharyngeal cancer

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the established treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, there is no evidence supporting routine adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to demonstrate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival and distant metastasis in high-risk N3 NPC patients. We linked the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Cause of Death database to obtain data. Clinical N3 NPC patients were divided as those receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and platinum (PF) chemotherapy and those receiving no chemotherapy after CCRT. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We compared overall survival, disease-free survival, local control, and distant metastasis in both groups using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Propensity-score matching was also performed to evaluate the independent effect of adjuvant PF in a matched cohort with similar baseline characteristics. We included 431 patients (152 and 279 patients in the adjuvant PF and observation groups, respectively). Median follow-up was 4.3 years. The 5-year overall survival were 69.1% and 57.4% in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy and observation groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–0.84; p = 0.003), even after adjusting for baseline prognostic factors (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.86; p = 0.005). Distant metastasis-free survival at 12 months was higher in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy group than in the observation group (98% vs 84.8%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with freedom from distant metastasis (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02–0.46; p = 0.003). Adjuvant chemotherapy was also associated with a decreased risk of death (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41–0.85, p = 0.004) in a propensity score-matched cohort. Prospective evaluation of adjuvant PF chemotherapy in N3 NPC patients treated with definitive CCRT is warranted because adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and decreased risk of distant metastasis.

The Integration of the Pre-Treatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Staging System for Nasopharynx Cancer

Objective

The present study aimed to evaluate the role of integrating the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) into the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system for nasopharynx cancer in an endemic region.

Methods

Between May 2007 and December 2012, a total of 713 cases with NPC were retrospectively analyzed. The separation ability in terms of overall survival (OS), local failure-free survival (LFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and failure-free survival (FFS) was evaluated. The discriminatory ability was assessed using Harrell’s concordance index (c-index). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted and incorporated with pretreatment NLR.

Results

When integrated with NLR, the separate and discriminatory abilities for N classifications were improved in terms of OS and DMFS, but not for T categories. By using Recursive partitioning analysis, five subgroups were generated. Compared with the overall stage, the integration of NLR could not enhance the separate and discriminatory abilities. However, patients in the RPA 4 group gained significant benefits in terms of OS (HR 0.390 (95%CI 0.212-0.716), P = 0.002) and FFS (HR 0.548 (95%CI 0.314-0.958), P = 0.032) from the additional adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Conclusion

The integration of NLR into the 8^th edition of the AJCC staging system could enhance the separation and discriminatory abilities for N classifications, but not for T categories. In addition, patients in the RPA 4 group could benefit from the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Survival benefit of induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognosis based on a new risk estimation model

BACKGROUND

Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines recommend CCRT+AC and IC + CCRT as level 2A evidence for treatment of the locoregionally advanced NPC (II-IVa), IC + CCRT+AC could also be an alternative but it is seldom used because of the low completion rates. This article aimed to compare the effectiveness of the three radiotherapy regimens using a large-scale retrospective study.

METHODS

This retrospective single center analysis enrolled 1812 diagnosed NPC patients at Nanfang Hospital from January 2005 to December 2015 and only 729 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Patients without distant metastasis, age of 18-70 years, Karnofsky scores of at least 70,stage III-IVb, and adequate adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Were enrolled. Adverse events and other categorical variables were compared by Pearson chi-square test or Fishier exact test. Time-to-event data were described with the Kaplan-Meier curves, time-to-event intervals compared with the log-rank test. We did multivariable analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model to test the independent signifi cance of diff erent factors. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the β regression coeffi cient, p value, and hazard ratio and its 95% CI for each of the selected risk predictors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 47 months. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed no significant differences among three groups in 3-year failure-free survival (FFS, P = 0.225), 3-year overall survival (OS, P = 0.992), 3-year locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS, P = 0.549), and 3-year distant failure-free survival (DFFS, P = 0.174). Stratified survival analysis based on the risk scoring model revealed no differences in FFS, OS, LFFS, and DFFS between IC + CCRT and CCRT+AC groups for low-risk patients, however, the 3-year OS (88.3% vs. 77.6%, P = 0.049) and 3-year DFFS (84.0% vs.66.8%, P = 0.032) were respectively significantly better in IC + CCRT group compared with CCRT+AC group for high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CCRT+AC, IC + CCRT lowers distant metastasis rate and improves OS among patients with locally advanced NPC in high risk group.

The Current Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the head and neck, and it originates from the mucous epithelium of the nasopharynx. Because it is "hidden", the symptoms of NPC can easily be missed, and more than 70% of patients present with locally advanced disease at diagnosis. Concurrent radiation therapy with chemotherapy can significantly improve regional control of NPC. At present, distant metastasis is the main cause of treatment failure. At the end of the 20th century, clinical trial No. IG0099 in the United States confirmed the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for the first time. However, in the past 20 years, various clinical trials and meta-analyses conducted globally have yielded contradictory results regarding the effect of AC on locally advanced NPC. AC has changed from category 1 to the current category 2A in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, and it remains controversial whether AC can significantly improve the survival of NPC patients. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the role of AC in locally advanced NPC by comparing some treatment methods. We conclude the role of AC in treating locally advanced NPC, based on the studies presented, remains undefined but is associated with increased toxicity.

Two-year outcome of concurrent chemoradiation with carboplatin with or without adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil in nasopharyngeal cancer: A multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

According to the noninferiority result of chemoradiation with carboplatin in our previous nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) study along with the inconclusive data on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we designed to assess the role of adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil following CCRT with carboplatin in locoregionally advanced NPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter randomized trial was conducted at 5 cancer centers in Thailand. We enrolled in stage T2N0M0-T4N2M0 (American Joint Cancer Committee 7th edition) WHO Type 2 NPC patients. N3 or metastatic disease patients were excluded. Participants were randomized into 2 groups: CCRT plus AC group vs the CCRT alone group. Patients in both groups received weekly carboplatin 100 mg/m² for 6 cycles concurrently with radiotherapy 69.96-70 Gy. Patients in the AC group subsequently received 3 cycles of carboplatin area under curve-5 plus 1000 mg/m²/day of fluorouracil infusion within 96 hours every 3 weeks. We report the 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Treatment-related toxicities and compliance were also explored.

RESULTS

Of 175 patients, 82 (46.9%) were assigned to the AC group, and 93 (53.1%) to the CCRT group. The compliance rate during CCRT was 90% and 86% in the AC and CCRT group, whereas 81.7% during adjuvant treatment in the AC group. With a median follow-up time of 24.4 months (interquartile range 17.9-24.4), the 2-year OS rate was 89.6% in the AC group and 81.8% in the CCRT group (P= 0.167). The 2-year DFS rate was 86.8% in the AC group and 74.6% in the CCRT group (P = 0.042). The 2-year LRFS rate was 91.5% in the AC group and 88.2% in the CCRT group (P = 0.443). The 2-year DMFS rate was 85.4% in the AC group and 79.6% in the CCRT group (P = 0.294). The most frequent serious (grade 3/4) nonhematologic toxicity was acute mucositis, which occurred 5% in the AC group vs 4% in the CCRT group (P = 0.498). For hematologic toxicity, grade 3-4 leukopenia were found 10% and 5% in the adjuvant and CCRT groups, respectively (P = 0.003). Multivariate analyses determined stage N2 disease was an adverse prognostic factor associated with shorter OS, DFS, and DMFS. And the adjuvant treatment was a significant protective factor for only DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil following CCRT with carboplatin significantly improved 2-year DFS in stage T2N0M0-T4N2M0 NPC albeit there was a nonsignificant trend in favor of a higher 2-year OS, LRFS, and DMFS. Long-term efficacy and late toxicities of AC still require exploration.

Added value of metastatic cervical lymph node group V in nodal staging of nasopharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognostic significance of posterior cervical lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal cancer is largely unknown. This study aims to determine the added prognostic significance of cervical lymph node group V to the standard American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (eighth edition AJCC) of nasopharyngeal patients with cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in terms of overall survival (OS), distant metastatic-free survival (DMFS), and disease-free survival (DFS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective cohort of 199 consecutively diagnosed nasopharyngeal patients with cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the era of IMRT in a large university hospital in endemic area of Southeast Asia. Pre-treatment imaging studies were thoroughly re-evaluated and re-staged by a board-certified radiologist using radiographic criteria for cervical lymph node metastasis. T and N classifications were reclassified according to the eighth AJCC staging system. Group V (Va and Vb) cervical node was evaluated for its added prognostic significance. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to retrieve hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval and P value for N classification. Harrell's C-statistic (concordance index) was used for test of discrimination and internal validation was calculated by bootstrap method.

RESULTS

This study demonstrated greater separation of OS with HR of 6.75 (95%CI 1.94-23.51, P = .003) by using group Vb only as N3 compared to HR of 4.70 (95%CI 1.37-16.13, P = .014) by using current standard N3 disease (groups IV and Vb). Similarly, N2 with presence of Va shows worsened DFS with HR of 8.70 (95%CI 1.08-69.67, P = .042) compared to N2 without Va with HR of 5.93 (95%CI 0.76-46.00, P = .089). After incorporating cervical group V into nodal staging, the HR and 95%CI among each group was better separated than the eighth AJCC staging system but without significant improvement in C-index.

CONCLUSION

Cervical lymph node group V is a potentially added prognostic factor to standard TNM staging.

Prognostic Nomogram For Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

The TNM staging system of NPC is the most important model for survival prediction. However, this model does not consider the biological variability of the tumor itself. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the overall survival of loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. 487 Patients with confimed nasopharyngeal carcinoma who underwent IMRT and chemotherapy were included in this study. We established prognostic nomogram for overall survival (OS) based on the Cox proportional hazards model. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were measured using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. Nomogram was validated externally by assessing discrimination and calibration using an independent data set. Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to analyze whether nomogram improve the prediction of survival than TNM stage system. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to stratifying risk of patients. Age, T-stage, N-stage, NLR, LDH were included in the nomogram for OS. The C-index of the nomogram for OS were 0.726 (95% CI, 0.690 to 0.762); The calibration curve showed the nomogram was able to predict 5-year OS accurately. The nomogram had a higher C-index than the TNM stage system (0.726 VS 0.632, P-value < 0.001). The NRI was 0.235 (95% CI: 0.129 to 0.396, P < 0.001), the IDI was 0.079 (95% CI: 0.034 to 0.396, p < 0.001). RPA was performed to stratify patients into three risk group, OS was significantly different between all three risk groups. High risk groups can be benefited survival from adjuvant chemotherapy. The nomogram outperformed the TNM staging system in predicting the OS of loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy and chemotherapy.

Prognostic role of pre-treatment serum albumin in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pre-treatment serum albumin (ALB) is a novel index that was identified in recent years and is considered to be closely related to the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the association between ALB and NPC remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW

To assess the prognostic significance of pre-treatment serum ALB in patients with NPC.

TYPE OF REVIEW

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science for studies published up to August 2018. The keywords used were related to albumin, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and prognosis.

EVALUATION METHOD

We extracted the following data from all included studies: author, publication year, country, cancer centre, time points of randomisation, sample size, mean or median age, gender, TNM stage of NPC, cut-off value of pre-treatment serum albumin, number of high-grade cases and duration of follow-up. Then, we generated the pooled hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) to perform this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies comprising 7339 cases were included. Lower pre-treatment serum ALB levels were significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.17-1.48) and DMFS (HR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.80). In general, our findings were further verified in the subgroup analyses based on three features, including cancer stage, cut-off value and analysis type.

CONCLUSION

A decreased level of pre-treatment serum albumin implies a poor prognosis and can be detected to define the risk stratification of NPC patients.

Clinical outcome and prognostic analysis of young adults nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients of a nonendemic area in intensity-modulated radiotherapy era

AIM

To investigate the clinical outcome and prognostic factors of young adults nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome and the prognostic factors of young adults NPC patients who were admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to December 2013. COX regression model was used to identify factors associated with survival. The acute and late toxicities were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were included; the median follow-up time for all the patients was 65 months (4-96 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival and local-regional recurrence-free survival were 85.9, 82.4, 76.4 and 92.4%, respectively. N stage was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.009) and distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.008). Cumulative cisplatin >200 mg/m² was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Young adults with NPC can achieve a reasonable local-regional control and OS in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with tolerable toxicities.