1
|
Cutler J, Bodet A, Rivest J, Cavanagh P. The word superiority effect overcomes crowding. Vision Res 2024; 222:108436. [PMID: 38820621 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
Crowding and the word superiority effect are two perceptual phenomena that influence reading. The identification of the inner letters of a word can be hindered by crowding from adjacent letters, but it can be facilitated by the word context itself (the word superiority effect). In the present study, strings of four-letters (words and non-words) with different inter-letter spacings (ranging from an optimal spacing to produce crowding to a spacing too large to produce crowding) were presented briefly in the periphery and participants were asked to identify the third letter of the string. Each word had a partner word that was identical except for its third letter (e.g., COLD, CORD) so that guessing as the source of the improved performance for words could be ruled out. Unsurprisingly, letter identification accuracy for words was better than non-words. For non-words, it was lowest at closer spacings, confirming crowding. However, for words, accuracy remained high at all inter-letter spacings showing that crowding did not prevent identification of the inner letters. This result supports models of "holistic" word recognition where partial cues can lead to recognition without first identifying individual letters. Once the word is recognized, its inner letters can be recovered, despite their feature loss produced by crowding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June Cutler
- Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M6, Canada
| | - Alexandre Bodet
- Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M6, Canada
| | - Josée Rivest
- Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M6, Canada; Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
| | - Patrick Cavanagh
- Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M6, Canada; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smithers SP, Shao Y, Altham J, Bex PJ. Large depth differences between target and flankers can increase crowding: Evidence from a multi-depth plane display. eLife 2023; 12:e85143. [PMID: 37665324 PMCID: PMC10476968 DOI: 10.7554/elife.85143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Crowding occurs when the presence of nearby features causes highly visible objects to become unrecognizable. Although crowding has implications for many everyday tasks and the tremendous amounts of research reflect its importance, surprisingly little is known about how depth affects crowding. Most available studies show that stereoscopic disparity reduces crowding, indicating that crowding may be relatively unimportant in three-dimensional environments. However, most previous studies tested only small stereoscopic differences in depth in which disparity, defocus blur, and accommodation are inconsistent with the real world. Using a novel multi-depth plane display, this study investigated how large (0.54-2.25 diopters), real differences in target-flanker depth, representative of those experienced between many objects in the real world, affect crowding. Our findings show that large differences in target-flanker depth increased crowding in the majority of observers, contrary to previous work showing reduced crowding in the presence of small depth differences. Furthermore, when the target was at fixation depth, crowding was generally more pronounced when the flankers were behind the target as opposed to in front of it. However, when the flankers were at fixation depth, crowding was generally more pronounced when the target was behind the flankers. These findings suggest that crowding from clutter outside the limits of binocular fusion can still have a significant impact on object recognition and visual perception in the peripheral field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel P Smithers
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern UniversityBostonUnited States
| | - Yulong Shao
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern UniversityBostonUnited States
| | - James Altham
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern UniversityBostonUnited States
| | - Peter J Bex
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern UniversityBostonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalpadakis-Smith AV, Tailor VK, Dahlmann-Noor AH, Greenwood JA. Crowding changes appearance systematically in peripheral, amblyopic, and developing vision. J Vis 2022; 22:3. [PMID: 35506917 PMCID: PMC9078053 DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.6.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Visual crowding is the disruptive effect of clutter on object recognition. Although most prominent in adult peripheral vision, crowding also disrupts foveal vision in typically developing children and those with strabismic amblyopia. Do these crowding effects share the same mechanism? Here we exploit observations that crowded errors in peripheral vision are not random: Target objects appear either averaged with the flankers (assimilation) or replaced by them (substitution). If amblyopic and developmental crowding share the same mechanism, then their errors should be similarly systematic. We tested foveal vision in children aged 3 to 8 years with typical vision or strabismic amblyopia and peripheral vision in typical adults. The perceptual effects of crowding were measured by requiring observers to adjust a reference stimulus to match the perceived orientation of a target “Vac-Man” element. When the target was surrounded by flankers that differed by ± 30°, all three groups (adults and children with typical or amblyopic vision) reported orientations between the target and flankers (assimilation). Errors were reduced with ± 90° differences but primarily matched the flanker orientation (substitution) when they did occur. A population pooling model of crowding successfully simulated this pattern of errors in all three groups. We conclude that the perceptual effects of amblyopic and developing crowding are systematic and resemble the near periphery in adults, suggesting a common underlying mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vijay K Tailor
- Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre @ Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.,Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,
| | - Annegret H Dahlmann-Noor
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre @ Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.,Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,
| | - John A Greenwood
- Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK., http://eccentricvision.com
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rideaux R, West RK, Wallis TSA, Bex PJ, Mattingley JB, Harrison WJ. Spatial structure, phase, and the contrast of natural images. J Vis 2022; 22:4. [PMID: 35006237 PMCID: PMC8762697 DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.1.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The sensitivity of the human visual system is thought to be shaped by environmental statistics. A major endeavor in vision science, therefore, is to uncover the image statistics that predict perceptual and cognitive function. When searching for targets in natural images, for example, it has recently been proposed that target detection is inversely related to the spatial similarity of the target to its local background. We tested this hypothesis by measuring observers' sensitivity to targets that were blended with natural image backgrounds. Targets were designed to have a spatial structure that was either similar or dissimilar to the background. Contrary to masking from similarity, we found that observers were most sensitive to targets that were most similar to their backgrounds. We hypothesized that a coincidence of phase alignment between target and background results in a local contrast signal that facilitates detection when target-background similarity is high. We confirmed this prediction in a second experiment. Indeed, we show that, by solely manipulating the phase of a target relative to its background, the target can be rendered easily visible or undetectable. Our study thus reveals that, in addition to its structural similarity, the phase of the target relative to the background must be considered when predicting detection sensitivity in natural images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben Rideaux
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca K West
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Thomas S A Wallis
- Institut für Psychologie & Centre for Cognitive Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Peter J Bex
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason B Mattingley
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - William J Harrison
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shechter A, Yashar A. Mixture model investigation of the inner-outer asymmetry in visual crowding reveals a heavier weight towards the visual periphery. Sci Rep 2021; 11:2116. [PMID: 33483608 PMCID: PMC7822962 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81533-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Crowding, the failure to identify a peripheral item in clutter, is an essential bottleneck in visual information processing. A hallmark characteristic of crowding is the inner-outer asymmetry in which the outer flanker (more eccentric) produces stronger interference than the inner one (closer to the fovea). We tested the contribution of the inner-outer asymmetry to the pattern of crowding errors in a typical radial crowding display in which both flankers are presented simultaneously on the horizontal meridian. In two experiments, observers were asked to estimate the orientation of a Gabor target. Instead of the target, observers reported the outer flanker much more frequently than the inner one. When the target was the outer Gabor, crowding was reduced. Furthermore, when there were four flankers, two on each side of the target, observers misreported the outer flanker adjacent to the target, not the outermost flanker. Model comparisons suggested that orientation crowding reflects sampling over a weighted sum of the represented features, in which the outer flanker is more heavily weighted compared to the inner one. Our findings reveal a counterintuitive phenomenon: in a radial arrangement of orientation crowding, within a region of selection, the outer item dominates appearance more than the inner one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adi Shechter
- The Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- The Department of Learning Disabilities, Faculty of Education, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Amit Yashar
- The Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
- The Department of Special Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Haifa, 199 Abba Khoushy Ave, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE Performance on clinical tests of visual acuity can be influenced by the presence of nearby targets. This study compared the influence of neighboring flanking bars and letters on foveal and peripheral letter identification. PURPOSE Contour interaction and crowding refer to an impairment of visual resolution or discrimination produced by different types of flanking stimuli. This study compared the impairment of percent correct letter identification that is produced in normal observers when a target letter is surrounded by an array of four flanking bars (contour interaction) or four flanking letters (crowding). METHODS Performance was measured at the fovea and at eccentricities of 1.25, 2.5, and 5° for photopic (200 cd/m2) and mesopic stimuli (0.5 cd/m2) and a range of target-to-flanker separations. RESULTS Consistent with previous reports, foveal contour interaction and crowding were more pronounced for photopic than mesopic targets. However, no statistically significant difference existed between foveal contour-interaction and crowding functions at either luminance level. On the other hand, flanking bars produced much less impairment of letter identification than letter flankers at all three peripheral locations, indicating that crowding is more severe than contour interaction in peripheral vision. In contrast to the fovea, peripheral crowding and contour-interaction functions did not differ systematically for targets of photopic and mesopic luminance. CONCLUSION The similarity between foveal contour interaction and crowding and the dissimilarity between peripheral contour interaction and crowding suggest the involvement of different mechanisms at different retinal locations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
In this article, I present a framework that would accommodate the classic ideas of visual information processing together with more recent computational approaches. I used the current knowledge about visual crowding, capacity limitations, attention, and saliency to place these phenomena within a standard neural network model. I suggest some revisions to traditional mechanisms of attention and feature integration that are required to fit better into this framework. The results allow us to explain some apparent theoretical controversies in vision research, suggesting a rationale for the limited spatial extent of crowding, a role of saliency in crowding experiments, and several amendments to the feature integration theory. The scheme can be elaborated or modified by future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Endel Põder
- Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- www.ut.ee/~endelp/
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Raveendran RN, Krishnan AK, Thompson B. Reduced fixation stability induced by peripheral viewing does not contribute to crowding. J Vis 2020; 20:3. [PMID: 33007078 PMCID: PMC7545060 DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.10.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Attending to peripheral visual targets while maintaining central fixation, a process that involves covert attention, reduces fixation stability. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes in fixation stability induced by peripheral viewing contribute to crowding in peripheral vision by increasing positional uncertainty. We first assessed whether fixation was less stable during peripheral versus central (foveal) viewing for both crowded and uncrowded stimuli. We then tested whether fixation stability during peripheral viewing was associated with the extent of crowding. Fourteen participants performed a tumbling E orientation discrimination task at three different eccentricities (0°, 5°, 10°). The target was presented with or without flankers. Fixational eye movements were measured using an infrared video-based eyetracker. A central fixation cross was provided for the two peripheral viewing conditions, and optotype size was scaled for each eccentricity. Discrimination of appropriately scaled uncrowded stimuli was unaffected by eccentricity, whereas discrimination of crowded stimuli deteriorated dramatically with eccentricity, despite scaling. Both crowded and uncrowded peripheral stimuli were associated with reduced fixation stability, increased microsaccadic amplitude, and a greater proportion of horizontal microsaccades relative to centrally presented stimuli. However, these effects were not associated with the magnitude of crowding. This suggests that reduced fixation stability due to peripheral viewing does not contribute to crowding in peripheral vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajkumar Nallour Raveendran
- Envision Research Institute, Wichita, KS, USA.,School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.,
| | | | - Benjamin Thompson
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.,Centre for Eye and Vision Research, Hong Kong.,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Strappini F, Martelli M, Cozzo C, di Pace E. Empirical Evidence for Intraspecific Multiple Realization? Front Psychol 2020; 11:1676. [PMID: 32793053 PMCID: PMC7394053 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the remarkable advances in behavioral and brain sciences over the last decades, the mind-body (brain) problem is still an open debate and one of the most intriguing questions for both cognitive neuroscience and philosophy of mind. Traditional approaches have conceived this problem in terms of a contrast between physicalist monism and Cartesian dualism. However, since the late sixties, the landscape of philosophical views on the problem has become more varied and complex. The Multiple Realization Thesis (MRT) claims that mental properties can be (or are) realized, and mental processes can be (or are) implemented by neural correlates of different kinds. Thus, MRT challenges the psychoneural type-identity theory and the corresponding reductionism. Many philosophers have acknowledged the a priori plausibility of MRT. However, the existence of empirical evidence in favor of intraspecific, human multiple realizations of mental processes and properties is still controversial. Here, we illustrate some cases that provide empirical evidence in support of MRT. Recently, it has been proposed that foveal agnosic vision, like peripheral vision, can be restored by increasing object parts’ spacing (Crutch and Warrington, 2007; Strappini et al., 2017b). Agnosic fovea and normal periphery are both limited by crowding, which impairs object recognition, and provides the signature of visual integration. Here, we define a psychological property of restored object identification, and we cross-reference the data of visually impaired patients with different etiologies. In particular, we compare the data of two stroke patients, two patients with posterior cortical atrophy, six cases of strabismic amblyopia, and one case with restored sight. We also compare these patients with unimpaired subjects tested in the periphery. We show that integration (i.e., restored recognition) seems to describe quite accurately the visual performance in all these cases. Whereas the patients have different etiologies and different neural correlates, the unimpaired subjects have no neural damage. Thus, similarity in the psychological property given the differences in the neural substrate can be interpreted in relation to MRT and provide evidence in its support. Finally, we will frame our contribution within the current debate concerning MRT providing new and compelling empirical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cesare Cozzo
- Department of Philosophy, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico di Pace
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Object recognition in the periphery is limited by clutter. This phenomenon of visual crowding is ameliorated when the objects are dissimilar. This effect of inter-object similarity has been extensively studied for low-level features and is thought to reflect bottom-up processes. Recently, crowding was also found to be reduced when objects belonged to explicitly distinct groups; that is, crowding was weak when they had low group membership similarity. It has been claimed that top-down knowledge is necessary to explain this effect of group membership, implying that the effect of similarity on crowding cannot be a purely bottom-up process. We tested the claim that the effect of group membership relies on knowledge in two experiments and found that neither explicit knowledge about differences in group membership nor the possibility of acquiring knowledge about target identities is necessary to produce the effects. These results suggest that top-down processes need not be invoked to explain the effect of group membership. Instead, we suggest that differences in flanker reportability that emerge from the differences in group membership are the source of the effect. That is, when targets and flankers are sampled from distinct groups, flankers cannot be inadvertently reported, leading to fewer errors and hence weaker crowding. Further, we argue that this effect arises at the stage of response selection. This conclusion is well supported by an analytical model based on these principles. We conclude that previously observed effects in crowding attributed to top-down or higher level processes might instead be due to post-perceptual response selection strategies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Coates DR, Bernard JB, Chung STL. Feature contingencies when reading letter strings. Vision Res 2019; 156:84-95. [PMID: 30660632 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 01/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Many models posit the use of distinctive spatial features to recognize letters of the alphabet, a fundamental component of reading. It has also been hypothesized that when letters are in close proximity, visual crowding may cause features to mislocalize between nearby letters, causing identification errors. Here, we took a data-driven approach to investigate these aspects of textual processing. Using data collected from subjects identifying each letter in thousands of lower-case letter trigrams presented in the peripheral visual field, we found characteristic error patterns in the results suggestive of the use of particular spatial features. Distinctive features were seldom entirely missed, and we found evidence for errors due to doubling, masking, and migration of features. Dependencies both amongst neighboring letters and in the responses revealed the contingent nature of processing letter strings, challenging the most basic models of reading that ignore either crowding or featural decomposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susana T L Chung
- School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Visual Working Memory Is Independent of the Cortical Spacing Between Memoranda. J Neurosci 2018; 38:3116-3123. [PMID: 29459370 PMCID: PMC5864153 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2645-17.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The sensory recruitment hypothesis states that visual short-term memory is maintained in the same visual cortical areas that initially encode a stimulus' features. Although it is well established that the distance between features in visual cortex determines their visibility, a limitation known as crowding, it is unknown whether short-term memory is similarly constrained by the cortical spacing of memory items. Here, we investigated whether the cortical spacing between sequentially presented memoranda affects the fidelity of memory in humans (of both sexes). In a first experiment, we varied cortical spacing by taking advantage of the log-scaling of visual cortex with eccentricity, presenting memoranda in peripheral vision sequentially along either the radial or tangential visual axis with respect to the fovea. In a second experiment, we presented memoranda sequentially either within or beyond the critical spacing of visual crowding, a distance within which visual features cannot be perceptually distinguished due to their nearby cortical representations. In both experiments and across multiple measures, we found strong evidence that the ability to maintain visual features in memory is unaffected by cortical spacing. These results indicate that the neural architecture underpinning working memory has properties inconsistent with the known behavior of sensory neurons in visual cortex. Instead, the dissociation between perceptual and memory representations supports a role of higher cortical areas such as posterior parietal or prefrontal regions or may involve an as yet unspecified mechanism in visual cortex in which stimulus features are bound to their temporal order. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although much is known about the resolution with which we can remember visual objects, the cortical representation of items held in short-term memory remains contentious. A popular hypothesis suggests that memory of visual features is maintained via the recruitment of the same neural architecture in sensory cortex that encodes stimuli. We investigated this claim by manipulating the spacing in visual cortex between sequentially presented memoranda such that some items shared cortical representations more than others while preventing perceptual interference between stimuli. We found clear evidence that short-term memory is independent of the intracortical spacing of memoranda, revealing a dissociation between perceptual and memory representations. Our data indicate that working memory relies on different neural mechanisms from sensory perception.
Collapse
|