Development of an in silico profiler for respiratory sensitisation

In this article, we outline work that led the QSAR and Molecular Modelling Group at Liverpool John Moores University to be jointly awarded the 2013 Lush Science Prize. Our research focuses around the development of in silico profilers for category formation within the Adverse Outcome Pathway paradigm. The development of a well-defined chemical category allows toxicity to be predicted via read-across. This is the central approach used by the OECD QSAR Toolbox. The specific work for which we were awarded the Lush Prize was for the development of such an in silico profiler for respiratory sensitisation. The profiler was developed by an analysis of the mechanistic chemistry associated with covalent bond formation in the lung. The data analysed were collated from clinical reports of occupational asthma in humans. The impact of the development of in silico profilers on the Three Rs is also discussed.

Proposal of an in silico profiler for categorisation of repeat dose toxicity data of hair dyes

This study outlines the analysis of 94 chemicals with repeat dose toxicity data taken from Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety opinions for commonly used hair dyes in the European Union. Structural similarity was applied to group these chemicals into categories. Subsequent mechanistic analysis suggested that toxicity to mitochondria is potentially a key driver of repeat dose toxicity for chemicals within each of the categories. The mechanistic hypothesis allowed for an in silico profiler consisting of four mechanism-based structural alerts to be proposed. These structural alerts related to a number of important chemical classes such as quinones, anthraquinones, substituted nitrobenzenes and aromatic azos. This in silico profiler is intended for grouping chemicals into mechanism-based categories within the adverse outcome pathway paradigm.

Experimental verification of structural alerts for the protein binding of sulfur-containing compounds

As often noted by Dr. Gilman Veith, a major barrier to advancing any model is defining its applicability domain. Sulfur-containing industrial organic chemicals can be grouped into several chemical classes including mercaptans (RSH), sulfides (RSR'), disulfides (RSSR'), sulfoxides (RS(=O)R'), sulfones (RS(=O)(=O)R'), sulfonates (ROS(=O)(=O)R') and sulfates (ROS(=O)(=O)OR'). In silico expert systems that predict protein binding reactions from 2D structure sub-divide these chemical classes into a variety of chemical reactive mechanisms and reactions which have toxic consequences. Using the protein binding profilers in version 3.1 of the OECD QSAR Toolbox, a series of sulfur-containing chemicals were profiled for protein binding potential. From these results it was hypothesized which sulfur-containing chemicals would be reactive or non-reactive in an in chemico glutathione assay and whether if reactive they would exhibit toxicity in excess of baseline in the Tetrahymena pyriformis population growth impairment assay. Subsequently, these hypotheses were tested experimentally. The in chemico data show that the in silico profiler predictions were generally correct for all chemical categories, where testing was possible. Mercaptans could not be assessed for GSH reactivity because they react directly with the chromophore 5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid). With some exceptions, the major being disulfides, the in vitro toxicity data supported the in chemico findings.