Evaluation of the state-of-the-art of butyl- and phenyltin compound determinations in freshwater sediment prior to certification of a reference material

Simultaneous determination of mono-, di-, and tributyltin in sediments by isotope dilution analysis using gas chromatography--ICPMS

A mixed spike containing 119Sn-enriched monobutyltin (MBT), dibutyltin (DBT), and tributyltin (TBT) was prepared by direct butylation of 119Sn-enriched tin metal using a 1:3 molar excess of butyl chloride with iodide and triethylamine as catalysts. The isotopic composition of the different tin species in the spike solution was determined by gas chromatography- ICPMS after aqueous ethylation using sodium tetraethylborate. Reverse isotope dilution analysis was used for the characterization of the spike by means of natural MBT, DBT, and TBT standards. No species transformation was evident during derivatization from the reverse isotope dilution experiments based on the measured isotope ratios both before and after spiking. The mixed spike was applied to the simultaneous analysis of MBT, DBT, and TBT in certified reference materials, PACS-2 and CRM 646, with satisfactory results.

Accuracy and traceability concepts applied to environmental speciation analysis

Traceability issues are of increasing concern in all fields where chemical measurements form the basis for decisions. The concepts of accuracy and traceability as applied to environmental analysis are, however, still prone to misunderstandings, which has been recently illustrated by controversial discussions among the analytical community with respect to accuracy and traceability issues in the area of speciation analysis. Analytical techniques used for the determination of chemical species (speciation analysis) are generally based on a succession of steps (e.g. extraction derivatisation, separation, detection) which are all prone to various sources of systematic errors. Many speciation measurement techniques have been studied within the last decade through interlaboratory studies and certification of reference materials. These collaborative efforts have been understood as being directed towards strive for accuracy (trueness and precision). It has been recognised recently that the achievements actually enabled mostly to establish reference points (e.g. certified values in reference materials) which does not necessarily correspond to 'true values' but rather offer a mean for laboratories to compare their data internationally and, hence, achieve traceability. This ambiguity still generates confusion and misunderstandings among the scientific community. This communication discusses this issue, focusing on analytical measurements only. Extending discussions on general traceability issues would imply an examination of steps prior to laboratory work (sampling, storage, etc.) which is beyond the scope of this contribution.