Selective complexation of uranium(iii) over lanthanide(iii) triflates by 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine. X-Ray crystal structures of [M(OTf)3(terpy)2] and [M(OTf)2(terpy)2(py)][OTf] (M = Nd, Ce, U) and of polynuclear µ-oxo uranium(iv) complexes resulting from hydrolysis

Polypyridines, Picrates, Lanthanides: A Plethora of Stacks?

Reactions of the lanthanide(iii) picrates (picrate=2,4,6-trinitrophenoxide=pic) with 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) and 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine (terpy) in a 1:2 molar ratio have provided crystals suitable for X-ray structure determinations in instances predominantly involving the lighter lanthanides. In all, the aza-aromatic ligands chelate the lanthanide ion, none being found as ‘free’ ligands within the lattice. The complexes of 1,10-phenanthroline have been characterised in two forms, one unsolvated (Ln=La, Sm, Eu; monoclinic, C2/c, Z 8), one an acetonitrile monosolvate (Ln=Gd; monoclinic, P21/a, Z 4), the latter being the only previously known form (with Ln=La). In both forms, the LnIII is nine-coordinate, in an approximately tricapped trigonal-prismatic environment, with two picrate ligands chelating through phenoxide and 2-nitro group oxygen atoms, the third being bound through phenoxide-O only. The 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine complexes, all acetonitrile monosolvates defined for Ln=La, Gd, Er, and Y (monoclinic, C2/c, Z 4), are ionic, one picrate having been displaced from the primary coordination sphere. For Ln=La, the two bound picrates are again chelating, making the LaIII 10-coordinate in a distorted bicapped square-antiprismatic environment but in the other species they are bound through phenoxide-O only, making the LnIII ions eight-coordinate in a distorted square-antiprismatic environment. Stacked arrays of the ligands can be found in both series of complexes, with intramolecular picrate–picrate and picrate–aza-aromatic stacks being prominent features.

Ligand size dependence of U–N and U–O bond character in a series of uranyl hexaphyrin complexes: quantum chemical simulation and density based analysis

A quantum chemical and density based analysis of bonding in uranyl hexaphyrin complexes, looking for trends in stability and covalency.

A Highly Triflated Rare-Earth Ion in [Eu(O3SCF3)8](5-)

The reaction of Eu2O3 with fuming nitric acid, trifluormethanesulfonic acid, and its anhydride in torch-sealed glass ampoules at 120 °C gave the europium compound (NO)5[Eu(O3SCF3)8] (orthorhombic, Fddd, Z = 16, a = 1932.69(4), b = 2878.44(7), c = 2955.12(7) pm, V = 16439.7(7) Å(3)). The compound exhibits the [Eu(O3SCF3)8](5-) anion showing for the first time a lanthanide ion that is exclusively coordinated by eight triflate anions. The anion has been further investigated by DFT calculations, which also allowed clear assignment of the vibrational spectra. Moreover, magnetochemical and luminescence measurements gave additional insight into the properties of this complex. The luminescence spectra revealed that the Eu(3+) ions are in a pseudo D4d symmetric environment.

New polynuclear U(IV)-U(V) complexes from U(IV) mediated uranyl(V) disproportionation

U(IV) promotes the disproportionation of otherwise stable uranyl(V) Schiff base complexes affording U(IV)-U(V) oxo clusters with new geometries and the first example of a U(IV)···UO(2)(+) cation-cation interaction.

Linear uranium metallocenes with polydentate aromatic nitrogen ligands

Treatment of [Cp*(2)U(NCMe)(5)]X(2) [Cp* = C(5)Me(5), X = BPh(4) (1) or I (1')] or Cp*(2)UI(2) in acetonitrile with the polydentate aromatic nitrogen bases phen, terpy and R(4)btbp led to the formation of the linear uranium metallocenes [Cp*(2)U(NCMe)(3)(phen)]X(2) [X = BPh(4) (2), I (2')], [Cp*(2)U(NCMe)(2)(terpy)][BPh(4)](2) (4), [Cp*(2)U(NCMe)(Me(4)btbp)][BPh(4)](2) (5) and [Cp*(2)U(NCMe)(CyMe(4)btbp)][X](2), [X = BPh(4) (6), I (6')], [phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, terpy = 2,2':6,2''-terpyridine, Me(4)btbp = 6,6'-bis-(3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-1,2,4-triazin-3-yl)-2,2'-bipyridine, CyMe(4)btbp = 6,6'-bis-(3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-cyclohexane-1,2,4-triazin-3-yl)-2,2'-bipyridine]. The bent metallocene [Cp*(2)U(phen)(2)][BPh(4)](2) (3) was isolated from the reaction of 1 and two molar equivalents of phen in THF. The X-ray crystal structures of 2.2MeCN, 3.2THF, and 6'.2MeCN were determined.

Lanthanide(III) and actinide(III) complexes [M(BH4)2 (THF)5][BPh4] and [M(BH4)2(18-crown-6)][BPh4] (M = Nd, Ce, U): synthesis, crystal structure, and density functional theory investigation of the covalent contribution to metal-borohydride bonding

Treatment of [M(BH4)3(THF)3] with NEt3HBPh4 in THF afforded the cationic complexes [M(BH4)2(THF)5][BPh4] [M = U (1), Nd (2), Ce (3)] which were transformed into [M(BH4)2(18-crown-6)][BPh4] [M = U (4), Nd (5), Ce (6)] in the presence of 18-crown-6; [U(BH4)2(18-thiacrown-6)][BPh4] (7) was obtained from 1 and 18-thiacrown-6 in tetrahydro-thiophene. Compounds 1, 3.C4H8S, 4.THF, 5, and 6.THF exhibit a penta- or hexagonal bipyramidal crystal structure with the two terdentate borohydride ligands in apical positions; the BH4 groups in the crystals of 7.C4H8S are in relative cis positions, and the thiacrown-ether presents a saddle shape, with two diametrically opposite sulfur atoms bound to uranium in trans positions. The crystal structures of these complexes, as well as those of previously reported [M(BH4)2(THF)5]+ cations, do not reveal any clear-cut lanthanide(III)/actinide(III) differentiation. The structural data obtained for [M(BH4)2(18-crown-6)]+ (M = U, Ce) by relativistic density functional theory (DFT) calculations are indicative of a small shortening of the U...B with respect to the Ce...B distance, which is accompanied by a lengthening of the U-Hb bonds and an opening of the Hb-B-Hb angle (Hb = bridging hydrogen atom of the eta3-BH4 ligand). The Mulliken population analysis and the natural bond orbital analysis indicate that the BH4 -->M(III) donation is greater for M = U than for M = Ce, as well as the overlap population of the M-Hb bond, thus showing a better interaction between the uranium 5f orbitals and the Hb atoms. The more covalent character of the B-H-U three-center two-electron bond was confirmed by the molecular orbital (MO) analysis. Three MOs represent the pi bonding interactions between U(III) and the three Hb atoms with significant 6d and 5f orbital contributions. These MOs in the cerium(III) complex exhibit a much lesser metallic weight with practically no participation of the 4f orbitals.

The vitality of uranium molecular chemistry at the dawn of the XXIst century

The intent of this Dalton Perspective is to highlight the recent advances in uranium molecular chemistry, with the results reported during the 2000-2006 period. This discipline is currently witnessing an impressive development, together with the theoretical chemistry and solid-state chemistry of the f-elements, and its face has profoundly changed, revealing unsuspected structural and reactivity features. This progress required and was facilitated by the use of new precursors. Studies of low-valent compounds gave a better insight into lanthanide(III)/actinide(III) differentiation and led to the discovery of unusual reactions, including activation of small molecules. A number of tetravalent uranium complexes, in particular polynuclear compounds, have been synthesized, which exhibit exciting structures and physicochemical properties. The potential of uranium(III) and uranium(IV) complexes in catalysis has been confirmed. The uranyl complexes, from mononuclear species to supramolecular assemblies, reveal a variety of novel structures, changing the generally accepted ideas on the coordination geometry and the stability of the UO2(2+) ion.

Lanthanide(III)/Actinide(III) Differentiation in the Cerium and Uranium Complexes [M(C5Me5)2(L)]0,+ (L=2,2′-Bipyridine, 2,2′:6′,2′′-Terpyridine): Structural, Magnetic, and Reactivity Studies

Treatment of [Ce(Cp*)(2)I] or [U(Cp*)(2)I(py)] with 1 mol equivalent of bipy (Cp*=C(5)Me(5); bipy=2,2'-bipyridine) in THF gave the adducts [M(Cp*)(2)I(bipy)] (M=Ce (1 a), M=U (1 b)), which were transformed into [M(Cp*)(2)(bipy)] (M=Ce (2 a), M=U (2 b)) by Na(Hg) reduction. The crystal structures of 1 a and 1 b show, by comparing the U-N and Ce-N distances and the variations in the C-C and C-N bond lengths within the bidentate ligand, that the extent of donation of electron density into the LUMO of bipy is more important in the actinide than in the lanthanide compound. Reaction of [Ce(Cp*)(2)I] or [U(Cp*)(2)I(py)] with 1 mol equivalent of terpy (terpy=2,2':6',2''-terpyridine) in THF afforded the adducts [M(Cp*)(2)(terpy)]I (M=Ce (3 a), M=U (3 b)), which were reduced to the neutral complexes [M(Cp*)(2)(terpy)] (M=Ce (4 a), M=U (4 b)) by sodium amalgam. The complexes [M(Cp*)(2)(terpy)][M(Cp*)(2)I(2)] (M=Ce (5 a), M=U (5 b)) were prepared from a 2:1 mixture of [M(Cp*)(2)I] and terpy. The rapid and reversible electron-transfer reactions between 3 and 4 in solution were revealed by (1)H NMR spectroscopy. The spectrum of 5 b is identical to that of the 1:1 mixture of [U(Cp*)(2)I(py)] and 3 b, or [U(Cp*)(2)I(2)] and 4 b. The magnetic data for 3 and 4 are consistent with trivalent cerium and uranium species, with the formulation [M(III)(Cp*)(2)(terpy(*-))] for 4 a and 4 b, in which spins on the individual units are uncoupled at 300 K and antiferromagnetically coupled at low temperature. Comparison of the crystal structures of 3 b, 4 b, and 5 b with those of 3 a and the previously reported ytterbium complex [Yb(Cp*)(2)(terpy)] shows that the U-N distances are much shorter, by 0.2 A, than those expected from a purely ionic bonding model. This difference should reflect the presence of stronger electron transfer between the metal and the terpy ligand in the actinide compounds. This feature is also supported by the small but systematic structural variations within the terdentate ligands, which strongly suggest that the LUMO of terpy is more filled in the actinide than in the lanthanide complexes and that the canonical forms [U(IV)(Cp*)(2)(terpy(*-))]I and [U(IV)(Cp*)(2)(terpy(2-))] contribute significantly to the true structures of 3 b and 4 b, respectively. This assumption was confirmed by the reactions of complexes 3 and 4 with the H(.) and H(+) donor reagents Ph(3)SnH and NEt(3)HBPh(4), which led to clear differentiation of the cerium and uranium complexes. No reaction was observed between 3 a and Ph(3)SnH, while the uranium counterpart 3 b was transformed in pyridine into the uranium(IV) compound [U(Cp*)(2){NC(5)H(4)(py)(2)}]I (6), where NC(5)H(4)(py)(2) is the 2,6-dipyridyl(hydro-4-pyridyl) ligand. Complex 6 was further hydrogenated to [U(Cp*)(2){NC(5)H(8)(py)(2)}]I (7) by an excess of Ph(3)SnH in refluxing pyridine. Treatment of 4 a with NEt(3)HBPh(4) led to oxidation of the terpy(*-) ligand and formation of [Ce(Cp*)(2)(terpy)]BPh(4), whereas similar reaction with 4 b afforded [U(Cp*)(2){NC(5)H(4)(py)(2)}]BPh(4) (6'). The crystal structures of 6, 6' and 7 were determined.

Unprecedented reduction of the uranyl ion [UO2]2+ into a polyoxo uranium(iv) cluster: Synthesis and crystal structure of the first f-element oxide with a M6(µ3-O)8 core

The smooth comproportionation reaction of the U(VI) and U(III) complexes UO2(OTf)2 and U(OTf)3, afforded the hexanuclear U(IV) oxide cluster [U6(micro3-O)8(micro2-OTf)8(py)8], a rare example of a metal oxide with a M6(micro3-O)8 core.

The distinct affinity of cyclopentadienyl ligands towards trivalent uranium over lanthanide ions. Evidence for cooperative ligation and back-bonding in the actinide complexes

The mono and bis(cyclopentadienyl) compounds [M(C5H4Bu t)I2] and [M(C5H4Bu t)2I](M = U, La, Ce, Nd) were formed in thf by comproportionation reactions of [M(C5H4Bu t)3] and LnI3 or [UI3(L)4](L = thf or py) in the molar ratio of 1 : 2 and 2 : 1, respectively, while treatment of [UI(3)(py)(4)] or LnI(3)(Ln = La, Ce, Nd) with 1 or 2 mol equivalents of LiC5H4Bu t in thf afforded the [M(C5H4Bu t)I2] and [M(C5H4Bu t)2I2]- compounds, respectively. The X-ray crystal structures of [M(C5H4Bu t)I2(py)3](M = U, La, Ce, Nd), [{Ce(C5H4Bu t)2(mu-I)}2] and [M(C5H4Bu t)2I(py)2](M = U, Nd) have been determined; the differences between the average M-C distances in the mono(cyclopentadienyl) complexes correspond to the variation in the ionic radii of the trivalent uranium and lanthanide ions while the U-N and U-I bond lengths seem to be smaller than those predicted from a purely ionic bonding model. The distinct affinity of the cyclopentadienyl ligands towards Ln(III) and U(III) was revealed by two series of competing reactions: the ligand exchange reactions between [Ln(C5H4Bu t)(n')I(3-n')](Ln = La, Ce, Nd) and [U(C5H4Bu t)(n'')I(3-n'')] species (1 < or = n'+n'' =n < or = 5), and the addition of n mol equivalents of LiC(5)H(4)Bu(t)(1 [less-than-or-equal]n[less-than-or-equal] 5) to a 1 : 1 mixture of LnI3 and [UI3(thf)4] or [UI3(py)4]. The stability of the [M(C5H4Bu t)I2] species was found to vary in the order Nd > Ce > U > La, a trend which is in accord with an electrostatic bonding model. However, the bis and tris(cyclopentadienyl) complexes of uranium are more stable than their lanthanide analogues. This difference can be accounted for by a higher degree of covalency in the U-C5H4Bu t bond, resulting from the late appearance of back-bonding which would emerge only after the first cyclopentadienyl ligand is bound.