New pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridones as selective A(1) adenosine receptor antagonists: synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies

G protein-coupled adenosine (P1) and P2Y receptors: ligand design and receptor interactions

The medicinal chemistry and pharmacology of the four subtypes of adenosine receptors (ARs) and the eight subtypes of P2Y receptors (P2YRs, activated by a range of purine and pyrimidine mono- and dinucleotides) has recently advanced significantly leading to selective ligands. X-ray crystallographic structures of both agonist- and antagonist-bound forms of the A(2A)AR have provided unprecedented three-dimensional detail concerning molecular recognition in the binding site and the conformational changes in receptor activation. It is apparent that this ubiquitous cell signaling system has implications for understanding and treating many diseases. ATP and other nucleotides are readily released from intracellular sources under conditions of injury and organ stress, such as hypoxia, ischemia, or mechanical stress, and through channels and vesicular release. Adenosine may be generated extracellularly or by cellular release. Therefore, depending on pathophysiological factors, in a given tissue, there is often a tonic activation of one or more of the ARs or P2YRs that can be modulated by exogenous agents for a beneficial effect. Thus, this field has provided fertile ground for pharmaceutical development, leading to clinical trials of selective receptor ligands as imaging agents or for conditions including cardiac arrhythmias, ischemia/reperfusion injury, diabetes, pain, thrombosis, Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, dry eye disease, pulmonary diseases such as cystic fibrosis, glaucoma, cancer, chronic hepatitis C, and other diseases.

Ligand and structure-based methodologies for the prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor ligands

Accurate in silico models for the quantitative prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands would greatly facilitate the process of drug discovery and development. Several methodologies have been developed based on the properties of the ligands, the direct study of the receptor-ligand interactions, or a combination of both approaches. Ligand-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D-QSAR) techniques, not requiring knowledge of the receptor structure, have been historically the first to be applied to the prediction of the activity of GPCR ligands. They are generally endowed with robustness and good ranking ability; however they are highly dependent on training sets. Structure-based techniques generally do not provide the level of accuracy necessary to yield meaningful rankings when applied to GPCR homology models. However, they are essentially independent from training sets and have a sufficient level of accuracy to allow an effective discrimination between binders and nonbinders, thus qualifying as viable lead discovery tools. The combination of ligand and structure-based methodologies in the form of receptor-based 3D-QSAR and ligand and structure-based consensus models results in robust and accurate quantitative predictions. The contribution of the structure-based component to these combined approaches is expected to become more substantial and effective in the future, as more sophisticated scoring functions are developed and more detailed structural information on GPCRs is gathered.

Probing distal regions of the A2B adenosine receptor by quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of known and novel agonists

The binding modes at the A 2B adenosine receptor (AR) of 72 derivatives of adenosine and its 5'- N-methyluronamide with diverse substitutions at the 2 and N (6) positions were studied using a molecular modeling approach. The compounds in their receptor-docked conformations were used to build CoMFA and CoMSIA quantitative structure-activity relationship models. Various parameters, including different types of atomic charges, were examined. The best statistical parameters were obtained with a joint CoMFA and CoMSIA model: R (2) = 0.960, Q (2) = 0.676, SEE = 0.175, F = 158, and R (2) test = 0.782 for an independent test set containing 18 compounds. On the basis of the modeling results, four novel adenosine analogues, having elongated or bulky substitutions at N (6) position and/or 2 position, were synthesized and evaluated biologically. All of the proposed compounds were potent, full agonists at the A 2B AR in adenylate cyclase studies. Thus, in support of the modeling, bulky substitutions at both positions did not prevent A 2B AR activation, which predicts separate regions for docking of these moieties.

Synthesis and pharmacology of pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidinediones bearing polar substituents as adenosine receptor antagonists

Amino-substituted pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidinediones have previously been found to bind to adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in micromolar concentrations. The present study was aimed at studying the structure-activity relationships of this class of compounds in more detail. Most of the investigated compounds were provided with polar substituents, such as ethoxycarbonyl groups and basic amino functions, in order to improve their water-solubility. The compounds were synthesized starting from 6-amino-1,3-dimethyluracil via different reaction sequences involving (cyano)acetylation, Vilsmeier formylation, or reaction with diethyl ethoxymethylenemalonate (EMME). The most potent and selective compound of the present series was 6-carbethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,3-dimethyl-5-(2-naphthylmethyl)aminopyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-2,4-dione (11c) with a Ki value of 5 nM at rat and 25 nM at human A1 receptors. The compound was more than 60-fold selective versus A3 and more than 300-fold selective versus A2A receptors. It showed an over 300-fold improvement with respect to the lead compound. In GTPgammaS binding studies at membranes of Chinese hamster ovary cells recombinantly expressing the human adenosine A1 receptor, 11c behaved as an antagonist with inverse agonistic activity. A regioisomer of 11c, 6-carbethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,3-dimethyl-7-(2- naphthylmethyl)aminopyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-2,4-dione (7a) in which the 2-naphthylmethylamino substituent at position 5 of 11c was moved to the 7-position, was a relatively potent (Ki=226 nM) and selective (>20-fold) A3 ligand. In the series of compounds lacking an electron-withdrawing ethoxycarbonyl or cyano substituent in the 6-position, compounds with high affinity for adenosine A2A receptors were identified, such as 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,3-dimethyl-5-(1-naphthyl)aminopyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-2,4-dione 16b (Ki human A2A=81.3 nM, Ki human A1=153 nM, and Ki human A3>10,000 nM).