Influence of variation of a side chain on the folding equilibrium of a β-peptide: limitations of one-step perturbation

In a recent study (Lin et al., Helv. Chim. Acta 2011, 94, 597), the one-step perturbation method was applied to tackle a challenging computational problem, that is, the calculation of the folding free enthalpies ΔGF,U of six hepta-β-peptides with different, Ala, Val, Leu, Ile, Ser, or Thr, side chains in the fifth residue. The ΔGF,U values obtained using one-step perturbation based on a single molecular dynamics simulation of a judiciously chosen reference state with soft-core atoms in the side chain of the fifth residue showed an overall accuracy of about kB T for the four peptides with nonpolar side chains, but twice as large deviations were observed for the peptides with polar side chains. Here, alternative reference-state Hamiltonians that better cover the conformational space relevant to these peptides are investigated, and post simulation rotational sampling of the χ1 and χ2 torsional angles of the fifth residue is carried out to sample different orientations of the side chain. A reference state with rather soft atoms yields accurate ΔGF,U values for the peptides with the Ser and Thr side chains, but it failed to correctly predict the folding free enthalpy for one peptide with a nonpolar side chain, that is, Leu. Based on the results and those of earlier studies, possible ways to improve the accuracy of the efficient one-step perturbation technique to compute free enthalpies of folding are discussed.

Combination of Enveloping Distribution Sampling (EDS) of a Soft-Core Reference-State Hamiltonian with One-Step Perturbation to Predict the Effect of Side Chain Substitution on the Relative Stability of Right- and Left-Helical Folds of β-Peptides

Folding free enthalpies of many not too different polypeptides can be efficiently and accurately predicted with the one-step perturbation (OSP) method using only one or a few molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. In this article, we introduce a combination of enveloping distribution sampling (EDS) and the OSP method (EDS-OSP) and apply it to predict the free enthalpy differences between a right-handed 2.710/12-helix and a left-handed 314-helix for 16 β-peptides with slightly different side-chain substitution patterns. An EDS simulation of a designed soft-core reference-state peptide was carried out in which both helices were sampled. Then, the soft-core atoms were perturbed into physical atoms. Thus, free enthalpy differences between the two helices for the 16 β-peptides can be predicted from only one simulation. The results predicted by EDS-OSP and a previous OSP study are very similar, i.e., the deviations between the results of the 16 peptides are mostly within the order of kBT, and the average absolute deviation is 1.2 kJ mol(-1). Together with the EDS parameter update simulation, about 128 ns of MD simulations needed to be carried out using the EDS-OSP method, while 700 ns of MD simulations were required in the previous OSP study where two separate reference-state simulations and an additional long time MD simulation of one of the 16 β-peptides were carried out. Thus, the computational effort was significantly reduced, i.e., by more than a factor of 5, using the EDS-OSP method. Hence, we consider this method an efficient tool to predict conformational free enthalpy differences from MD simulations.

Conformational state-specific free energy differences by one-step perturbation: protein secondary structure preferences of the GROMOS 43A1 and 53A6 force fields

The one-step free energy perturbation approach can be applied to obtain conformational state-specific free energy differences (FEDs) associated with changes in force field parameters, and thus offers the possibility to consider conformational equilibria during force field parameterization. In this work, using the alanine decapeptide in explicit water solution as a model, the α-helical and β-hairpin state-specific FEDs associated with force field changes between two widely used parameter sets of the GROMOS force field, namely, 43A1 and 53A6, were determined using one-step perturbation. The results mostly deviated by only 1 kJ mol(−1) in absolute or a few percent in relative values from thermodynamic integration results, suggesting that the convergence ranges of one-step perturbation were large enough to cover the substantial changes in nonbonded parameters between the two parameter sets. It was also found that one-step perturbation may give larger errors when the changes from the reference state include a large decrease in van der Waals radius, as indicated by the result for the β-hairpin state-specific free energy change going from 53A6 to 43A1. According to the free energy results, the α-helical state of the alanine decapeptide is destabilized by 15 kJ mol(−1), i.e., 1.5 kJ mol(−1) per residue, relative to the β-hairpin state when going from 43A1 to 53A6, in agreement with previous direct simulations in which native α-helices were often found to be unstable in simulations using 53A6, despite that the 53A6 parameters better reproduce a range of thermodynamic properties of small molecular systems. By applying one-step perturbation to analyze the effects of perturbing individual parameters, the differential stabilization of the two secondary structure states can be traced to the changes in van der Waals parameters, especially a van der Waals parameter involved in third-neighbor interactions. This study provides an example of the efficiency of one-step perturbation in force field development, reducing the computational cost by orders of magnitude.