1
|
Frolov RV, Severina I, Novikova E, Ignatova II, Liu H, Zhukovskaya M, Torkkeli PH, French AS. Opsin knockdown specifically slows phototransduction in broadband and UV-sensitive photoreceptors in Periplaneta americana. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2022; 208:591-604. [PMID: 36224473 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-022-01580-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Photoreceptors with different spectral sensitivities serve different physiological and behavioral roles. We hypothesized that such functional evolutionary optimization could also include differences in phototransduction dynamics. We recorded elementary responses to light, quantum bumps (QBs), of broadband green-sensitive and ultraviolet (UV)-sensitive photoreceptors in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana, compound eyes using intracellular recordings. In addition to control photoreceptors, we used photoreceptors from cockroaches whose green opsin 1 (GO1) or UV opsin expression was suppressed by RNA interference. In the control broadband and UV-sensitive photoreceptors average input resistances were similar, but the membrane capacitance, a proxy for membrane area, was smaller in the broadband photoreceptors. QBs recorded in the broadband photoreceptors had comparatively short latencies, high amplitudes and short durations. Absolute sensitivities of both opsin knockdown photoreceptors were significantly lower than in wild type, and, unexpectedly, their latency was significantly longer while the amplitudes were not changed. Morphologic examination of GO1 knockdown photoreceptors did not find significant differences in rhabdom size compared to wild type. Our results differ from previous findings in Drosophila melanogaster rhodopsin mutants characterized by progressive rhabdomere degeneration, where QB amplitudes were larger but phototransduction latency was not changed compared to wild type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman V Frolov
- Laboratory of Comparative Sensory Physiology, Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Thorez 44, 194223, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
| | - Irina Severina
- Laboratory of Comparative Sensory Physiology, Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Thorez 44, 194223, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Novikova
- Laboratory of Comparative Sensory Physiology, Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Thorez 44, 194223, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Irina I Ignatova
- Laboratory of Comparative Sensory Physiology, Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Thorez 44, 194223, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Hongxia Liu
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, P.O. BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Marianna Zhukovskaya
- Laboratory of Comparative Sensory Physiology, Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Thorez 44, 194223, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Päivi H Torkkeli
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, P.O. BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Andrew S French
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, P.O. BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ignatova II, Frolov RV. Distinct mechanisms of light adaptation of elementary responses in photoreceptors of Dipteran flies and American cockroach. J Neurophysiol 2022; 128:263-277. [PMID: 35730751 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00519.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Of many light adaptation mechanisms optimizing photoreceptor functioning in the compound eyes of insects, those modifying the single photon response, the quantum bump (QB), remain least studied. Here, by recording from photoreceptors of the blow fly Protophormia terraenovae, the hover fly Volucella pellucens and the cockroach Periplaneta americana, we investigated mechanisms of rapid light adaptation by examining how properties of QBs change after light stimulation and multiquantal impulse responses during repetitive stimulation. In P. terraenovae, light stimulation reduced latencies, characteristic durations and amplitudes of QBs in the intensity- and duration-dependent manner. In P. americana, only QB amplitudes decreased consistently. In both species, time constants of QB parameters' recovery increased with the strength and duration of stimulation, reaching about 30 s after bright prolonged 10 s pulses. In the blow fly, changes in QB amplitudes during recovery correlated with changes in half-widths but not latencies, suggesting at least two separate mechanisms of light adaptation: acceleration of QB onset by sensitizing transduction channels, and acceleration of transduction channel inactivation causing QB shortening and diminishment. In the cockroach, light adaptation reduced QB amplitude by apparently lowering the transduction channel availability. Impulse response data in the blow fly and cockroach were consistent with the mechanistic inferences from the QB recovery experiments. However, in the hover fly V. pellucens, impulse response latencies and durations decreased simultaneously whereas amplitudes decreased little, even when bright flashes were applied at high frequencies. These findings indicate existence of dissimilar mechanisms of light adaptation in the microvilli of different species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina I Ignatova
- Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Roman V Frolov
- Laboratory of Comparative Sensory Physiology, Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morphological and electrophysiological specializations of photoreceptors in the love spot of hover fly Volucella pellucens. Vis Neurosci 2021; 38:E015. [PMID: 34635193 DOI: 10.1017/s0952523821000146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Studies of functional variability in the compound eyes of flies reveal superior temporal resolution of photoreceptors from the frontal areas that mediate binocular vision, and in males mate recognition and pursuit. However, the mechanisms underlying differences in performance are not known. Here, we investigated properties of hover fly Volucella pellucens photoreceptors from two regions of the retina, the frontal-dorsal "love spot" and the lateral one. Morphologically, the microvilli of the frontal-dorsal photoreceptors were relatively few in number per rhabdomere cross-section, short and narrow. In electrophysiological experiments involving stimulation with prolonged white-noise and natural time intensity series, frontal-dorsal photoreceptors demonstrated comparatively high corner frequencies and information rates. Investigation of possible mechanisms responsible for their superior performance revealed significant differences in the properties of quantum bumps, and, unexpectedly, relatively high absolute sensitivity of the frontal-dorsal photoreceptors. Analysis of light adaptation indicated that photoreceptors from two regions adapt similarly but because frontal-dorsal photoreceptors were depolarized much stronger by the same stimuli than the lateral photoreceptors, they reached a deeper state of adaptation associated with higher corner frequencies of light response. Recordings from the photoreceptor axons were characterized by spike-like events that can significantly expand the frequency response range. Seamless integration of spikes into the graded voltage responses was enabled by light adaptation mechanisms that accelerate kinetics and decrease duration of depolarizing light response transients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Mechanosensing is a key feature through which organisms can receive inputs from the environment and convert them into specific functional and behavioral outputs. Mechanosensation occurs in many cells and tissues, regulating a plethora of molecular processes based on the distribution of forces and stresses both at the cell membrane and at the intracellular organelles levels, through complex interactions between cells’ microstructures, cytoskeleton, and extracellular matrix. Although several primary and secondary mechanisms have been shown to contribute to mechanosensation, a fundamental pathway in simple organisms and mammals involves the presence of specialized sensory neurons and the presence of different types of mechanosensitive ion channels on the neuronal cell membrane. In this contribution, we present a review of the main ion channels which have been proven to be significantly involved in mechanotransduction in neurons. Further, we discuss recent studies focused on the biological mechanisms and modeling of mechanosensitive ion channels’ gating, and on mechanotransduction modeling at different scales and levels of details.
Collapse
|
5
|
Speed of phototransduction in the microvillus regulates the accuracy and bandwidth of the rhabdomeric photoreceptor. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16:e1008427. [PMID: 33196643 PMCID: PMC7704055 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Phototransduction reactions in the rhabdomeric photoreceptor are profoundly stochastic due to the small number of participating molecules and small reaction space. The resulting quantum bumps (QBs) vary in their timing (latency), amplitudes and durations, and these variabilities within each cell are not correlated. Using modeling and electrophysiological recordings, we investigated how the QB properties depend on the cascade speed and how they influence signal transfer. Parametric analysis in the model supported by experimental data revealed that faster cascades elicit larger and narrower QBs with faster onsets and smaller variabilities than slower cascades. Latency dispersion was stronger affected by modification of upstream than downstream activation parameters. The variability caused by downstream modifications closely matched the experimental variability. Frequency response modeling showed that corner frequency is a reciprocal function of the characteristic duration of the multiphoton response, which, in turn, is a non-linear function of QB duration and latency dispersion. All QB variabilities contributed noise but only latency dispersion slowed and spread multiphoton responses, lowering the corner frequency. Using the discovered QB correlations, we evaluated transduction noise for dissimilar species and two extreme adaptation states, and compared it to photon noise. The noise emitted by the cascade was non-additive and depended non-linearly on the interaction between the QB duration and the three QB variabilities. Increased QB duration strongly suppressed both noise and corner frequency. This trade-off might be acceptable for nocturnal but not diurnal species because corner frequency is the principal determinant of information capacity. To offset the increase in noise accompanying the QB narrowing during light adaptation and the response-expanding effect of latency dispersion, the cascade accelerates. This explains the widespread evolutionary tendency of diurnal fliers to have fast phototransduction, especially after light adaptation, which thus appears to be a common adaptation to contain stochasticity, improve SNR and expand the bandwidth.
Collapse
|
6
|
Suppression of Gq and PLC gene expression has a small effect on quantum bumps in vivo in Periplaneta americana. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2020; 206:597-610. [PMID: 32285147 PMCID: PMC7314733 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-020-01417-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Visual signal transmission by Drosophila melanogaster photoreceptors is mediated by a Gq protein that activates a phospholipase C (PLC). Mutations and deficiencies in expression of either of these proteins cause severe defects in phototransduction. Here we investigated whether these proteins are also involved in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana, phototransduction by silencing Gq α-subunit (Gqα) and phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PLC) by RNA interference and observing responses to single photons (quantum bumps, QB). We found (1) non-specific decreases in membrane resistance, membrane capacitance and absolute sensitivity in the photoreceptors of both Gqα and PLC knockdowns, and (2) small changes in QB statistics. Despite significant decreases in expressions of Gq and PLC mRNA, the changes in QB properties were surprisingly modest, with mean latencies increasing by ~ 10%, and without significant decrease in their amplitudes. To better understand our results, we used a mathematical model of the phototransduction cascade. By modifying the Gq and PLC abundances, and diffusion rates for Gq, we found that QB latencies and amplitudes deteriorated noticeably only after large decreases in the protein levels, especially when Gq diffusion was slow. Also, reduction in Gq but not PLC lowered quantum efficiency. These results suggest that expression of the proteins may be redundant.
Collapse
|
7
|
Parag KV, Vinnicombe G. Point process analysis of noise in early invertebrate vision. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005687. [PMID: 29077703 PMCID: PMC5678801 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2015] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Noise is a prevalent and sometimes even dominant aspect of many biological processes. While many natural systems have adapted to attenuate or even usefully integrate noise, the variability it introduces often still delimits the achievable precision across biological functions. This is particularly so for visual phototransduction, the process responsible for converting photons of light into usable electrical signals (quantum bumps). Here, randomness of both the photon inputs (regarded as extrinsic noise) and the conversion process (intrinsic noise) are seen as two distinct, independent and significant limitations on visual reliability. Past research has attempted to quantify the relative effects of these noise sources by using approximate methods that do not fully account for the discrete, point process and time ordered nature of the problem. As a result the conclusions drawn from these different approaches have led to inconsistent expositions of phototransduction noise performance. This paper provides a fresh and complete analysis of the relative impact of intrinsic and extrinsic noise in invertebrate phototransduction using minimum mean squared error reconstruction techniques based on Bayesian point process (Snyder) filters. An integrate-fire based algorithm is developed to reliably estimate photon times from quantum bumps and Snyder filters are then used to causally estimate random light intensities both at the front and back end of the phototransduction cascade. Comparison of these estimates reveals that the dominant noise source transitions from extrinsic to intrinsic as light intensity increases. By extending the filtering techniques to account for delays, it is further found that among the intrinsic noise components, which include bump latency (mean delay and jitter) and shape (amplitude and width) variance, it is the mean delay that is critical to noise performance. As the timeliness of visual information is important for real-time action, this delay could potentially limit the speed at which invertebrates can respond to stimuli. Consequently, if one wants to increase visual fidelity, reducing the photoconversion lag is much more important than improving the regularity of the electrical signal. The invertebrate phototransduction system captures and converts environmental light inputs into electrical signals for use in later visual processing. Consequently, one would expect it to be optimised in some way to ensure that only a minimal amount of environmental information is lost during conversion. Confirming this requires an understanding and quantification of the performance limiting noise sources. Photons, which are inherently random and discrete, introduce extrinsic noise. The phototransduction cascade, which converts photons into electrical bumps possessing non-deterministic shapes and latencies, contributes intrinsic noise. Previous work on characterising the relative impact of all these sources did not account for the discrete, causal, point process nature of the problem and thus results were often inconclusive. Here we use non-linear Poisson process filtering to show that photon noise is dominant at low light intensity and cascade noise limiting at high intensity. Further, our analysis reveals that mean bump delay is the most deleterious aspect of the intrinsic noise. Our work emphasises a new approach to assessing sensory noise and provides the first complete description and evaluation of the relative impact of noise in phototransduction that does not rely on continuity, linearity or Gaussian approximations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris V. Parag
- Control Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Glenn Vinnicombe
- Control Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Senthilan PR, Helfrich-Förster C. Rhodopsin 7-The unusual Rhodopsin in Drosophila. PeerJ 2016; 4:e2427. [PMID: 27651995 PMCID: PMC5018682 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Rhodopsins are the major photopigments in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila express six well-characterized Rhodopsins (Rh1–Rh6) with distinct absorption maxima and expression pattern. In 2000, when the Drosophila genome was published, a novel Rhodopsin gene was discovered: Rhodopsin 7 (Rh7). Rh7 is highly conserved among the Drosophila genus and is also found in other arthropods. Phylogenetic trees based on protein sequences suggest that the seven Drosophila Rhodopsins cluster in three different groups. While Rh1, Rh2 and Rh6 form a “vertebrate-melanopsin-type”–cluster, and Rh3, Rh4 and Rh5 form an “insect-type”-Rhodopsin cluster, Rh7 seem to form its own cluster. Although Rh7 has nearly all important features of a functional Rhodopsin, it differs from other Rhodopsins in its genomic and structural properties, suggesting it might have an overall different role than other known Rhodopsins.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hardie RC, Juusola M. Phototransduction in Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2015; 34:37-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2014] [Accepted: 01/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
10
|
Chu B, Postma M, Hardie R. Fractional Ca(2+) currents through TRP and TRPL channels in Drosophila photoreceptors. Biophys J 2013; 104:1905-16. [PMID: 23663833 PMCID: PMC3647204 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2013] [Revised: 03/05/2013] [Accepted: 03/25/2013] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Light responses in Drosophila photoreceptors are mediated by two Ca(2+) permeable cation channels, transient receptor potential (TRP) and TRP-like (TRPL). Although Ca(2+) influx via these channels is critical for amplification, inactivation, and light adaptation, the fractional contribution of Ca(2+) to the currents (Pf) has not been measured. We describe a slow (τ ∼ 350 ms) tail current in voltage-clamped light responses and show that it is mediated by electrogenic Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange. Assuming a 3Na:1Ca stoichiometry, we derive empirical estimates of Pf by comparing the charge integrals of the exchanger and light-induced currents. For TRPL channels, Pf was ∼17% as predicted by Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) theory. Pf for TRP (29%) and wild-type flies (26%) was higher, but lower than the GHK prediction (45% and 42%). As predicted by GHK theory, Pf for both channels increased with extracellular [Ca(2+)], and was largely independent of voltage between -100 and -30 mV. A model incorporating intra- and extracellular geometry, ion permeation, diffusion, extrusion, and buffering suggested that the deviation from GHK predictions was largely accounted for by extracellular ionic depletion during the light-induced currents, and the time course of the Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange current could be used to obtain estimates of cellular Ca(2+) buffering capacities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Chu
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marten Postma
- Section of Molecular Cytology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roger C. Hardie
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stochastic, adaptive sampling of information by microvilli in fly photoreceptors. Curr Biol 2012; 22:1371-80. [PMID: 22704990 PMCID: PMC3420010 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2012] [Revised: 03/14/2012] [Accepted: 05/25/2012] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background In fly photoreceptors, light is focused onto a photosensitive waveguide, the rhabdomere, consisting of tens of thousands of microvilli. Each microvillus is capable of generating elementary responses, quantum bumps, in response to single photons using a stochastically operating phototransduction cascade. Whereas much is known about the cascade reactions, less is known about how the concerted action of the microvilli population encodes light changes into neural information and how the ultrastructure and biochemical machinery of photoreceptors of flies and other insects evolved in relation to the information sampling and processing they perform. Results We generated biophysically realistic fly photoreceptor models, which accurately simulate the encoding of visual information. By comparing stochastic simulations with single cell recordings from Drosophila photoreceptors, we show how adaptive sampling by 30,000 microvilli captures the temporal structure of natural contrast changes. Following each bump, individual microvilli are rendered briefly (∼100–200 ms) refractory, thereby reducing quantum efficiency with increasing intensity. The refractory period opposes saturation, dynamically and stochastically adjusting availability of microvilli (bump production rate: sample rate), whereas intracellular calcium and voltage adapt bump amplitude and waveform (sample size). These adapting sampling principles result in robust encoding of natural light changes, which both approximates perceptual contrast constancy and enhances novel events under different light conditions, and predict information processing across a range of species with different visual ecologies. Conclusions These results clarify why fly photoreceptors are structured the way they are and function as they do, linking sensory information to sensory evolution and revealing benefits of stochasticity for neural information processing.
Collapse
|
12
|
Phospholipase C-mediated suppression of dark noise enables single-photon detection in Drosophila photoreceptors. J Neurosci 2012; 32:2722-33. [PMID: 22357856 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.5221-11.2012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Drosophila photoreceptor cells use the ubiquitous G-protein-mediated phospholipase C (PLC) cascade to achieve ultimate single-photon sensitivity. This is manifested in the single-photon responses (quantum bumps). In photoreceptor cells, dark activation of G(q)α molecules occurs spontaneously and produces unitary dark events (dark bumps). A high rate of spontaneous G(q)α activation and dark bump production potentially hampers single-photon detection. We found that in wild-type flies the in vivo rate of spontaneous G(q)α activation is very high. Nevertheless, this high rate is not manifested in a substantially high rate of dark bumps. Therefore, it is unclear how phototransduction suppresses dark bump production arising from spontaneous G(q)α activation, while still maintaining high-fidelity representation of single photons. In this study we show that reduced PLC catalytic activity selectively suppressed production of dark bumps but not light-induced bumps. Manipulations of PLC activity using PLC mutant flies and Ca(2+) modulations revealed that a critical level of PLC activity is required to induce bump production. The required minimal level of PLC activity selectively suppressed random production of single G(q)α-activated dark bumps despite a high rate of spontaneous G(q)α activation. This minimal PLC activity level is reliably obtained by photon-induced synchronized activation of several neighboring G(q)α molecules activating several PLC molecules, but not by random activation of single G(q)α molecules. We thus demonstrate how a G-protein-mediated transduction system, with PLC as its target, selectively suppresses its intrinsic noise while preserving reliable signaling.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hardie RC. Phototransduction mechanisms in Drosophila microvillar photoreceptors. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1002/wmts.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|