Pearson WH, Urban JJ, MacArthur AHR, Lin S, Cabrera DWL. Crystal structures of N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]benzamide and N-(4-methoxyphenyl)benzamide at 173 K: a study of the energetics of conformational changes due to crystal packing.
Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun 2022;
78:297-305. [PMID:
35371548 PMCID:
PMC8900516 DOI:
10.1107/s2056989022000950]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The conformations of two aryl amides have been determined experimentally in crystal structures using X-ray data and calculated with DFT methods for the isolated molecules. Geometrical comparisons are made along with energy analyses of the intermolecular interactions in the two crystal structures.
As a part of our study of the syntheses of aryl amides, the crystal structures of two benzamides were determined from single-crystal X-ray data at 173 K. Both crystal structures contain molecular units as asymmetric units with no solvent in the unit cells. Crystal structure I, TFMP, is the result of the crystallization of N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]benzamide, C14H10F3NO. Crystal structure II, MOP, is composed of N-(4-methoxyphenyl)benzamide, C14H13NO2, units. TFMP is triclinic, space group P, consisting of two molecules in the unit cell related by the center of symmetry. MOP is monoclinic, space group P21/c, consisting of four molecules in the unit cell. Both types of molecules contain three planar regions; a phenyl ring, an amide planar region, and a para-substituted phenyl ring. The orientations of these planar regions within the asymmetric units are compared to their predicted orientations, in isolation, from DFT calculations. The aryl rings are tilted approximately 60° with respect to each other in both experimentally determined structures, as compared to 30° in the DFT results. These conformational changes result in more favorable environments for N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding and aryl ring π-stacking in the crystal structures. Intermolecular interactions were examined by Hirshfeld surface analysis and quantified by calculating molecular interaction energies. The results of this study demonstrate that both hydrogen bonding and dispersion are essential to the side-by-side stacking of molecular units in these crystal structures. Weaker dispersion interactions along the axial directions of the molecules reveal insight into the melting mechanisms of these crystals.
Collapse