Gromov OI, Kuzin SV, Golubeva EN. Performance of DFT methods in the calculation of isotropic and dipolar contributions to
14N hyperfine coupling constants of nitroxide radicals.
J Mol Model 2019;
25:93. [PMID:
30859325 DOI:
10.1007/s00894-019-3966-y]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
In the present study, we tested the widely used density functionals BP86, PBE, OLYP, TPSS, M06-L, B3LYP, PBE0, mPW1PW, B97, BHandHLYP, TPSS0, M06, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, ωB97x, and B2PLYP with the cc-pCVQZ basis set in calculations on a set of 23 nitroxide radicals with well-resolved 14N anisotropic hyperfine coupling (HFC) constants. The results were compared with those obtained using the B3LYP/N07D and PBE/N07D methods. The convergence of the HFC values to the complete basis set limit is briefly discussed. The best results were obtained using the M06/COSMO method, with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 0.4 G for the dipole-dipole contribution and MAD = 0.6 G for the contact coupling contribution (as compared to 1.1 G and 1.0 G, respectively, for the B3LYP/N07D/COSMO method and 1.7 G and 0.5 G, respectively, for the B3LYP/N07D method). The majority of the functionals yielded satisfactory results for the dipole-dipole contribution, but only the M06 functional yielded similar errors for both the dipole-dipole and isotropic contributions. The RIJCOSX and RI approximations introduced errors equal to or smaller than 0.01 G.
Collapse