New ruthenium(II) complexes with cyclic thio- and semicarbazone: evaluation of cytotoxicity and effects on cell migration and apoptosis of lung cancer cells

We describe the synthesis, physicochemical characterization, and in vitro antitumor assays of four novel analogous ruthenium(II) complexes with general formula cis-[Ru^II(N-L)(P-P)₂]PF₆, where P-P = bis(diphenylphosphine)methane (dppm, in complexes 1 and 2) or bis(diphenylphosphine)ethane (dppe, in complexes 3 and 4) and N-L = 5,6-diphenyl-4,5-dihydro-2H-[1,2,4]triazine-3-thione (Btsc, in complexes 1 and 3) or 5,6-diphenyltriazine-3-one (Bsc, in complexes 2 and 4). The data were consistent with cis arrangement of the biphosphine ligands. For the Btsc and Bsc ligands, the data pointed to monoanionic bidentate coordination to ruthenium(II) through N,S and N,O, respectively. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction showed that complex 1 crystallized in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/c. Determination of the cytotoxicity profiles of complexes 1-4 gave SI values ranging from 1.19 to 3.50 against the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 and the non-tumor lung cell line MRC-5. Although the molecular docking studies suggested that the interaction between DNA and complex 4 was energetically favorable, the experimental results showed that they interacted weakly. Overall, our results demonstrated that these novel ruthenium(II) complexes have interesting in vitro antitumor potential and this study may contribute to further studies in medicinal inorganic chemistry.

The role of neutral Rh(PONOP)H, free NMe2H, boronium and ammonium salts in the dehydrocoupling of dimethylamine-borane using the cationic pincer [Rh(PONOP)(η2-H2)]+ catalyst

The σ-amine-borane pincer complex [Rh(PONOP)(η1-H3B·NMe3)][BArF4] [2, PONOP = κ3-NC5H3-2,6-(OPtBu2)2] is prepared by addition of H3B·NMe3 to the dihydrogen precursor [Rh(PONOP)(η2-H2)][BArF4], 1. In a similar way the related H3B·NMe2H complex [Rh(PONOP)(η1-H3B·NMe2H)][BArF4], 3, can be made in situ, but this undergoes dehydrocoupling to reform 1 and give the aminoborane dimer [H2BNMe2]2. NMR studies on this system reveal an intermediate neutral hydride forms, Rh(PONOP)H, 4, that has been prepared independently. 1 is a competent catalyst (2 mol%, ∼30 min) for the dehydrocoupling of H3B·Me2H. Kinetic, mechanistic and computational studies point to the role of NMe2H in both forming the neutral hydride, via deprotonation of a σ-amine-borane complex and formation of aminoborane, and closing the catalytic cycle by reprotonation of the hydride by the thus-formed dimethyl ammonium [NMe2H2]+. Competitive processes involving the generation of boronium [H2B(NMe2H)2]+ are also discussed, but shown to be higher in energy. Off-cycle adducts between [NMe2H2]+ or [H2B(NMe2H)2]+ and amine-boranes are also discussed that act to modify the kinetics of dehydrocoupling.

Dehydropolymerization of H3B·NMeH2 Using a [Rh(DPEphos)]+ Catalyst: The Promoting Effect of NMeH2

[Rh(κ²-PP-DPEphos){η²η²-H₂B(NMe₃)(CH₂)₂^tBu}][BAr^F₄] acts as an effective precatalyst for the dehydropolymerization of H₃B·NMeH₂ to form N-methylpolyaminoborane (H₂BNMeH)_n. Control of polymer molecular weight is achieved by variation of precatalyst loading (0.1–1 mol %, an inverse relationship) and use of the chain-modifying agent H₂: with M_n ranging between 5 500 and 34 900 g/mol and Đ between 1.5 and 1.8. H₂ evolution studies (1,2-F₂C₆H₄ solvent) reveal an induction period that gets longer with higher precatalyst loading and complex kinetics with a noninteger order in [Rh]_TOTAL. Speciation studies at 10 mol % indicate the initial formation of the amino–borane bridged dimer, [Rh₂(κ²-PP-DPEphos)₂(μ-H)(μ-H₂BN=HMe)][BAr^F₄], followed by the crystallographically characterized amidodiboryl complex [Rh₂(cis-κ²-PP-DPEphos)₂(σ,μ-(H₂B)₂NHMe)][BAr^F₄]. Adding ∼2 equiv of NMeH₂ in tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution to the precatalyst removes this induction period, pseudo-first-order kinetics are observed, a half-order relationship to [Rh]_TOTAL is revealed with regard to dehydrogenation, and polymer molecular weights are increased (e.g., M_n = 40 000 g/mol). Speciation studies suggest that NMeH₂ acts to form the  precatalysts [Rh(κ²-DPEphos)(NMeH₂)₂][BAr^F₄] and [Rh(κ²-DPEphos)(H)₂(NMeH₂)₂][BAr^F₄], which were independently synthesized and shown to follow very similar dehydrogenation kinetics, and produce polymers of molecular weight comparable with [Rh(κ²-PP-DPEphos){η²-H₂B(NMe₃)(CH₂)₂^tBu}][BAr^F₄], which has been doped with amine. This promoting effect of added amine in situ is shown to be general in other cationic Rh-based systems, and possible mechanistic scenarios are discussed.

Synthetic and structural studies of phosphine coordinated boronium salts

The reaction of BrH₂B·SMe₂ with primary and secondary phosphines affords a range of boronium salts of the form [H₂B(PR₃)₂]Br (PR₃ = PHCy₂1; PHPh₂, 2; PH₂Cy, 3), which have been fully characterised including solid-state determinations. Reactions of bulky tertiary phosphines, e.g., PCy₃ and PPh₃, with BrH₂B·SMe₂ do not proceed beyond the phosphine-stabilised bromoborane adducts, however, the smaller tertiary phosphine PMe₂Ph readily proceeds to form [H₂B(PMe₂Ph)₂]Br (4). The formation of the unsymmetrical boronium salts [H₂B(PH₂Cy)(PHCy₂)]Br (5) and [H₂B(PHCy₂)(PHPh₂)]Br (6) was observed by in situ NMR spectroscopy, however, the compounds were found to spontaneously disproportionate to their respective homophosphine boronium cations, even on prolonged storage in solution at -78 °C. Di- and triphosphines were found to form ring-closed boronium salts to afford [H₂B(κ²-P,P'-diphosphine)]Br (diphosphine = dppe, 7; dcpe, 8; dmpe, 9; dppf, 10; dppf with [AsF₆]^- counterion, 11; amphos, 12). The analogous methodology with Br₂HB·SMe₂ proved less generally applicable due to an accessible decomposition pathway being available to boronium salts bearing primary and secondary phosphines, leading to the formation of phosphonium salts, although [BrHB(dcpe)]Br (13), [BrHB(PMe₂Ph)₂]Br (14) and [BrHB(amphos)]Br (15) were synthesised with varying degrees of success. Reaction of BrH₂B·SMe₂ with diphars afforded the boronium salt [H₂B(κ²-P,P'-diphars)]Br (16), which featured two pendant arsine arms. Similarly, triphos was found to react with BrH₂B·SMe₂ to give [H₂B(κ²-P,P'-triphos)]Br (17), which featured a pendant phosphine arm. Substitution of the bromide counter anion with either hexafluoroarsenate or hexfluoroantimonate anions revealed weak hydrogen bonds between the P-H bonds of the boronium cations and the anions, that appeared through NMR studies to be retained in solution (where hydrogen bonding order was determined to be Br^- > [SbF₆]^-/[AsF₆]^-). This was further demonstrated by comparison of solid-state structures and solution NMR data of 1 with [H₂B(PHCy₂)₂][SbF₆] (18), 4 with [H₂B(PMe₂Ph)₂][AsF₆] (19) and 17 with [H₂B(triphos)][AsF₆] (20).

Planar-chiral ferrocenylphosphine-borane complexes featuring agostic-type B–H⋯E (E = Hg, Sn) interactions

Ferrocenylphosphine-borane adducts with Lewis acidic organotin and organomercury substituents inortho-position show rare agostic-type B–H⋯E (E = Sn, Hg) interactions that have been studied by single crystal XRD, multinuclear solution NMR, and computational methods.

Donor ligands based on tricoordinate boron formed by B–H-activation of bis(phosphine)boronium salts

The (R₃P)₂HB-moiety in a palladium(ii) pincer complex is demonstrated to be a L-type ligand and compared with other bonding types.

The Simplest Amino-borane H2 B=NH2 Trapped on a Rhodium Dimer: Pre-Catalysts for Amine-Borane Dehydropolymerization

The μ-amino-borane complexes [Rh2 (L(R) )2 (μ-H)(μ-H2 B=NHR')][BAr(F) 4 ] (L(R) =R2 P(CH2 )3 PR2 ; R=Ph, (i) Pr; R'=H, Me) form by addition of H3 B⋅NMeR'H2 to [Rh(L(R) )(η(6) -C6 H5 F)][BAr(F) 4 ]. DFT calculations demonstrate that the amino-borane interacts with the Rh centers through strong Rh-H and Rh-B interactions. Mechanistic investigations show that these dimers can form by a boronium-mediated route, and are pre-catalysts for amine-borane dehydropolymerization, suggesting a possible role for bimetallic motifs in catalysis.

Reactive p-block cations stabilized by weakly coordinating anions

The chemistry of the p-block elements is a huge playground for fundamental and applied work. With their bonding from electron deficient to hypercoordinate and formally hypervalent, the p-block elements represent an area to find terra incognita. Often, the formation of cations that contain p-block elements as central ingredient is desired, for example to make a compound more Lewis acidic for an application or simply to prove an idea. This review has collected the reactive p-block cations (rPBC) with a comprehensive focus on those that have been published since the year 2000, but including the milestones and key citations of earlier work. We include an overview on the weakly coordinating anions (WCAs) used to stabilize the rPBC and give an overview to WCA selection, ionization strategies for rPBC-formation and finally list the rPBC ordered in their respective group from 13 to 18. However, typical, often more organic ion classes that constitute for example ionic liquids (imidazolium, ammonium, etc.) were omitted, as were those that do not fulfill the - naturally subjective -"reactive"-criterion of the rPBC. As a rule, we only included rPBC with crystal structure and only rarely refer to important cations published without crystal structure. This collection is intended for those who are simply interested what has been done or what is possible, as well as those who seek advice on preparative issues, up to people having a certain application in mind, where the knowledge on the existence of a rPBC that might play a role as an intermediate or active center may be useful.

Dehydrocoupling of phosphine-boranes using the [RhCp*Me(PMe3)(CH2Cl2)][BArF4] precatalyst: stoichiometric and catalytic studies

Detailed experimental and computational studies are reported on the fundamental B–H and P–H bond activation steps involved in the dehydrocoupling/dehydropolymerization of primary and secondary phosphine–boranes, H₃B·PPhR′H (R = Ph, H), using the [RhCp*(PMe₃)Me(ClCH₂Cl)][BAr^F₄] catalyst.

We report a detailed, combined experimental and computational study on the fundamental B–H and P–H bond activation steps involved in the dehydrocoupling/dehydropolymerization of primary and secondary phosphine–boranes, H₃B·PPhR′H (R = Ph, H), using [RhCp*(PMe₃)Me(ClCH₂Cl)][BAr^F₄], to either form polyphosphino-boranes [H₂B·PPhH]_n (M_n ∼ 15 000 g mol^–1, PDI = 2.2) or the linear diboraphosphine H₃B·PPh₂BH₂·PPh₂H. A likely polymer-growth pathway of reversible chain transfer step-growth is suggested for H₃B·PPhH₂. Using secondary phosphine–boranes as model substrates a combined synthesis, structural (X-ray crystallography), labelling and computational approach reveals: initial bond activation pathways (B–H activation precedes P–H activation); key intermediates (phosphido-boranes, α-B-agostic base-stabilized boryls); and a catalytic route to the primary diboraphosphine (H₃B·PPhHBH₂·PPhH₂). It is also shown that by changing the substituent at phosphorus (Ph or Cy versus^tBu) different final products result (phosphido-borane or base stabilized phosphino-borane respectively). These studies provide detailed insight into the pathways that are operating during dehydropolymerization.

Effect of the phosphine steric and electronic profile on the Rh-promoted dehydrocoupling of phosphine-boranes

The electronic and steric effects in the stoichiometric dehydrocoupling of secondary and primary phosphine–boranes H₃B·PR₂H [R = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃; p-(CF₃)C₆H₄; p-(OMe)C₆H₄; adamantyl, Ad] and H₃B·PCyH₂ to form the metal-bound linear diboraphosphines H₃B·PR₂BH₂·PR₂H and H₃B·PRHBH₂·PRH₂, respectively, are reported. Reaction of [Rh(L)(η⁶-FC₆H₅)][BAr^F₄] [L = Ph₂P(CH₂)₃PPh₂, Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃] with 2 equiv of H₃B·PR₂H affords [Rh(L)(H)(σ,η-PR₂BH₃)(η¹-H₃B·PR₂H)][BAr^F₄]. These complexes undergo dehydrocoupling to give the diboraphosphine complexes [Rh(L)(H)(σ,η²-PR₂·BH₂PR₂·BH₃)][BAr^F₄]. With electron-withdrawing groups on the phosphine–borane there is the parallel formation of the products of B–P cleavage, [Rh(L)(PR₂H)₂][BAr^F₄], while with electron-donating groups no parallel product is formed. For the bulky, electron rich, H₃B·P(Ad)₂H no dehydrocoupling is observed, but an intermediate Rh(I) σ phosphine–borane complex is formed, [Rh(L){η²-H₃B·P(Ad)₂H}][BAr^F₄], that undergoes B–P bond cleavage to give [Rh(L){η¹-H₃B·P(Ad)₂H}{P(Ad)₂H}][BAr^F₄]. The relative rates of dehydrocoupling of H₃B·PR₂H (R = aryl) show that increasingly electron-withdrawing substituents result in faster dehydrocoupling, but also suffer from the formation of the parallel product resulting from P–B bond cleavage. H₃B·PCyH₂ undergoes a similar dehydrocoupling process, and gives a mixture of stereoisomers of the resulting metal-bound diboraphosphine that arise from activation of the prochiral P–H bonds, with one stereoisomer favored. This diastereomeric mixture may also be biased by use of a chiral phosphine ligand. The selectivity and efficiencies of resulting catalytic dehydrocoupling processes are also briefly discussed.

The effect of changing the steric and electronic profile of the phosphine of primary and secondary phosphine−boranes H₃B·PR₂H (R = H, aryl, adamantyl) on the Rh-catalyzed dehydrocoupling to form metal-bound linear diboraphosphines is reported.