Inference of cancer mechanisms through computational systems analysis

Perspective: Dimensions of the scientific method

The scientific method has been guiding biological research for a long time. It not only prescribes the order and types of activities that give a scientific study validity and a stamp of approval but also has substantially shaped how we collectively think about the endeavor of investigating nature. The advent of high-throughput data generation, data mining, and advanced computational modeling has thrown the formerly undisputed, monolithic status of the scientific method into turmoil. On the one hand, the new approaches are clearly successful and expect the same acceptance as the traditional methods, but on the other hand, they replace much of the hypothesis-driven reasoning with inductive argumentation, which philosophers of science consider problematic. Intrigued by the enormous wealth of data and the power of machine learning, some scientists have even argued that significant correlations within datasets could make the entire quest for causation obsolete. Many of these issues have been passionately debated during the past two decades, often with scant agreement. It is proffered here that hypothesis-driven, data-mining-inspired, and "allochthonous" knowledge acquisition, based on mathematical and computational models, are vectors spanning a 3D space of an expanded scientific method. The combination of methods within this space will most certainly shape our thinking about nature, with implications for experimental design, peer review and funding, sharing of result, education, medical diagnostics, and even questions of litigation.

Dynamical systems approaches to personalized medicine

The complexity of the human body is a major roadblock to diagnosis and treatment of disease. Individuals may be diagnosed with the same disease but exhibit different biomarker profiles or physiological changes and, importantly, they may respond differently to the same risk factors and the same treatment. There is no doubt that computational methods of data analysis and interpretation must be developed for medicine to evolve from the traditional population-based approaches to personalized treatment strategies. We discuss how computational systems biology is contributing to this current evolution.

Human Systems Biology and Metabolic Modelling: A Review-From Disease Metabolism to Precision Medicine

In cell and molecular biology, metabolism is the only system that can be fully simulated at genome scale. Metabolic systems biology offers powerful abstraction tools to simulate all known metabolic reactions in a cell, therefore providing a snapshot that is close to its observable phenotype. In this review, we cover the 15 years of human metabolic modelling. We show that, although the past five years have not experienced large improvements in the size of the gene and metabolite sets in human metabolic models, their accuracy is rapidly increasing. We also describe how condition-, tissue-, and patient-specific metabolic models shed light on cell-specific changes occurring in the metabolic network, therefore predicting biomarkers of disease metabolism. We finally discuss current challenges and future promising directions for this research field, including machine/deep learning and precision medicine. In the omics era, profiling patients and biological processes from a multiomic point of view is becoming more common and less expensive. Starting from multiomic data collected from patients and N-of-1 trials where individual patients constitute different case studies, methods for model-building and data integration are being used to generate patient-specific models. Coupled with state-of-the-art machine learning methods, this will allow characterizing each patient's disease phenotype and delivering precision medicine solutions, therefore leading to preventative medicine, reduced treatment, and in silico clinical trials.

A computational method using differential gene expression to predict altered metabolism of multicellular organisms

Altered metabolism is often identified as a cause or an effect of physiology and pathogenesis. But it is difficult to predict the metabolic flux distributions of multicellular organisms due to the lack of an explicit metabolic objective function. Here we present a computational method which can successfully describe the differences in metabolism between two different conditions on a large scale. By integrating gene expression data with an existing comprehensive reconstruction of the global human metabolic network, we qualitatively predicted significantly differential fluxes without prior knowledge or the rate of metabolite uptake and secretion. Therefore, this method can be applied for both microorganisms and multicellular organisms. Different from traditional enrichment analysis methods and constraint-based models, we consider conditions and interactions within the metabolic network simultaneously. To apply the proposed method, we predicted altered fluxes for E. coli strains and clear cell renal cell carcinoma, while the E. coli strains are growing aerobically in a chemostat with different dilution rates and clear cell renal cell carcinoma is compared with normal kidney cells. Then we map the significantly differential reactions to metabolic subsystems defined in the original metabolic network for ccRCC to observe the altered metabolism. In contrast with existing studies, our results show a high accuracy of the E. coli experiment and a more reasonable prediction of the ccRCC experiment. The method presented here provides a computational approach for the genome-wide study of altered metabolism under pairs of conditions for both microorganisms and multicellular organisms.