Unsymmetric Ir2 and RhIr Dinuclear Complexes Supported by a Linear Tetraphosphine meso-dpmppp, Showing High Reactivity for O2, H2, and HCl

Unsymmetric dinuclear Ir(I) complexes, [Ir2Cl2(L)(meso-dpmppp)] (L = XylNC (1aIr2), tBuNC (1bIr2), CO (1cIr2)), were synthesized using meso-Ph2PCH2P(Ph)(CH2)3P(Ph)CH2PPh2 (meso-dpmppp), which supports cis-P,P (M1) and trans-P,P (M2) metal sites, and exhibited high reactivity for O2, H2, and HCl. The IrRh heterodinuclear complexes, [M1M2Cl2(L)(meso-dpmppp)] (1xM1M2) (M1M2 = IrRh, RhIr; L = XylNC, CO (x = a, c)), were also synthesized and used together with the Rh2 complexes (1a,cRh2) to elucidate the role of each metal site. For the reactions of O2, 1aIr2 and 1aRhIr showed higher reactivity than those of 1aIrRh and 1aRh2, giving η2-peroxide complexes [{M1Cl2}{M2(η2-O2)(XylNC)}(meso-dpmppp)] (2aIr2, 2aRhIr), from which O2 would not dissociate. All the CO complexes 1cM1M2 (M1, M2 = Ir or Rh) showed no reactivity for O2. In the reactions with H2, 1aIr2 reacted with H2 to give the dihydride complex, [{IrCl2}{Ir(H)2L}(meso-dpmppp)] (11aIr2) and the tetrahydride complex, [{Ir(H)Cl2}(μ-H){Ir(H)2L}(meso-dpmppp)] (12aIr2), while 1aRhIr gave the dihydride complex, and 1aIrRh and 1aRh2 gave no hydride complexes. Reactions of 1a,cM1M2 with HCl afforded the dihydride complexes, [{IrCl3}(μ-H){Ir(H)Cl(XylNC)}(meso-dpmppp)] (14aIr2), [{Ir(H)Cl2}(μ-H){M2Cl2(L)}(meso-dpmppp)] (M2 = Ir, L = CO (15cIr2); M2 = Rh, L = XylNC (15aIrRh), CO (15cIrRh)), and [{Rh(H)Cl2}(μ-Cl){Ir(H)Cl(XylNC)}(meso-dpmppp)] (18aRhIr), the structures varying depending on M1 and M2 as well as L.

Organometallic Allene [(μ-C)(Fe(CO)4 )2 ]: Bridging Carbon Showing Transformation from Classical Electron-Sharing Bonding to Double σ-Donor and Double π-Acceptor Ligation

Allenes (R2 C=C=CR2 ) have been traditionally perceived to feature localized orthogonal π-bonds between the carbon centres. We have carried out quantum-mechanical studies of the organometallic allenes envisioned by the isolobal replacement of the terminal CH2 groups by the d8 Fe(CO)4 fragment. Our studies have identified two organometallic allenes viz. D2d symmetric [(μ-C)(Fe(CO)4 )2 ] (2) and D3 symmetric [(μ-C)(Fe(CO)4 )2 ] (3) with trigonal bipyramidal coordination at the Fe atoms. Compound 2 features the bridging carbon atom in an equatorial position with respect to the ligands on the TM centre, while 3 features the central carbon atom in an axial position. The bis-pseudoallylic anionic delocalisation proposed in the C2-C1-C3 spine of organic allene is retained in the organometallic allene 2, and is transformed to a typical three-centre bis-allylic anionic delocalisation in the organometallic allene 3. The topological analysis of electron density also indicates a bis-allylic anionic type delocalisation in the organometallic allenes. The quantitative bonding analysis using the EDA-NOCV method suggests a transition from classical electron-sharing bonding between the central carbon atom and the terminal groups in 1 to donor-acceptor bonding in 3. Meanwhile, both electron-sharing and donor-acceptor bonding models are found to be probable heuristic bonding representations in the organometallic allene 2.

Inorganometallic allenes [(Mn(η5-C5H5)(CO)2)2(μ-E)] (E = Si-Pb): bis-allylic anionic delocalisation similar to organometallic allene but differential σ-donation and π-backdonation

The chemistry of heavy group-14 tetrel atoms is known to diverge from that of the lighter congener carbon. Here, we report the structure and bonding in inorganometallic allenes [(MnCp(CO)2)2(μ-E)] (2E, E = Si-Pb; Cp = η5-C5H5). These inorganometallic allenes are structurally similar to the lighter organometallic analog [(MnCp(CO)2)2(μ-C)] (2C). The bonding analysis of these compounds at the M06/def2-TZVPP//BP86/def2-SVP level of theory identifies a linear Mn-E-Mn spine with delocalised, mutually orthogonal π-systems across this back-bone. This results in a bis-allylic anionic bonding scenario. However, the strength of the Mn-E bonding is found to be weaker in these inorganometallic allenes. The energy decomposition analysis at the BP86/TZ2P//BP86/def2-SVP level of theory further reveals that the bonding in these compounds cannot be represented by one unique heuristic bonding model, but multiple bonding models. For all 2E (E = C-Pb), the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson bonding model is one of the best bonding representations, where the central tetrel atom acts as a 4e- σ-donor and 4e- π-acceptor. The bonding analysis indicates that the carbon atom in the organometallic allene acts as a better π-acceptor than σ-donor, while the heavier tetrel atoms in the inorganometallic allenes are better σ-donors than π-acceptors. The npz-orbital is found to be a better σ-donor than the valence ns-orbital. However, when the bonding representation is changed to a traditional electron-sharing model, the contribution from the ns-orbital was found to be the largest in comparison to the interaction from the remaining three valence np-orbitals. It can be suggested that the ns-orbitals contribute more towards chemical bonding when participating via an electron-sharing interaction than a donor-acceptor interaction.

Heterobimetallic μ2-Halocarbyne complexes

The halocarbyne complexes [M(≡CX)(CO)2(Tp*)] (M = Mo, W; X = Cl, Br; Tp* = hydrotris(dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) react with [AuCl(SMe2)], [Pt(-H2C=CH2)(PPh3)2] or [Pt(nbe)3] (nbe = norbornene) to furnish rare examples of μ2-halocarbyne...

Unsymmetric Dinuclear RhI2 and RhIRhIII Complexes Supported by Tetraphosphine Ligands and Their Reactivity of Oxidative Protonation and Reductive Dechlorination

Two linear tetradentate phosphine ligands, meso-Ph₂PCH₂P(Ph)CH₂XCH₂P(Ph)CH₂PPh₂ (X = CH₂ (meso-dpmppp), NBn (meso-dpmppmNBn; Bn = benzyl)) were utilized to synthesize unsymmetrical dinuclear Rh^I complexes, [Rh₂Cl₂(meso-dpmppp)(L)] (L = XylNC (1a), CO (1b)) and [Rh₂Cl₂(meso-dpmppmNBn)(L)] (L = XylNC (1c), CO (1d)), where electron-deficient Rh^I → Rh^I centers with 30 valence electrons are supported by a tetraphosphine in an unusual cis-/trans-P,P coordination mode. The Rh^I dimers of 1a-d were treated with HCl under air to afford the Rh^I → Rh^III dimers with 32 e^-, [Rh₂Cl₄(meso-dpmppp)(L)] (L = XylNC (4a), CO (4b)) and [Rh₂Cl₄(meso-dpmppmNBn)(L)] (L = XylNC (4c), CO (4d)), via intermediate hydride complexes, [{RhCl₂(μ-H)RhCl(L)}(meso-dpmppp)] (L = XylNC (2a), CO (2b)) and [{RhCl₂(μ-H)RhCl(L)}(meso-dpmppmNBn)] (L = XylNC (2c), CO (2d)), and [{Rh(H)Cl₂(μ-Cl)Rh(L)}(meso-dpmppp)] (L = XylNC (3a), CO (3b)) and [{Rh(H)Cl₂(μ-Cl)Rh(L)}(meso-dpmppmNBn)] (L = XylNC (3c), CO (3d)). The hydride intermediates 2 and 3 were monitored under nitrogen by ¹H{³¹P} and ³¹P{¹H} NMR techniques to reveal two reaction pathways depending on the terminal auxiliary ligand L. Further, the reductive dechlorination converting Rh^IRh^III (4b,d) to Rh^I₂ (1b,d) was accomplished with a CO terminal ligand by reacting with various amines that acted as one-electron reducing agents through an inner-sphere electron transfer mechanism. DFT calculations were performed to elucidate the electronic structures of 1a-d and 4a-d and to estimate the structures of the hydride intermediate complexes 2 and 3.

Transition Metal Carbide Complexes

Carbide complexes remain a rare class of molecules. Their paucity does not reflect exceptional instability but is rather due to the generally narrow scope of synthetic procedures for constructing carbide complexes. The preparation of carbide complexes typically revolves around generating L_nM-CE_x fragments, followed by cleavage of the C-E bonds of the coordinated carbon-based ligands (the alternative being direct C atom transfer). Prime examples involve deoxygenation of carbonyl ligands and deprotonation of methyl ligands, but several other p-block fragments can be cleaved off to afford carbide ligands. This Review outlines synthetic strategies toward terminal carbide complexes, bridging carbide complexes, as well as carbide-carbonyl cluster complexes. It then surveys the reactivity of carbide complexes, covering stoichiometric reactions where the carbide ligands act as C₁ reagents, engage in cross-coupling reactions, and enact Fischer-Tropsch-like chemistry; in addition, we discuss carbide complexes in the context of catalysis. Finally, we examine spectroscopic features of carbide complexes, which helps to establish the presence of the carbide functionality and address its electronic structure.

Benzyne addition to a metal-carbon multiple bond

The linear μ-carbido complex [Rh2(μ-C)Cl2(dppm)2] (dppm = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) reacts with a benzyne equivalent (Me3SiC6H4OTf-2/F-) to afford [Rh2(μ-CC6H4)(μ-Cl)(C6H5)Cl2(μ-dppm)2], in which the benzyne moiety adds across one of the two metal-carbon double bonds.

A heterobimetallic cumulenic μ-carbido complex

Cleavage of a selenocarbonyl ligand in [W(CSe)(NO)(CO)(Tp*)] by [Re(THF)(CO)₂(Cp)] provides heterobimetallic cumulenic μ-carbido and μ-selenido complexes.

Dimetalla-heterocyclic carbenes: the interconversion of chalcocarbonyl and carbido ligands

Different classes of dirhodium μ-carbido complexes cleave CS₂ to afford mono- and bi-nuclear CS complexes, the CSe analogues of which are also described.

Halogenation of A-frame μ-carbido complexes: a diamagnetic rhodium(ii) carbido complex

Chlorination of the new μ-carbido [Rh₂(μ-C)Cl₂(μ-dppf)₂] (dppf = 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) affords the dirhodium(ii) complex [Rh₂(μ-C)Cl₄(μ-dppf)₂] the carbido bridge of which can only be adequately described by delocalised bonding.

Tungsten–platinum μ-carbido and μ-methylidyne complexes

The lithiocarbyne [W]CLi ([W] = W(CO)₂(Tp*); Tp* = tris(dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) with divalent platinum complexes afford access to μ-carbido, μ-methylidyne and carbyne-based metallo-ligand complexes.

Platinum(ii) as an assembly point for carbide and nitride ligands

The sequential treatment of (Cy₃P)₂Cl₂RuC with [PtCl₂(C₂H₄)]₂ and (dbm)₂CrN affords a platinum(ii) center coordinated by both carbide and nitride ligands.