Applications of boroxide ligands in supporting small molecule activation by U(iii) and U(iv) complexes

Arene-, Chlorido-, and Imido-Uranium Bis- and Tris(boryloxide) Complexes

We introduce the boryloxide ligand {(HCNDipp)2BO}- (NBODipp, Dipp = 2,6-di-isopropylphenyl) to actinide chemistry. Protonolysis of [U{N(SiMe3)2}3] with 3 equiv of NBODippH produced the uranium(III) tris(boryloxide) complex [U(NBODipp)3] (1). In contrast, treatment of UCl4 with 3 equiv of NBODippK in THF at room temperature or reflux conditions produced only [U(NBODipp)2(Cl)2(THF)2] (2) with 1 equiv of NBODippK remaining unreacted. However, refluxing the mixture of 2 and unreacted NBODippK in toluene instead of THF afforded the target complex [U(NBODipp)3(Cl)(THF)] (3). Two-electron oxidation of 1 with AdN3 (Ad = 1-adamantyl) afforded the uranium(V)-imido complex [U(NBODipp)3(NAd)] (4). The solid-state structure of 1 reveals a uranium-arene bonding motif, and structural, spectroscopic, and DFT calculations all suggest modest uranium-arene δ-back-bonding with approximately equal donation into the arene π4 and π5 δ-symmetry π* molecular orbitals. Complex 4 exhibits a short uranium(V)-imido distance, and computational modeling enabled its electronic structure to be compared to related uranium-imido and uranium-oxo complexes, revealing a substantial 5f-orbital crystal field splitting and extensive mixing of 5f |ml,ms⟩ states and mj projections. Complexes 1-4 have been variously characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, 1H NMR, IR, UV/vis/NIR, and EPR spectroscopies, SQUID magnetometry, elemental analysis, and CONDON, F-shell, DFT, NLMO, and QTAIM crystal field and quantum chemical calculations.

Theoretical Investigation of Catalytic Water Splitting by the Arene-Anchored Actinide Complexes

Actinide complexes, which could enable the electrocatalytic H₂O reduction, are not well documented because of the fact that actinide-containing catalysts are precluded by extremely stable actinyl species. Herein, by using relativistic density functional theory calculations, the arene-anchored trivalent actinide complexes (^Me,MeArO)₃ArAn (marked as [AnL]) with desirable electron transport between metal and ligand arene are investigated for H₂ production. The metal center is changed from Ac to Pu. Electron-spin density calculations reveal a two-electron oxidative process (involving high-valent intermediates) for complexes [AnL] (An = P-Pu) along the catalytic pathway. The electrons are provided by both the actinide metal and the arene ring of ligand. This is comparable to the previously reported uranium catalyst (^Ad,MeArO)₃mesU (Ad = adamantine and mes = mesitylene). From the thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives, [PaL] offers appreciably lower reaction energies for the overall catalytic cycle than other actinide complexes. Thus, the protactinium complex tends to be the most reactive for H₂O reduction to produce H₂ and has the advantage of its experimental accessibility.

In silico design criteria for high blocking barrier uranium (III) SIMs

A combination of DFT and ab initio CASSCF/PT2 calculations on U(III) fictitious models and numerous reported X-ray structures unveils several geometries from coordination number 1 to 12 that can be targeted to design potential U(III) SIMs with attractive barrier heights. Among the geometries studied, the T-shaped and capped pentagonal antiprism geometries yield values exceeding 1500 cm^-1 - a value that is elusive for any uranium SIMs.

Instantaneous and Phosphine-Catalyzed Arene Binding and Reduction by U(III) Complexes

Neutral arenes such as benzene have never been considered suitable ligands for electropositive actinide cations, yet we find that even simple U^III UX₃ aryloxide complexes such as U(ODipp)₃ bind and reduce arenes spontaneously at room temperature, forming inverse arene sandwich (IAS) complexes X_nU(μ-C₆D₆)UX_m (X = ODipp, n=2, m=3; X = OBMes₂ n=m=2 or 3) (ODipp = OC₆H₃ⁱPr₂-2,6; Mes = 2,4,6-Me₃-C₆H₂). In some of these cases, further arene reduction has occured as a result of X ligand redistribution. These unexpected spontaneous reactions explain the anomalous spectra and reported lack of further reactivity of strongly reducing U^III centers of U(ODipp)₃. Phosphines that are not considered suitable ligands for actinides can catalyze the formation of the IAS complexes. This enables otherwise inaccessible asymmetric and less congested IAS complexes to be isolated and the bonding in this series compared.

Selective oxo ligand functionalisation and substitution reactivity in an oxo/catecholate-bridged UIV/UIV Pacman complex

The oxo- and catecholate-bridged U^IV/U^IV Pacman complex [{(py)U^IVOU^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] A (L^A = a macrocyclic "Pacman" ligand; anthracenylene hinge between N₄-donor pockets, ethyl substituents on meso-carbon atom of each N₄-donor pocket) featuring a bent U^IV-O-U^IV oxo bridge readily reacts with small molecule substrates to undergo either oxo-atom functionalisation or substitution. Complex A reacts with H₂O or MeOH to afford [{(py)U^IV(μ-OH)₂U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (1) and [{(py)U^IV(μ-OH)(μ-OMe)U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (2), respectively, in which the bridging oxo ligand in A is substituted for two bridging hydroxo ligands or one bridging hydroxo and one bridging methoxy ligand, respectively. Alternatively, A reacts with either 0.5 equiv. of S₈ or 4 equiv. of Se to provide [{(py)U^IV(μ-η²:η²-E₂)U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (E = S (3), Se (4)) respectively, in which the [E₂]^2- ion bridges the two U^IV centres. To the best of our knowledge, complex A is the first example of either a d- or f-block bimetallic μ-oxo complex that activates elemental chalcogens. Complex A also reacts with XeF₂ or 2 equiv. of Me₃SiCl to provide [{(py)U^IV(μ-X)₂U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (X = F (5), Cl (6)), in which the oxo ligand has been substituted for two bridging halido ligands. Reacting A with either XeF₂ or Me₃SiCl in the presence of O(Bcat)₂ at room temperature forms [{(py)U^IV(μ-X)(μ-OBcat)U^IV(μ-O₂C₆H₄)(py)}(L^A)] (X = F (5A), Cl (6A)), which upon heating to 80 °C is converted to 5 and 6, respectively. In order to probe the importance of the bent U^IV-O-U^IV motif in A on the observed reactivity, the bis(boroxido)-U^IV/U^IV complex, [{(py)(pinBO)U^IVOU^IV(OBpin)(py)}(L^A)] (B), featuring a linear U^IV-O-U^IV bond angle was treated with H₂O and Me₃SiCl. Complex B reacts with two equiv. of either H₂O or Me₃SiCl to provide [{(py)HOU^IVOU^IVOH(py)}(L^A)] (7) and [{(py)ClU^IVOU^IVCl(py)}(L^A)] (8), respectively, in which reactions occur preferentially at the boroxido ligands, with the μ-oxo ligand unchanged. The formal U^IV oxidation state is retained in all of the products 1-8, and selective reactions at the bridging oxo ligand in A is facilitated by: (1) its highly nucleophilic character which is a result of a non-linear U^IV-O-U^IV bond angle causing an increase in U-O bond covalency and localisation of the lone pairs of electrons on the μ-oxo group, and (2) the presence of the bridging catecholate ligand, which destabilises a linear oxo-bridging geometry and stabilises the resulting products.