Naz F, Samad Khan A, Kader MA, Al Gelban LOS, Mousa NMA, Asiri RSH, Hakeem AS. Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials.
Saudi Dent J 2021;
33:666-673. [PMID:
34803317 PMCID:
PMC8589597 DOI:
10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.012]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite.
METHODOLOGY
Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
RESULTS
For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite.
CONCLUSION
The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.
Collapse